Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2396856
 


 



Sovereign Bonds and National Relativism: Can New York Law Contracts Safely Cross the Atlantic?


Mathias Audit


University of Paris Ouest Nanterre La Defense

February 16, 2014

Forthcoming in The Capital Markets Law Journal (2014)

Abstract:     
Based on an overview of European cases related to the NML vs Argentina litigation saga, this article aims to show that the crossing of the Atlantic is perilous travel for sovereign bonds contracts terms. Normally, the choice of New York as providing governing law and as the competent court would ensure a certain degree of uniformity of interpretation and application of those contracts terms. However, it appears that some European countries’ rules might interfere with this goal of uniformity, particularly in the context of two clauses: the waiver of immunity from attachment and execution and the pari passu clause.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: sovereign, debt, immunity, pari passu, NML, Argentina

JEL Classification: K33

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 17, 2014 ; Last revised: February 18, 2014

Suggested Citation

Audit, Mathias, Sovereign Bonds and National Relativism: Can New York Law Contracts Safely Cross the Atlantic? (February 16, 2014). Forthcoming in The Capital Markets Law Journal (2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2396856

Contact Information

Mathias Audit (Contact Author)
University of Paris Ouest Nanterre La Defense ( email )
200 avenue de la Republique
Nanterre, 92000
France
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 472
Downloads: 154
Download Rank: 113,754

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.282 seconds