| . |
Paul J. Devereux's
Scholarly Papers
Click on the title of any column to sort the table by that
column. |
|
|
| |
|
|
Aggregate Statistics |
|
Total Downloads
939 |
Total
Citations
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
Why the Apple Doesn't Fall Far: Understanding Intergenerational Transmission of Human Capital
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (4)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
06 Nov 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 Nov 04
|
|
213 ( 39,987) |
49
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
18 Oct 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 Nov 04
|
|
40
|
49
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Parents with higher education levels have children with higher education levels. However, is this because parental education actually changes the outcomes of children, suggesting an important spillover of education policies, or is it merely that more able individuals who have higher education also have more able children? This paper proposes to answer this question with a unique dataset from Norway. Using the reform of the education system that was implemented in different municipalities at different times in the 1960s as an instrument for parental education, we find little evidence of a causal relationship between parents' education and children's education, despite significant OLS relationships. We find 2SLS estimates that are consistently lower than the OLS estimates, with the only statistically significant effect being a positive relationship between mother's education and son's education. These findings suggest that the high correlations between parents' and children's education are due primarily to family characteristics and inherited ability and not education spillovers.
Intergenerational mobility, education, educational reform
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
12 Jan 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Feb 04
|
|
24
|
49
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Parents with higher education levels have children with higher education levels. Is this because parental education actually changes the outcomes of children, suggesting an important spillover of education policies, or is it merely that more able individuals who have higher education also have more able children? This Paper proposes to answer this question by using a unique dataset from Norway. Using the reform of the education system that was implemented in different municipalities at different times in the 1960s as an instrument for parental education, we find little evidence of a causal relationship between parents' education and children's education, despite significant OLS relationships. We find 2SLS estimates that are consistently lower than the OLS estimates with the only statistically significant effect being a positive relationship between mother's education and son's education. These findings suggest that the high correlations between parent's and children's education are due primarily to family characteristics and inherited ability and not education spillovers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Dec 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
02 Sep 04
|
|
118
|
49
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Parents with higher education levels have children with higher education levels. However, is this because parental education actually changes the outcomes of children, suggesting an important spillover of education policies, or is it merely that more able individuals who have higher education also have more able children? This paper proposes to answer this question by using a unique dataset from Norway. Using the reform of the education system that was implemented in different municipalities at different times in the 1960s as an instrument for parental education, we find little evidence of a causal relationship between parents' education and children's education, despite significant OLS relationships. We find 2SLS estimates that are consistently lower than the OLS estimates with the only statistically significant effect being a positive relationship between mother's education and son's education. These findings suggest that the high correlations between parents' and children's education are due primarily to family characteristics and inherited ability and not education spillovers.
intergenerational mobility, education, educational reform
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Nov 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
12 Jan 04
|
|
31
|
49
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Parents with higher education levels have children with higher education levels. However, is this because parental education actually changes the outcomes of children, suggesting an important spillover of education policies, or is it merely that more able individuals who have higher education also have more able children? This paper proposes to answer this question by using a unique dataset from Norway. Using the reform of the education system that was implemented in different municipalities at different times in the 1960s as an instrument for parental education, we find little evidence of a causal relationship between parents' education and children's education, despite significant OLS relationships. We find 2SLS estimates that are consistently lower than the OLS estimates with the only statistically significant effect being a positive relationship between mother's education and son's education. These findings suggest that the high correlations between parents'and children's education are due primarily to family characteristics and inherited ability and not education spillovers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
The More the Merrier? The Effect of Family Composition on Children's Education
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
26 Aug 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Sep 04
|
|
189 ( 45,129) |
13
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Sep 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Sep 04
|
|
40
|
13
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Among the perceived inputs in the 'production' of child quality is family size; there is an extensive theoretical literature that postulates a tradeoff between child quantity and quality within a family. However, there is little causal evidence that speaks to this theory. Our analysis is able to overcome many limitations of the previous literature by using a rich dataset that contains information on the entire population of Norway over an extended period of time and allows us to match adult children to their parents and siblings. In addition, we use exogenous variation in family size induced by the birth of twins to isolate causation. Like most previous studies, we find a negative correlation between family size and children's educational attainment. However, when we include indicators for birth order, the effect of family size becomes negligible. This finding is robust to the use of twin births as an instrument for family size. In addition, we find that birth order has a significant and large effect on children's education; children born later in the family obtain less education. These findings suggest the need to revisit economic models of fertility and child 'production', focusing not only on differences across families but differences within families as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Aug 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Sep 04
|
|
149
|
13
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Among the perceived inputs in the "production" of child quality is family size; there is an extensive theoretical literature that postulates a tradeoff between child quantity and quality within a family. However, there is little causal evidence that speaks to this theory. Our analysis is able to overcome many limitations of the previous literature by using a rich dataset that contains information on the entire population of Norway over an extended period of time and allows us to match adult children to their parents and siblings. In addition, we use exogenous variation in family size induced by the birth of twins to isolate causation. Like most previous studies, we find a negative correlation between family size and children's educational attainment. However, when we include indicators for birth order, the effect of family size becomes negligible. This finding is robust to the use of twin births as an instrument for family size. In addition, we find that birth order has a significant and large effect on children's education; children born later in the family obtain less education. These findings suggest the need to revisit economic models of fertility and child "production," focusing not only on differences across families but differences within families as well.
