• Selected
• Entire List

Abstract:
Elinor Ostrom, the 2009 Nobel Prize winner in economic science, has made significant contributions throughout her career to the disciplines of political economy and public choice. Her most widely recognized contributions relate to the work on common-pool resources. She has discovered a diversity of institutional arrangements that serve in various human societies to promote cooperation and avoid conflict over resource use. Where a strict interpretation of theory would predict over-use and mismanagement, she found collective action arrangements that proved effective in limiting access and establishing accountability. Many of the effective tools of governance she found resided not in the formal structure of government, but instead in the informal, and sometimes even tacit, rules that communities live by.

Abstract:
The authors offer perspective on the world financial crisis. Specifically, they claim it was a perfect storm of policy errors that caused the housing bubble and then perpetuated the recovery period into an over-extended recession.

Financial Crisis, Austrian Business Cycle

Abstract:
Peter L. Berger is one of the most influential social scientists of the 20th century. A citation study of his work published in 1986 that studied the decade between the early 1970s to early 1980s demonstrated that his citation count during this time (1052) put him in the company of other thinkers such as Dewey, Whitehead and Marcuse. His contributions to the sociology of knowledge, sociology of religion, and the sociological/cultural analysis of capitalism are well-known and widely discussed. They are not without controversy however. In fact, it might be safe to say that Peter Berger marched to a beat of a different drum within his chosen field of sociology. Paul Samuelson once remarked that in economic science we compete for the only coin worth achieving, the applause of our peers. Peter Berger saw things differently and pursued a more subversive agenda in the social sciences. The pursuit of truth and the coming to an understanding of the society in which we dwell, as well as that which remains exotic, required a skeptical (and often comical) stance.

Abstract:
The author explores the life of James Buchanan.

Abstract:
With the premature passing of Laurence Moss, the field of history of economic thought has lost one of its great practitioners and mentors. Larry was not only an outstanding scholar in the field in his own right, but in his capacity as an officer in HES and as an editor of the AJES, he was a mentor to my generation of scholars entering the field. Put simply, Larry was a generous man who sought out and encouraged young scholars in economics to think seriously about the history and methodology of the discipline.

Larry Moss, History of Economic Thought

Abstract:
In the Economic Viewpoints section we welcome extended reviews of important works on economics and political economy. Deirdre McCloskey's The Bourgeois Virtues is one of the most ambitious and important works published in classical liberal political economy for at least half a century.

Abstract:
It is a great honor for me to have this opportunity to speak at this great institution of economic education and research, and on this occasion to honor F. A. Hayek – a scholar who I admire greatly as a man of keen intellect and courage. Hayek’s scholarly career spanned from the 1920s to the 1980s, and he had appointments at several universities, but the LSE was the school where he taught at for the longest period, and where his own ideas took shape. I want to thank the staff at LSE for coordinating my visit, Professor Tim Besley for being a gracious and welcoming host, and Mr. Toby Baxendale for his respect for the ideas of the LSE tradition of Cannan, Robbins, Plant, Hayek, Coase and P. T. Bauer, and for his vision of how these ideas can be revitalized and advanced at this great institution of higher learning to both improve our understanding and realize a freer and more economically prosperous state of affairs in Britain and abroad.

I have chosen as my topic “Hayek and Market Socialism,” and I have done so for a variety of reasons:

(1) It is in this debate that Hayek’s research program in philosophy, politics, and economics emerged; (2) Hayek’s main contributions to this controversy were written while he was here at the LSE; (3) The topic is not an example of ‘beating a dead horse’ because the subtlety of Hayek’s argument is not fully appreciated and its relevance to contemporary debates in public policy is not generalized recognized.

In the interest of being completely frank, I should add that I also recently had occasion to revisit this episode in Hayek’s career for a series of professional publication opportunities.

Abstract:
F. A. Hayek's significant intellectual contribution to a number of scholarly disciplines was grounded in his critique of socialist economics. This article sets out how Hayek's critique of classical and market socialism led to the development of his wide-ranging research programme in the social sciences and shows that the implications of this research programme remain crucial to academic research and public policy in the twenty-first century.

Abstract:
The others consider realism in economics.

Abstract:
The author distinguished between mainstream and mainline economics and argues that the latter consistently articulates the virtue choosing liberty over power.

Abstract:
Does the emergence of a stock market require a well-developed legal and/or regulatory system? Although historical work by Neal and Davis [Neal, L., & Davis, L. (2005). The evolution of the rules and regulations of the first emerging markets: The London, New York, and Paris stock exchanges, 1792-1914. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 45, 296-311] and Stringham [Stringham, E. (2003). The extralegal development of securities trading in seventeenth century Amsterdam. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 43, 321-344] suggests that securities markets have successfully developed with little government oversight, numerous authors [including Black, B. (2001). The legal and institutional preconditions for strong securities markets. University of California Law Angeles Law Review, 48, 781-855; Coffee, J. (1999). Privatization and corporate governance: The lessons from securities market failure. Journal of Corporation Law, 25, 1-39; Frye, T. (2000). Brokers and bureaucrats: Building market institutions in Russia. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; Glaeser, E., Johnson, S., & Shleifer, A. (2001). Coase versus the Coasians. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 853-899; Ml coch, L. (2000). Restructuring of property rights: An institutional view. In L. Ml coch et al. (Eds.), Economic and Social Changes in Czech Society After 1989. Prague: The Karolinum Press; Pistor, K. (2001). Law as a determinant for equity market development – the experience of transition economies. In Peter Murrell (Ed.), The Value of Law in Transition Economies (pp. 249-287). Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press; Stiglitz, J. (1999). Whither reform. Ten years of the transition. Keynote Address, Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC, April 28-30, 1999; Zhang, X. (2006). Financial market governance in developing countries: Getting the political underpinnings right. Journal of Developing Societies, 2, 169-196] argue that the Czech Republic and other Eastern European governments need more regulation for their newly created stock markets. They maintain that the Warsaw Stock Exchange, which is seen as more regulated, has outperformed the Prague Stock Exchange which is seen as largely unregulated. Thus increased regulations are a key to increased performance. This article, however, maintains that the evidence from the Czech experience has been misinterpreted. This article provides an in depth case study of the Czech stock market and finds that (a) Czech capital markets have been hindered by government intervention from their beginning, (b) that the evidence on Poland’s superior performance is not as strong as suggested, and (c) that Czech regulators seem to be unqualified, lack the proper incentives, and are unlikely to benefit the market. Under these circumstances it appears that Neal and Davis (2005:311) are correct that increased government involvement is unlikely to improve the situation.

