| . |
Campbell R. Harvey's
Scholarly Papers
Click on the title of any column to sort the table by that
column. |
|
|
| |
|
|
Aggregate Statistics |
|
Total Downloads
72,065 |
Total
Citations
4,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
12 Apr 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 Nov 00
|
|
8,246 (88)
|
458
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We survey 392 CFOs about the cost of capital, capital budgeting, and capital structure. Large firms rely heavily on net present value techniques and the capital asset pricing model, while small firms are relatively likely to use the payback criterion. Older executives without an MBA are more likely to rely on payback than are younger executives with an MBA. Surprisingly, most companies use a single company-wide discount rate to evaluate a project in a new industry and country. In addition to market risk, firms also frequently adjust cash flows or discount rates for interest rate risk, exchange rate risk, business cycle risk, and inflation risk. Few firms adjust discount rates or cash flows for book-to-market, distress, or momentum risks. A majority of large firms have a tight or somewhat tight target debt ratio, in contrast to only one-third of small firms. Executives rely heavily on informal rules when choosing capital structure. The most important factors affecting debt policy are maintaining financial flexibility and having a good credit rating. When issuing equity, respondents are concerned about earnings per share dilution and recent stock price appreciation. We find some support for the pecking-order and trade-off capital structure hypotheses but little evidence that executives are concerned about asset substitution, asymmetric information, transactions costs, free cash flows, or personal taxes. If CFOs behave according to these deeper hypotheses, they apparently do so unknowingly.
Capital Structure, Cost of Capital, Cost of Equity, Capital Budgeting, Discount Rates, Project Valuation, Survey
|
|
|
2.
|
|
Payout Policy in the 21st Century
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Alon Brav Duke University - Fuqua School of Business John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Roni Michaely Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management
|
|
Posted:
|
|
23 May 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Nov 05
|
|
4,931 ( 252) |
125
|
|
|
|
|
Alon Brav Duke University - Fuqua School of Business John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Roni Michaely Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Aug 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Nov 05
|
|
4,835
|
125
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We survey 384 financial executives and conduct in depth interviews with an additional 23 to determine the factors that drive dividend and share repurchase decisions. Our findings indicate that maintaining the dividend level is on par with investment decisions, while repurchases are made out of the residual cash flow after investment spending. Perceived stability of future earnings still affects dividend policy as in Lintner (1956). However, fifty years later, we find that the link between dividends and earnings has weakened. Many managers now favor repurchases because they are viewed as being more flexible than dividends and can be used in an attempt to time the equity market or to increase EPS. Executives believe that institutions are indifferent between dividends and repurchases and that payout policies have little impact on their investor clientele. In general, management views provide little support for agency, signaling, and clientele hypotheses of payout policy. Tax considerations play a secondary role. This is the final working paper version of our 2005 publication in the Journal of Financial Economics.
Payout, Dividend policy, Share repurchases, Lintner model
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alon Brav Duke University - Fuqua School of Business John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Roni Michaely Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management
|
| Posted: |
|
23 May 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 May 03
|
|
96
|
125
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We survey 384 CFOs and Treasurers, and conduct in-depth interviews with an additional two dozen, to determine the key factors that drive dividend and share repurchase policies. We find that managers are very reluctant to cut dividends, that dividends are smoothed through time, and that dividend increases are tied to long-run sustainable earnings but much less so than in the past. Rather than increasing dividends, many firms now use repurchases as an alternative. Paying out with repurchases is viewed by managers as being more flexible than using dividends, permitting a better opportunity to optimize investment. Managers like to repurchase shares when they feel their stock is undervalued and in an effort to affect EPS. Dividend increases and the level of share repurchases are generally paid out of residual cash flow, after investment and liquidity needs are met. Financial executives believe that retail investors have a strong preference for dividends, in spite of the tax disadvantage relative to repurchases. In contrast, executives believe that institutional investors as a class have no strong preference between dividends and repurchases. In general, management views provide at most moderate support for agency, signaling, and clientele hypotheses of payout policy. Tax considerations play only a secondary role. By highlighting where the theory and practice of corporate payout policy are consistent and where they are not, we attempt to shed new light on important unresolved issues related to payout policy in the 21st century.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (4)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Shivaram Rajgopal University of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
25 Jan 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Aug 08
|
|
4,470 ( 310) |
300
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Shivaram Rajgopal University of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
12 Jan 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
06 Mar 05
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We survey 401 financial executives, and conduct in-depth interviews with an additional 20, to determine the key factors that drive decisions related to performance measurement and voluntary disclosure. The majority of firms view earnings, especially EPS, as the key metric for an external audience, more so than cash flows. We find that the majority of managers would avoid initiating a positive NPV project if it meant falling short of the current quarter's consensus earnings. Similarly, more than three-fourths of the surveyed executives would give up economic value in exchange for smooth earnings. Managers believe that missing an earnings target or reporting volatile earnings reduces the predictability of earnings, which in turn reduces stock price because investors and analysts dislike uncertainty. We also find that managers make voluntary disclosures to reduce information risk associated with their stock but at the same time, try to avoid setting a disclosure precedent that will be difficult to maintain. In general, management's views support stock price motivations for earnings management and voluntary disclosure, but provide only modest evidence consistent with other theories of these phenomena (such as debt, political cost and bonus plan based hypotheses).
Financial statement, earnings management, earnings benchmark, voluntary disclosure, information risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Shivaram Rajgopal University of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Sep 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Aug 08
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We survey 401 financial executives, and conduct in-depth interviews with an additional 20, to determine the key factors that drive decisions related to performance measurements and voluntary disclosure. The majority of firms view earnings, especially EPS, as the key metric for an external audience, more so than cash flows. We find that the majority of managers would avoid initiating a positive NPV project if it meant falling short of the current quarter's consensus earnings. Similarly, more than three-fourths of the surveyed executives would give up economic value in exchange for smooth earnings. Managers believe that missing an earnings target or reporting volatile earnings reduces the predictability of earnings, which in turn reduces stock price because investors and analysts dislike uncertainty. We also find that managers make voluntary disclosures to reduce information risk associated with their stock but try to avoid setting a disclosure precedent that will be difficult to maintain. In general, management's views support stock price motivations for earnings management and voluntary disclosure, but provide only modest evidence consistent with other theories of these phenomena (such as debt, political cost and bonus plan based hypotheses).
financial statement, earnings management, earnings benchmark, voluntary disclosure, information risk,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Shivaram Rajgopal University of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Jun 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Jun 04
|
|
68
|
300
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We survey 401 financial executives, and conduct in-depth interviews with an additional 20, to determine the key factors that drive decisions related to reported earnings and voluntary disclosure. The majority of firms view earnings, especially EPS, as the key metric for outsiders, even more so than cash flows. Because of the severe market reaction to missing an earnings target, we find that firms are willing to sacrifice economic value in order to meet a short-run earnings target. The preference for smooth earnings is so strong that 78% of the surveyed executives would give up economic value in exchange for smooth earnings. We find that 55% of managers would avoid initiating a very positive NPV project if it meant falling short of the current quarter's consensus earnings. Missing an earnings target or reporting volatile earnings is thought to reduce the predictability of earnings, which in turn reduces stock price because investors and analysts hate uncertainty. We also find that managers make voluntary disclosures to reduce information risk associated with their stock but try to avoid setting a disclosure precedent that will be difficult to maintain. In general, management's views provide support for stock price motivations for earnings management and voluntary disclosure, but provide only modest evidence in support of other theories of these phenomena (such as debt, political cost and bonus plan based hypotheses).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Shivaram Rajgopal University of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Jan 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
12 Jan 05
|
|
4,402
|
300
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We survey 401 financial executives, and conduct in-depth interviews with an additional 20, to determine the key factors that drive decisions related to performance measurement and voluntary disclosure. The majority of firms view earnings, especially EPS, as the key metric for an external audience, more so than cash flows. We find that the majority of managers would avoid initiating a positive NPV project if it meant falling short of the current quarter's consensus earnings. Similarly, more than three-fourths of the surveyed executives would give up economic value in exchange for smooth earnings. Managers believe that missing an earnings target or reporting volatile earnings reduces the predictability of earnings, which in turn reduces stock price because investors and analysts dislike uncertainty. We also find that managers make voluntary disclosures to reduce information risk associated with their stock but at the same time, try to avoid setting a disclosure precedent that will be difficult to maintain. In general, management's views support stock price motivations for earnings management and voluntary disclosure, but provide only modest evidence consistent with other theories of these phenomena (such as debt, political cost and bonus plan based hypotheses).
financial statement, earnings management, earnings benchmark, voluntary disclosure, information risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
The Tactical and Strategic Value of Commodity Futures
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Claude B. Erb TCW Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
03 Feb 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
12 Jan 06
|
|
4,249 ( 343) |
32
|
|
|
|
|
Claude B. Erb TCW Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
29 Apr 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
29 Apr 05
|
|
77
|
32
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Historically, commodity futures have had excess returns similar to those of equities. But what should we expect in the future? The usual risk factors are unable to explain the time-series variation in excess returns. In addition, our evidence suggests that commodity futures are an inconsistent, if not tenuous, hedge against unexpected inflation. Further, the historically high average returns to a commodity futures portfolio are largely driven by the choice of weighting schemes. Indeed, an equally weighted long-only portfolio of commodity futures returns has approximately a zero excess return over the past 25 years. Our portfolio analysis suggests that the a long-only strategic allocation to commodities as a general asset class is a bet on the future term structure of commodity prices, in general, and on specific portfolio weighting schemes, in particular. In contrast, we provide evidence that there are distinct benefits to an asset allocation overlay that tactically allocates using commodity futures exposures. We examine three trading strategies that use both momentum and the term structure of futures prices. We find that the tactical strategies provide higher average returns and lower risk than a long-only commodity futures exposure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claude B. Erb TCW Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Feb 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
12 Jan 06
|
|
4,172
|
32
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Investors face a number of challenges when seeking to estimate the prospective performance of a long-only investment in commodity futures. For instance, historically, the average annualized excess return of individual commodity futures has been approximately zero and commodity futures returns have been largely uncorrelated with one another. However, the prospective annualized excess return of a rebalanced portfolio of commodity futures can be equity-like. Certain security characteristics, such as the term structure of futures prices, and some portfolio strategies have historically been rewarded with above average returns. Avoiding naïve extrapolation of historical returns and striking a balance between dependable sources of return and possible sources of return is important. This is the unabridged version of our 2006 publication in the Financial Analysts Journal.
Strategic asset allocation, Tactical asset allocation, Diversification return, Roll return, Momentum, Market timing, Convenience yield, Contango, Backwardation, Normal backwardation, Commodity correlation, Commodity risk factors, Commodity term structure, Trading strategies, Overlay strategies
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
Magnus Dahlquist Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Sep 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Nov 08
|
|
2,357 (1,013)
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We provide a framework for using conditioning information in the process of global asset allocation. While we discuss strategies in a global setting, the same reasoning can be applied to other asset allocation programs with different investment objectives. We examine three levels of asset allocation: unconditional or benchmark allocation, strategic asset allocation, and tactical asset allocation. We show how to use conditioning information in the process of global tactical asset allocation. An important lesson emerges. There is considerable work documenting predictability of returns using past information variables. Many of these variables are related to the stage of the business cycle, and suggest that much of the predictability in these assets, or markets, are common. The fact that returns are predictable means that active asset allocation strategies can outperform passive strategies. Uncovering the predictability is challenging as it but allows managers to beat traditional benchmarks.
Benchmarks, strategic asset allocation, tactical asset allocation, dynamic trading strategies, return predictability, trading strategies, active management, passive management, business cycle, yield curve, term structure
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Jul 06
|
|
2,038 (1,371)
|
81
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Given the cross-sectional and temporal variation in their liquidity, emerging equity markets provide an ideal setting to examine the impact of liquidity on expected returns. Our main liquidity measure is a transformation of the proportion of zero daily firm returns, averaged over the month. We find that our liquidity measures significantly predict future returns, whereas alternative measures such as turnover do not. Consistent with liquidity being a priced factor, unexpected liquidity shocks are positively correlated with contemporaneous return shocks and negatively correlated with shocks to the dividend yield. We consider a simple asset pricing model with liquidity and the market portfolio as risk factors and transaction costs that are proportional to liquidity. The model differentiates between integrated and segmented countries and time periods. Our results suggest that local market liquidity is an important driver of expected returns in emerging markets, and that the liberalization process has not fully eliminated its impact.
Liquidity, liquidity risk, asset pricing, emerging markets, market integration, market segmentation, liquidity risk factor, local liquidity, zero returns, bid-ask spread, price impact, liquidity measures
|
|
|
7.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Jan 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Jan 03
|
|
1,925 (1,543)
|
65
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Emerging markets have long posed a challenge for finance. Standard models are often ill suited to deal with the specific circumstances arising in these markets. However, the interest in emerging markets has provided impetus for the adaptation of current models to new circumstances in these markets and the development of new models. The model of market integration and segmentation is our starting point. Next, we emphasize the distinction between market liberalization and integration. We explore the financial effects of market integration as well as the impact on the real economy. We also consider a host of other issues such as contagion, corporate finance, market microstructure and stock selection in emerging markets. Apart from surveying the literature, this article contains new results regarding political risk and liberalization, the volatility of capital flows and the performance of emerging market investments.
