| . |
Steven N. Kaplan's
Scholarly Papers
Click on the title of any column to sort the table by that
column. |
|
|
| |
|
|
Aggregate Statistics |
|
Total Downloads
35,024 |
Total
Citations
2,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
The State of U.S. Corporate Governance: What's Right and What's Wrong?
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Bengt R. Holmström Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
11 Apr 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 Oct 09
|
|
6,214 ( 152) |
|
|
|
|
|
Bengt R. Holmström Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
08 Sep 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
02 Apr 08
|
|
6,078
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The U.S. corporate governance system has recently been heavily criticized, largely as a result of failures at Enron, WorldCom, Tyco and some other prominent companies. Those failures and criticisms, in turn, have served as catalysts for legislative change (Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) and regulatory change (new governance guidelines from the NYSE and NASDAQ). In this paper, we consider two questions. First, is it clear that the U.S. system has performed that poorly; is it really that bad? Second, will the changes lead to an improved U.S. corporate governance system? We first note that the broad evidence is not consistent with a failed U.S. system. The U.S. economy and stock market have performed well both on an absolute basis and relative to other countries over the past two decades. And the U.S. stock market has continued to outperform other broad indices since the scandals broke. Our interpretation of the evidence is that while parts of the U.S. corporate governance system failed under the exceptional strain of the 1990s, the overall system, which includes oversight by the public and the government, reacted quickly to address the problems. We then consider the effects that the legislative, regulatory, and market responses are likely to have in the near future. Our assessment is that they are likely to make a good system better, though there is a danger of overreacting to extreme events.
U.S. corporate governance system, shareholder value, executive compensation, boards, Sarbanes-Oxley act, comparative corporate governance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bengt R. Holmström Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Apr 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 Oct 09
|
|
136
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The U.S. corporate governance system has recently been heavily criticized, largely as a result of failures at Enron, WorldCom, Tyco and some other prominent companies. Those failures and criticisms, in turn, have served as catalysts for legislative change (Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) and regulatory change (new governance guidelines from the NYSE and NASDAQ). In this paper, we consider two questions. First, is it clear that the U.S. system has performed that poorly; is it really that bad? Second, will the changes lead to an improved U.S. corporate governance system? We first note that the broad evidence is not consistent with a failed U.S. system. The U.S. economy and stock market have performed well both on an absolute basis and relative to other countries over the past two decades. And the U.S. stock market has continued to outperform other broad indices since the scandals broke. Our interpretation of the evidence is that while parts of the U.S. corporate governance system failed under the exceptional strain of the 1990s, the overall system, which includes oversight by the public and the government, reacted quickly to address the problems. We then consider the effects that the legislative, regulatory, and market responses are likely to have in the near future. Our assessment is that they are likely to make a good system better, though there is a danger of overreacting to extreme events.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Antoinette Schoar Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Dec 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Feb 09
|
|
5,935 (171)
|
142
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper investigates the performance of private equity partnerships using a data set of individual fund returns collected by Venture Economics. Over the sample period, average fund returns net of fees approximately equal the S&P 500 although there is a large degree of heterogeneity among fund returns. Returns persist strongly across funds raised by individual private equity partnerships. The returns also improve with partnership experience. Better performing funds are more likely to raise follow-on funds and raise larger funds than funds that perform poorly. This relationship is concave so that top performing funds do not grow proportionally as much as the average fund in the market. At the industry level, we show that market entry in the private equity industry is cyclical. Funds (and partnerships) started in boom times are less likely to raise follow-on funds, suggesting that these funds subsequently perform worse. Aggregate industry returns are lower following a boom, but most of this effect is driven by the poor performance of new entrants, while the returns of established funds are much less affected by these industry cycles. Several of these results differ markedly from those for mutual funds.
private equity partnerships, fund returns,
|
|
|
3.
|
|
Corporate Governance and Merger Activity in the U.S.: Making Sense of the 1980s and 1990s
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Bengt R. Holmström Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
21 Feb 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Nov 03
|
|
3,504 ( 509) |
|
|
|
|
|
Bengt R. Holmström Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
08 Apr 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Dec 01
|
|
102
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper describes and considers explanations for changes in corporate governance and merger activity in the United States since 1980. Corporate governance in the 1980s was dominated by intense merger activity distinguished by the prevalence of leveraged buyouts (LBOs) and hostility. After a brief decline in the early 1990s, substantial merger activity resumed in the second half of the decade, while LBOs and hostility did not. Instead, internal corporate governance mechanisms appear to have played a larger role in the 1990s. We conclude by considering whether these changes and the movement toward shareholder value are likely to be permanent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bengt R. Holmström Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
21 Feb 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Nov 03
|
|
3,402
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper describes and considers explanations for changes in corporate governance and merger activity in the United States since 1980. Corporate governance in the 1980s was dominated by intense merger activity distinguished by the prevalence of leveraged buyouts (LBOs) and hostility. After a brief decline in the early 1990s, substantial merger activity resumed in the second half of the decade, while LBOs and hostility did not. Instead, internal corporate governance mechanisms appear to have played a larger role in the 1990s. We conclude by considering whether these changes and the movement toward shareholder value are likely to be permanent.
Corporate Governance; Stock Options; Mergers and Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Apr 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 Jul 00
|
|
2,893 (725)
|
275
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this paper, we compare the characteristics of real world financial contracts to their counterparts in financial contracting theory. We do so by conducting a detailed study of actual contracts between venture capitalists (VCs) and entrepreneurs. We consider VCs to be the real world entities who most closely approximate the investors of theory. (1) The distinguishing characteristic of VC financings is that they allow VCs to separately allocate cash flow rights, voting rights, board rights, liquidation rights, and other control rights. We explicitly measure and report the allocation of these rights. (2) While convertible securities are used most frequently, VCs also implement a similar allocation of rights using combinations of multiple classes of common stock and straight preferred stock. (3) Cash flow rights, voting rights, control rights, and future financings are frequently contingent on observable measures of financial and non-financial performance. (4) If the company performs poorly, the VCs obtain full control. As company performance improves, the entrepreneur retains / obtains more control rights. If the company performs very well, the VCs retain their cash flow rights, but relinquish most of their control and liquidation rights. The entrepreneur's cash flow rights also increase with firm performance. (5) It is common for VCs to include non-compete and vesting provisions aimed at mitigating the potential hold-up problem between the entrepreneur and the investor. We interpret our results in relation to existing financial contracting theories. The contracts we observe are most consistent with the theoretical work of Aghion and Bolton (1992) and Dewatripont and Tirole (1994). They also are consistent with screening theories.
|
|
|
5.
|
|
Wall Street and Main Street: What Contributes to the Rise in the Highest Incomes?