Abstract:
Chapter 9 from Defense Spending and Economic Growth.

Abstract:
Although Adam Smith’s 1776 Wealth of Nations is often cited as marking the birth of economics, it was really not until after the second world war that economics became the distinctive, more or less unified, and largely separate discipline summarised in the textbooks of today. Even a mere fifty years ago, it was possible for the intelligent reader to move with relative ease between economics on the one hand and political economy, sociology and social theory, psychology and philosophy on the other. This is now no longer the case, and most young economists are taught to think of their discipline, not primarily in terms of the particular economic social phenomena it was once taken to be about, but as a sophisticated and largely self-contained analytical approach to the investigation of social phenomena of any kind. Even so, economics has never been able to separate itself entirely from its sister disciplines, even at the high tide of mathematical economics and positivism during the 1970s and 1980s, and many of the most active new areas in economics currently involve some form of boundary crossing (e.g. experimental economics, neuroeconomics and computational economics to name just three). With respect to the philosophy of economics in particular, the last fifty years or so have seen a steady expansion in scholarly investigation into different connections between economics and philosophy, with the emergence of new journals, professional associations, research networks and the like. There has been a great deal of work on epistemological questions in the wake of the decline of positivism, on boundary issues and the question of whether or not economics constitutes a science, and on the rhetoric of economics, ethics, value and, latterly, the ontology of economics (Hands, 2001). It is against this background that, in 2004, three of us published the Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy (Davis, Marciano and Runde, 2004, henceforth the Companion), an edited collection aimed at documenting the current state of play in three important areas of the philosophy of economics:

(1) Political economy as political philosophy; (2) The methodology and epistemology of economics; and (3) Social ontology and the ontology of economics.

Abstract:
The puzzle that is Africa has captured the imagination of scholars, intellectuals and policy-makers. Jeff Sachs, Bono and Bill Gates have become identified in the public mind with the project to end poverty and disease in Africa. There should be no doubt that the puzzle is real and the situation is tragic. Why has Africa lingered behind the developed world? How can so many suffer from extreme poverty (living on less than $2 a day) and from disease (malaria, TB and HIV)? Far too many Africans face a life of famine, disease, political corruption and war. Africa has more poor countries and more oppressive regimes in power than any other region of the world.address the puzzle of Africa are a modern version of large-scale planning.

Abstract:
The socialist experiment proved to be a failure. It proved not only an isolated failure, but also a global one - every political and economic system influenced by socialism suffered from a severe crisis in the last decades of the 20th century. The soft socialism of the democratic welfare states suffered from fiscal crises in the 1970s and 1980s and led to dramatic policy transformations in the UK (Thatcher), and US (Reagan). Other highly regulated and egalitarian societies followed the Thatcher/Reagan path in the 1980s and 1990s - New Zealand, Ireland, and even the Scandinavian welfare states had to adjust their fiscal houses. Of course, perhaps the most dramatic political-economic event of the 20th century was the collapse of real-existing socialist states throughout East and Central Europe in 1989 and the dissolution of the former Soviet Union in 1991 (the only other contender for most dramatic event this century is the Great Depression of the 1930s). A century that began with increasing demands for the regulation of business and economic planning by government to achieve more efficient production and a more egalitarian distribution of income, ended with a worldwide privatization revolution and a generalized recognition of the innovative benefits that accrue from entrepreneurship. The intellectual demand for state control of economic life was replaced by a ‘gains from trade’ understanding of how the world works. Public choice theory played no small role in this dramatic shift in the intellectual climate of opinion. More pertinent for our purposes here, public choice theory provided the intellectual apparatus needed to pierce the Romantic veil of socialist ideology and lay bear the ugly reality of the political economy of socialism.

Abstract:
Legal scholars and economists alike have been quite critical of F. A. Hayek’s legal theory. According to Richard Posner, Hayek’s legal theory is “formalist” and serves as a useless guide for legal scholars and judges. Alan Ebenstein claims that Hayek’s arguments in technical economics fail. Therefore, Hayek’s research program in economic science should be abandoned, but his program in social philosophy should be preserved. We argue that these criticisms are misplaced, and we contend that Hayek’s legal theory cannot be separated from his economic theory. To establish this point, we trace the evolution of Hayek’s thought from his earlier writings in technical economics to his later writings on legal theory. Both Posner and Ebenstein fail to appreciate the subtlety of Hayek’s legal theory because they understand Hayek’s work in law in isolation from his work in economics.

Abstract:
The author discusses recent work in the anarchy literature and suggests avenues for progress in this area.

Abstract:
I have been teaching college-level economics since the mid-1980s at various colleges and universities, to a wide variety of students, and within different classroom settings. As a graduate student, I taught a graduate-level course to elementary school teachers on how to introduce economics to young kids; as a new assistant professor, I taught large sections of introductory economics; at three different universities, I have taught in the Honors College to the best and the brightest, and I have taught the one-semester course on economics for non-majors. In teaching undergraduate economics in these alternative settings, I have had to adjust my teaching style in the attempt to communicate with my students to maximize the chance that they will learn the material in an effective and enjoyable manner. In this effort, I have tried different lecture styles, shown movies, watched documentaries, used newspapers and magazines, and conducted classroom experiments.