Market liberalization, portfolio flows, market reforms, economic growth, risk sharing, contagion, privatization, capital flows, market microstructure, inequality, productivity, volatility of capital flows, performance of emerging market investments
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
12 May 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
29 May 03
|
|
1,915 (1,559)
|
12
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In February and March of 1999, we surveyed 392 CFOs about the cost of capital, capital budgeting, and capital structure. The survey consisted of 14 main questions, most with subparts - over 100 questions in total. Although the survey was anonymous, we also collected information on 12 characteristics of the firms and management. We asked questions about firm size, foreign sales, industry, CEO education, age of the CEO, CEO tenure, ownership, whether the firm paid dividends, whether the firm was regulated, and the proportion of common stock that the top three executives owned if all their options were exercised. We also collected information on debt-equity ratios and debt ratings. The analysis, published in the 2001 Journal of Financial Economics (http://ssrn.com/abstract=220251), showed that many survey responses differed by the firm and management characteristics. Our research left much of the data unexplored. In particular, in only one instance in the paper did we perform question-conditional analysis. That is, given a particular response to one question, how does that impact the response on another question. For example, is it the case that those CFOs that use real options analysis in project evaluation decisions also value financial flexibility in capital structure? Given the large number of inquiries we have received for the survey data, we now publicly release the raw data files so that other researchers can conduct question-conditional analysis. Using these data, researchers should be able to obtain CFO survey evidence related to specific aspects of their own research agendas, as well as perform more detailed analysis of the survey responses.
|
|
|
9.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business John Liechty Pennsylvania State University, University Park Merrill W. Liechty Drexel University - Department of Decision Sciences Peter Mueller The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
|
| Posted: |
|
29 Dec 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
29 Dec 04
|
|
1,869 (1,648)
|
44
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We propose a method for optimal portfolio selection using a Bayesian decision theoretic framework that addresses two major shortcomings of the Markowitz approach: the ability to handle higher moments and estimation error. We employ the skew normal distribution which has many attractive features for modeling multivariate returns. Our results suggest that it is important to incorporate higher order moments in portfolio selection. Further, our comparison to other methods where parameter uncertainty is either ignored or accommodated in an ad hoc way, shows that our approach leads to higher expected utility than the resampling methods that are common in the practice of finance.
Bayesian decision problem, multivariate skewness, parameter uncertainty, optimal portfolios, utility function maximization, resampling, resampled portfolios, estimation error, mean-variance portfolios, expected returns, Markowitz optimization
|
|
|
10.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
29 Sep 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 Oct 08
|
|
1,764 (1,819)
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The Trouble Asset Relief Program (TARP) is an insufficient policy initiative to end the current credit crisis. The measures that I propose below call for a fundamentally different approach to dealing with troubled assets, the recapitalization of the FDIC and moves to reduce bank runs, mechanisms that the Federal Reserve and Treasury need to put in place to deal with the inevitable surge in bank failures, and a proposal for a Bank Capitalization Fund that would jump start our credit system. So far, policy makers have reacted to one crisis after another. My proposals are proactive and are guided by lessons learned in previous financial crises, in particular the Swedish banking crisis. 1. In implementing the TARP, Treasury avoid paying "hold to maturity" prices for troubled assets. The price should be set in between the firesale and hold to maturity. This insures a fair price for both the government and the financial institution. It reduces the cost of the program. In addition, the TARP should not purchase troubled assets at a premium price from any insolvent institution. 2. Establish a Bank Capitalization Fund (BCF) with the goal of purchasing amount equity of all viable financial institutions. This equity injection can be done quickly and will immediately impact the availability of loans. 3. Immediately fund the BCF investment fund with $200-$300 billion. Allow private investors to contribute capital. 4. BCF should expire in seven years. 5. Management of any government purchase of troubled assets should either not be outsourced or designed in a way so that the manager has minimum conflict of interest with their company's portfolio. 6. Recapitalize the FDIC both in anticipation of future bank failures and to instill confidence among depositors. 7. For a period of three years, guarantee all demand and savings deposits at FDIC insured institutions. Premiums that the banks pay the FDIC are frozen for three years. Afterwards, reset the FDIC maximum insured amount to $300,000. This will immediately boost confidence in the banking system. 8. Fed/Treasury needs to quickly put in place the staff to handle the potential of 750-1,000 bank failures. 9. Reestablish the Resolution Trust Corporation. This entity is mandated to dispose of assets of failed financial institutions. 10. Government incented principal resets of mortgages (cram downs). Resets determined by banks and both have the option to recover some of the reset if house price appreciates. 11. Two year moratorium on mortgage prepayment penalties. 12. Explicit quid pro quo for banks participating in TARP that credit should not be cut off from non-financial companies, particularly, small and medium sized companies that are the engine of growth and jobs in our economy.
Financial Crisis, TARP, Bank runs, FDIC, BCF, RTC
|
|
|
11.
|
|
Expectations of Equity Risk Premia, Volatility and Asymmetry from a Corporate Finance Perspective
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
08 Dec 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Jul 02
|
|
1,717 ( 1,907) |
34
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Dec 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Jul 02
|
|
42
|
34
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We present new evidence on the distribution of the ex ante risk premium based on a multi-year survey of Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) of U.S. corporations. Currently, we have responses from surveys conducted from the second quarter of 2000 through the third quarter of 2001. The results in this paper will be augmented as future surveys become available. We find direct evidence that the one-year risk premium is highly variable through time and 10-year expected risk premium is stable. In particular, after periods of negative returns, CFOs significantly reduce their one-year market forecasts, disagreement (volatility) increases and returns distributions are more skewed to the left. We also examine the relation between ex ante returns and ex ante volatility. The relation between the one-year expected risk premium and expected risk is negative. However, our research points to the importance of horizon. We find a significantly positive relation between expected return and expected risk at the 10-year horizon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
08 Dec 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Mar 02
|
|
1,675
|
34
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We present new evidence on the distribution of the ex ante risk premium based on a multi-year survey of Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) of U.S. corporations. Currently, we have responses from surveys conducted from the second quarter of 2000 through the third quarter of 2001. The results in this paper will be augmented as future surveys become available. We find direct evidence that the 10-year expected risk premium is stable and equal to about 4%. In contrast, the one-year risk premium is highly variable through time. In particular, after periods of negative returns, CFOs significantly reduce their one-year market forecasts, disagreement (volatility) increases and returns distributions are more skewed to the left. We also examine the relation between ex ante returns and ex ante volatility. The relation between the one-year expected risk premium and expected risk is negative. However, our research points to the importance of horizon. We find a significantly positive relation between expected return and expected risk at the 10-year horizon. Finally, our last survey was delivered September 10, 2001. We are able to measure the increase in perceived risk following the September 11, 2001 crisis.
Risk premium, cost of capital, asymmetric volatility, skewness, leverage effect, expectations, risk to reward, momentum, September 11 crisis
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
|
|
Itzhak Ben-David Ohio State University - Finance Department, Fisher College of Business John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Mar 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Nov 07
|
|
1,531 (2,340)
|
33
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Miscalibration is a standard measure of overconfidence in both psychology and economics. Although it is often used in lab experiments, there is scarcity of evidence about its effects in practice. We test whether top corporate executives are miscalibrated, and whether their miscalibration impacts investment behavior. Over six years, we collect a unique panel of nearly 7,000 observations of probability distributions provided by top financial executives regarding the stock market. Financial executives are miscalibrated: realized market returns are within the executives' 80% confidence intervals only 38% of the time. We show that companies with overconfident CFOs use lower discount rates to value cash flows, and that they invest more, use more debt, are less likely to pay dividends, are more likely to repurchase shares, and they use proportionally more long-term, as opposed to short-term, debt. The pervasive effect of this miscalibration suggests that the effect of overconfidence should be explicitly modeled when analyzing corporate decision-making.
Overconfidence,Behavioral Biases,Behavioral Corporate Finance,Investment Policy,Payout Policy,Managerial Forecast,Survey Methodology,Stock Returns,Capital Structure,Executive Compensation,Risk,Volatility,Stock Market Forecasts,Debt Policy,Dividends,Behavioral Finance,Risk Premium,Managers,Forecasts
|
|
|
13.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
18 Nov 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Nov 04
|
|
1,475 (2,501)
|
128
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the importance of political risk, the financial risk, and economic risk in portfolio and direct investment decisions. In addition, the components (from the International Country Risk Guide) of each of these risk measures are examined. The components of political risk include: Government Stability, Socioeconomic Conditions, Investment Profile, Internal Conflict, External Conflict, Corruption, Military in Politics, Religion in Politics, Law and Order, Ethnic Tensions, Democratic Accountability, and Bureaucracy Quality. The financial risk components include: Foreign Debt as a Percentage of GDP, Foreign Debt Service as a Percentage of Exports of Goods and Services, Current Account as a Percentage of Exports of Goods and Services, Net International Liquidity as Months of Import Cover, and Exchange Rate Stability. The Economic Risk category includes: Per Capita GDP, Real GDP Growth, Annual Inflation Rate, Budget Balance as a Percentage of GDP, and Current Account as a Percentage of GDP. First, I explore whether any of these measures contain information about future expected stock returns by conducting trading simulations. Second, I show the relation between these measures and implied costs of capital based on earnings forecasts. My results suggest that the country risk measures are correlated future equity returns - but only in emerging markets. These results are consistent with emerging markets being to some degree segmented from world capital markets.
Political Risk, Quality of Institutions, Law and Order, Financial Risk, Economic Risk, Country Risk Premium, Market Integration, Market Segmentation, Implied Cost of Capital
|
|
|
14.
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Sep 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
12 Sep 05
|
|
1,435 (2,632)
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A large body of academic research describes the optimal decisions that corporations should make, given certain assumptions and conditions. Anecdotal evidence, however, suggests that the way that corporations actually make decisions is not always consistent with the academic decision rules. In this paper, we analyze a comprehensive survey that describes the current practice of corporate finance. This allows us to identify areas where the theory and practice of corporate finance are consistent and areas where they are not.
Capital structure, Cost of capital, Cost of equity, Capital budgeting, Discount Rates, Project valuation, Survey, Debt policy, Trade-off theory
|
|
|
15.
|
|
|
Claude B. Erb TCW Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Tadas E. Viskanta First Chicago Investment Management Co.
|
| Posted: |
|
08 May 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Nov 04
|
|
1,410 (2,713)
|
56
|
|
| |
Abstract:
How important is an understanding of country risk for investors? Given the increasingly global nature of investment portfolios, we believe it is very important. Our paper measures the economic content of five different measures of country risk: The International Country Risk Guide is political risk, the financial risk, economic risk and composite risk indices and Institutional Investoris country credit ratings. First, we explore whether any of these measures contain information about future expected stock returns by conducting trading simulations. Next, we conduct time-series-cross-sectional analysis linking these risk measures to future expected returns. Second, we investigate the relation between these measures and other, more standard, approaches to risk exposures. Finally, we analyze the linkages between fundamental attributes within each economy, such as book-to-price ratios, and the risk measures. Our results suggest that the country risk measures are correlated future equity returns. We find that the country risk measures are correlated with each other, however, financial risk measures contain the most information about future equity returns. Finally, we find that country risk measures are highly correlated with country equity valuation measures. This provides some insight into the reason why value-oriented strategies generate higher returns.
Country Risk Assessment, Mean-Reverision of Risk, Country Trading Strategies, Risk Exposure
|
|
|
16.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Apr 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Apr 00
|
|
1,377 (2,844)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This abstract describes two courses offered to full time MBA students. While different in their content, each has a self-contained hypersyllabus that includes a detailed course description, individual session assignments, references to readings, articles and other course materials, digital video clips and past student projects. Tactical Global Asset Allocation and Stock Selection delivers the theory and the quantitative tools that are necessary for global asset management. The focus of the course is on tactical rather than passive asset management. One unique feature of the course is that students are shown how to put a portfolio together from individual stocks (stock selection). Emerging Markets Finance course explores the corporate finance issues that are special to evaluating projects in emerging economies. The primary assignment in this course is for students to write a case study from scratch. A one page downloadable pdf file provides more detailed descriptions of each course and a url for each hypersyllabus.
|
|
|
17.
|
|
Value Destruction and Financial Reporting Decisions
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Shivaram Rajgopal University of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
20 Dec 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Jan 07
|
|
1,363 ( 2,901) |
17
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Shivaram Rajgopal University of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Jan 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Jan 07
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The comprehensive survey reported here allowed analysis of how senior U.S. financial executives make decisions related to performance measurement and voluntary disclosure. Chief financial officers were asked what earnings benchmarks they cared about and which factors motivated executives to exercise discretion—even sacrifice economic value—to deliver earnings. These issues are crucially linked to stock market performance. The results show that the destruction of shareholder value through legal means is pervasive, perhaps even a routine way of doing business. Indeed, the amount of value destroyed by companies striving to hit earnings targets exceeds the value lost in recent high-profile fraud cases.
Financial Statement Analysis, Accounting and Financial Reporting Issues; Equity Investments, Fundamental Analysis and Valuation Models; Corporate Governance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Shivaram Rajgopal University of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Dec 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 Sep 06
|
|
1,363
|
17
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We recently conducted a comprehensive survey that analyzes how senior financial executives make decisions related to performance measurement and voluntary disclosure. In particular, we ask CFOs what earnings benchmarks they care about and which factors motivate executives to exercise discretion, and even sacrifice economic value, to deliver earnings. These issues are crucially linked to stock market performance. Much of the media attention is focused on a small number of high profile firms that have engaged in earnings fraud. Our results show that the destruction of shareholder value through legal means is pervasive, if not a routine way of doing business. Indeed, we assert that the amount of value destroyed by firms striving to hit earnings targets exceeds the value lost in these high profile fraud cases.
Earnings management, earnings smoothing, consensus earnings, meeting benchmarks, value destruction, agency problems, real earnings management, unexpected earnings, earnings surprise, net present value
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Jan 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Jan 07
|
|
1,348 (2,962)
|
13
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We analyze the results of the most recent survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) which looks ahead to the first quarter of 2007 and beyond. We present expectations of the equity risk premium measured over a 10-year horizon relative to a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond. This multi-year survey has been conducted every quarter from June 2000 to November 2006. Each quarter the survey also provides measures of cross-sectional disagreement about the risk premium, skewness, and a measure of individual uncertainty. The individual uncertainty is deduced from the 80% confidence interval that each respondent provides for his or her risk premium assessment. We also present evidence on the determinants of the long-run risk premium. Our analysis suggests there is a positive correlation between the ex ante risk premium and real interest rates as reflected in Treasury Inflation Indexed Notes. The level of the risk premium also appears to track market volatility as reflected in the VIX index.