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Joshua D. Rauh Northwestern University - Department of Finance
|
|
Posted:
|
|
20 Sep 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Nov 08
|
|
2,123 ( 1,263) |
23
|
|
|
|
|
Joshua D. Rauh Northwestern University - Department of Finance Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
23 Jul 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Oct 07
|
|
32
|
17
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We consider how much of the top end of the income distribution can be attributed to four sectors -- top executives of non-financial firms (Main Street); financial service sector employees from investment banks, hedge funds, private equity funds, and mutual funds (Wall Street); corporate lawyers; and professional athletes and celebrities. Non-financial public company CEOs and top executives do not represent more than 6.5% of any of the top AGI brackets (the top 0.1%, 0.01%, 0.001%, and 0.0001%). Individuals in the Wall Street category comprise at least as high a percentage of the top AGI brackets as non-financial executives of public companies. While the representation of top executives in the top AGI brackets has increased from 1994 to 2004, the representation of Wall Street has likely increased even more. While the groups we study represent a substantial portion of the top income groups, they miss a large number of high-earning individuals. We conclude by considering how our results inform different explanations for the increased skewness at the top end of the distribution. We argue the evidence is most consistent with theories of superstars, skill biased technological change, greater scale and their interaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Joshua D. Rauh Northwestern University - Department of Finance
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Sep 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Nov 08
|
|
2,091
|
23
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We consider how much of the top end of the income distribution can be attributed to four sectors - top executives of non-financial firms (Main Street); financial service sector employees from investment banks, hedge funds, private equity funds, and mutual funds (Wall Street); corporate lawyers; and professional athletes and celebrities. Non-financial public company CEOs and top executives do not represent more than 6.5% of any of the top AGI brackets (the top 0.1%, 0.01%, 0.001%, and 0.0001%). Individuals in the Wall Street category comprise at least as high a percentage of the top AGI brackets as non-financial executives of public companies. While the representation of top executives in the top AGI brackets has increased from 1994 to 2004, the representation of Wall Street has likely increased even more. While the groups we study represent a substantial portion of the top income groups, they miss a large number of high-earning individuals. We conclude by considering how our results inform different explanations for the increased skewness at the top end of the distribution. We argue the evidence is most consistent with theories of superstars, skill biased technological change, greater scale and their interaction.
Compensation, Wage Differentials, Income Inequality, Corporate Governance
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
Which CEO Characteristics and Abilities Matter?
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Mark M. Klebanov University of Chicago - Graduate School of Business (GSB) Morten Sorensen Columbia Business School
|
|
Posted:
|
|
20 Mar 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Aug 08
|
|
1,904 ( 1,590) |
11
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Mark M. Klebanov University of Chicago - Graduate School of Business (GSB) Morten Sorensen Columbia Business School
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Aug 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Aug 08
|
|
63
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We study the characteristics and abilities of CEO candidates for companies involved in buyout (LBO) and venture capital (VC) transactions and relate them to hiring decisions, investment decisions, and company performance. Candidates are assessed on more than thirty individual abilities. The abilities are highly correlated; a factor analysis suggests there are two primary factors with intuitive characterizations -- one for general ability and one that contrasts team-related, interpersonal skills with execution skills. Both LBO and VC firms are more likely to hire and invest in CEOs with greater general abilities, both execution- and team-related. Success, however, is more strongly related to execution skills than to team-related skills. Success is, at best, only marginally related to incumbency, holding observable talent and ability constant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Mark M. Klebanov University of Chicago - Graduate School of Business (GSB) Morten Sorensen Columbia Business School
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Mar 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 Jul 08
|
|
1,841
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Using a dataset of assessments of CEO candidates for companies involved in private equity transactions (PE) - buyout (BO) and venture capital (VC) - we study how CEO characteristics and abilities relate to hiring decisions, PE investment decisions, and subsequent performance. CEOs are assessed in seven general areas - leadership, personal, intellectual, motivational, interpersonal, technical and functional. The ratings of different characteristics and abilities are generally correlated. For both BO and VC firms, outside CEO candidates are more highly rated than incumbents. PE firms - both BO and VC - are more likely to hire and invest in more highly rated/talented CEOs. More highly rated CEOs who are hired are more likely to be successful, particularly for buyout-funded companies. In comparing the characteristics that matter for hiring and investment relative to those related to success, we find that characteristics related to executive skills appear undervalued while those related to interpersonal skills appear overvalued.
CEO characteristics, private equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
|
Leveraged Buyouts and Private Equity
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
|
Posted:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 Jan 09
|
|
1,812 ( 1,746) |
19
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 Jan 09
|
|
1,723
|
19
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We describe and present time series evidence on the leveraged buyout/private equity industry, both firms and transactions. We discuss the existing empirical evidence on the economics of the firms and transactions. We consider similarities and differences between the recent private equity wave and the wave of the 1980s. Finally, we speculate on what the evidence implies for the future of private equity.
Private Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Aug 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Aug 08
|
|
89
|
19
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We describe and present time series evidence on the leveraged buyout / private equity industry, both firms and transactions. We discuss the existing empirical evidence on the economics of the firms and transactions. We consider similarities and differences between the recent private equity wave and the wave of the 1980s. Finally, we speculate on what the evidence implies for the future of private equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Mark L. Mitchell CNH Partners Karen Hopper Wruck Ohio State University - Fisher College of Business, Department of Finance
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Aug 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
31 Jan 00
|
|
1,714 (1,918)
|
12
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper presents clinically-based studies of two acquisitions that received very different stock market reactions at announcements one positive and one negative. Despite the differing market reactions, we find that, ultimately, neither acquisition created value overall. In exploring the reasons for the acquisition outcomes, we rely primarily on interviews with managers and on internally generated performance data. We compare the results of these analyses to those from analyses of post-acquisition operating and stock price performance traditionally applied to large samples. We draw two primary conclusions. (1) Our findings highlight the difficulty of implementing a successful acquisition strategy and of running an effective internal capital market. Post-acquisition difficulties resulted because: (a) managers of the acquiring company did not deeply understand the target company at the time of the acquisition; (b) the acquirer imposed an inappropriate organizational design on the target as part of the post-acquisition integration process; and (c) inappropriate management incentives existed at both the top management and division level. (2) Measures of operating performance used in large sample studies are weakly correlated with actual post-acquisition operating performance.
|
|
|
9.
|
|
What are Firms? Evolution from Early Business Plans to Public Companies
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Berk A. Sensoy Fisher College of Business - Ohio State University Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
|
Posted:
|
|
16 Feb 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
27 Aug 08
|
|
1,666 ( 2,023) |
16
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Berk A. Sensoy Fisher College of Business - Ohio State University Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Apr 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Oct 06
|
|
323
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We study how firm characteristics evolve from early business plan to initial public offering (IPO) to public company for 50 venture capital (VC) financed companies. We describe the financial performance, line of business, point(s) of differentiation, non-human capital assets, growth strategy, top management, and ownership structure. The most striking finding is that firm business lines or ideas remain remarkably stable from business plan through public company. Within those business lines, non-human capital aspects of the businesses are more stable than human capital aspects. In the cross-section, firms with more alienable assets experience more managerial turnover suggesting that specific people becomes less critical as firms establish non-human assets. We obtain qualitatively similar results to those in our primary sample for all non-financial start-up IPOs in 2004 - both VC- and non-VC backed. This suggests that our main results are not specific to the presence of a VC or to the time period. We discuss how our results relate to theories of the firm and to VC investment decisions.