One constant in all of this experimentation in teaching economics is that the best textbook for introducing economics to the uninitiated that I have found is Paul Heyne’s book The Economic Way of Thinking. Another constant that I have continued to come back to was the use of novels as a teaching tool in economics, and from the beginning I have used Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged (1957) as one of the primary novels. I often like to assign The Grapes of Wrath (1939) by John Steinbeck and Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand and ask the students to write a term paper on which novel is more informed on economics and why that matters for the relevance of the narrative constructed in the books.

Abstract:
John Searle has argued against the viability f strong versions of artificial intelligence. His most well-known counter-example is the Chinese Room thought experiment where he stressed that syntax is not semantics. We reason by analogy to highlight previously unnoticed similarities between Searle and F.A. Hayek's critique of socialist planning. We extend their insights to explain the failure of many reforms in Eastern Europe in the 1990s.

Abstract:
The author considers how History of Economic thought has been beneficial and, at other times, stifling to the development of Austrian economics.

Abstract:
The Austrian School of Economics since WWII has increasingly claimed a unique position within the scientific community of economists. This paper argues that the most persuasive way to make this claim to uniqueness is to focus on the distinction scholars in the Austrian tradition place between information and knowledge in their work. In other words, it is the epistemic-cognitive turn that the Austrian school took in the wake of the socialist calculation debate that separates the school from other branches of neo-classicism within economic science that constitutes its best case for analytical uniqueness.

Abstract:
It has become a copybook maxim to assert that the policy of "War Communism" was imposed on the Bolsheviks by the Civil War and the foreign intervention. This is completely untrue, if only for the reason that the first decrees on introducing the "socialist ideal" exactly "according to Marx" in Soviet Russia were issued long before the beginning of the Civil War (the decrees of Jan. 26 and Feb. 14, 1918, on the nationalization of the merchant fleet and of all banks), while the last decree on the socialization of all small handicraftsmen and artisans was issued on Nov. 29, 1920, i.e., after the end of the Civil War in European Russia. Of course, the conditions of the Civil Wan and the intervention left an imprint. But the main thing was something else--the immediate implementation of theory in strict accordance with Marx (from "Critique of the Gotha Program") and Engles (from "Anti-During"). Siotkin-1989.

In the failure of War Comunism [sic] and the retreat to NEP the impossibility of the planning as articulated theoretically in the Mises-Hayek critique was directly demonstrated in practice. Don Lavoie-1986-87.

Abstract:
The author introduces the works in this issue of the RAE.

Abstract:
The authors explore the intellectual life of Frank Knight.

Abstract:
This paper is an exercise in the archeology of knowledge that seeks to understand the intellectual precursors to the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. This perspective reveals that the research agenda of the Ostroms draws significantly from the ideas and themes developed in the first half of the 20th century by Knight, Mises, and Hayek. In so doing, we argue, they usefully deploy and expand the economic way of thinking beyond its traditional boundaries while avoiding most of the criticisms of economic imperialism.

Abstract:
The author explores the microfoundations of Gordon Tullock's contributions to political economy and argue that his approach is consistent with the "invisible hand" theorizing of Adam Smith. While Smith (and Hayek) are celebrated for their emphasis on the "bright-side" of spontaneous social cooperation, Tullock emphasized the "dark-side" of social processes when the incentives are perverse and information is distorted. By explicating the microfoundations of Tullock's rendering of Smithian political economy this paper will set the stage for reassessment of Tullock as a spontaneous order theorist.

Abstract:
The author discusses the Spontaneous Order and Cultural Evolution theories of F.A. Hayek.

Abstract:
The author comments on Elias Khalil's (2002) attempt to close Hayek's system.

Abstract:
The authors consider Public Choice from an Austrian perspective.

Abstract:
The author considers monetary regimes in post-Soviet countries.

Abstract:
The author analyzes monetary regime change in the former Soviet Union.

Abstract:
The author considers social cooperation as a standard for morality.

Abstract:
The author argues that economic calculation is the most important contribution of the Austrian school.

Abstract:
Following the October Revolution of 1917 the Bolsheviks embarked upon a series of initiatives in order to bring about a socialist economic order. Traditional accounts of these events - "War Communism" and the New Economic Policy - are deficient in two respects. First, they do not consider the policy implications of early twentieth century Marxism. Second, they do not appreciate the economic coordination problems such policies would, and did, encounter. As a result, the standard account of early Soviet socialism is distorted. This paper attempts to rectify these deficiencies by discussing the Bolsheviks' own assessments of their purposes and exploring the consequences of their policies in the period 1918-1921.

Abstract:
The author reflects on the life of Don Lavoie.

Abstract:
An important question for any researcher who wishes to revisit the socialist calculation debate is: Why beat a dead horse? With the collapse of the communism in 1991, other than for historical purposes, there seems to be little value in rehashing the debate over socialism’s feasibility. Nevertheless, we believe that there are at least two very good reasons to consider this debate again.

The first reason has to do with the fact that socialism is an intellectually and emotionally powerful idea. This is particularly so as it is articulated by Karl Marx. Socialism is thus worthy of our most serious intellectual effort in analyzing its claims. The classical political economy thought experiment that highlighted self-regulation and harmony of interests was called into direct challenge by Marx who argued that the natural workings of the market economy lead to a clash of interests among classes and to market failure in the cases of monopoly and crises.

In the wake of the collapse of real-existing socialism many intellectuals continue to find comfort in socialism’s promise of a better world, even if the particulars of how to achieve that better world are a subject of dispute and puzzlement. It is often contended that the events of 1989-1991 were the outcome of frail humanity that failed to live up to the demands of socialism. It is our contention that by revisiting the debate concerning socialism it becomes apparent that the opposite is actually true. Humanity did not fall short of the ideals of socialism; socialism fell short of the demands of humanity.