Cost of capital, equity premium, long-term market returns, long-term equity returns, expected excess returns, disagreement, individual uncertainty, skewness, asymmetry, survey methods, risk and reward, TIPs, VIX
|
|
|
19.
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Sep 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Sep 05
|
|
1,235 (3,430)
|
10
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We present expectations of the equity risk premium measured over a 10-year horizon relative to a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond based on a survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs). This multi-year survey has been conducted each quarter from June 2000. Each quarter the survey also provides measures of cross-sectional disagreement about the risk premium, skewness, and a measure of individual uncertainty. The individual uncertainty is deduced from the 80% confidence interval that each respondent provides for his or her risk premium assessment. We also present evidence on the determinants of the long-run risk premium. Our analysis suggests that there is a positive correlation between the ex ante risk premium and real interest rates as reflected in Treasury Inflation Indexed Notes.
Cost of capital, equity premium, long-term market returns, long-term equity returns, expected excess returns, disagreement, individual uncertainty, skewness, asymmetry, survey methods, risk and reward
|
|
|
20.
|
|
|
Karl V. Lins University of Utah - Department of Finance Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Andrew H. Roper University of Wisconsin, Madison - Department of Finance, Investment and Banking
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Aug 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Jun 03
|
|
1,234 (3,417)
|
50
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper conducts powerful new tests of whether debt can mitigate the effects of agency and information problems. We focus on emerging market firms for which pyramid ownership structures create potentially extreme managerial agency costs. Our tests incorporate both traditional financial statement data and new data on global debt contracts. Our analysis is mindful of the potential endogeneity between debt, ownership structure, and value, and takes into account differences in the debt capacity of a firm's assets in place and future growth opportunities. The results indicate that the incremental benefit of debt is concentrated in firms with high expected managerial agency costs that are also most likely to have overinvestment problems resulting from high levels of assets in place or limited future growth opportunities. Subsequent internationally syndicated term loans are particularly effective at creating value for these firms. Our results support the recontracting hypothesis that equity holders value compliance with monitored covenants, particularly when firms are likely to overinvest.
capital structure, debt, agency problems, emerging markets, governance
|
|
|
21.
|
|
The Real Effects of Financial Constraints: Evidence from a Financial Crisis
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Murillo Campello University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign - Department of Finance John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
22 Dec 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Oct 09
|
|
1,139 ( 3,952) |
8
|
|
|
|
|
Murillo Campello University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign - Department of Finance John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Mar 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Mar 09
|
|
261
|
8
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The global credit crisis of 2008 provides a unique opportunity to study the effects of financing constraints on corporate behavior. Based on standard economic priors, we investigate whether this credit supply shock has a differential impact on the real and financial policies of credit constrained firms. In contrast to previous research, which has used proxies such as firm size and credit ratings to measure constraints, we survey 1,050 CFOs in the U.S., Europe, and Asia and directly assess whether their firms are credit constrained. Our evidence shows that the impact of the financial crisis is severe on credit constrained firms, leading to deeper cuts in planned R&D, employment, and capital spending. These firms also burn through more cash, draw more heavily on lines of credit for fear banks will restrict access in the future, and sell more assets to fund their operations. Using our direct measure of constraints, we also find that the inability to borrow externally causes many firms to bypass attractive investment projects, with 86% of constrained U.S. CFOs saying their investment in attractive projects has been restricted during the credit crisis of 2008 and more than half outright cancelling or postponing their investment plans. Our results also hold in Europe and Asia, and in many cases are stronger in those economies.
Financial crisis, financing constraints, investment spending, liquidity management, matching estimators
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murillo Campello University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign - Department of Finance John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Dec 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Oct 09
|
|
878
|
8
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The global credit crisis of 2008 provides a unique opportunity to study the effects of financial constraints on real corporate actions. In contrast to previous research which has used proxies such as firm size and credit ratings to measure constraints, we survey 1,050 CFOs in the U.S., Europe and Asia and directly assess whether firms are credit constrained. Our evidence shows that the impact of the credit crisis was severe on constrained firms, leading to deep cuts in R&D, employment, and capital spending. These firms burn through more cash, draw more heavily on lines of credit for fear banks will restrict access in the future, and sell more assets to fund their operations. Among other results, we find that a greater proportion of unconstrained firms resist using lines of credit in order to preserve their reputation in the financial markets. Using our direct measure of constraints, we also find that the inability to borrow externally causes many financially constrained firms to bypass attractive investment projects, with 86% of U.S. CFOs saying their investment has been restricted during the credit crisis of 2008 and more than half outright cancelling or postponing their investment plans. Our results also hold in Europe and Asia, and in many cases are stronger in those economies.
Financial crisis, financing constraints, investment spending, liquidity management
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.
|
|
Does Financial Liberalization Spur Growth?
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
|
Posted:
|
|
19 Apr 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Nov 04
|
|
1,026 ( 4,718) |
220
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Apr 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Apr 01
|
|
56
|
220
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We show that equity market liberalizations, on average, lead to a one percent increase in annual real economic growth over a five-year period. The liberalization effect is not spuriously accounted for by macro-economic reforms and does not reflect a business cycle effect. Although financial liberalizations further financial development, measures of financial development fail to fully drive out the liberalization effect. The investment/GDP ratio increases post liberalization, with the investment partially financed by foreign capital inducing worsened trade balances. Differentiating across liberalizing countries, a large secondary school enrollment, a small government sector and an Anglo-Saxon legal system tend to enhance the liberalization effect. Finally, the conditional convergence effect is larger once financial liberalization is accounted for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Apr 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Nov 04
|
|
970
|
220
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We show that equity market liberalizations, on average, lead to a one percent increase in annual real economic growth. The effect is robust to alternative definitions of liberalization and does not reflect variation in the world business cycle. The effect also remains intact when an exogenous measure of growth opportunities is included in the regression. We find that capital account liberalization also plays a role in future economic growth, but, importantly, it does not subsume the contribution of equity market liberalizations. Other simultaneous reforms only partially account for the equity market liberalization effect. Finally, the largest growth response occurs in countries with high quality institutions.
Equity Market Liberalization, Capital Account Openness, Quality of Institutions, GDP Growth, Shareholder Protection, Growth Opportunities, Legal Systems, Political Risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.
|
|
Dynamic Trading Strategies and Portfolio Choice
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Ravi Bansal Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Magnus Dahlquist Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
24 Sep 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Nov 08
|
|
976 ( 5,129) |
9
|
|
|
|
|
Ravi Bansal Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Magnus Dahlquist Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Oct 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Oct 04
|
|
54
|
9
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Traditional mean-variance efficient portfolios do not capture the potential wealth creation opportunities provided by predictability of asset returns. We propose a simple method for constructing optimally managed portfolios that exploits the possibility that asset returns are predictable. We implement these portfolios in both single and multi-period horizon settings. We compare alternative portfolio strategies which include both buy-and-hold and fixed weight portfolios. We find that managed portfolios can significantly improve the mean-variance trade-off, in particular, for investors with investment horizons of three to five years. Also, in contrast to popular advice, we show that the buy-and-hold strategy should be avoided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ravi Bansal Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Magnus Dahlquist Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Sep 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Nov 08
|
|
922
|
9
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Traditional mean-variance efficient portfolios do not capture the potential wealth creation opportunities provided by predictability of asset returns. We propose a simple method for constructing optimally managed portfolios that exploits the possibility that asset returns are predictable. We implement these portfolios in both single and multi-period horizon settings. We compare alternative portfolio strategies which include both buy-and-hold and fixed weight portfolios. We find that managed portfolios can significantly improve the mean-variance trade-off, in particular, for investors with investment horizons of three to five years. Also, in contrast to popular advice, we show that the buy-and-hold strategy should be avoided.
Dynamic strategies, mean-variance optimization, multiperiod choice, efficient frontier, buy-and-hold investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.
|
|
Investor Competence, Trading Frequency, and Home Bias
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Hai Huang Duke University - Finance
|
|
Posted:
|
|
18 Nov 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Jul 09
|
|
950 ( 5,368) |
36
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Hai Huang Duke University - Finance
|
| Posted: |
|
07 Jul 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Jul 09
|
|
72
|
36
|
|
| |
Abstract:
People are more willing to bet on their own judgments when they feel skillful or knowledgeable (Heath and Tversky (1991)). We investigate whether this "competence effect" influences trading frequency and home bias. We find that investors who feel competent trade more often and have a more internationally diversified portfolio. We also find that male investors, and investors with higher income or more education, are more likely to perceive themselves as competent investors than are female investors, and investors with lower income or less education. Our results are unlikely to be explained by other hypotheses, such as overconfidence or information advantage. Finally, we separately establish a link between optimism towards the home market and international portfolio diversification.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Hai Huang Duke University - Finance
|
| Posted: |
|
18 Nov 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
31 May 06
|
|
878
|
36
|
|
| |
Abstract:
People are more willing to bet on their own judgments when they feel skillful or knowledgeable (Heath and Tversky, 1991). We investigate whether this 'competence effect' influences trading frequency and home bias. We find that investors who feel competent trade more often and have more internationally diversified portfolios. We also find that male investors, and investors with larger portfolios or more education, are more likely to perceive themselves as competent than are female investors, and investors with smaller portfolios or less education. Our paper also contributes to understanding the theoretical link between overconfidence and trading frequency. Existing theories on trading frequency have focused on one aspect of overconfidence, i.e., miscalibration. Our paper offers a potential mechanism for the 'better-than-average' aspect of overconfidence to influence trading frequency. In the context of our paper, overconfident investors tend to perceive themselves to be more competent, and thus are more willing to act on their beliefs, leading to higher trading frequency.
Behavioral Finance, Investment, Competence, Ambiguity, Stock Trading Frequency, Home Bias
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.
|
|
Market Integration and Contagion
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Angela Ng Hong Kong University of Science & Technology (HKUST) - Department of Finance
|
|
Posted:
|
|
22 Mar 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Feb 03
|
|
851 ( 6,519) |
78
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Angela Ng Hong Kong University of Science & Technology (HKUST) - Department of Finance
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Feb 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Feb 03
|
|
29
|
78
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Contagion is usually defined as correlation between markets in excess of what would be implied by economic fundamentals; however, there is considerable disagreement regarding the definitions of the fundamentals, how the fundamentals might differ across countries, and the mechanisms that link the fundamentals to asset returns. Our research takes, as a starting point, a two-factor model with time-varying betas that accommodates various degrees of market integration between different markets. We apply this model to stock returns in three different regions: Europe, South-East Asia, and Latin America. In addition to providing new insights on contagion during crisis periods, we document patterns through time in world and regional market integration and measure the proportion of volatility driven by global, regional, and local factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Angela Ng Hong Kong University of Science & Technology (HKUST) - Department of Finance
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Mar 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Jul 02
|
|
822
|
78
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Contagion is usually defined as correlation between markets in excess of what would be implied by economic fundamentals. However, there is considerable disagreement regarding the definitions of the fundamentals, how the fundamentals might differ across countries and the mechanisms that link the fundamentals to asset returns. Our research takes as a starting point, a two-factor model with time-varying betas that accommodates various degrees of market integration between the different markets. We apply this model to stock returns in three different regions, Europe, South-East Asia and Latin America. In addition to providing new insights on contagion during crisis periods, we document patterns through time in world and regional market integration and measure the proportion of volatility driven by global, regional, as well as, local factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.
|
|
|
Alon Brav Duke University - Fuqua School of Business John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Roni Michaely Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management
|
| Posted: |
|
21 Nov 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Oct 06
|
|
821 (6,870)
|
122
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In early 2002, we surveyed 384 financial executives, to determine the factors that drive dividend and share repurchase decisions. Our survey was supplemented by in-depth interviews with an additional 23 executives. The survey consisted of 11 main questions, most with subparts - over 100 questions in total. Although the survey was anonymous, we also collected information on 20 characteristics of the firms and management. We asked questions about firm size, number of employees, industry, CEO education, age of the CEO, CEO tenure, ownership, the proportion of common stock owned by insiders, credit ratings, debt/equity ratios, dividend payout, earnings per share, average price to earnings ratio over the past few years, and the current price of the stock. The analysis was recently published in the September 2005 Journal of Financial Economics (http://ssrn.com/abstract=571046). Our findings indicate that maintaining the dividend level is on par with investment decisions, while repurchases are made out of the residual cash flow after investment spending. Perceived stability of future earnings still affects dividend policy as in Lintner (1956). However, 50 years later, we find that the link between dividends and earnings has weakened. Many managers now favor repurchases because they are viewed as being more flexible than dividends and can be used in an attempt to time the equity market or to increase earnings per share. Executives believe that institutions are indifferent between dividends and repurchases and that payout policies have little impact on their investor clientele. In general, management views provide little support for agency, signaling, and clientele hypotheses of payout policy. Tax considerations play a secondary role. We provide new analysis of the survey responses which are conditional on the firm and CEO characteristics. In addition, we provide the codebook and original survey data. This allows researchers to conduct question-conditional analysis. It is now possible to address questions like: given the set of respondents that answered one set of questions in a particular way, what are their responses to other questions? We hope that these data spur future research on payout policy.
