| . |
Rajiv Lal's
Scholarly Papers
Click on the title of any column to sort the table by that
column. |
|
|
| |
|
|
Aggregate Statistics |
|
Total Downloads
709 |
Total
Citations
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
David E. Bell Harvard Business School Rajiv Lal Harvard Business School
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Dec 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 Mar 04
|
|
709 (9,443)
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Frequent Shopper programs are becoming ubiquitous in retailing. Retailers seem unsure however about whether these programs are leading to higher loyalty, or to higher profits. In this paper we analyze data from a US supermarket chain that has used a number of frequent shopper rewards to improve sales and profitability. We find that while these programs are profitable, this is only because substantial incremental sales to casual shoppers (cherry pickers) oset subsidies to already loyal customers. In this way our findings are inconsistent with existing theories about how frequent shopper programs are supposed to work. We construct our own Hotelling - like model that explicitly models cherry picking behavior and show that its predictions match the data quite closely. We further test the predictions of our model by characterizing the impact of such programs on trip frequency and basket size. We then use the model to examine more complex scenarios. For example, our analysis suggests that frequent shopper programs may be unprofitable if they eliminate all cherry picking. This may explain why some retailers seem dissatisfied with their programs. We end by proposing a solution that retains the benefits of the frequent shopper programs and yet continues to let supermarkets benefit from price discrimination.
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
Rajiv Lal Harvard Business School Cathy Ross Harvard Business School
|
| Posted: |
|
21 May 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 May 09
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In September 2008, Todd Bradley, executive vice president of Hewlett-Packard Company's Personal Systems Group (PSG) gathered his thoughts before a meeting with his top executives and managers for product design and marketing. On the agenda was a discussion of strategic next steps for the group. Hewlett-Packard (HP), a technology company providing a wide range of products and services including computers, handheld devices, servers and digital entertainment, employed 172,000 people and posted $104 billion in sales in 2007. PSG, one of HP's three major divisions, offered notebook and desktop personal computers, handheld mobile computing devices, monitors, workstations, and related support services. Bradley's PSG had played an important role in HP's financial success over the previous three years.
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
Rajiv Lal Harvard Business School Carmen Matutes affiliation not provided to SSRN
|
| Posted: |
|
10 May 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 Oct 08
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We study pricing and advertising strategies of retailers competing for the demand of an assortment of goods. In a model where uninformed rational consumers decide where to buy each product, we find that firms advertise prices below marginal cost to attract consumers into the store and profit from other goods which consumers plan to buy at the store. Incorporating product line decisions indicates that firms do not restrict their product assortment even when they make a loss on one of the goods. Finally, products with lower reservation prices are shown to be more natural candidates for loss-leader pricing.
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
Rajiv Lal Harvard Business School J. Miguel Villas-Boas University of California, Berkeley
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Jul 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Mar 08
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We study retail price promotions and manufacturer trade deals in markets with exclusive dealing. We find thatmodels that do not account for the existence of retailers overestimate the depth of promotions. We then compare the price promotions outcomes of markets with and without exclusive dealing. We also evaluate whether exclusive dealing can be an equilibrium outcome, and find that, under certain conditions of the model, the equilibrium is for manufacturers to distribute through several retailers even though their profits might end up lower than if each retailer carried only one product.
|
|