The second reason for reconsidering the socialist calculation debate is of a more parochial concern, but equally important nonetheless. This debate taught the Austrian economists how their understanding of the market system differed from the understanding of their neoclassical colleagues. In this regard, the debate was critical to the development of a unique Austrian paradigm represented in the work of thinkers like Ludwig von Mises and F.A. Hayek (see Lavoie 1985 and Kirzner 1988).

Abstract:
The basic thesis in The Road to Serfdom is that the lure of socialist ideology has the unintended and undesirable consequence of economic depravation and political tyranny when countries follow its policy agenda. Socialist planning requires economic planners to assume a level of responsibility for economic life in a country which is both cumbersome to the point of impossible, and powerful beyond any reasonable limit that could be safely trusted to any one individual or group of individuals. The papers in this symposium provide a critical reading of the Hayek’s thesis on socialism. While many strong points are made in the discussion, the critical reading of Hayek offered must ultimately be judged unsatisfactory. The issues of choice and consequences are not addressed, and as a result the basic argument presented in The Road to Serfdom is never adequately engaged.

Abstract:
The author considers political economy as a value-relevant discipline.

Abstract:
The authors review The Economics of the Colour Bar by William H. Hutt.

South Africa, Apartheid, Hutt

Abstract:
The author illustrates the impossibility of the socialism in the real world.

Abstract:
The authors use the revival of the Austrian tradition to contrast market process theory with end-state, or equilibrium, analysis.

Market Process, Austrian Economics

Abstract:
The author argues that the Austrian school has consistently applied an evolutionary perspective in their analysis.

Abstract:
This paper examines the exchange in the mid-1970s between James Buchanan and Warren Samuels on the role of the status quo in political and economic reform.

Abstract:
Hayek is known primarily as an economic theorist and classical liberal political economist. A few scholars have delved deeply into the connection between Hayek's analytical contributions to economics and his visionary political economy of liberalism, but most prefer to divide Hayek's career into two distinct stages: an early stage as an economist primarily concerned with monetary theory and business fluctuations, and a later stage as a social theorist concerned with the critique of socialism and the advocacy of classical liberalism. It is not my purpose to counter this argument in this chapter with an argument for unity in the corpus of Hayek's work. Instead, what I want to emphasize is not so much his analytical unity (which I do believe is largely present), but an attitudinal unity with regard to the way one makes an argument in politics, philosophy, and economics. Throughout his career, Hayek possessed a profound respect for the intellectual history of the various disciplines within which he chose to write. He read far into the past of the discipline in order to place contemporary disputes in context and to borrow from older ideas in order to make innovative contribution. For Hayek, saying something old often represented saying something extremely fresh and new. Hayek was part of a generation of economists who believed that knowledge of history of the discipline was not simply an antiquarian interest, but a vital component of the education and training of any economist.

Abstract:
The author considers the contributions of Warren Samuels to political economy.

Abstract:
This paper explores the relationship of Max Weber's "social economics" to the work of the Austrian School of Economics, and in particular the writings of Ludwig von Mises and F. A. Hayek. We argue that the Austrian school scholars complement and extend the work of Weber. The sophisticated form of methodological individualism found in Weber, Mises and Hayek overcomes the shortcomings of traditional economic and sociological analysis and could provide the analytical structure for a post-classical political economy.

Abstract:
Does the production of scientific knowledge differ in certain important respects from the kinds of activity economics typicaly studies? If it does, the kinds of coordinating mechanisms at work in science that would allow us to see such activities as a Hayekian "order" might well differ from the order we more readily associate with catallactic activity, defined here to refer to "market phenomena". As Professor Kirzner and Mises before him have so adeptly shown, entrepreneurial activity is central to understanding how markets work. We advance the claim that because "scientific activity," or at least salient aspects of it, differs from catallactic activity, the coordinating mechanisms found in science do not necessarily involve catallactic entrepreneurship. As such, more than Kirznerian entrepreneurship must be used to describe the coordinating mechanisms in science. While this suggests, as Kirzner has noted, caution in applying insights gained from economic theory to non-market domains, we also note that actual ongoing changes in institutional arrangements and structures are likely to make scientific activity increasingly more market-like, therefore permitting a fuller catallactic treatment of science than the currently dominant institutional forms allow. Scientific activity may be largely non-market activity, but it does not have to be.

Abstract:
This paper examines the impact of the rule of law on human capabilities. Amartya Sen has argued and provided evidence that improvements in economic development do not necessarily lead to human capabilities. Human capabilities are defined as non-monetary factors that improve well-being such as life expectancy, infant mortality, malnutrition, environmental factors, and education. We estimate the impact of the rule of law on human capabilities by using an instrumental variables approach. We instrument the level of development with an index for the rule of law. There is little theoretical reason to expect the rule of law to directly impact human capabilities. We then use the predicted values of development to determine if the economic development is positively correlated with human capabilities. We find that there is a positive relationship between and most measures of human capabilities. We find no such relationship when examining environmental factors that is likely the result of the small number of observations.

Abstract:
The authors explore the intellectual life of F.A. Hayek.

Abstract:
The authors summarize the Austrian School of Economics.

Abstract:
This article provides a critical analysis of Frye (2000) and existing theories of self-governance. Following up on the recent studies by Stringham (2003, 2003), we focus our attention on the emergence of financial markets for several reasons. The common perception is that complicated financial instruments require state sanction to emerge. It is widely argued that in the absence of state regulation of financial markets, cheating will be common. We maintain, in contrast, that the evidence does not support this pessimistic view. In fact, markets are capable of endogenously generating the rules that govern their operation and these rules discipline cheating severely. Finally, if we can persuasively make the case that self-governance in financial markets is effective - with the complicated nature of transactions that take place - then the argument for self-governance in economic life, we contend, is much stronger than even classical liberalism has led us to believe.

Abstract:
The authors consider entrepreneurial solutions to adverse selection.