Payout, Dividend policy, Share repurchases, Survey, Survey data
|
|
|
27.
|
|
The Asian Bet
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Andrew H. Roper University of Wisconsin, Madison - Department of Finance, Investment and Banking
|
|
Posted:
|
|
23 Sep 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Nov 99
|
|
813 ( 6,971) |
19
|
|
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Andrew H. Roper University of Wisconsin, Madison - Department of Finance, Investment and Banking
|
| Posted: |
|
23 Sep 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Nov 99
|
|
300
|
19
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Local Asian and international capital markets have been branded as culprits in the recent Asian financial crisis. Unfortunately, much of our understanding of the crisis stems from macro level analysis. We provide a micro level approach to understanding the Asian financial crisis that focuses on understanding the development of capital markets throughout the region as well as deciphering the performance of Asian corporations. We find that Asian capital markets were successful at fostering new capital mobilization as well as offering a high degree of liquidity to investors. Asian capital markets also pursued gradual liberalization and privatization programs during the 1990s. Despite these successes, Asian equity markets were characterized by a high degree of asset and industry based concentration. Both forms of concentration help to explain the high correlation among individual stock returns in Asia. Stock market investment performance in Asian failed to achieve returns comparable to less risky investments made in the US and the rest of the world. The only exception to this poor investment performance resulted from dynamic trading strategies designed to capture the price appreciation associated with capital market integration. We argue that corporate managers bet their companies by taking greatly increased leverage in the face of declining profitability. In addition, much of the debt was foreign denominated. This added an extra dimension to the gamble. Asian managers were betting that the exchange rate would remain stable. We argue that the crisis was heightened by the extra risk exposure that Asian managers induced by their leverage policies. This all points to a failure in corporate governance with respect to risk management and control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Andrew H. Roper University of Wisconsin, Madison - Department of Finance, Investment and Banking
|
| Posted: |
|
23 Sep 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Oct 99
|
|
513
|
19
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Local Asian and international capital markets have been branded as culprits in the recent Asian financial crisis. Unfortunately, much of our understanding of the crisis stems from macro level analysis. We provide a micro level approach to understanding the Asian financial crisis that focuses on understanding the development of capital markets throughout the region as well as deciphering the performance of Asian corporations. We find that Asian capital markets were successful at fostering new capital mobilization as well as offering a high degree of liquidity to investors. Asian capital markets also pursued gradual liberalization and privatization programs during the 1990s. Despite these successes, Asian equity markets were characterized by a high degree of asset and industry based concentration. Both forms of concentration help to explain the high correlation among individual stock returns in Asia. Stock market investment performance in Asian failed to achieve returns comparable to less risky investments made in the US and the rest of the world. The only exception to this poor investment performance resulted from dynamic trading strategies designed to capture the price appreciation associated with capital market integration. We argue that corporate managers "bet" their companies by taking greatly increased leverage in the face of declining profitability. In addition, much of the debt was foreign denominated. This added an extra dimension to the gamble. Asian managers were betting that the exchange rate would remain stable. We argue that the crisis was heightened by the extra risk exposure that Asian managers induced by their leverage policies. This all points to a failure in corporate governance with respect to risk management and control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.
|
|
The Dynamics of Emerging Market Equity Flows
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Robin L. Lumsdaine American University - Department of Finance and Real Estate
|
|
Posted:
|
|
24 Sep 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Jun 00
|
|
781 ( 7,394) |
49
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Robin L. Lumsdaine American University - Department of Finance and Real Estate
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Jun 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Jun 00
|
|
23
|
49
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We study the interrelationship between capital flows, returns, dividend yields and world interest rates in 20 emerging markets. We estimate a vector autoregressionn with these variables to measure the degree to which lower interest rates contribute to increased capital flows and shocks in flows affect the cost of capital among other dynamic relations. We precede the VAR analysis by a detailed examination of endogenous break points in capital flows and the other variables. These structural breaks are traced to the liberalization of emerging equity markets. Our evidence of structural breaks call into question past research which estimates VAR models over the full sample. After a liberalization, we find that equity flows increase by 1.4% of market capitalization. We also show that shocks in equity flows initially increase returns which is consistent with a price pressure hypothesis. While the effect is diminished over time, there also appears to be a permenant impact. This is consistent with our finding that our proxy for the cost of capital, dividend yields, decreases. Finally, our analysis of the transitition dynamics from pre-liberalization to post-liberalization suggests that when capital leaves, it leaves faster than it came in. These results may help us understand the dynamics of the recent crises in Latin America and East Asia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Robin L. Lumsdaine American University - Department of Finance and Real Estate
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Sep 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Dec 99
|
|
758
|
49
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We study the interrelationship between capital flows, returns, dividend yields and world interest rates in 20 emerging markets. We use a structural VAR framework to examine the impact of shocks in interest rates and net capital flows on asset returns and the cost of capital. In contrast to previous research, we explicitly take into account a fundamental nonstationarity in the data - structural breaks induced by liberalizations. We estimate our VARs in both the full sample, pre-break and the post-break sample, with the breaks endogenously determined. We find significant differences, in particular, between the pre-break analysis and the post-break analysis. We revisit a number of important hypotheses within the VAR framework. First, the "push effect" from world interest rates to capital flows appears consistently when we cumulate impulse responses whereas contemporaneously interest rates and capital flows show no consistent correlation pattern. Second, unexpected shocks to equity flows have a strongly positive contemporaneous effect on returns, in line with the findings of Clark and Berko (1997), and Froot et al. (1998). The effect immediately dies out but there is only incomplete reversal suggesting some of the effect is permanent. This is consistent with our finding that positive shocks in net equity capital flows lead to lower dividend yields -- our proxy for expected returns. Following Bekaert and Harvey's (1999) argument that dividend yield changes reveal information about the cost of equity capital, the equity capital flow shocks lead to lower cost of capital in many countries. We find that this relation is dramatically strengthened if we estimate our VARs on the post break sample. Although part of the initial effect may be due to "price pressure", our results suggest part of the response is near permanent and beneficial. Third, we revisit the Bohn and Tesar (1996) argument that capital flows are more likely driven by "return chasing" than portfolio rebalancing. We find evidence that positive returns shocks are followed by increased short-term equity capital flows. Finally, we provide interesting new results on the transition from pre-break to post-break systems. In almost all the countries we examine, our transition analysis of equity flows suggests that when capital leaves it leaves faster than it came. These intriguing results may shed light on the recent crises in Latin America and Asia and the role of capital flight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.
|
|
Conditioning Variables and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Wayne E. Ferson University of Southern California Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
20 Apr 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Apr 08
|
|
778 ( 7,440) |
80
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne E. Ferson University of Southern California Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Jun 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Apr 08
|
|
28
|
80
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Previous studies have identified predetermined variables that have some power to explain the time series of stock and bond returns. This paper shows that loadings on the same variables also provide significant cross-sectional explanatory power for stock portfolio returns. These loadings are important, over and the above the variables advocated by Fama and French (1993) in their three factor model,' and also the four factors of Elton, Gruber and Blake (1995). The explanatory power of the loadings on lagged variables is robust to various portfolio grouping procedures and other considerations. The lagged variables reveal information about the cross-section of expected returns that is not captured by popular asset pricing factors. These results carry implications for risk analysis, performance measurement, cost-of-capital calculations and other applications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne E. Ferson University of Southern California Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Apr 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Apr 99
|
|
750
|
80
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Previous studies have identified predetermined variables that have some power to explain the time series of stock and bond returns. This paper shows that loadings on the same variables also provide significant cross-sectional explanatory power for stock portfolio returns. These loadings are important, over and the above the variables advocated by Fama and French (1993) in their three factor "model," and also the four factors of Elton, Gruber and Blake (1995). The explanatory power of the loadings on lagged variables is robust to various portfolio grouping procedures and other considerations. The lagged variables reveal information about the cross-section of expected returns that is not captured by popular asset pricing factors. These results carry implications for risk analysis, performance measurement, cost-of-capital calculations and other applications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.
|
|
Predictable Risk and Returns in Emerging Markets
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
22 Aug 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
12 Apr 08
|
|
751 ( 7,876) |
188
|
|
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
12 Sep 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Oct 05
|
|
710
|
188
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The emergence of new equity markets in Europe, Latin America, Asia, the Mideast and Africa provides a new menu of opportunities for investors. These markets exhibit high expected returns as well as high volatility. Importantly, the low correlations with developed countries' equity markets significantly reduce the unconditional portfolio risk of a world investor. However, standard global asset pricing models, which assume complete integration of capital markets, fail to explain the cross-section of average returns in emerging countries. An analysis of the predictability of the returns reveals that emerging market returns are more likely than developed countries to be influenced by local information. This is the final working paper version of my 1995 publication in the Review of Financial Studies.
Emerging markets, cost of capital, performance evaluation, non-normality, market integration, market segmentation, capital market reforms, market liberalization, financial openness, predictable returns
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
12 Apr 08
|
|
41
|
188
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The emergence of new equity markets in Europe, Latin America, Asia, the Mideast and Africa provides a new menu of opportunities for investors. These markets exhibit high expected returns as well as high volatility. Importantly, the low correlations with developed countries' equity markets significantly reduces the unconditional portfolio risk of a world investor. However, standard global asset pricing models, which assume complete integration of capital markets, fail to explain the cross-section of average returns in emerging countries. An analysis of the predictability of the returns reveals that emerging market returns are more likely than developed countries to be influenced by local information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Aug 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Aug 98
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The emergence of new equity markets in Europe, Latin America, Asia, the Mideast and Africa provides a new menu of opportunities for investors. These markets exhibit high expected returns as well as high volatility. Importantly, the low correlations with developed countries' equity markets significantly reduces the unconditional portfolio risk of a world investor. However, standard global asset pricing models, which assume complete integration of capital markets, fail to explain the cross-section of average returns in emerging countries. An analysis of the predictability of the returns reveals that emerging market returns are more likely than developed countries to be influenced by local information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.
|
|
Global Growth Opportunities and Market Integration
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area Stephan Siegel University of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
01 Jul 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Jun 06
|
|
741 ( 8,051) |
45
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area Stephan Siegel University of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
18 Jan 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Jan 05
|
|
37
|
45
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We measure a country's growth opportunities by investigating how its industry mix is priced in global capital markets, using price earnings ratios of global industry portfolios. We derive three sets of empirical results. First, these exogenous growth opportunities strongly predict future changes in real GDP and investment in a large panel of countries. This relation is strongest in countries that have liberalized their capital accounts, equity markets, and banking systems. Second, we re-examine the link between financial development, investor protection, capital allocation, and growth. We find that financial development and investor protection measures are much less important in aligning growth opportunities with growth than is capital market openness. Third, we formulate new tests of market integration and segmentation. Under integration, the difference between a country's local PE ratio and its global counterpart should not predict relative growth, but the difference between its "exogenous" global PE ratio and the world market PE ratio should predict relative growth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area Stephan Siegel University of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
01 Jul 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Jun 06
|
|
704
|
45
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We propose an exogenous measure of a country's growth opportunities by interacting the country's local industry mix with global price to earnings (PE) ratios. We find that these exogenous growth opportunities predict future changes in real GDP and investment in a large panel of countries. This relation is strongest in countries that have liberalized their capital accounts, equity markets, and banking systems. We also find that financial development, external finance dependence, and investor protection measures are much less important in aligning growth opportunities with growth than is capital market openness. Finally, we formulate new tests of market integration and segmentation by linking local and global PE ratios to relative economic growth.
Growth Opportunities, Market Integration, Finance and Growth, Capital Allocation, Capital Account Openness, Financial Liberalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
17 May 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Jul 09
|
|
722 (8,476)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We analyze the history of the equity risk premium from surveys of U.S. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) conducted every quarter from June 2000 to March 2009. The risk premium is the expected 10-year S&P 500 return relative to a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond yield. The last two surveys were conducted during the darkest parts of a global financial crisis and our results show that the equity premium sharply increased during the crisis. The survey also provides measures of cross-sectional disagreement about the risk premium, skewness, and a measure of individual uncertainty. The level of disagreement in late 2008 and early 2009 is 64% higher than 2007 levels. We also present evidence on the determinants of the long-run risk premium. Our analysis suggests the level of the risk premium closely tracks both market volatility (reflected in the VIX index) as well as credit spreads.
Cost of capital, financial crisis, equity premium, long-term market returns, long-term equity returns, expected excess returns, disagreement, individual uncertainty, skewness, asymmetry, survey methods, risk and reward, TIPs, VIX, Credit spreads
|
|
|
33.
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Jul 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Jul 08
|
|
667 (9,418)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We analyze the results of a recent survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) conducted in 2008. We present expectations of the equity risk premium measured over a 10-year horizon relative to a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond. This multi-year survey has been conducted every quarter from June 2000 to March 2008. Each quarter the survey also provides measures of cross-sectional disagreement about the risk premium, skewness, and a measure of individual uncertainty. The individual uncertainty is deduced from the 80% confidence interval that each respondent provides for his or her risk premium assessment. Using our time series of risk premia, we explore the link between these premia and real interest rates implied in Treasury Inflation Indexed Notes, stock market volatility represented by the VIX index, past stock market returns and equity valuation reflected in price to earnings ratios.
cost of capital, equity premium, long-term market returns, long-term equity returns, expected excess returns, disagreement, individual uncertainty, skewness, asymmetry, survey methods, risk and reward, TIPs, VIX
|
|
|
34.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area Stephan Siegel University of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
27 Mar 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Sep 08
|
|
610 (10,698)
|
8
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We propose a new, valuation-based measure of world equity market segmentation. While we observe decreased levels of segmentation in many developing countries, the level of segmentation is still significant. In contrast to previous research, we characterize the factors that account for variation in market segmentation both through time as well as across countries. While a country's regulation with respect to foreign capital flows is important in determining its level of segmentation, we find that non-regulatory factors are also related to the cross-sectional and time-series variation in the level of segmentation. We identify a country's political risk profile and its stock market development as two additional local segmentation factors as well as the U.S. corporate credit spread as a global segmentation factor.
|
|
|
35.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Sep 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Sep 05
|
|
562 (12,096)
|
56
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Much has been learned about emerging markets finance over the past 20 years. These markets have attracted a unique interdisciplinary interest that bridges both investment and corporate finance with international economics, development economics, law, demographics and political science. Our paper focuses on the research areas that are ripe for exploration. We provide new evidence on how emerging market returns, volatility, betas, correlations, skewness and kurtosis have changed as these markets become more financially open.