Entrepreneurship, Venture Capital, Theory of the firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Berk A. Sensoy Fisher College of Business - Ohio State University Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
16 Feb 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
27 Aug 08
|
|
1,343
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We study how firm characteristics evolve from early business plan to IPO to public company for 50 venture capital (VC) financed companies. We find that firm business lines remain remarkably stable while management turnover is substantial. Management turnover is positively related to the formation of alienable assets. We obtain similar results from an out-of-sample analysis of all 2004 IPOs indicating that our main results are not specific to VC-backed firms or to the time period. The results suggest that, at the margin, investors in start-ups should place more weight on investing in a strong business ("the horse") than on a strong management team ("the jockey"). We also discuss how our results inform theories of the firm.
Entrepreneurship, Venture Capital, Theory of the firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
|
Characteristics, Contracts and Actions: Evidence from Venture Capitalist Analyses
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
|
Posted:
|
|
15 Jan 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Sep 08
|
|
979 ( 5,119) |
111
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Apr 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Apr 02
|
|
27
|
111
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We study the investment analyses of 67 portfolio investments by 11 venture capital (VC) firms. VCs consider the attractiveness and risks of the business, management, and deal terms as well as expected post-investment monitoring. We then consider the relation of the analyses to the contractual terms. Greater internal and external risks are associated with more VC cash flow rights, VC control rights; greater internal risk, also with more contingencies for the entrepreneur; and greater complexity, with less contingent compensation. Finally, expected VC monitoring and support are related to the contracts. We interpret these results in relation to financial contracting theories.
Investment banking, venture capital, financing policy, capital and ownership structure, brokerage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Jan 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Sep 08
|
|
952
|
111
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We study the investment analyses of 67 portfolio investments by 11 venture capital (VC) firms. VCs consider the attractiveness and risks of the business, management, and deal terms as well as expected post-investment monitoring. We then consider the relation of the analyses to the contractual terms. Greater internal and external risks are associated with more VC cash flow rights, VC control rights; greater internal risk, also with more contingencies for the entrepreneur; and greater complexity, with less contingent compensation. Finally, expected VC monitoring and support are related to the contracts. We interpret these results in relation to financial contracting theories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Gregor M-M. Andrade Harvard Business School
|
| Posted: |
|
21 Apr 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Jul 00
|
|
958 (5,308)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies thirty-one highly leveraged transactions (HLTs) of the 1980s that subsequently become financially distressed. At the time of distress, all sample firms have operating margins that are positive and in the majority of cases greater than the median for the industry. We argue that these firms, therefore, are financially distressed, not economically distressed. The net effect of the HLT and financial distress is a slight increase in value -- from the pre-transaction to distress resolution, the sample firms experience a marginally positive change in (market- or industry-adjusted) value. This finding strongly suggests that, overall, the HLTs of the late 1980s succeeded in creating value. We also present quantitative and qualitative estimates of the (direct and indirect) costs of financial distress and their determinants. Our preferred estimates of the costs of financial distress are 10% of firm value. Our most conservative estimates do not exceed 23% of firm value. Operating margins of the distressed firms increase immediately after the HLT, decline when the firms become distressed and while they are distressed, but then rebound after the distress is resolved. Consistent with some costs of financial distress, we find evidence of unexpected cuts in capital expenditures, undesired asset sales, and costly managerial delay in restructuring. To the extent they occur, the costs of financial distress that we identify are heavily concentrated in the period after the firms become distressed, but before they enter Chapter 11. We conclude the paper with an analysis of the determinants of the costs of financial distress.
|
|
|
12.
|
|
What is the Price of Hubris? Using Takeover Battles to Infer Overpayments and Synergies
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Pekka Hietala INSEAD - Finance Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business David T. Robinson Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
16 Sep 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
909 ( 5,847) |
31
|
|
|
|
|
Pekka Hietala INSEAD - Finance Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business David T. Robinson Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
10 Jan 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Jan 05
|
|
18
|
31
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We present a framework for determining the information that can be extracted from stock prices around takeover contests. In only two types of cases is it theoretically possible to use stock price movements to infer bidder overpayment and relative synergies. Even in these two cases, we argue that it is practically difficult to extract this information. We illustrate one of these generic cases using the takeover contest for Paramount in 1994 in which Viacom overpaid by more than $2 billion. Our findings are consistent with managerial overconfidence and/or large private benefits, but not with the traditional agency-based incentive problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pekka Hietala INSEAD - Finance Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business David T. Robinson Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Oct 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Oct 02
|
|
31
|
31
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We present a framework for determining the information that can be extracted from stock prices around takeover contests. In only two types of cases is it theoretically possible to use stock price movements to infer bidder overpayment and relative synergies. The takeover contest for Paramount in 1994 illustrates one of these generic cases. We estimate that Viacom, the 'winning' bidder, overpaid for Paramount by more than $2 billion. This occurred despite the fact that Viacom's CEO owned roughly 3/4 of Viacom. These results are consistent with managerial overconfidence and/or large private benefits, but not with the traditional agency-based incentive problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pekka Hietala INSEAD - Finance Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business David T. Robinson Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
16 Sep 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
860
|
31
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper analyzes the amount of information that can be extracted from stock prices around takeover contests. The first part of the paper shows that it is not generally possible to use target and bidder stock price movements to infer the market's estimates of synergies, bidder overpayment, and changes in bidder and target values. In two generic cases, however, we show that it is possible to use bidder and target stock prices to obtain market estimates of overpayment. In the second part of the paper, we illustrate one of these two generic cases through a clinical study of the takeover contest for Paramount. We find that the market estimated that Viacom, the eventual "winner" of the takeover battle, overpaid by over $1.5 billion when it agreed to purchase Paramount in a $9.2 billion acquisition in February 1994. We also find that the market believed that QVC, the eventual "loser" of the battle, had substantially larger synergies (on the order of $1 billion more) with Paramount than Viacom did. Viacom prevailed due to its willingness to over-pay. That this overpayment occurred despite the fact that Sumner Redstone, the CEO of Viacom, owned roughly 2/3 of Viacom supports Roll's Hubris hypothesis (1986) as well as the results in Morck, Shleifer, and Vishny (1990) and Lang, Stulz, and Walkling (1989).