Abstract:
The author offers a case study of the Soviet Union.

Abstract:
The author discusses the proliferation of ideas throughout society and discusses the implications of this mechanism for social change.

Abstract:
The author provides a definition for entrepreneurship and discusses two competing views.

Abstract:
They authors analyze the Soviet Union from a Public Choice perspective.

Abstract:
The author considers the fundamental determinants of economic growth with respect to the Soviet Union.

Abstract:
The author argues that alternative institutional contexts affect economic growth.

Abstract:
The author articulates Public Choice arguments contained with The Road to Serfdom.

Abstract:
F.A. Hayek's realistic economic theory has been replaced by the formalistic use of equilibrium models that bear little resemblance to reality. These models are as serviceable to the right as to the left: they allow the economist either to condemn capitalism for failing to measure up to the model of perfect competition, or to praise capitalism as a utopia of perfect knowledge and rational expectations. Hayek, by contrast, used equilibrium to show that while capitalism is not perfect, it contains error-correcting institutions that bring it closer to perfection than i intuitively apparent.

Abstract:
The authors use a Public Choice framework to analyze the Soviet Union.

Abstract:
The author replies to Ricardo F. Crespo.

Abstract:
The author explores rational choice with the assumption that the choosers are human.

Abstract:
The author considers possible policy paths in post-Soviet Russia.

Abstract:
Book reviewers know that it is a challenge to review a collection of 12 separately-authored essays. Here, we have been asked to read and comment briefly on the character of the 62 dense, technical articles in the six 2002 issues of the Journal of Development Economics (vols. 67, 68, and 69). Started in 1974, the journal is published by Elsevier and is conventionally regarded as one of the top field journals in development economics.

There is no way to discuss more than a few in any detail. We have read the entire set, but we have not attempted to really master the material. We approached the material with critical priors that, to our mind, were essentially confirmed, but we try not to let our treatment become cavalier or dismissive. Unfortunately, it is perhaps inevitable that a brief and unfavorable gloss on the character of a set of 62 articles will come off as cavalier.

Abstract:
Nonprofit organizations have traditionally been considered a meaningful substitute for the services provided by the bureaucratic welfare state (Berger, Neuhaus, and Novak, 1996), a vibrant but largely overlooked “independent sector” characterized by a spontaneous ordering of associations that are founded neither on the state’s compulsory power nor the search for private monetary profit (Cournelle, 1965). Lester Salamon’s body of work - which is extensive - suggests otherwise.1 Salamon argues that the U.S. has a long, established history of efficient institutional linkages between the nonprofit sector, which he calls the “voluntary sector,” and the state. Rather than a substitute, Salamon sees nonprofits in an effective “partnership” with the state, a viable form of “third party” governance. He argues that the independent sector is in fact not so independent. On its own it is prone to failure.

Abstract:
In 1989, most economists thought the problem of transition was one of allowing prices to float to market clearing levels. After all one of the most observable problems throughout the former socialist economies was the existence of pervasive shortages. Indeed prices did need to be freed up. But we learned in the process that free pricing required a network of institutional reforms to define and enforce private property rights and secure the freedom of contract. By the mid-1990s economic attention had moved away from the macroeconomic stabilization, privatization and price liberalization agenda to a broader notion of institutional reform. Since that time, political economists have also learned that discussion of institutional reform is incomplete unless we can talk meaningfully about cultural attitudes and beliefs. There is no doubt that perhaps the most important advice an economist (of any stripe) can provide to a reforming government is to stress how much incentives matter. But we do not adequately understand incentive mechanisms unless we also understand how individuals within a specific context attribute social meaning to the incentives they face. Thus, we economists are faced with a dilemma at the beginning of the 21st century that was widely recognized in the 19th century - to do good economics one must study the interaction of the economy, polity, and society and that nothing is as dangerous as an economists who attempts to pro-offer advice based on a study of the economy isolated from all other factors.

Abstract:
This special issue of the Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, “Polycentric Political Economy: A Festschrift for Elinor and Vincent Ostrom,” began as a conference at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University that was organized in conjunction with an award ceremony celebrating a lifetime of scholarship and teaching by Elinor and Vincent Ostrom. Former students, colleagues, and admirers gathered at George Mason University to honor the Ostroms’ work as scholars, teachers, and mentors. The award was the first in a series of initiatives begun by the Fund for the Study of Spontaneous Order. The Fund is the brain-child of Richard Cornuelle, the author of Reclaiming the American Dream (1965), The De-Managing of America (1975) and Healing America (1983). Cornuelle was Ludwig von Mises’s research assistant at New York University in the mid- to late-1940s. Cornuelle learned from Mises the idea that the economic way of thinking (praxeology) could be applied to areas outside of the domain of the market economy to understand the societal forces at work that either lead to, or hinder, peaceful social cooperation. After leaving New York University, Cornuelle worked in various jobs, including as a Program Officer at the Volker Fund, which in the 1950s and early 1960s was instrumental in helping establish the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Study of Political Economy at the University of Virginia, the Journal of Law and Economics at the University of Chicago School of Law, and a lecture series for students that helped produce such books as Bruno Leoni’s Freedom and the Law and Milton Friedman’s Capitalism and Freedom.

Abstract:
There is little contention that entrepreneurship is the driver of economic growth (Leff, 1979; Kasper and Streit, 1998; Kirzner, 1985; Boettke and Coyne, 2003).* Globalization - specifi cally, ever-expanding technologies and avenues into economic markets throughout the world - characterize today’s economic environment in which the entrepreneur must act. This ever-growing interdependence is illustrated by the relationship between the United States (USA) and the European Union (EU).

Abstract:
The authors consider the economist's role in society.