Emerging markets, International Cost of Capital, Financial openness, dating integration, market segmentation, market integration, capital flows, contagion, market correlations, emerging market volatility, emerging return skewness, emerging return kurtosis
|
|
|
36.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business John Liechty Pennsylvania State University, University Park Merrill W. Liechty Drexel University - Department of Decision Sciences
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Apr 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
27 Mar 08
|
|
550 (12,447)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We replay an investment game that compares the performance of a player using Bayesian methods for determining portfolio weights with a player that uses the Monte Carlo based resampling approach advocated in Michaud (1998). Markowitz and Usmen (2003) showed that the Michaud player always won. However, in the original experiment, the Bayes player was handicapped because the algorithm that was used to evaluate the predictive distribution of the portfolio provided only a rough approximation. We level the playing field by allowing the Bayes player to use a more standard algorithm. Our results sharply contrast with those of the original game. The final part of our paper proposes a new investment game that is much more relevant for the average investor - a one-period ahead asset allocation. For this game, the Bayes player always wins.
Bayesian decision problem, parameter uncertainty, optimal portfolios, utility function maximization, resampling
|
|
|
37.
|
|
Emerging Equity Market Volatility
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
26 Aug 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 08
|
|
534 ( 12,958) |
198
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Sep 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Sep 05
|
|
491
|
198
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Understanding volatility in emerging capital markets is important for determining the cost of capital and for evaluating direct investment and asset allocation decisions. We provide an approach that allows the relative importance of world and local information to change through time in both the expected returns and conditional variance processes. Our time-series and cross-sectional models analyze the reasons that volatility is different across emerging markets, particularly with respect to the timing of capital market reforms. We find that capital market liberalizations often increase the correlation between local market returns and the world market but do not drive up local market volatility.
Emerging markets, volatility, capital market reforms, asymmetric volatility, country risk, market liberalization, financial openness, market integration, market segmentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Aug 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 08
|
|
43
|
198
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Returns in emerging capital markets are very different from returns in developed markets. While most previous research has focused on average returns, we analyze the volatility of the returns in emerging equity markets. We characterize the time-series of volatility in emerging markets and explore the distributional foundations of the variance process. Of particular interest is evidence of asymmetries in volatility and the evolution of the variance process after periods of capital market reform. We shed indirect light on the question of capital market integration by exploring the changing influence of world factors on the volatility in emerging markets. Finally, we investigate the cross-section of volatility. We use measures such as asset concentration, market capitalization to GDP, size of the trade sector, cross-sectional volatility of individual securities within each country, turnover, foreign exchange variability and national credit ratings to characterize why volatility is different across emerging markets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.
|
|
|
Claude B. Erb TCW Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Tadas E. Viskanta First Chicago Investment Management Co.
|
| Posted: |
|
23 Dec 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 Dec 05
|
|
532 (13,056)
|
57
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We analyze expected returns and volatility in 135 different markets. We argue that country credit risk is a proxy for the ex-ante risk exposure of, particularly, segmented developing countries. We fit a time-series cross-sectional regression using data on the 47 countries which have equity markets. These regressions predict both expected returns and volatility using credit risk as a single explanatory variable. We then use the credit rating data on the other 88 countries to project hurdle rates and volatility into the future. Finally, we calculate for each country, the expected time in years, given the forecasted country risk premium and volatility, for an investor to break even and double the initial investment - with 90% probability. This is the final working paper version of our 1996 Journal of Portfolio Management paper.
International cost of capital, country hurdle rates, forecasting volatility, forecasting correlation, country rate of return, country risk, political risk, credit ratings, risk ratings, hitting time
|
|
|
39.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Aug 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 Nov 00
|
|
523 (13,345)
|
79
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We provide an analysis of real economic growth prospects in emerging markets after financial liberalizations. In contrast with previous research, we identify the financial liberalization dates and examine the influence of liberalizations while controlling for a number of other macroeconomic and financial variables. Our work also introduces an econometric methodology that allows us to use extensive time-series as well as cross-sectional information for our tests. We find across a number of different specifications that financial liberalizations are associated with significant increases in real economic growth. The effect is larger for countries with high education levels.
|
|
|
40.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
08 Oct 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 Dec 05
|
|
503 (14,122)
|
281
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper proposes tests of asset pricing models that allow for time variation in conditional covariances. The evidence indicates that the conditional covariances do change through time. Estimates of the expected excess return on the market divided by the variance of the market (reward-to-risk ratio) are presented for the Sharpe-Lintner CAPM, as well as a number of tests of the model specification. The patterns of the pricing errors through time suggest the model's inability to capture the dynamic behavior of asset returns. This is the working paper version of my 1989 Journal of Financial Economics article.
CAPM, asset pricing tests, market efficiency, time-varying risk, dynamic risk, predicting returns, forecasting stock returns
|
|
|
41.
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Jun 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Jun 05
|
|
495 (14,451)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Based on a multi-year survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs), we present expectations of the risk premium measured over a 10-year horizon relative to a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond. Our survey also provides measures of the disagreement over the risk premium. We also provide a measure of individual uncertainty in that we ask for each respondent's 80% confidence interval for their risk premium assessment. We combine the June 2005 survey data with 20 historical quarterly surveys that date back to June 2000. We also collect demographic information about our survey participants. Finally, we present the results of other questions on the survey in June 2005 which include assessments of both economy-wide and firm optimism.
Cost of capital, equity premium, hurdle rate, long-term market returns, long-term equity returns, expected excess returns, disagreement, individual uncertainty, skewness, asymmetry, survey methods, risk and reward
|
|
|
42.
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Dec 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Dec 05
|
|
469 (15,520)
|
12
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We analyze the results of the most recent survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) which looks ahead to the first quarter of 2006 and beyond. We present expectations of the equity risk premium measured over a 10-year horizon relative to a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond. This multi-year survey has been conducted every quarter from June 2000 to November 2005. Each quarter the survey also provides measures of cross-sectional disagreement about the risk premium, skewness, and a measure of individual uncertainty. The individual uncertainty is deduced from the 80% confidence interval that each respondent provides for his or her risk premium assessment. We also present evidence on the determinants of the long-run risk premium. Our analysis suggests there is a positive correlation between the ex ante risk premium and real interest rates as reflected in Treasury Inflation Indexed Notes. The level of the risk premium also appears to track market volatility as reflected in the VIX index.
Cost of capital, equity premium, long-term market returns, long-term equity returns, expected excess returns, disagreement, individual uncertainty, skewness, asymmetry, survey methods, risk and reward, TIPs, VIX
|
|
|
43.
|
|
Growth Volatility and Financial Liberalization
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
|
Posted:
|
|
14 Jun 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
31 Jul 05
|
|
463 ( 15,829) |
52
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Jul 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 Aug 04
|
|
24
|
52
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We examine the effects of both equity market liberalization and capital account openness on real consumption growth variability. We show that financial liberalization is mostly associated with lower consumption growth volatility. Our results are robust, surviving controls for business-cycle effects, economic and financial development, the quality of institutions, and other variables. Countries that have more open capital accounts experience a greater reduction in consumption growth volatility after equity market openings. The results hold for both total and idiosyncratic consumption growth volatility. We also find that financial liberalizations are associated with declines in the ratio of consumption growth volatility to GDP growth volatility, suggesting improved risk sharing. Our results are weaker for liberalizing emerging markets but we never observe an increase in real volatility. Moreover, we demonstrate significant differences in the volatility response depending on the size of the banking and government sectors and certain institutional factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Jun 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
31 Jul 05
|
|
439
|
52
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We examine the effects of both equity market liberalization and capital account openness on real consumption growth variability. We show that financial liberalization is mostly associated with lower consumption growth volatility. Our results are robust, surviving controls for business-cycle effects, economic and financial development, the quality of institutions, and other variables. Countries that have more open capital accounts experience a greater reduction in consumption growth volatility after equity market openings. The results hold for both total and idiosyncratic consumption growth volatility. We also find that financial liberalizations are associated with declines in the ratio of consumption growth volatility to GDP growth volatility, suggesting improved risk sharing. Our results are weaker for liberalizing emerging markets but we never observe a significant increase in real volatility. Moreover, we demonstrate significant differences in the volatility response depending on the size of the banking and government sectors and certain institutional factors.
Consumption growth, equity market liberalization, capital account liberalization, consumption growth volatility, economic volatility, capital account openness, risk sharing, emerging markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Akhtar R. Siddique Office of the Comptroller of the Currency - Risk Analysis Division
|
| Posted: |
|
08 May 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Nov 04
|
|
428 (17,567)
|
75
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We present a framework for modeling and estimating dynamics of variance and skewness from time-series data using a maximum likelihood approach assuming that the errors from the mean have a non-central conditional t distribution. We parameterize conditional variance and conditional skewness in an autoregressive framework similar to that of GARCH models and estimate the parameters in a conditional noncentral t distribution. The likelihood function has two time-varying parameters, the degrees of freedom and the noncentrality parameter. We apply this methodology to daily and monthly equity returns data from the U.S., Germany and Japan, concurrently estimating conditional mean, variance and skewness. We find that there is significant conditional skewness. We then use this model to understand how the inclusion of conditional skewness affects some of the well-known stylized facts about conditional variance and the relation between returns and conditional variance. Two important stylized facts about conditional variance we examine are persistence and asymmetry in variance. Persistence refers to the tendency where high conditional variance is followed by high conditional variance. Asymmetry in variance, i.e., the observation that conditional variance depends on the sign of the innovation to the conditional mean has been documented in asymmetric variance models used in Glosten, Jagannathan, and Runkle (1993) and Engle and Ng (1993). We find that the evidence of asymmetric variance is really just conditional skewness. Inclusion of conditional skewness also impacts the persistence in conditional variance. However, we also find that there are significant seasonalities in variance and the results also depend on how the seasonal effects are accommodated in the estimation methodology. We also examine the relation between expected returns and volatility.
Time-varying skewness, GARCH, non-central t-distribution, leverage effect
|
|
|
45.
|
|
Foreign Speculators and Emerging Equity Markets
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
08 May 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 Apr 08
|
|
416 ( 18,251) |
332
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
30 Aug 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 Apr 08
|
|
22
|
332
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A number of countries have delayed the opening of their capital markets to international investment because of reservations about the impact of foreign speculators on both expected returns and market volatility. We propose a cross-sectional time-series model that attempts to assess the impact of market liberalizations, in the form of the offering of depositary receipts country funds and other financial instruments, in an extranational market and market volatility in emerging equity markets. We also examine the impact of capital market liberalizations on the correlation of emerging equity market returns and the world market return. Our empirical approach is designed to control for other economic events which might confound the impact of foreign speculators on local equity markets. Whatever the empirical specification the cost of capital always decreases after a capital market liberalization but the effect is economically and statistically weak. The effects on volatility and correlation are less robust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
08 May 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Nov 04
|
|
394
|
332
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A number of countries have delayed the opening of their capital markets to international investment because of reservations about the impact of foreign speculators on both expected returns and market volatility. We propose a cross-sectional time-series model that attempts to assess the impact of market liberalizations, in the form of the offering of depositary receipts, country funds and other financial instruments, in an extranational market, on the cost of capital and market volatility in emerging equity markets. We also examine the impact of capital market liberalizations on the correlation of emerging equity market returns and the world market return. Our empirical approach is designed to control for other economic events which might confound the impact of foreign speculators on local equity markets. Whatever the empirical specification, the cost of capital always decreases after a capital market liberalization with the effect varying between 5 and 90 basis points depending on the specification. There is little impact on volatility. While correlation with world markets increases after liberalizations, it is unlikely that this higher correlation will impact global investors looking to diversify their international portfolios.
Equity Market Liberalization, Cost of Capital, Investment Growth, Economic Growth, Liberalization and Risk, Country Correlations, Country Betas, Country Volatility
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.
|
|
Dating the Integration of World Equity Markets
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Robin L. Lumsdaine American University - Department of Finance and Real Estate
|
|
Posted:
|
|
17 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Apr 08
|
|
399 ( 19,226) |
107
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Robin L. Lumsdaine American University - Department of Finance and Real Estate
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Oct 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Oct 01
|
|
383
|
107
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Measuring the integration of world capital markets is notoriously difficult. For example, regulatory changes which appear comprehensive may have little impact on the functioning of the capital market if they fail to lead to foreign portfolio inflows. In contrast to the usual practice of documenting the timing of regulatory changes, we specify a reduced-form model for a number of financial time-series (for example, equity returns and dividend yields) and search for a common break in the process generating the data. In addition, we estimate a confidence interval for the break. Information on a variety of financial and macroeconomic indicators is employed to interpret the results and to identify the likely date the equity market becomes financially integrated with world capital markets. We find endogenous break dates that are very accurately estimated but do not always correspond closely to dates of official capital market reforms. After the break, stock markets are on average larger and more liquid than before; returns are more volatile and more highly correlated with the world market return, dividend yields are lower and credit ratings improve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Robin L. Lumsdaine American University - Department of Finance and Real Estate
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Apr 08
|
|
16
|
107
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Measuring the integration of world capital markets is notoriously difficult. For example, regulatory changes which appear comprehensive may have little impact on the functioning of the capital market if they fail to lead to foreign portfolio inflows. In contrast to the usual practice of documenting the timing of regulatory changes, we specify a reduced-form model for a number of financial time-series (for example, equity returns and dividend yields) and search for a common break in the process generating the data. In addition, we estimate a confidence interval for the break. Information on a variety of financial and macroeconomic indicators is employed to interpret the results and to identify the likely date the equity market becomes financially integrated with world capital markets. We find endogenous break dates that are very accurately estimated but do not always correspond closely to dates of official capital market reforms. After the break, stock markets are on average larger and more liquid than before; returns are more volatile and more highly correlated with the world market return, dividend yields are lower and credit ratings improve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.
|
|
|
Alon Brav Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Roni Michaely Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management
|
| Posted: |
|
23 Jan 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Sep 07
|
|
382 (20,408)
|
7
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We survey 328 financial executives to determine the effects of the May 2003 dividend tax cut on corporate payout policy. We find that the tax cut led to initiations and dividend increases at some firms, weakly more so at firms for which retail investors are particularly important. However, financial executives say that the tax rate reduction ranks behind stability of future cash flows and cash holdings (and for firms already paying dividends, taxes also rank behind the historic level of dividends) in a list of factors that affect dividend policy. Tax effects are of roughly the same importance as attracting institutional investors and the availability of profitable investments. We also search press releases and find that the dividend tax cut is only occasionally mentioned as the reason for an initiation, especially from 2004 onward. Overall, the evidence indicates that dividend tax rates are a second-order concern in setting payout policy.