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
|
|
Michael C. Jensen Harvard Business School Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Laura Stiglin Econalytics
|
| Posted: |
|
16 Aug 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Feb 08
|
|
890 (6,051)
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this report, the tax effects of leveraged buyouts (LBOs) based on the current tax law and data from LBOs during the period 1979 through 1985 are examined. The analysis challenges the argument that LBOs result in net losses of tax revenues to the U.S. Treasury. Five ways are shown in which LBOs can generate incremental revenues to the U.S. Treasury: increased capital gains taxes for shareholders; increased operating revenues; interest income earned by LBO creditors; more efficient use of capital; and asset sales triggering additional corporate taxes on the capital gains. Offsetting these incremental revenue gains are: increased interest deductions on the LBO debt and lower tax revenues on dividends foregone. We conclude that the U.S. Treasury's revenues from LBO firms have increased over the time period examined and that policies that restrict LBOs likely will reduce future tax revenues received by the Federal government.
|
|
|
14.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business John D. Martin Baylor University - Department of Finance, Insurance & Real Estate Robert Parrino University of Texas at Austin - Department of Finance
|
| Posted: |
|
30 Jan 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
01 Aug 01
|
|
634 (10,114)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
SUBJECT AREAS: Business Valuation, Financial Forecasting, Strategic Analysis. CASE SETTING: 1996, U.S. In the Spring of 1996 Berg Electronics is poised to become a publicly traded company after going through a "build-up" leveraged buyout by Hicks, Muse, Tate, and Furst (HMTF). HMTF purchased Berg from DuPont in 1993 for $370 million then added over $100 million in acquisitions between 1993 and 1995. In February 1996 Jack Furst, the HMTF partner in charge of the Berg acquisition, was contemplating whether the offering price for Berg shares suggested by Berg's investment banker was appropriate. The student is asked to analyze the suggested offering price for the shares using multiples based on comparable companies and discounted cash flow. In addition, the case provides an opportunity to perform a strategic analysis of Berg using SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis. The case can be used to illustrate three basic points: 1. The application of the capitalized cash flow (CCF) valuation method proposed by Kaplan and Ruback (1995) as a tool for valuing highly levered transactions. The APV approach can also be illustrated. 2. The differences in firm valuations that can arise between discounted cash flow valuation estimates and value estimates from an analysis of comparable/guideline company multiples. 3. The role of a competitive analysis in analyzing a firm's intrinsic worth. This case is used in an advanced course in corporate finance to illustrate the valuation of a highly leveraged firm. Alternatively, the case can be used to introduce the use of the Adjusted Present Value (APV) and Capital Cash Flow (CCF) (CCF is also known as Compressed APV) approaches to business valuation. A pedagogical note for CCF is appended to the case teaching note.
|
|
|
15.
|
|
The Effects of Business-to-Business E-Commerce on Transaction Costs
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Luis Garicano University of Chicago - Booth School of Business - Economics Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
24 Nov 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
610 ( 10,728) |
13
|
|
|
|
|
Luis Garicano University of Chicago - Booth School of Business - Economics Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
10 Dec 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
430
|
13
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies transaction costs changes arising from the introduction of the Internet in transactions between firms. We divide transaction costs into coordination costs and motivation costs. We classify coordination efficiencies into three categories: process improvements, marketplace benefits, and indirect improvements. For motivation costs, we focus on informational asymmetries. We apply this framework to internal data from an Internet-based firm to measure process improvements, marketplace benefits, and motivation costs. Our results suggest potentially large process improvements and marketplace benefits. We find little evidence that informational asymmetries are more important in the electronic marketplace than in the existing physical ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luis Garicano University of Chicago - Booth School of Business - Economics Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Nov 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
06 Sep 02
|
|
180
|
13
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this paper, we study the changes in transaction costs from the introduction of the Internet in transactions between firms (i.e., business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce). We begin with a conceptual framework to organize the changes in transaction costs that are likely to result when a transaction is transferred from a physical marketplace to an Internet-based one. Following Milgrom and Roberts (1992), we differentiate between the impact on coordination costs and motivation costs. We argue that it is likely that B2B e-commerce reduces coordination costs and increases efficiency. We classify these efficiencies into three broad categories (1) process improvements; (2) marketplace benefits; and (3) indirect improvements. At the same time, B2B e-commerce affects incentive costs. In particular, we discuss the impact of the introduction of e-commerce on informational asymmetries. We implement this framework by analyzing detailed internal data from one Internet-based firm to measure process improvements, marketplace benefits, and motivation costs. We present less detailed data and analyses for one other firm. Our results suggest that process improvements and marketplace benefits are potentially large. We find little evidence that informational asymmetries are more important in the electronic marketplace we study than the existing physical ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.
|
|
How Do Legal Differences and Learning Affect Financial Contracts?
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR) Frederic Martel UBS Global Asset Management
|
|
Posted:
|
|
17 Nov 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Sep 09
|
|
425 ( 17,793) |
35
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR) Frederic Martel UBS Global Asset Management
|
| Posted: |
|
21 Jun 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Jul 04
|
|
373
|
35
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We analyze venture capital (VC) investments in twenty-three non-U.S. countries and compare them to U.S. VC investments. We describe how the contracts allocate cash flow, board, liquidation, and other control rights. In univariate analyses, contracts differ across legal regimes. However, more experienced VCs implement U.S.-style contracts regardless of legal regime. In most specifications, legal regime becomes insignificant controlling for VC sophistication. VCs who use U.S.-style contracts fail significantly less often. The results suggest that U.S.-style contracts are efficient across a wide range of legal regimes. The evolution of contracts is consistent with financial contracting theories and costly learning.
Venture Capital, financial contracting, law and finance, capital and ownership structure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Frederic Martel UBS Global Asset Management Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
12 Jan 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
30 Jan 04
|
|
29
|
35
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We analyse venture capital (VC) investments in 23 non-US countries and compare them to VC investments in the US. We describe how the contracts allocate cash flow, board, liquidation, and other control rights. In univariate analyses, contracts differ across legal regimes. At the same time, however, more experienced VCs implement US-style contracts regardless of legal regime. In most specifications, legal regime becomes insignificant controlling for VC sophistication. VCs who use US-style contracts fail significantly less often. Financial contracting theories in the presence of fixed costs of learning, therefore, appear to explain contracts along a wide range of legal regimes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Frederic Martel UBS Global Asset Management Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Nov 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Sep 09
|
|
23
|
35
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We analyze venture capital (VC) investments in twenty-three non-U.S. countries and compare them to VC investments in the U.S. We describe how the contracts allocate cash flow, board, liquidation, and other control rights. In univariate analyses, contracts differ across legal regimes. At the same time, however, more experienced VCs implement U.S.-style contracts regardless of legal regime. In most specifications, legal regime becomes insignificant controlling for VC sophistication. VCs who use U.S.-style contracts fail significantly less often. Financial contracting theories in the presence of fixed costs of learning, therefore, appear to explain contracts along a wide range of legal regimes.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.
|
|
|
Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR) Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Dec 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 May 02
|
|
319 (25,490)
|
49
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We study the investment analyses of 67 portfolio investments by 11 venture capital (VC) firms. VCs consider the attractiveness and risks of the business, management, and deal terms as well as expected post-investment monitoring. We then consider the relation of the analyses to the contractual terms. Greater internal and external risks are associated with more VC cash flow rights, VC control rights; greater internal risk, also with more contingencies for the entrepreneur; and greater complexity, with less contingent compensation. Finally, expected VC monitoring and support are related to the contracts. We interpret these results in relation to financial contracting theories.