Abstract:
The debate over immigration has been a central part of America’s political, social, and economic history. Concerns over the impact of immigration on American identity can be traced back to the Founding Fathers. Thomas Jefferson worried that immigrants from monarchies would fail to support a republican system of government. George Washington was concerned that immigrants would engage in activities that would challenge a federal government. Benjamin Franklin, questioning the costs imposed by immigration from Germany, called the German immigrants “the most stupid of their own nation,” and raised concerns that “through their indiscretion, or ours, or both, great disorders may one day arise among us.” Franklin, however, also realized the benefits of immigration when he noted that German immigrants were, “excellent husbandmen, and contribute greatly to the improvement of a country.” At the heart of Franklin’s concern was the fear that open immigration would erode the unique identity that made America what it was.

Over two hundred and fifty years later, Franklin’s concern remains a central issue in American society. When one considers the magnitude of immigration in the United States, it becomes clear why the issue is so controversial. There are more immigrants living in the U.S. today – 31 million – than ever before. Approximately 1.2 million immigrants arrive in the United States each year. One out of every nine U.S. citizens is an immigrant. About half of the workers entering the U.S. labor force in the 1990s were born in foreign countries.

Abstract:
The issue of economic development has been at the center of economics from its beginnings. Adam Smith, writing in 1776, attempted to determine the factors that led to the wealth of nations. He concluded that low taxes, peace and a workable system of justice would lead to economic growth (Smith 1776, p. 43). Robert Lucas, discussing the economic development of India more than two centuries later wrote: “The consequences for human welfare involved in questions like these are simply staggering: Once one starts to think about them, it is hard to think about anything else” (Lucas 1988, p. 5). Clearly, economic development is still a central issue in modern economics. However, the economic development establishment has changed greatly since the time of Smith.

As this field has evolved, one critical question has been overlooked: where is the economist in all this? In other words, what role is the economist to play in understanding and contributing to economic development? This question is rarely, if ever, considered.

Abstract:
The authors reply to Hoffenberg's criticisms.

Reply

Abstract:
Economists have historically believed that some goods and services can be provided only by the government. The traditional theory, Boettke and Ellig suggest, does not mean that we know for certain which specific goods those are in the real world. They propose allowing the market to decide what private enterprise can or cannot do by allowing private firms to compete with the government in the production of public goods, including the monetary system. As the scope of government activity shrinks, so, of course, will deficits.

Public Goods

Abstract:
This paper argues that the approach to economics that is characteristic of Austrian economists emerged out of the interaction of continental thought and classical economics. This approach begins with reflection upon the purposive action of living men, and views the market as an ongoing process of learning and discovery. The paper concludes that Austrian economists, as a result of this process perspective, possess a greater appreciation for, and are able to explain the complex phenomena of social interactions better than the standard Neo-classical economics.

Abstract:
The author responds to Farrell's "Information and the Coase Theorem."

Abstract:
The author replies to criticisms.

Abstract:
The author discusses the political and economic challenges of Perestroika.

Abstract:
This book is a revised version of the author's doctoral dissertation.

Abstract:
The author reviews Geoffrey Hodgson's "Economics and Institutions."

Abstract:
The Russian economic system has been a state of continual turmoil and reform for over a century, making it difficult for business to develop as the political, legal, and economic foundation continually shifts. The beginning of the 20th century saw Russia struggling to change its economic system from feudalism to mercantilism under the Czars. World War I ended with Russia in the midst of transforming its economic and political system into the world's first full-fledged communist system. The first months after the October REvolution were characterized by decree after decree detailing the aspirations of the Bolshevik leaders to usher in a new communist order. These decrees ranged from abolition of the exploitation of men and women to the nationalization of all industry. The period of communist optimism quickly gave way to the reality of perverse incentives and the inability of actors to engage in rational economic calculation.

Abstract:
Don Lavoie was my professor and friend. From the day I entered graduate school until the day I left, Don worked extremely closely with me. I came to GMU to specifically study with Don and my experience exceeded all my expectations. After Roy Cordato and Karen Palasek advanced in their studies, I was asked to work with Don on the Center for the Study of Market Processes publication, Market Process, as the managing editor. At the time, Market Process, was the only regular publication devoted exclusively to Austrian economics—it was a dream come true for me to work with Don on this publication.

Abstract:
The authors consider Knight's critique of Austrian capital theory and the problem of socialism.

Abstract:
The aim of this paper is to elaborate on the Austrian school’s methodological orientation, which they named “subjectivism,” in a way that shows its affinity with the main thrust of John Dewey’s notion of the logic of inquiry. It is trying to make two distinct but related points. First, it is trying to clarify what “subjectivism,” the central methodological principle of Austrian economics, really means, or at least what we think it should mean. It can be understood as a challenge to the “objectivistic” attitude of mainstream economics, the attitude that the Austrians argue is what is keeping economics too disconnected with the everyday world. Second, the paper is trying to show that the confusions that have arisen around the Austrians’ own method might be cleared up if we were to draw from Dewey’s work.

Abstract:
Market process theory has its origins in the attempt to gain a richer understanding of how the invisible hand operates in coordinating the vast array of economic exchanges that occur on a daily basis. This is in stark contrast to general equilibrium theory, which seeks a price vector that allows all markets to simultaneously clear. As Ludwig von Mises (1978: 36) wrote: ‘What distinguishes the Austrian School and will lend it immortal fame is precisely the fact that it created a theory of economic action and not of economic equilibrium.’ General equilibrium theory explains the achievement of the desired efficiency in terms of strict behavioral assumptions placed upon economic participants. In contrast, the former methodology focuses on the institutional structure that creates a unique incentive-based framework that in turn influences the behavior of actors. This behavior includes the dissemination of information which then directly influences the decisions and actions of agents in coordinating their activities and hence in improving the overall efficiency of the economic system. The Austrian School was certainly not the only one to focus attention on the market process rather than the equilibrium state. The Swedish school of economics made significant contributions to the development of a theory of the economic process as well. The Swedish and Austrian Schools, while surely not the only contributors to market process theory, have made distinct contributions to the development of this methodology. These contributions have established market process theory as a distinct and robust explanation of economic activity.