Payout, Dividend policy, Share repurchases, Tax cut, Press Release
|
|
|
48.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
12 Mar 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
31 Jul 05
|
|
382 (20,329)
|
51
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We examine the effects of both equity market liberalization and capital account openness on real consumption growth variability. We show that financial liberalization is mostly associated with lower consumption growth volatility. Our results are robust, surviving controls for business-cycle effects, economic and financial development, the quality of institutions, and other variables. Countries that have more open capital accounts experience a greater reduction in consumption growth volatility after equity market openings. The results hold for both total and idiosyncratic consumption growth volatility. We also find that financial liberalizations are associated with declines in the ratio of consumption growth volatility to GDP growth volatility, suggesting improved risk sharing. Our results are weaker for liberalizing emerging markets but we never observe a significant increase in real volatility. Moreover, we demonstrate significant differences in the volatility response depending on the size of the banking and government sectors and certain institutional factors.
Economic volatility, risk sharing, financial openness, equity market liberalization, capital account openness, GDP volatility, consumption volatility
|
|
|
49.
|
|
Time-Varying World Market Integration
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
03 May 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Apr 08
|
|
382 ( 20,329) |
277
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
12 Sep 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 Oct 05
|
|
349
|
277
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We propose a measure of capital market integration arising from a conditional regime-switching model. Our measure allows us to describe expected returns in countries that are segmented from world capital markets in one part of the sample and become integrated later in the sample. We find that a number of emerging markets exhibit time-varying integration. Some markets appear more integrated than one might expect based on prior knowledge of investment restrictions. Other markets appear segmented even though foreigners have relatively free access to their capital markets. While there is a perception that world capital markets have become more integrated, our country-specific investigation suggests that this is not always the case.
Emerging markets, cost of capital, market integration, market segmentation, capital market reforms, market liberalization, financial openness, regime switching
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Jun 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Apr 08
|
|
33
|
277
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We propose a conditional measure of capital market integration that allows us to characterize both the cross-section and time-series of expected returns in developed and emerging markets. Our measure, which arises from a conditional regime-switching model, allows us to describe expected returns in countries that are segmented from world capital markets in one part of the sample and become integrated later in the sample. Our results suggest that a number of emerging markets exhibit time-varying integration. Interestingly, some markets appear to be more integrated than one might expect based on prior knowledge of investment restrictions. Other markets appear segmented even though foreigners have relatively free access to their capital markets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
03 May 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 May 00
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We propose a measure of capital market integration arising from a conditional regime-switching model. Our measure allows us to describe expected returns in countries that are segmented from world capital markets in one part of the sample and become integrated later in the sample. We find that a number of emerging markets exhibit time-varying integration. Some markets appear more integrated than one might expect based on prior knowledge of investment restrictions. Other markets appear segmented even though foreigners have relatively free access to their capital markets. While there is a perception that world capital markets have become more integrated, our country-specific investigation suggests that this is not always the case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.
|
|
|
Murillo Campello University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign - Department of Finance John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
12 Mar 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
12 Mar 09
|
|
344 (23,270)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The focus of the current credit crisis is on the immediate implications, such as reduced profits and increased unemployment. In contrast, we show that there are worrisome long-term economic consequences of the crisis through its effect on financially constrained firms. Using a survey of over 1,000 CFOs in the United States, Europe and Asia, we show that firms are cutting back or canceling projects that they know add to firm value. The elimination of profitable projects is especially acute for firms that face financial constraints. One of the basic tenets of finance is that projects that enhance firm value should be pursued. Financial constraints potentially prevent the funding of these projects. The current credit crisis is an ideal setting to measure the impact of constraints on value creation. Turning down or canceling profitable projects is a lesser known cost of the current financial crisis. Our evidence suggests that in the scramble for short-term cash flow, firms are sacrificing long-term value. This implies lower future growth opportunities and lower future employment growth.
Financial crisis, financing constraints, investment spending, liquidity management, matching estimators
|
|
|
51.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
08 Oct 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
12 Oct 05
|
|
326 (24,745)
|
62
|
|
| |
Abstract:
One version of the consumption-based asset pricing model implies a linear relation between expected returns and expected consumption growth. This paper provides evidence that the expected real term structure contains information that can be used to forecast consumption growth. The evidence is strongest for the 1970's and 1980's. The real term structure contains more information than two alternative measures: lagged consumption growth and lagged stock returns. Further, the real term structure appears to have slightly more forecasting power than the leading commercial econometric models. This is the working paper version of my 1988 Journal of Financial Economics article.
Term structure, yield curve, forecasting economic growth, predicting consumption growth
|
|
|
52.
|
|
|
Wayne E. Ferson University of Southern California Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Apr 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Jun 99
|
|
311 (26,194)
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We explore the different factors that drive expected returns in world markets. Our research offers two innovations. First, the introduction of the Euro currency unit greatly reduces the complexity of including foreign exchange risk in asset pricing models. We use a synthetic Euro excess return along with a Yen excess return to assess country equity sensitivities to currency risk factors. Second, when combining the currency factors with a group of economic factors, we measure the incremental information in the factor proposed in Fama and French (1998). We find that a global price-to-book factor offers little additional explanatory power over and above a model that includes economic risk factors.
|
|
|
53.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Sep 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 Sep 05
|
|
304 (26,925)
|
21
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines a comprehensive list of 18 different risk factors that potentially impact international equity returns. These factors include systematic risk, idiosyncratic risk, size, semi-variance, downside betas, value-at-risk, skewness, coskewness, kurtosis, political risk and country risk. I investigate whether these risk factors explain the cross-section of average returns in 47 countries. I also analyze whether the same risk factors influence developed and emerging market returns. I find evidence that an asset pricing framework that incorporates skewness has success in explaining average returns.
Global risk factors, beta, cross-section of returns, systematic risk, idiosyncratic risk, size, semi-variance, downside betas, value-at-risk, skewness, coskewness, kurtosis, political risk, country risk
|
|
|
54.
|
|
|
Claude B. Erb TCW Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Tadas E. Viskanta First Chicago Investment Management Co.
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Oct 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Oct 05
|
|
285 (29,005)
|
43
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Is there information in the commonly used indicators of country risk for expected global fixed income returns and volatility? We examine the information content in publicly available measures of political, financial and economic risk. We find that these ex-ante measures contain important information about the cross-section of expected fixed income and currency returns. Trading strategies based on the change in, and level of, these risk measures produce positive risk-adjusted returns. We find that the country risk measures are significantly correlated with international bond metrics, such as real yields. This is the final working paper version of our 1996 Journal of Fixed Income publication.
global bond strategies, predicting bond returns, trading strategies, interest rates, political risk, economic risk, financial risk, country risk, trading strategies, active management
|
|
|
55.
|
|
Capital Flows and the Behavior of Emerging Market Equity Returns
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
08 May 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Apr 08
|
|
278 ( 29,833) |
67
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Apr 08
|
|
31
|
67
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Foreign portfolio flows may reflect deep changes in the functioning of an emerging market economy and its capital markets. Using a database of monthly net U.S. equity flows, we investigate the relation of these flows to the behavior of equity returns, the structural characteristics of the capital markets, exchange rates, and the strength of the economy. We find that increases in equity flows are associated with a lower cost of capital, higher correlation with world market returns, lower asset concentration, lower inflation, larger market size relative to GDP, more trade, and slightly higher per capita economic growth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
08 May 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Nov 04
|
|
247
|
67
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Foreign portfolio flows may reflect deep changes in the functioning of an emerging market economy and its capital markets. Using a database of monthly net U.S. equity flows, we investigate the relation of these flows to the behavior of equity returns, the structural characteristics of the capital markets, exchange rates, and the strength of the economy. We find that increases in equity flows are associated with a lower cost of capital, higher correlation with world market returns, lower asset concentration, lower inflation, larger market size relative to GDP, more trade and slightly higher per capita economic growth.
Capital Markets, U.S. Equity Flows, Distribution of Equity Returns, Economic Growth
|
|
|
|
|
|
56.
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Sep 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Sep 05
|
|
269 (30,983)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We analyze the results of the September 2005 survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs). We present expectations of the equity risk premium measured over a 10-year horizon relative to a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond. This multi-year survey has been conducted every quarter from June 2000 to September 2005. Each quarter the survey also provides measures of cross-sectional disagreement about the risk premium, skewness, and a measure of individual uncertainty. The individual uncertainty is deduced from the 80% confidence interval that each respondent provides for his or her risk premium assessment. We also present evidence on the determinants of the long-run risk premium. Our analysis suggests there is a positive correlation between the ex ante risk premium and real interest rates as reflected in Treasury Inflation Indexed Notes. The level of the risk premium also appears to track market volatility as reflected in the VIX index.
Cost of capital, equity premium, long-term market returns, long-term equity returns, expected excess returns, disagreement, individual uncertainty, skewness, asymmetry, survey methods, risk and reward, TIPs, VIX
|
|
|
57.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Akhtar R. Siddique Office of the Comptroller of the Currency - Risk Analysis Division
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Sep 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Sep 05
|
|
264 (31,639)
|
10
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Single factor asset pricing models face two major hurdles: the problematic time-series properties of the ex ante market risk premium and the inability of the risk measure to account for a substantial degree of the cross-sectional variation of expected excess returns. We provide an explanation for the first failure using the following intuition: if investors know that the asset returns have conditional skewness given the information known today, the expected excess returns should include rewards for accepting skewness. We formalize this intuition with an asset pricing model which incorporates conditional skewness. We decompose the expected excess returns into components due to conditional variance and skewness. Our results show that conditional skewness is important and, when combined with the economy-wide reward for skewness, helps explain the time-variation of the ex ante market risk premiums. Conditional skewness has greater success in explaining the ex ante risk premium for the world portfolio than for the U.S. portfolio.
Risk premium, reward to risk, volatility, skewness, risk premium puzzle, reward for skewness
|
|
|
58.
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Sep 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 05
|
|
242 (34,858)
|
51
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We analyze the advice contained in a sample of 237 investment strategies over the 1980-1992 period. Each newsletter strategy recommends a mix of equity and cash. We construct portfolios based on these recommendations and find that only a small number of the newsletters appear to have higher average returns than passive portfolios constructed to have the same returns variance. We test the timing abilities of newsletters by examining how often newsletters correctly change their equity weights. Our evidnece shows that the newsletters offer unimpressive asset allocation advice. Knowledge of the asset allocation weights also implies knowledge of the exact conditional betas. As a result, we present direct tests of market timing ability that bypass beta estimation problems. Assuming that different letters cater to investors with different risk aversions, we are able to infer each newsletter's forecasted market returns. The standard deviation of newsletters' forecasts provides a natural measure of disagreement in the market. We find that the degree of disagreement contains information about both market volatility and trading activity.
Newsletter performance, market timing
|
|
|
59.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Sep 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Sep 05
|
|
239 (35,317)
|
24
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Equity market liberalizations, if effective, lead to important changes in both the financial and real sectors as the economy becomes integrated into world capital markets. The study of market integration is complicated because there are many ways one can liberalize and many countries have taken different routes. To study the effectiveness of particular liberalization policies, the sequencing of liberalizations, and the impact on the real economy, systematic methods must be developed to 'date' the liberalization of emerging equity markets. We provide a synthesis of the current methods, and also show the impact of liberalization on the real sector.
Financial openness, economic growth, equity liberalization, economic volatility, dating integration, market segmentation, market integration, GDP growth, GDP volatility
|
|
|
60.
|
|
|
Murillo Campello University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign - Department of Finance Erasmo Giambona University of Amsterdam - Finance Group John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
07 Aug 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 Aug 09
|
|
234 (36,297)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
As liquidity became scarce and internal profits plunged, many firms were forced to rely on bank lines of credit during the 2008-9 financial crisis. Surprisingly, little is known about these credit facilities in general, let alone about their importance during a crisis. This paper investigates a unique dataset that describes how public and private firms in the U.S. and abroad use lines of credit during early 2009. Our analysis emphasizes the interaction between internal funds, external funds, and real decisions such as corporate investment and employment. Among other things, we find that firms that are "credit constrained" (small, private, non-investment grade, and unprofitable) have larger credit lines (as a proportion of assets) than their large, public, investment-grade, profitable counterparts both before and during the crisis. Constrained firms draw more funds from their credit lines and are more likely to face difficulties in renewing or initiating new lines during the crisis. The terms of credit line facilities changed significantly with the crisis: maturities declined; and commitment fees and interest spreads went up for all firms, but particularly for constrained firms. Our evidence suggests that while being profitable helps firms establish credit lines, it does not monotonically lead to increased use. Instead, lines of credit are used when internal funds (cash stocks and cash flows) decline. Looking at real-side decisions, our estimates suggest that lines of credit provide the liquidity "edge" firms need to invest during the crisis.
