Victoria University of Wellington - Faculty of Law
January 1, 2014
Despite claims that the modern approach to interpretation of contracts has usurped much of its function, the equitable jurisdiction to rectify a written contract on the ground of common mistake remains one of the most practically important areas of the law of contract. Rectification claims are a regular feature of modern commercial litigation, very often of course in tandem with interpretation disputes. Unfortunately, however, recent cases demonstrate that the law governing this form of equitable relief has become extraordinarily, and needlessly, complex. The purpose of this article is to suggest that this complexity can be resolved by returning to first principles of the law of contract formation, particularly those concerning the meaning of the objective test and the relevance of the parties’ actual or subjective intentions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29
Keywords: Contract, Rectification, Interpretation, Formation
JEL Classification: K12
Date posted: March 28, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.031 seconds