Abstract:
This paper documents and articulates Murray N. Rothbard’s contribution to our understanding of the theory and practice of socialism. We summarize his theoretical contributions and then turn to his explanation of the operation of socialism in the Soviet Union. Moreover, we make and support the conjecture that Rothbard, writing in the 1950s and 60s, anticipated allthe major subsequent developments in the economic analysis regarding the problems of the Soviet economy and allthe major works in comparative political economy for real-existing socialism in the Soviet Union.

Abstract:
The author considers interpretive reasoning in the study of social life.

Abstract:
The author considers the policies implemented by the Reagan regulatory regime to the rhetoric offered.

Abstract:
The author argues that the decay of liberal capitalism is the consequence of social rules that leave unconstrained the unwarranted intrusion of government into our economic affairs and reward leaders who can succeed in this process of power politics.

Abstract:
The author recommends constitutional remedies for Soviet Russia.

Abstract:
The author provides a Hayekian definition of competition.

Abstract:
The author explores the complexity of "vision" and "analysis" with respect to economic discourse.

Abstract:
The author explores the life of Ludwig Lachman.

Abstract:
The authors consider the contributions of Boulding to subjectivist economic thought.

Abstract:
The author considers ideology and science with respect to the Austrian school.

Abstract:
The author considers regime change in Soviet Russia.

Abstract:
Chapter 6 of Economic Transition in Eastern Europe and Russia: Realities of Reform.

Abstract:
Economic formalism crowds out the analysis of change and adjustments to change under capitalism. They style of analytical narrative that was practiced by the first generation of neoclassical economists, in contrast, is more productive of genuine economic understanding. Despite Daniel Hausman's challenging argument to the contrary, I maintain that Joseph Stiglitz's work is formalist at its core. While I agree with Robert Heilbroner's critique of contemporary economics, there is a limited sense in which nonformalist economics can rely on universalistic assumptions. And Thomas Mayer has provided useful guidelines for focusing nonformalist analysis on real-world economic problems.

Abstract:
Chapter 10 of "Coasean Economics: Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics."

Abstract:
The author articulates a research agenda for the modern Austrian school.

Abstract:
The author explores the life of Ludwig von Mises.

Abstract:
The authors comment on Ludwig Lachman.

Abstract:
The author discusses the transition to a market economy in post-Soviet Russia.

Abstract:
The author discusses the political economy of post-Soviet Russia.

Abstract:
The common perception is that complicated financial instruments require state sanction to emerge. It is argued that in the absence of state regulation of financial markets, cheating will be common. We argue that the evidence does not support this pessimistic view. In fact, markets are capable of generating endogenously the rules that govern their operation and these rules discipline cheating severely. Finally, if we can persuasively argue that self-governance in financial markets is effective - with the complicated nature of transactions that take place - then the argument for self-governance in economic life, we contend, is much stronger than even economic liberalism has led us to believe. As a foil for this study we will critically examine the work of Timothy Frye (2000) on the financial exchanges in the Russian transition economy. Frye’s work represents a significant step forward in the literature on financial markets in transition economies. Many studies prior to Frye insisted that institutions of corporate governance needed to exist prior to the introduction of privatization and that the rules which defined these institutions of corporate governance were the appropriate domain of the state (Frydman and Rapaczynski, 1994). Without an activist state establishing the framework, and regulating the practices, corporate governance will be ineffective and the market economy will be littered with opportunism and inefficient organizations. Frye does much to dispel this argument. But, despite Frye’s advances over the previous literature, we will argue that his introduction of political actors into the discussion of the mechanics of self-governance ultimately confuses the issue.

Abstract:
This paper suggests that contemporary economics is characterized by three key features. First, it is focused on 'big questions' in political economy and is willing to look outside economics to search for these questions and their answers. Second, contemporary economics is empirically focused. 'Grand theory' has taken a back seat to empirical explorations of institutions in particular. Third, modern economics has been dramatically influenced by 'freakonomics' - the application of economic principles to unusual and unorthodox topics - and is increasingly directed at a popular lay audience. We argue that these particular areas of modern economics’ evolution are not unrelated. The development of each key feature is connected to the others.

Abstract:
The discipline of political economy was born from the intellectual exercise of comparative analysis to understand the “wealth of nations.” Understanding the historical patterns in the rise and decline of prosperity remains a central issue in modern political economy. This paper explores “comparative historical political economy,” which traces the causal mechanisms that explain differences in wealth and well being. The central argument is that political economy is comparative and historical, and that comparative historical analysis is how the discipline generates useful knowledge.

Abstract:
In this paper, we examine the resiliency of community recovery after a natural disaster. We argue that a resilient recovery requires robust economic/financial institutions, political/legal institutions, and social/cultural institutions. We explore how politically and privately created disaster preconditions and responses have contributed to or undermined institutional robustness in the context of the Gulf Coast's recovery after Hurricane Katrina. We find that where post disaster resiliency has been observed, private-sector responses contributing to the health of these institutional arenas are largely responsible. Where post disaster fragility and slowness has been observed, public-sector responses contributing to the frailty of these institutional arenas are largely the cause. In other words, we engage in a comparative institutional analysis of civil society, entrepreneurial commercial society, and government agencies and political actors in the wake of a natural disaster.

Abstract:
Property rights are a key aspect of the rules governing economic interactions, providing individuals with dependable information and incentives. Well-defined and stable property rights encourage the effective use of existing scarce resources and also provide the incentive to innovate. In this context, we explore the impact of government takings on entrepreneurship and the market process. By changing the rules of the game, takings distorts the market process by shifting the opportunities and incentives facing entrepreneurs. The use of takings also introduces "regime uncertainty" whereby the predictability of the rules of the game is weakened. These costs of takings are typically overlooked because they involve unrealized entrepreneurial opportunities that cannot be captured in standard cost-benefit calculations.