Financial crisis, investment, liquidity management, lines of credit
|
|
|
61.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Claude B. Erb TCW Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Tadas E. Viskanta First Chicago Investment Management Co.
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Oct 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
06 Feb 06
|
|
226 (37,521)
|
13
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We explore the cross-sectional determinants of emerging equity market returns. We find that the behavior of emerging market returns differs substantially from the behavior of developed equity market returns and that these differences have persisted in the period ending June 1996. While there are some similarities between the cross-sectional determinants of emerging and developed market equity returns, emerging market strategies must take into account the special characteristics of these markets. In particular, the degree of integration of these markets with world equity markets has changed through time. This time-varying integration must be taken into account in asset allocation strategies. This is the final working paper version of a chapter we wrote for a book published in 1997.
emerging market returns, predicting equity returns, factors, active management, market integration, asset allocation, emerging markets, time-varying integration
|
|
|
62.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
07 Jun 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 Jun 07
|
|
219 (38,742)
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We reflect on China's economic performance from the perspective of the experiences of a broad panel of countries. We formulate an econometric framework building on standard growth regressions that allows us to measure the impact of various factors on economic growth and growth variability. As China has become more and more integrated into the world's economic and financial landscape, we devote special attention to measures of (de jure) financial openness. We also document how the real effects of openness are impacted by financial development, political risk, and the quality of institutions. Standard growth regressions cannot explain China's extraordinary growth experience and we fail to find an important role for foreign trade and foreign direct investment. In contrast, the sheer volume of investment has played a significant role in China's growth. As China's per capita GDP continues to grow, it must find sustainable sources of growth. We identify a more efficient financial sector, less state ownership higher quality of government institutions and full financial openness as important factors. Interaction analysis suggests that the beneficial effects of financial openness first require further financial and institutional development. China is less of an outlier in its growth variability experience but achieved high growth with surprisingly low growth volatility.
|
|
|
63.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Oct 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 Dec 05
|
|
201 (42,296)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper compares forecasts of real economic growth from models based on the stock market and bond market data. Although both contain information relevant for predicting GNP growth, the bond market delivers more accurate predictions. The bond market predictions are compared to the forecasts of seven leading econometric forecasting services. None of these services is able to provide a lower root mean squared error than the bond market model. This is the working paper version of my 1989 Financial Analysts Journal article.
structure, yield curve, forecasting GDP, predicting GDP
|
|
|
64.
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Manju Puri Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Jul 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Jul 09
|
|
200 (42,521)
|
6
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Traditional economic theory suggests no role for managerial attitudes in forming corporate policies. In contrast, our paper provides striking evidence based on psychometric tests administered to CEOs that personal (or behavioral) traits such as managerial risk aversion, time preference, and optimism are related to corporate financial policies. We also provide evidence consistent with a matching between the behavioral traits of executives and the kinds of companies they join; that is, certain types of firms attract executives with particular psychological profiles. Further, we provide new evidence that behavioral traits help explain compensation structure. Finally, we offer evidence that U.S. CEOs differ from non-U.S. CEOs in terms of their underlying attitudes. CEOs are also significantly more optimistic and risk-tolerant than the lay population.
Managers, attitudes, risk aversion, capital structure, debt, acquisitions, corporate policies, behavioral corporate finance
|
|
|
65.
|
|
|
Wayne E. Ferson University of Southern California Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
27 Oct 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 Nov 05
|
|
185 (46,029)
|
24
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper provides a global asset pricing perspective on the debate over the relation between predetermined attributes of common stocks, such as ratios of price-to-book-value, cash-flow, earnings, and other variables to the future returns. Some argue that such variables may be used to find securities that are systematically undervalued by the market, while others argue that the measures are proxies for exposure to underlying economic risk factors. It is not possible to distinguish between these views without explicitly modelling the relation between such attributes and risk factors. We present an empirical framework for attacking the problem at a global level, assuming integrated markets. Our perspective pulls together the traditional academic and practitioner viewpoints on lagged attributes. We present new evidence on the relative importance of risk and mispricing effects, using monthly data for 21 national equity markets. We find that the cross-sectional explanatory power of the lagged attributes is related to both risk and mispricing in the two-factor model, but the risk effects explain more of the variance than mispricing. This paper is an unabridged version of our 1997 publication in the Journal of Banking and Finance.
International asset pricing, fundamental ratios, country risk, time-varying risk, valuation
|
|
|
66.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Mar 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Mar 09
|
|
174 (48,914)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Financial openness is often associated with higher rates of economic growth. We show that the impact of openness on factor productivity growth is more important than the effect on capital growth. This explains why the growth effects of liberalization appear to be largely permanent, not temporary. We attribute these permanent liberalization effects to the role financial openness plays in stock market and banking sector development, and to changes in the quality of institutions. We find some indirect evidence of higher investment efficiency post-liberalization. We also document threshold effects: countries that are more financially developed or have higher quality of institutions experience larger productivity growth responses. Finally, we show that the growth boost from openness outweighs the detrimental loss in growth from global or regional banking crises.
financial openness, growth, liberalization, productivity
|
|
|
67.
|
|
|
Claude B. Erb TCW Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Tadas E. Viskanta First Chicago Investment Management Co.
|
| Posted: |
|
31 Oct 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
31 Oct 05
|
|
169 (50,630)
|
6
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Population demographics impact both the time-series and cross-section of expected asset returns. A number of theories link the average age of a population to expected market returns. For example, Bakshi and Chen (1994) argue that an older population will demand a higher premium on equity investment because their risk aversion is higher. We argue that, in an international context, population demographics are more likely to reveal information about the risk exposure of a particular country. Our evidence supports the risk hypothesis. This is the last working paper version of our 1997 Financial Analysts Journal article.
global investment, population, international stock returns, asset allocation, active management, risk premium
|
|
|
68.
|
|
The Impact of the Federal Reserve Bank's Open Market Operations
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Roger D. Huang University of Notre Dame
|
|
Posted:
|
|
19 Jun 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 May 05
|
|
160 ( 53,058) |
5
|
|
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Roger D. Huang University of Notre Dame
|
| Posted: |
|
04 May 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 May 05
|
|
140
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The Federal Reserve Bank has the ability to change the money supply and to shape the expectations of market participants through their open market operations. These operations may amount to 20% of the day's volume and are concentrated during the half hour known as "Fed Time." Using previously unavailable data on open market operations from 1982 to 1988, our paper provides the first comprehensive examination of the impact of the Federal Reserve Bank's trading on both fixed income instruments and foreign currencies. Our results detail a dramatic increase in volatility during Fed Time, consistent with market expectations of Fed intervention during this time interval. We find that there is little systematic difference in market impact between reserve-draining and reserve-adding operations. Additionally, Fed Time volatility is, on average, higher on days when open market operations are absent. These results suggest that the markets are potentially confused about the purpose of the open market operations during our sample period. The evidence is also consistent with the Fed operations conveying information which smooths market participants' expectations. A revised version of this paper was published in the Journal of Financial Markets in 2002.
Federal Reserve Intervention, Bond market volatility, currency market volality, Reserve-draining operations, Reserve-adding operations, Fed Time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Roger D. Huang University of Notre Dame
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Jun 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Jun 00
|
|
20
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The Federal Reserve Bank has the ability to change the money supply and to shape the expectations of market participants through their open market operations. These operations may amount to 20% of the day's volume and are concentrated during the half hour known as `Fed Time'. Using previously unavailable data on open market operations, our paper provides the first comprehensive examination of the impact of the Federal Reserve Bank's trading on both fixed income instruments and foreign currencies. Our results detail a dramatic increase in volatility during Fed Time. Surprisingly, the Fed Time volatility is higher on days when open market operations are absent. In addition, little systematic differences in market impact are observed for reserve-draining versus reserve-adding operations. These results suggest that the financial markets correctly anticipate the purpose of open market operations but are unable to forecast the timing of the operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
69.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Guofu Zhou Washington University, St. Louis - John M. Olin School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
08 Oct 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 Oct 05
|
|
148 (57,078)
|
14
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We test the mean-variance efficiency of a given portfolio with a Bayesian framework. Our test is more direct than Shanken's (1987), because we impose a prior on all the parameters of the multivariate regression model. The approach is also easily adapted to other problems. We use Monte Carlo numerical integration to accurately evaluate 90-dimensional integrals. Posterior-odds ratios are calculated for 12 industry portfolios from 1926-1987. The sensitivity of the inferences to the prior is investigated using three distributions. The probability that the given portfolio is mean-variance efficient is small for a range of plausible priors. This is the working paper version of our 1990 Journal of Financial Economics article.
Asset pricing, CAPM, Bayesian finance, CAPM tests, market efficiency
|
|
|
70.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Apr 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
27 May 05
|
|
124 (66,533)
|
55
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper explores different specifications of conditional expectations. The mostcommon specification, linear least squares, is contrasted with nonparametric techniques that make no assumptions about the distribution of the data. Nonparametric regression is successful in capturing some nonlinearities in financial data, in particular, asymmetric responses of security returns to the direction and magnitude of market returns. The technique is ideally suited for empirically modeling returns of securities that have complicated embedded options. The conditional mean and variance of the NYSE market return are also examined. Forecasts of market returns are not improved with the nonparametric techniques which suggests that linear conditional expectations are a reasonable approximation in conditional asset pricing research. However, the linear model produces a disturbing number of negative expected excess returns. My results also indicate that the relation between the conditional mean and variance depends on the specification of the conditional variance. Furthermore, a linear model relating mean to variance is rejected and these tests are not sensitive to the expectation generating mechanism nor the conditioning information. Rejections are driven by the distinct countercyclical variation in the ratio of the conditional mean to variance. A revised version of this paper was published in the Journal of Empirical Finance in 2001.
nonparametric density estimation, forecasted returns, forecasted volatility, asymmetric volatility, reward to risk, time-varying expected returns
|
|
|
71.
|
|
|
Bernard Dumas University of Lausanne - Swiss Finance Institute Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Pierre Ruiz affiliation not provided to SSRN
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Apr 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Jul 09
|
|
97 (80,429)
|
18
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In an integrated world capital market, the same pricing kernel is applicable to all securities. We apply this idea to the stock returns of different countries. We investigate the underlying determinants of cross-country stock return correlations. First, we determine, for a given, measured degree of commonality of country outputs, what should be the degree of correlation of national stock returns. We propose a framework that contains a statistical model for output and an intertemporal financial market model for stock returns. We then attempt to match the correlations generated by the model with measured correlations. Our results show that under the hypothesis of market segmentation, the model correlations are much smaller than observed correlations. However, assuming world markets are integrated, our model correlations closely match observed correlations.
Industry correlations, market integration, market segmentation, stock correlation, output correlation
|
|
|
72.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Guofu Zhou Washington University, St. Louis - John M. Olin School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
31 Oct 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
31 Oct 05
|
|
93 (82,923)
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The unconditional mean-variance efficiency of the Morgan Stanley Capital International world equity index is investigated. Using data from 16 OECD countries and Hong Kong and maintaining the assumption of multivariate normality, we cannot reject the efficiency of the benchmark. However, residual diagnostics reveal significant departures from normality. We test the sensitivity of the results by specifying error structures that are t-distributed and mixtures of normal distributions. Even after relaxing the i.d.d. assumption, we cannot reject the mean-variance efficiency of the world portfolio. Our results suggest that differences in country risk exposure, measured against the MSCI world portfolio, will lead to differences in expected returns. This is the final working paper version of our 1993 publication in the Journal of Empirical Finance.
International asset pricing, CAPM, mean-variance efficiency, alternative distributions, mixtures of normals
|
|
|
73.
|
|
|
Itzhak Ben-David Ohio State University - Finance Department, Fisher College of Business John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
31 Dec 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Feb 08
|
|
72 (97,953)
|
33
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Miscalibration is a standard measure of overconfidence in both psychology and economics. Although it is often used in lab experiments, there is scarcity of evidence about its effects in practice. We test whether top corporate executives are miscalibrated, and whether their miscalibration impacts investment behavior. Over six years, we collect a unique panel of nearly 7,000 observations of probability distributions provided by top financial executives regarding the stock market. Financial executives are miscalibrated: realized market returns are within the executives' 80% confidence intervals only 38% of the time. We show that companies with overconfident CFOs use lower discount rates to value cash flows, and that they invest more, use more debt, are less likely to pay dividends, are more likely to repurchase shares, and they use proportionally more long-term, as opposed to short-term, debt. The pervasive effect of this miscalibration suggests that the effect of overconfidence should be explicitly modeled when analyzing corporate decision-making.
|
|
|
74.
|
|
Liquidity and Expected Returns: Lessons from Emerging Markets
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
|
Posted:
|
|
06 Jul 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Feb 09
|
|
55 (113,475) |
81
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Jun 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Feb 09
|
|
0
|
81
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Given the cross-sectional and temporal variation in their liquidity, emerging equity markets provide an ideal setting to examine the impact of liquidity on expected returns. Our main liquidity measure is a transformation of the proportion of zero daily firm returns, averaged over the month. We find that it significantly predicts future returns, whereas alternative measures such as turnover do not. Consistent with liquidity being a priced factor, unexpected liquidity shocks are positively correlated with contemporaneous return shocks and negatively correlated with shocks to the dividend yield. We consider a simple asset-pricing model with liquidity and the market portfolio as risk factors and transaction costs that are proportional to liquidity. The model differentiates between integrated and segmented countries and time periods. Our results suggest that local market liquidity is an important driver of expected returns in emerging markets, and that the liberalization process has not fully eliminated its impact.
