Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=929530
 
 

Citations (23)



 
 

Footnotes (46)



 


 



The Mythical Benefits of Shareholder Control


Lynn A. Stout


Cornell Law School - Jack G. Clarke Business Law Institute


Virginia Law Review, 2006
UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 06-19

Abstract:     
In 'The Myth of the Shareholder Franchise', Professor Lucian Bebchuk argues that the notion that shareholders in public corporations can remove directors is a myth. The same argument was made by Berle and Means in 1932. Not only is shareholder power to remove directors largely a myth in U.S. public companies, it has been widely recognized as a myth for three-quarters of a century.

What should we conclude from this? Professor Bebchuk concludes the time has come to make shareholder power a reality. But there are many myths - vampires, alligators in the sewers - we would not want to make real. Part I of this Response to Professor Bebchuk's article argues that we should not want to make shareholder power to oust directors more real because, while board control worsens agency costs, it offers important economic benefits to shareholders as well. In particular, board control promotes efficient and informed decisionmaking; discourages intershareholder opportunism; and encourages valuable specific investment in corporate team production.

Because board control has costs and benefits, theory cannot tell us whether we should make it easier for shareholders to oust directors. We must look to the evidence. Part II concludes the evidence does not support Bebchuk's proposal. To the contrary, it suggests shareholders in public firms reap net benefits from board control.

Why then do so many observers believe shareholders need more power over boards? Part III argues that calls for shareholder democracy appeal to the media and many observers not because they are based on evidence, but because of emotion. The emotional appeal of shareholder power can be traced to three sources; the common but misleading metaphor that shareholders own corporations; the opportunistic calls of activists seeking leverage over boards for self-interested reasons; and a strong but unfocused sense that something (anything!) should be done in the wake of recent corporate scandals. The result has been widespread propagation of a second myth - the myth that shareholder control of public companies benefits shareholders. The Response concludes by reminding readers of the dangers of policymaking based on myth rather than evidence, using the cautionary case of stock options.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: corporate governance, shareholder control, board of directors, public corporations

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 11, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Stout, Lynn A., The Mythical Benefits of Shareholder Control. Virginia Law Review, 2006; UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 06-19. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=929530

Contact Information

Lynn A. Stout (Contact Author)
Cornell Law School - Jack G. Clarke Business Law Institute ( email )
524 College Ave
Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-8431 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,879
Downloads: 1,129
Download Rank: 9,172
Citations:  23
Footnotes:  46

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.813 seconds