|
|
|
18.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Berk A. Sensoy Fisher College of Business - Ohio State University Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Oct 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
285 (29,095)
|
26
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Researchers increasingly have used the two primary venture capital databases - VentureOne and Venture Economics - to study venture capital (VC) financings. These data are largely self-reported. In this paper, we compare the actual contracts in 143 VC financings to their characterizations in the databases. The databases exclude roughly 15% of the financing rounds. The Venture Economics database oversamples larger rounds and California companies while the financing rounds included in the VentureOne database exhibit no significant bias. The databases provide unbiased, but noisy measures of financing amounts and their valuations. The databases also are less successful in measuring milestone rounds. The VentureOne database oversamples valuations for highly valued firms even controlling for firm characteristics. We discuss the implications of these findings for researchers and practitioners.
venture capital, databases, investments
|
|
|
19.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Antoinette Schoar Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management
|
| Posted: |
|
29 Jun 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Feb 09
|
|
200 (42,641)
|
138
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper investigates the performance of private equity partnerships using a data set of individual fund returns collected by Venture Economics. Over the sample period, average fund returns net of fees approximately equal the S&P 500 although there is a large degree of heterogeneity. Returns persist strongly across funds raised by individual private equity partnerships. Better performing funds are more likely to raise follow-on funds and raise larger funds than funds that perform poorly. This relationship is concave so that top performing funds do not grow proportionally as much as the average fund. Finally, market entry in private equity is cyclical. Funds (and partnerships) started in boom times are less likely to raise follow-on funds, suggesting that these funds subsequently perform worse. Several of these results differ markedly from those for mutual funds.
|
|
|
20.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Bernadette A. Minton Ohio State University - Department of Finance
|
| Posted: |
|
21 Aug 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Nov 06
|
|
116 (70,438)
|
37
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We study CEO turnover - both internal (board driven) and external (through takeover and bankruptcy) - from 1992 to 2005 for a sample of large U.S. companies. Annual CEO turnover is higher than that estimated in previous studies over earlier periods. Turnover is 14.9% from 1992 to 2005, implying an average tenure as CEO of less than seven years. In the more recent period since 1998, total CEO turnover increases to 16.5%, implying an average tenure of just over six years. Internal turnover is significantly related to three components of firm performance - performance relative to industry, industry performance relative to the overall market, and the performance of the overall stock market. Also in the more recent period since 1998, the relation of internal turnover to performance is more strongly related to all three measures of performance in the contemporaneous year. External turnover is not significantly related to any of the measures of stock performance over the entire sample period, nor over the two sub-periods. We discuss the implications of these findings for various issues in corporate governance.
|
|
|
21.
|
|
The Valuation of Cash Flow Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Richard S. Ruback Harvard Business School
|
|
Posted:
|
|
08 Aug 94
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
105 ( 76,184) |
81
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Richard S. Ruback Harvard Business School
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Jun 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Jun 00
|
|
105
|
81
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper compares the market value of highly leveraged transactions (HLTs) to the discounted value of their corresponding cash flow forecasts. These forecasts are provided by management to investors and shareholders in 51 HLTs completed between 1983 and 1989. Our estimates of discounted cash flows are within 10%, on average, of the market values of the completed transactions. Our estimates perform at least as well as valuation methods using comparable companies and transactions. We also invert our analysis and estimate the risk premium implied by transaction values and forecast cash flows, and the relation of the implied risk premium to firm-level betas, industry-level betas, firm size, and firm book-to-market ratios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Richard S. Ruback Harvard Business School
|
| Posted: |
|
18 Aug 95
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper compares the market value of highly leveraged transactions (HLTs) to the discounted value of their corresponding cash flow forecasts. For our sample of 51 HLTs completed between 1983 and 1989, the valuations of discounted cash flow forecasts are within 10%, on average, of the market values of the completed transactions. Our valuations perform at least as well as valuation methods using comparable companies and transactions. We also invertour analysis by estimating the risk premia implied by transaction values and forecast cash flows, and relating those risk premia to firm and industry betas, firm size, and firm book-to-market ratios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Richard S. Ruback Harvard Business School
|
| Posted: |
|
08 Aug 94
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper compares the market value of highly leveraged transactions (HLTs) to the discounted value of their corresponding cash flow forecasts. These forecasts are provided by management to investors and shareholders in 51 HLTs completed between 1983 and 1989. Our estimates of discounted cash flows are within 10%, on average, of the market values of the completed transactions. Our estimates perform at least as well as valuation methods using comparable companies and transactions. We also invert our analysis and estimate the risk premium implied by transaction values and forecast cash flows, and the relation of the implied risk premium to firm-level betas, industry-level betas, firm size, and firm book-to-market ratios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
16 May 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Apr 01
|
|
98 (80,091)
|
275
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this paper, we compare the characteristics of real world financial contracts to their counterparts in financial contracting theory. We do so by conducting a detailed study of actual contracts between venture capitalists (VCs) and entrepreneurs. We consider VCs to be the real world entities who most closely approximate the investors of theory. (1) The distinguishing characteristic of VC financings is that they allow VCs to separately allocate cash flow rights, voting rights, board rights, liquidation rights, and other control rights. We explicitly measure and report the allocation of these rights. (2) While convertible securities are used most frequently, VCs also implement a similar allocation of rights using combinations of multiple classes of common stock and straight preferred stock. (3) Cash flow rights, voting rights, control rights, and future financings are frequently contingent on observable measures of financial and non-financial performance. (4) If the company performs poorly, the VCs obtain full control. As company performance improves, the entrepreneur retains / obtains more control rights. If the company performs very well, the VCs retain their cash flow rights, but relinquish most of their control and liquidation rights. The entrepreneur's cash flow rights also increase with firm performance. (5) It is common for VCs to include non-compete and vesting provisions aimed at mitigating the potential hold-up problem between the entrepreneur and the investor. We interpret our results in relation to existing financial contracting theories. The contracts we observe are most consistent with the theoretical work of Aghion and Bolton (1992) and Dewatripont and Tirole (1994). They also are consistent with screening theories.
|
|
|
23.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
31 Mar 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
31 Mar 01
|
|
83 (89,829)
|
61
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Theoretical work on the principal-agent problem in financial contracting focuses on the conflicts of interest between an agent / entrepreneur with a venture that needs financing, and a principal / investor providing funds for the venture. Theory has identified three primary ways that the investor / principal can mitigate these conflicts - structuring financial contracts, pre-investment screening, and post-investment monitoring and advising. In this paper, we describe recent empirical work and its relation to theory for one prominent class of principals venture capitalists (VCs). The empirical studies indicate that VCs attempt to mitigate principal-agent conflicts in the three ways suggested by theory. The evidence also shows that contracting, screening, and monitoring are closely interrelated. In screening, the VCs identify areas where they can add value through monitoring and support. In contracting, the VCs allocate rights in order to facilitate monitoring and minimize the impact of identified risks. Also, the equity allocated to VCs provides incentives to engage in costly support activities that increase upside values, rather than just minimizing potential losses. There is room for future empirical research to study these activities in greater detail for VCs, for other intermediaries such as banks, and within firms.
|
|
|
24.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Jeremy C. Stein Harvard University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Jul 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Jul 04
|
|
71 (99,126)
|
61
|
|
| |
Abstract:
No abstract is available for this paper.
