Plural Marriage, Group Marriage and Immutability in Obergefell v. Hodges and Beyond

26 Pages Posted: 5 Jun 2016

See all articles by Edward Stein

Edward Stein

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Date Written: June 3, 2016

Abstract

For decades, opponents of marriage for same-sex couples have appealed to polygamy. The Chief Justice’s dissent in Obergefell is no exception insofar as he says that the logic of the majority opinion with respect to same-sex marriage also applies to plural marriage. This paper explores the resources for distinguishing polygamy from same-sex marriage, focusing on the mutability or immutability of the desire to engage in plural/group marriage as compared to the desires to marry someone of the same sex. It shows the appeal to immutability does not succeed in distinguishing plural/group marriages from same-sex marriages.

Keywords: Obergefell, same-sex marriage, gender equality, family law, equal protection, gay rights, polygamy, plural marriage, group marriage

Suggested Citation

Stein, Edward, Plural Marriage, Group Marriage and Immutability in Obergefell v. Hodges and Beyond (June 3, 2016). University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 3, 2016, Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 488, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2789949

Edward Stein (Contact Author)

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )

55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0269 (Phone)
212-790-0205 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
277
Abstract Views
1,161
Rank
202,525
PlumX Metrics