Eminent Domain, Takings, Entrepreneurship, Regime Uncertainty

Abstract:
This paper explores the political economy of F.A. Hayek with emphasis on the continued relevance of his work for contemporary scholars. We focus on the theme of coordination throughout Hayek's research program. This general theme can be traced from Hayek's technical economics up through his later writings in political philosophy. After considering Hayek's major works in political and legal theory, we conclude by discussing the contemporary implications of Hayek's political economy. Specifically, we discuss eight areas where modern economists should pay close attention to the main lessons and themes in Hayek's writings.

Hayek, Political Economy

Abstract:
Reconstruction involves military occupation with the aim of rebuilding and reforming both formal and informal institutions along liberal democratic lines. We contend that successful reconstructions require mechanisms which make reforms credible over the long-run. In the absence of a signal of sustained credible commitment, institutional reforms will not be trusted by the populace resulting in the failure of the broader reconstruction. The incentive, information and epistemic aspects of the credible commitment problem are analyzed. We also consider potential solutions to the problem of credible commitment. Absent such solutions, attempts to "export" institutions via military occupation should be either limited in their scope or curtailed entirely.

credible commitment, institutions, military occupation, reconstruction, reform

Abstract:
The turn of the century witnessed the emergence of several new democracies wrestling with the past of oppressive state regimes that committed atrocities on their own citizens. In East and Central Europe, the former Soviet Union, Latin America, South Africa, and the Middle East, new governments and their citizens are determining precisely how to balance past and present. In the mid-20th century, Germany and Japan had to negotiate a similar political terrain. Our paper is focused on past injustices perpetrated by totalitarian regimes and using basic economic reasoning we attempt to clear a path for reconciliation and thus hope for a future of peace and prosperity.

transitional justice

Abstract:
This paper argues that there are two tiers of entrepreneurship important for economic development. One is concerned with investments in productive technologies that improve productivity and better service consumer needs. The other is concerned with the creation of protective technologies that secure citizens’ private property rights vis-à-vis one another. In the developing world where governments cannot or do not protect citizens against predation, “institutional entrepreneurs” devise private mechanisms of property protection, providing the security required for productive entrepreneurship to grow. However, private protection technologies can be a double-edged sword. While private protection technologies enable some investment and exchange by securing citizens’ property where government does not, potential constraints on these technologies’ effectiveness may simultaneously limit their ability to expand investment and exchange beyond modest levels.

Abstract:
The economic approach to politics revolutionized the way scholars in economics and political science approached the study of political decision-making by introducing the possibility of government failure. However, the persistent and consistent application of neoclassical models of economics also seemed to suggest that once the full costs were accounted for, this failure was an illusion. This paper counters these arguments associated with George Stigler, Gary Becker and more recently Donald Wittman, at the core of the economic theory that underlies their approach. In contrast, we develop an alternative model of political economy grounded in the Austrian conception of the dynamic market process.

Abstract:
This paper discusses the inherent tension in the notion of entrepreneurship as developed by Ludwig von Mises and Israel Kirzner. Given that entrepreneurship is an omnipresent aspect of human action, it cannot also be the "cause" of economic development. Rather, for economic development to take place, certain institutions must be present in order for the entrepreneurial a spect of human action to flourish. After further developing this theoretical insight, an in-depth analysis of the institutions necessary for entrepreneurship are considered.

Economic Development, Austrian Economics, Entrepreneurship

Abstract:
The current approach to the war on terror is largely ineffective. Central to this approach are negative sanctions against actual and potential terrorists coupled with attempts to spread liberal democracy through war, occupation and reconstruction. We argue that negative sanctions are unsuccessful and in many cases counter productive in reducing terrorism. Further, we postulate that efforts to impose liberal democracy in weak and failed states via occupation and reconstruction have in large part failed. Only be returning to a position of principled non-intervention can the war on terror ultimately be won.

War on terror, social change, liberal democracy

Abstract:
Over the past decade, economists have increasingly focused on happiness research. The main focus has been on understanding the interconnection between economic outcomes and the resulting happiness of economic actors. The work in this area has yielded many implications for policy in a number of areas, including public finance (government expenditure and taxation), welfare policy and labor law. This chapter will critically reexamine the happiness and economics research program and the resulting policy implications through an Austrian/Public Choice lens. It is our contention that the main insights of these schools of thought have been neglected in this area of research.

Behavioral Economics, Economics and Happiness, Austrian Economics, Public Choice

Abstract:
We contend that the transformation of economics from a discipline that studies the economy to one that is entrusted with its control has threatened the very soul of economics. The false pretense of scientific management led economists to promise to accomplish tasks that they cannot legitimately achieve. We provide three cases where the scientistic pretensions of economists got the better of them in the 20th century: Keynesian demand management, the practice of cost/benefit analysis by regulators and lawyers, and the debate over market socialism. If our argument is right, the role of the economist should move from high priest back to lowly philosopher.

Abstract:
While markets are all around us, not all markets are the same. Markets come in a variety of colors based on the legality of activities in the specific market. As such, there is no market economy per se, but instead various shades of markets. The different shades of markets that are evidenced in practice directly depend on the institutional environment that makes certain activities legal or illegal. Shifts in the institutional environment are a result of entrepreneurial activity over the rules of the game. The rules of the game and resulting shade of the market in turn impact entrepreneurs acting within those rules and hence economic development or the lack thereof.

Abstract:
We argue that in the 20th century economic theory took a path that purged human actors from economic analysis. We describe this evolution as the result of four competing visions in economics: the analytic narrative approach pursued by the classical economists, New Institutional Economics, and Austrian economics, the approach of the old institutional economics, the approach of modern neoclassical economics, and an approach that blended neoclassical economics with a particular form of game theory, which we call formalistic historicism. We contend that only the first of these visions is consistent with acting man as the center of economic analysis. Movement back to human-centered economics requires a return to this vision.