|
|
|
25.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Luigi Zingales University of Chicago Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Aug 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 08
|
|
71 (99,126)
|
83
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper investigates the sources of the correlation between corporate cash flow and investment by undertaking an in-depth analysis of the 49 low-dividend firms identified by Fazzari, Hubbard, and Petersen (1988) as having an unusually high investment-cash flow sensitivity. We find that in only 15% of firm-years is there some question as to a firm's ability to access internal or external funds to increase investment. Strikingly, those firms that appear less financially constrained exhibit a significantly greater investment- cash flow sensitivity than firms that appear more financially constrained. We find this pattern for the entire sample period, for sub-periods, and for individual years. The results indicate that a higher sensitivity cannot be interpreted as evidence that a firm is more financially constrained. We discuss reasons and provide evidence why the opposite may be true. These findings challenge much of the existing evidence on the effects of financial constraints.
|
|
|
26.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
27 Apr 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Feb 08
|
|
62 (107,100)
|
45
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper compares CEO and top management turnover and its relation to firm performance in the larges companies (by sales) in Japan and the U.S. Japanese top managers are older and have shorter tenures as top managers than their U.S counterparts. Overall, however, turnover-performance relations are economically and statistically similar: turnover is negatively related to stock, sales, and earnings performance in both countries. Turnover in Japan is particularly sensitive to low earnings. Evidence on executive compensation confirms that Japanese executives own less stock and receive lower cash compensation than U.S. executives. Cash compensation-performance relations, nevertheless, are also similar in magnitude to those found in previous work for U.S. executives.
|
|
|
27.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Jan 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Feb 08
|
|
59 (109,850)
|
35
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper documents the organizational status over time of 183 large leveraged buyouts (LBOs) completed between 1979 and 1986. As of August 1990, 63% of the LBOs are private owned, 14% are independent public companies, and 23% are owned by other public companies. As time since the LBO increases, the percentages of LBOs that have returned to public ownership increases. The (unconditional) median time LBOs remain private equals 6.70 years. This evidence suggests that the majority of LBO organizations are neither short-lived not permanent. In addition, the moderate fraction of LBOs assets owned by other (potentially related) companies implies that asset sales play a role in, but are not the primarily force motivating LBO transactions.
|
|
|
28.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Michael S. Weisbach Ohio State University - Department of Finance
|
| Posted: |
|
05 Jul 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Jul 04
|
|
52 (116,738)
|
100
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies a sample of large acquisitions completed between 1971 and 1982. By the end of 1989, acquirers have divested almost 44% of the target companies. Using the accounting gain or loss recognized by the acquirer, press reports, and the sale price, we characterize the ex post success of the divested acquisitions and consider only 34% to 50% of classified divestitures as unsuccessful. Acquirer returns and total (acquirer and target) returns at the acquisition announcement are significantly lower for unsuccessful acquisitions than for the divestitures not classified as unsuccessful and for acquisitions not divested. These results suggest that market reactions to acquisition announcements reflect expectations of future profits and that unprofitable acquisitions are almost four times more likely to be divested than related acquisitions. However, we do not find strong evidence that diversifying acquisitions were less successful than related ones.
|
|
|
29.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Luigi Zingales University of Chicago Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
17 May 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
02 Apr 01
|
|
52 (116,738)
|
124
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Kaplan and Zingales [1997] provide both theoretical arguments and empirical evidence that investment-cash flow sensitivities are not good indicators of financing constraints. Fazzari, Hubbard and Petersen [1999] criticize those findings. In this note, we explain how the Fazzari et al. [1999] criticisms are either very supportive of the claims in Kaplan and Zingales [1997] or incorrect. We conclude with a discussion of unanswered questions.
|
|
|
30.
|
|
How Costly is Financial (not Economic) Distress? Evidence from Highly Leveraged Transactions that Became Distressed
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Gregor M-M. Andrade Harvard Business School Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
|
Posted:
|
|
23 May 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
51 (117,767) |
141
|
|
|
|
|
Gregor M-M. Andrade Harvard Business School Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Sep 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
06 Sep 00
|
|
51
|
141
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies thirty-one highly leveraged transactions (HLTs) of the 1980s that subsequently became financially distressed. At the time of distress, all sample firms have operating margins that are positive and in the majority of cases greater than the median for the industry. Therefore, we consider these firms financially distressed, not economically distressed. The net effect of the HLT and financial distress is a slight increase in value -- from pre-transaction to distress resolution, the sample firms experience a marginally positive change in (market- or industry-adjusted) value. This finding strongly suggests that, overall, the HLTs of the late 1980s succeeded in creating value. We also present quantitative and qualitative estimates of the (direct and indirect)costs of financial distress and their determinants. Our preferred estimates of the costs of financial distress are 10% of firm value. Our most conservative estimates do not exceed 23% of firm value. Operating margins of the distressed firms increase immediately after the HLT, decline when the firms become distressed and while they are distressed, but then rebound after the distress is resolved. Consistent with some costs of financial distress, we find evidence of unexpected cuts in capital expenditures, undesired asset sales, and costly managerial delay in restructuring. To the extent they occur, the costs of financial distress that we identify are heavily concentrated in the period after the firms become distressed, but before they enter Chapter 11.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregor M-M. Andrade Harvard Business School Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
23 May 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies twenty-nine highly leveraged transactions (HLTs) of the 1980s that subsequently become financially distressed. High leverage, not poor firm performance or poor industry performance, is the primary cause of financial distress for these firms -- all of the sample firms have positive operating income at the time of distress. These firms, therefore, are financially distressed, not economically distressed. We estimate the effects of this financial distress on value, the costs of financial distress, and their determinants. From pre-transaction to distress resolution, the sample firms experience a marginally positive change in (market- or industry-adjusted) value. The net effect of the HLT and distress, therefore, is to leave value slightly higher. Operating margins of the distressed firms increase immediately after the HLT, decline when the firms become distressed and while they are distressed, but then rebound after the distress is resolved. Consistent with some costs of financial distress, we find evidence of unexpected cuts in capital expenditures, undesired asset sales, and costly managerial delay in restructuring. Quantitative measures of the magnitude of the costs of financial distress, however, indicate that the costs are modest on average. To the extent they occur, the costs of financial distress that we identify are heavilyconcentrated in the period after the firms become distressed, but before they enter Chapter 11. We conclude the paper with an analysis of the determinants of the costs of financial distress. These costs are related to initial HLT capital, but are not related to the complexity of the firm's capital structure, to the time spent in distress or default, or to industry performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Tobias J. Moskowitz University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Berk A. Sensoy Fisher College of Business - Ohio State University
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Oct 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Nov 09
|
|
45 (124,361)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Working with a sizeable (greater than $15 billion in assets) anonymous money manager, we exogenously shift the supply of lendable shares for certain stocks by randomly making available for lending 2/3 of the stocks in the manager’s portfolio and withholding 1/3 of the stocks from the loan market. The lending program commenced in early September 2008 and the loans were recalled in mid-September 2008, with over $700 million of securities lent out at the peak of the study. During the lending (recall) period, returns to stocks randomly made available for lending were not lower (not greater) than returns to stocks randomly withheld from lending. Stocks randomly made available for lending experienced no differences in volatility, bid-ask spreads, or skewness than stocks randomly withheld from lending during either the lending or recall period. We find some evidence that loan supply increases volatilities and spreads for stocks with high short interest and expected loan spreads.