G12, G15, F30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Jan 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Feb 07
|
|
21
|
81
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Given the cross-sectional and temporal variation in their liquidity, emerging equity markets provide an ideal setting to examine the impact of liquidity on expected returns. Our main liquidity measure is a transformation of the proportion of zero daily firm returns, averaged over the month. We find that our liquidity measures significantly predict future returns, whereas alternative measures such as turnover do not. Consistent with liquidity being a priced factor, unexpected liquidity shocks are positively correlated with contemporaneous return shocks and negatively correlated with shocks to the dividend yield. We consider a simple asset pricing model with liquidity and the market portfolio as risk factors and transaction costs that are proportional to liquidity. The model differentiates between integrated and segmented countries and time periods. Our results suggest that local market liquidity is an important driver of expected returns in emerging markets, and that the liberalization process has not fully eliminated its impact.
Liquidity pricing, emerging markets, return predictability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Jul 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
06 Jul 05
|
|
34
|
81
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Given the cross-sectional and temporal variation in their liquidity, emerging equity markets provide an ideal setting to examine the impact of liquidity on expected returns. Our main liquidity measure is a transformation of the proportion of zero daily firm returns, averaged over the month. We find that our liquidity measures significantly predict future returns, whereas alternative measures such as turnover do not. Consistent with liquidity being a priced factor, unexpected liquidity shocks are positively correlated with contemporaneous return shocks and negatively correlated with shocks to the dividend yield. We consider a simple asset pricing model with liquidity and the market portfolio as risk factors and transaction costs that are proportional to liquidity. The model differentiates between integrated and segmented countries and periods. Our results suggest that local market liquidity is an important driver of expected returns in emerging markets, and that the liberalization process has not eliminated its impact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.
|
|
|
Wayne E. Ferson University of Southern California Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
10 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
12 Apr 08
|
|
55 (113,475)
|
53
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper empirically examines multifactor asset pricing models for the returns and expected returns on eighteen national equity markets. The factors are chosen to measure global economic risks. Although previous studies do not reject the unconditional mean- variance efficiency of a world market portfolio, our evidence indicates that the tests are low in power, and the world market betas do not provide a good explanation of cross-sectional differences in average returns. Multiple beta models provide an improved explanation of the equity returns.
|
|
|
76.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
01 Aug 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
12 Apr 08
|
|
40 (129,991)
|
13
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Within the context of conditional asset allocation strategies, this paper explores the implications of the low correlations of the emerging market returns with developed market returns and the relatively high degree predictability of emerging countries' returns. It is well known that low correlations improve investment opportunities and my research provides out-of-sample validation of the improved performance. However, the most dramatic enhancement is generated by the use of conditioning information. Portfolio strategies that use conditioning information to predict emerging market returns produce impressive out-of-sample performance over the 1980-1992 period.
|
|
|
77.
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Jun 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Apr 08
|
|
32 (140,574)
|
43
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We analyze the advice contained in a sample of 237 investment letters over the 1980-1992 period. Each newsletter recommends a mix of equity and cash. We construct portfolios based on these recommendations and find that only a small number of the newsletters appear to have higher average returns than a buy-and-hold portfolio constructed to have the same variance. Knowledge of the asset allocation weights also implies knowledge of the exact conditional betas. As a result, we present direct tests of market timing ability that bypass beta estimation problems. Assuming that different letters cater to investors with different risk aversions, we are able to imply the newsletters' forecasted market returns. The dispersion of the newsletters' forecasts provides a natural measure of disagreement in the market. We find that the degree of disagreement contains information about both market volatility and trading activity.
|
|
|
78.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 Sep 01
|
|
32 (140,574)
|
79
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We provide an analysis of real economic growth prospects in emerging markets after financial liberalizations. In contrast with previous research, we identify the financial liberalization dates and examine the influence of liberalizations while controlling for a number of other macroeconomic and financial variables. Our work also introduces an econometric methodology that allows us to use extensive time-series as well as cross-sectional information for our tests. We find across a number of different specifications that financial liberalizations are associated with significant increases in real economic growth.
|
|
|
79.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Karl V. Lins University of Utah - Department of Finance Andrew H. Roper University of Wisconsin, Madison - Department of Finance, Investment and Banking
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Sep 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Oct 01
|
|
30 (143,612)
|
49
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We provide new evidence that debt creates shareholder value for firms that face agency costs. Our tests are unique in two respects. First, we focus on a sample of firms with potentially extreme agency problems. We study emerging market firms where the routine use of pyramid ownership structures provides an acute separation of management cash flow rights and control rights. Second, we argue that not all debt is the same. Using new data on global debt issuance, we find that the type of debt that positively impacts shareholder value is the type that closely monitors management. This combination of a sample of firms with extreme expected agency problems and detailed information on the different types of debt allows us to construct powerful tests of whether debt can mitigate the effects of agency and information problems. Among other results, we find that the abnormal returns resulting from syndicated term loans (which provide monitoring) are significantly related to the extent of the separation of ownership and control. Our results are consistent with the idea that debt creates value because it reduces the agency costs associated with overinvestment.
|
|
|
80.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area
|
| Posted: |
|
07 Apr 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 Apr 09
|
|
26 (151,129)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Financial openness is often associated with higher rates of economic growth. We show that the impact of openness on factor productivity growth is more important than the effect on capital growth. This explains why the growth effects of liberalization appear to be largely permanent, not temporary. We attribute these permanent liberalization effects to the role financial openness plays in stock market and banking sector development, and to changes in the quality of institutions. We find some indirect evidence of higher investment efficiency post-liberalization. We also document threshold effects: countries that are more financially developed or have higher quality of institutions experience larger productivity growth responses. Finally, we show that the growth boost from openness outweighs the detrimental loss in growth from global or regional banking crises.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
81.
|
|
|
Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Bruno Solnik HEC Paris - Departement Finance et Economie Guofu Zhou Washington University, St. Louis - John M. Olin School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Dec 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Dec 00
|
|
23 (158,402)
|
22
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper characterizes the forces that determine time-variation in expected international asset returns. We offer a number of innovations. By using the latent factor technique, we do not have to prespecify the sources of risk. We solve for the latent premiums and characterize their time-variation. We find evidence that the first factor premium resembles the expected return on the world market portfolio. However, the inclusion of this premium alone is not sufficient to explain the conditional variation in the returns. We find evidence of a second factor premium which is related to foreign exchange risk. Our sample includes new data on both international industry portfolios and international fixed income portfolios. We find that the two latent factor model performs better in explaining the conditional variation in asset returns than a prespecified two factor model. Finally, we show that differences in the risk loadings are important in accounting for the cross-sectional variation in the international returns.
|
|
|
82.
|
|
|
Wayne E. Ferson University of Southern California Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Mar 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 May 00
|
|
22 (161,110)
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We explore the different factors that drive expected returns in world markets. Our research offers two innovations. First, the introduction of the Euro currency unit greatly reduces the complexity of including foreign exchange risk in asset pricing models. We use a synthetic Euro excess return along with a Yen excess return to assess country equity sensitivities to currency risk factors. Second, when combining the currency factors with a group of economic factors, we measure the incremental information in the factor proposed in Fama and French (1998). We find that a global price-to-book factor offers little additional explanatory power over and above a model that includes economic risk factors.
|
|
|
83.
|
|
|
Wayne E. Ferson University of Southern California Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
02 Apr 08
|
|
18 (172,515)
|
24
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper provides a global asset pricing perspective on the debate over the relation between predetermined attributes of common stocks, such as ratios of price-to-book-value, cash-flow, earnings, and other variables to the future returns. Some argue that such variables may be used to find securities that are systematically undervalued by the market, while others argue that the measures are proxies for exposure to underlying economic risk factors. It is not possible to distinguish between these views without explicitly modeling the relation between such attributes and risk factors. We present an empirical framework for attacking the problem at a global level, assuming integrated markets. Our perspective pulls together the traditional academic and practitioner viewpoints on lagged attributes. We present new evidence on the relative importance of risk and mispricing effects, using monthly data for 21 national equity markets. We find that the cross-sectional explanatory power of the lagged attributes is related to both risk and mispricing in the two-factor model than mispricing.
|
|
|
84.
|
|
|
Wayne E. Ferson University of Southern California Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Jul 00
|
|
18 (172,515)
|
18
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies average and conditional expected returns in national equity markets, and their relation to a number of fundamental country attributes. The attributes are organized into three groups. The first is relative valuation ratios, such as price-to-book-value, cash-flow, earnings and dividends. The second group measures relative economic performance and the third measures industry structure. We find that average returns across countries are related to the volatility of their price-to-book ratios. Predictable variation in returns is also related to relative gross domestic product, interest rate levels and dividend-price ratios. We explore the hypothesis that cross-sectional variation in the country attributes proxy for variation in the sensitivity of national markets to global measures of economic risks. We test single-factor and two-factor models in which countries' conditional betas are assumed to be functions of the more important fundamental attributes.
|
|
|
85.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Christian T. Lundblad University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finance Area Stephan Siegel University of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Mar 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 Mar 09
|
|
14 (184,045)
|
8
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We propose a new, valuation-based measure of world equity market segmentation. While we observe decreased levels of segmentation in many developing countries, the level of segmentation is still significant. In contrast to previous research, we characterize the factors that account for variation in market segmentation both through time as well as across countries. While a country's regulation with respect to foreign capital flows is important in determining its level of segmentation, we find that non-regulatory factors are also related to the cross-sectional and time-series variation in the level of segmentation. We identify a country's political risk profile and its stock market development as two additional local segmentation factors as well as the U.S. corporate credit spread as a global segmentation factor.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
86.
|
|
|
Murillo Campello University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign - Department of Finance John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Dec 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Nov 09
|
|
1 (6,195)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We survey 1,050 CFOs in the U.S., Europe, and Asia to assess whether their firms are credit constrained during the global credit crisis of 2008. We study whether corporate spending plans differ conditional on this measure of financial constraint. Our evidence indicates that constrained firms planned deeper cuts in tech spending, employment, and capital spending. Constrained firms also burned through more cash, drew more heavily on lines of credit for fear banks would restrict access in the future, and sold more assets to fund their operations. We also find that the inability to borrow externally causes many firms to bypass attractive investment opportunities, with 86% of constrained U.S. CFOs saying their investment in attractive projects was restricted during the credit crisis of 2008. More than half of the respondents say they will cancel or postpone their planned investment. Our results also hold in Europe and Asia, and in many cases are stronger in those economies. Although survey-based analyses have limitations, our evidence adds to the portfolio of approaches and knowledge about the impact of credit constraints on corporate behavior.
Financial crisis, financing constraints, investment spending, liquidity management, matching estimators
|
|
|
87.
|
|
|
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Oct 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Oct 07
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this paper, the authors analyze the results of the most recent survey of US Chief Financial Officers (CFOs), which looks ahead to the first quarter of 2007 and beyond. They present the expectations of the equity risk premium measured over a ten-year horizon relative to a ten-year US Treasury bond. This multi-year survey has been conducted every quarter from June 2000 to November 2006. Each quarterly survey provides measures of cross-sectional disagreement about the risk premium, skewness, and a measure of individual uncertainty. The individual uncertainty is deduced from the 80% confidence interval that each respondent provides for his or her risk Premium assessment. The authors also present evidence on the determinants of the long run risk premium. The analysis suggests that there is a positive correlation between the ex ante risk premium and real interest rates as reflected in the Treasury Inflation Indexed Notes. The level of risk premium also appears to track market volatility as reflected in the VIX index.
|
|
|
88.
|
|
|
Claude B. Erb TCW Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
23 May 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Nov 06
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Investors face numerous challenges when seeking to estimate the prospective performance of a longonly investment in commodity futures. For instance, historically, the average annualized excess return of the average individual commodity futures has been approximately zero and commodity futures returns have been largely uncorrelated with one another. The prospective annualized excess return of a rebalanced portfolio of commodity futures, however, can be equity-like. Some security characteristics (such as the term structure of futures prices) and some portfolio strategies have historically been rewarded with above-average returns. It is important to avoid naive extrapolation of historical returns and to strike a balance between dependable sources of return and possible sources of return. This paper is a shortened version of an earlier working paper. The unabridged version of this paper can be found at http://ssrn.com/abstract=650923.
Derivative Instruments, Commodity Derivatives, Alternative Investments, Commodities, Portfolio Management, Asset Allocation
|
|
|
89.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Marcio G.P. Garcia Pontifical Catholic University - Department of Economics Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Feb 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
29 Feb 08
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We present critical examination of the role of the speculator in transitional market-based economies. Speculators provide additional liquidity to the market and, in general, enhance the operational efficiency of the market. This serves to reduce the cost of capital which has broad positive implications for the welfare of the whole society. However, we argue that the presence of speculators alone does not guarantee these benefits. Indeed, the presence of a small group of speculators may lead to a distortion of market prices. Hence, in order to ensure the positive benefits, there must exist a sufficient number of speculators =96 both domestic and international. Our policy recommendations focus on ways to obtain this critical mass.
|
|
|
90.
|
|
|
Geert Bekaert Columbia University - Columbia Business School, Economics Department Marcio G.P. Garcia Pontifical Catholic University - Department of Economics Campbell R. Harvey Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
30 Jan 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
29 Feb 08
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Capital markets play an important role in the economic development of emerging capital markets. Well functioning markets insure that both corporations and investors get or receive fair prices for their securities. This ensures that valuable projects will be financed and negative value projects will be rejected. Most importantly, we argue that integration into world capital markets will accelerate the growth process. A country that erects to international participation will face a higher cost of capital. This discourages domestic investment and diminishes foreign direct investment. Our analysis indicates that Brazil's cost of equity capital could be lowered if an aggressive program is undertaken to increase the degree of integration with world capital markets.
|
|