Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2416568
 


 



Refining Rectification


David McLauchlan


Victoria University of Wellington - Faculty of Law

January 1, 2014


Abstract:     
Despite claims that the modern approach to interpretation of contracts has usurped much of its function, the equitable jurisdiction to rectify a written contract on the ground of common mistake remains one of the most practically important areas of the law of contract. Rectification claims are a regular feature of modern commercial litigation, very often of course in tandem with interpretation disputes. Unfortunately, however, recent cases demonstrate that the law governing this form of equitable relief has become extraordinarily, and needlessly, complex. The purpose of this article is to suggest that this complexity can be resolved by returning to first principles of the law of contract formation, particularly those concerning the meaning of the objective test and the relevance of the parties’ actual or subjective intentions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: Contract, Rectification, Interpretation, Formation

JEL Classification: K12

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 28, 2014  

Suggested Citation

McLauchlan, David, Refining Rectification (January 1, 2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2416568 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2416568

Contact Information

David McLauchlan (Contact Author)
Victoria University of Wellington - Faculty of Law ( email )
PO Box 600
Wellington, 6140
New Zealand

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 315
Downloads: 138
Download Rank: 125,055
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. The Entire Agreement Clause: Conclusive or a Question of Weight?
By David Mclauchlan

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.235 seconds