|
|
|
32.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Berk A. Sensoy Fisher College of Business - Ohio State University Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Oct 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 Oct 05
|
|
45 (124,361)
|
7
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We study how firm characteristics evolve from early business plan to initial public offering to public company for 49 venture capital financed companies. The average time elapsed is almost 6 years. We describe the financial performance, business idea, point(s) of differentiation, non-human capital assets, growth strategy, customers, competitors, alliances, top management, ownership structure, and the board of directors. Our analysis focuses on the nature and stability of those firm attributes. Firm business lines remain remarkably stable from business plan through public company. Within those business lines, non-human capital aspects of the businesses appear more stable than human capital aspects. In the cross-section, firms with more alienable assets have substantially more human capital turnover.
|
|
|
33.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
07 Feb 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 May 02
|
|
42 (127,891)
|
110
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We study the investment analyses of 67 portfolio investments by 11 venture capital (VC) firms. VCs consider the attractiveness and risks of the business, management, and deal terms as well as expected post-investment monitoring. We then consider the relation of the analyses to the contractual terms. Greater internal and external risks are associated with more VC cash flow rights, VC control rights; greater internal risk, also with more contingencies for the entrepreneur; and greater complexity, with less contingent compensation. Finally, expected VC monitoring and support are related to the contracts. We interpret these results in relation to financial contracting theories.
|
|
|
34.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Mark L. Mitchell CNH Partners Karen Hopper Wruck Ohio State University - Fisher College of Business, Department of Finance
|
| Posted: |
|
07 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 Jul 00
|
|
41 (129,082)
|
12
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper presents clinically-based studies of two acquisitions that received very different stock market reactions at announcement one positive and one negative. Despite the differing market reactions, we find that ultimately neither acquisition created value overall. In exploring the reasons for the acquisition outcomes, we rely primarily on interviews with managers and on internally generated performance data. We compare the results of these analyses to those from analyses of post-acquisition operating and stock price performance traditionally applied to large samples. We draw two primary conclusions. (1) Our findings highlight the difficulty of implementing a successful acquisition strategy and of running an effective internal capital market. Post-acquisition difficulties resulted because: (a) managers of the" acquiring company did not deeply understand the target company at the time of the acquisition; (b) the acquirer imposed an inappropriate organizational design on the target as part of the post-acquisition integration process; and (c) inappropriate management incentives existed at both the top management and division levels. (2) Measures of operating performance used in large sample studies are weakly correlated with actual post-acquisition operating performance."
|
|
|
35.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Berk A. Sensoy Fisher College of Business - Ohio State University Per Johan Strömberg Institute for Financial Research (SIFR)
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Oct 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Jan 06
|
|
22 (161,510)
|
7
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We study how firm characteristics evolve from early business plan, to initial public offering, to public company for 49 venture capital financed companies. The average time elapsed is almost six years. We describe the financial performance, business idea, point(s) of differentiation, non-human capital assets, growth strategy, customers, competitors, alliances, top management, ownership structure, and the board of directors. Our analysis focuses on the nature and stability of those firm attributes. Firm business lines remain remarkably stable from business plan through public company. Within those business lines, non-human capital aspects of the businesses appear more stable than human capital aspects. In the cross-section, firms with more alienable assets have substantially more human capital turnover.
Entrepreneurship, theory of the firm, venture capital
|
|
|
36.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
08 Aug 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 Aug 07
|
|
15 (181,535)
|
56
|
|
| |
Abstract:
No abstract is available for this paper.
|
|
|
37.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Aug 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Aug 04
|
|
11 (193,140)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
No abstract is available for this paper.
|
|
|
38.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Bernadette A. Minton University of Chicago - Booth School of Business - Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
27 Dec 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Jan 07
|
|
9 (198,667)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
No abstract is available for this paper.
|
|
|
39.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Berk A. Sensoy Fisher College of Business - Ohio State University
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Mar 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
0 (26,331)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We investigate whether mutual funds time their self-designated benchmark indexes. Using data on fund portfolio holdings, we consider two possible sources of timing attempts: variation in cash holdings and variation in the benchmark beta of the fund portfolio. The results are mixed. Inconsistent with timing, funds do not successfully time the benchmark by varying their cash holdings. If anything, funds are more likely to increase cash or maintain high levels of cash before positive, not negative, benchmark excess returns. At the same time, consistent with timing ability, changes in the benchmark betas of fund portfolios are positively associated with future benchmark excess returns at horizons of 3, 6, and 12 months. The relation is driven by changes in the benchmark beta of the equity portion of fund portfolios rather than changes in portfolio weights on equity.
Mutual Funds, Market Timing, Benchmarks, Cash
|
|
|
40.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
03 May 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This article examines executive turnover--for both management and supervisory boards--and its relation to firm performance in the largest companies in Germany in the 1980s. Turnover of the management board increases significantly with poor stock performance and particularly poor (i.e., negative) earnings, but is unrelated to sales growth and earnings growth. These turnover performance relations do not vary with measures of stock ownership and bank voting power. Supervisory board appointments andturnover also increase with poor stock performance, but are unrelated to other measures of performance.
|
|
|
41.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Oct 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 Oct 99
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies top executive turnover and compensation, and their relation to firm performance in the largest Japanese and U.S. companies. Japanese executive turnover and compensation are related to earnings, stock return, and sales performance measures. The fortunes of Japanese top executives, therefore, are positively correlated with stock performance and with current cash flows (or with factors contributing to such performance). The relations for the Japanese executives are generally economically and statistically similar to those for their U.S. counterparts, particularly for sales growth. There is some evidence, however, that the fortunes of Japanese executives are more sensitive to low income and less sensitive to stock returns than those of U.S. executives.
|
|
|
42.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Bernadette A. Minton Ohio State University - Department of Finance
|
| Posted: |
|
10 Aug 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper investigates the determinants of appointments of outsiders -- directors previously employed by banks (bank directors) or by other nonfinancial firms (corporate directors) -- to the boards of large nonfinancial Japanese corporations. Such appointments increase with poor stock performance; those of bank directors also increase with earnings losses. Turnover of incumbent top executives increases substantially in the year of both types of outside appointments. We perform a similar analysis for outside appointments in large U.S. firms and find different patterns. We conclude that banks and corporate shareholders play an important monitoring and disciplinary role in Japan.
|
|
|
43.
|
|
|
Robert Gertner University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Sep 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper compares board and director characteristics of reverse leveraged buyout (LBO) firms controlled by LBO specialists to those of an industry- and size-matched comparison sample. We consider the boards of the reverse LBOs to be value-maximizing because of the strong incentives the LBO specialists have to structure those boards in a way that maximizes shareholder value. Relative to the comparison firms, we find that the boards of the reverse LBOs are smaller, control larger equity stakes, and meet less frequently. Relative to directors of the comparison firms, directors of the reverse LBOs are younger, have shorter tenures, are less likely to be women, and are at least as likely to serve on other boards.
|
|
|
44.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Luigi Zingales University of Chicago Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Jun 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Jun 98
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper investigates the relationship between financing constraints and investment-cash flow sensitivities by analyzing the firms identified by Fazzari, Hubbard, and Petersen [1988] as having unusually high investment-cash flow sensitivities. We find that firms that appear less financially constrained exhibit significantly greater sensitivities than firms that appear more financially constrained. We find this pattern for the entire sample period, sub-periods, and individual years. These results (and simple theoretical arguments) suggest that higher sensitivities cannot be interpreted as evidence that firms are more financially constrained. These findings call into question the interpretation of most previous research that uses this methodology.
|
|
|
45.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business J. Mark Ramseyer Harvard University - Harvard Law School
|
| Posted: |
|
19 May 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
From time to time, observers argue that important facets of corporate governance are explicable only in path-dependent terms. Some buttress this claim with comparisons between U.S. and Japanese patterns of corporate governance. Using data that Kaplan has discussed in other contexts, we dispute the empirical foundation of this path-dependence claim. In fact, we find that U.S. and Japanese governance patterns are remarkably similar. We suggest that this similarity may imply that competitive product, capital and labor markets largely vitiate historically based idiosyncracies in governance.
|
|
|
46.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Sep 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
06 Mar 06
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This course uses a combination of cases and academic articles to study entrepreneurial finance and, more broadly, private equity finance. The course is motivated by recent large increases in both the supply of and demand for private equity. The primary objective of this course is to provide an understanding of the concepts and institutions involved in entrepreneurial finance and private equity markets. To do this, the course explores private equity from a number of perspectives, beginning with the entrepreneur / issuer, moving to the private equity partnership, and finishing with investors in private equity partnerships. Throughout the course, we focus on managing the large uncertainties, information problems and agency problems inherent in private equity situations. The first case of the course -- Yale University Investments Office -- provides an introduction to the different classes of private equity and to the concerns faced by investors in private equity partnerships. The remainder of the course is divided roughly into three sections: (1) Issuers/users of private equity; (2) The role of the private equity partnership; and (3) Investments in and fundraising by Private Equity Partnerships. In issuers / users of private equity, we study the issues faced by individual entrepreneurs and managers. The cases in this section begin with an evaluation of the qualitative attractiveness of the opportunity -- whether a start-up or buyout -- and then place a quantitative value on the opportunity. Armed with these appraisals, the cases then consider how the entrepreneur or manager should attempt to obtain financing. In intermediaries / private equity partnerships, we continue to study issuers of private equity, but we also focus on the role of the private equity partnership. In particular, we study the role of the private equity partnership in choosing, valuing, structuring, and managing private equity investments. In this section, we will look at particular investments made by venture capitalist partnerships, leveraged buyout partnerships, and distressed firm partnerships. More generally, this section of the course will consider why particular methodologies and structures have evolved in the way they have, as well as possible ways to improve on them. The final section of the course -- investments in private equity partnerships -- studies the issues faced in structuring private equity partnerships and in raising funds for them. In this section, we focus on the incentives faced by private equity partnerships and by investors in those partnerships. We also try to understand why the incentives and contractual terms take the form they do.
|
|
|
47.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Luigi Zingales University of Chicago Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
21 Jul 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper investigates the relationship between financing constraints and investment-cash flow sensitivities by analyzing the firms identified by Fazzari, Hubbard, and Petersen as having unusually high investment-cash flow sensitivities. We find that firms that appear less financially constrained exhibit significantly greater sensitivities than firms that appear more financially constrained. We find this pattern for the entire sample period, subperiods, and individual years. These results (and simple theoretical arguments) suggest that higher sensitivities cannot be interpreted as evidence that firms are more financially constrained. These findings call into question the interpretation of most previous research that uses this methodology.
|
|
|
48.
|
|
|
Robert Gertner University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Jun 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper compares board and director characteristics of reverse leveraged buyout (LBO) firms controlled by LBO specialists to those of an industry- and size-matched comparison sample. We consider the boards of the reverse LBOs to be value-maximizing because of the strong incentives the LBO specialists have to structure those boards in a way that maximizes shareholder value. Relative to the comparison firms, we find that the boards of the reverse LBOs are smaller, control larger equity stakes, and meet less frequently. Relative to directors of the comparison firms, directors of the reverse LBOs are younger, have shorter tenures, are less likely to be women, and are at least as likely to serve on other boards.
|
|
|
49.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Mar 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
SUBJECT AREAS: Valuation; mergers and acquisitions. CASE SETTING: 1994, Entertainment Industry. This case studies the takeover contest for Paramount Communications between Viacom and QVC. The case begins with Viacom's initial bid for Paramount in September 1993 and continues to the end of the contest between Viacom and QVC in February 1994. Paramount 1994 is a challenging case for MBAs. It has three primary roles. First, the case illustrates the issues involved in a takeover bidding war. The case documents the bidding tactics of Viacom and QVC and Paramount's responses. Particulalry interesting are: (a) Viacom s use of a derivative security -- contingent value rights (CVRs); (b) the interrelationships of the stock prices of Paramount, Viacom, and QVC during the bidding war that an equity trader or risk arbitrageur could have analyzed and acted upon. Second, the final outcome of the bidding war provides students with an opportunity to calculate the market s estimate of the synergies in the transaction for each bidder and the amount by which each bidder was willing to overpay. This calculation is particularly interesting when used after Paramount 1993 which requires the students to estimate Paramount's value. Third, and finally, the case provides an ideal vehicle to study the behavior of managers, boards of directors, and courts in the middle of a takeover contest. While Paramount 1994 can be taught on its own, it is besttaught after the companion case, Paramount 1993. (If an instructor plans to use Paramount 1994 without teaching Paramount 1993, the instructor should assign Paramount 1993 as background reading.)
|
|
|
50.
|
|
|
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
|
| Posted: |
|
29 Aug 96
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 08
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
SUBJECT AREAS: Valuation; mergers and acquisitions. CASE SETTING: 1993, Entertainment Industry. This case studies the takeover contest between Viacom and QVC for Paramount Communications. The Paramount 1993 case focuses on the events and situation leading up to the initial bid for Paramount by Viacom in September of 1993. Paramount 1993 has two primary roles. First, I have used Paramount 1993 successfully with MBAs and executives as a comprehensive valuation case. It should be taught after the students have been exposed to different valuation methodologies and, preferably, after they have worked through a simpler valuation case (or cases). With the information provided in the case, the students can perform discounted cash flow (DCF) valuations using the Adjusted Present Value (APV) method and the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) method. The case also exposes students to multiple valuation methods -- trading multiples and transaction multiples -- commonly used by investment bankers to value companies. The case, therefore, can be used to discuss the pluses and minuses of these different methods. Second, the case provides a vehicle to discuss the potential benefits from a strategic acquisition. The case is designed to force the students to understand that there are benefits only if the combined companies will act differently than they would if they remained independent. Given the huge egos involved, the case also provides a good forum for a discussion of managerial motives and private benefits of control.
|
|