I2, J1
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
Fast Times at Ridgemont High? The Effect of Compulsory Schooling Laws on Teenage Births
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
01 Dec 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 Dec 04
|
|
89 ( 85,788) |
4
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
01 Dec 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 Dec 04
|
|
63
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Research suggests that teenage childbearing adversely affects both the outcomes of the mothers as well as those of their children. We know that low-educated women are more likely to have a teenage birth, but does this imply that policies that increase educational attainment reduce early fertility? This paper investigates whether increasing mandatory educational attainment through compulsory schooling legislation encourages women to delay childbearing. We use variation induced by changes in compulsory schooling laws in both the United States and Norway to estimate the effect in two very different institutional environments. We find evidence that increased compulsory schooling does in fact reduce the incidence of teenage childbearing in both the United States and Norway, and these results are quite robust to various specification checks. Somewhat surprisingly, we also find that the magnitude of these effects is quite similar in the two countries. These results suggest that legislation aimed at improving educational outcomes may have spillover effects onto the fertility decisions of teenagers.
teenage childbearing, education, educational reform
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
07 Dec 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 Dec 04
|
|
26
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Research suggests that teenage childbearing adversely affects both the outcomes of the mothers as well as those of their children. We know that low-educated women are more likely to have a teenage birth, but does this imply that policies that increase educational attainment reduce early fertility? This paper investigates whether increasing mandatory educational attainment through compulsory schooling legislation encourages women to delay childbearing. We use variation induced by changes in compulsory schooling laws in both the United States and Norway to estimate the effect in two very different institutional environments. We find evidence that increased compulsory schooling does in fact reduce the incidence of teenage childbearing in both the United States and Norway, and these results are quite robust to various specification checks. Somewhat surprisingly, we also find that the magnitude of these effects is quite similar in the two countries. These results suggest that legislation aimed at improving educational outcomes may have spillover effects onto the fertility decisions of teenagers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
From the Cradle to the Labor Market? The Effect of Birth Weight on Adult Outcomes
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
05 Dec 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 Feb 06
|
|
69 (100,840) |
40
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
05 Dec 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
49
|
40
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Lower birth weight babies have worse outcomes, both short-run in terms of one-year mortality rates and longer run in terms of educational attainment and earnings. However, recent research has called into question whether birth weight itself is important or whether it simply reflects other hard-to-measure characteristics. By applying within twin techniques using a unique dataset from Norway, we examine both short-run and long-run outcomes for the same cohorts. We find that birth weight does matter; very small short-run fixed effect estimates can be misleading because longer-run effects on outcomes such as height, IQ, earnings, and education are significant and similar in magnitude to OLS estimates. Our estimates suggest that eliminating birth weight differences between socio-economic groups would have sizeable effects on the later outcomes of children from poorer families.
birth weight, twins, education, IQ, earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 Feb 06
|
|
20
|
40
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Lower birth weight babies have worse outcomes, both short-run in terms of one-year mortality rates and longer run in terms of educational attainment and earnings. However, recent research has called into question whether birth weight itself is important or whether it simply reflects other hard-to-measure characteristics. By applying within twin techniques using a unique dataset from Norway, we examine both short-run and long-run outcomes for the same cohorts. We find that birth weight does matter; very small short-run fixed effect estimates can be misleading because longer-run effects on outcomes such as height, IQ, earnings, and education are significant and similar in magnitude to OLS estimates. Our estimates suggest that eliminating birth weight differences between socio-economic groups would have sizeable effects on the later outcomes of children from poorer families.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
Like Father, Like Son? A Note on the Intergenerational Transmission of IQ Scores
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
27 Aug 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Sep 08
|
|
53 (115,775) |
2
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
01 Sep 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Sep 08
|
|
5
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
More able parents tend to have more able children. While few would question the validity of this statement, there is little large-scale evidence on the intergenerational transmission of IQ scores. Using a larger and more comprehensive dataset than previous work, we are able to estimate the intergenerational correlation in IQ scores, examining not just average correlations but also how this relationship varies for different subpopulations. We find that there is substantial intergenerational transmission of IQ scores; an increase in father's IQ at age 18 of 10% is associated with a 3.2% increase in son's IQ at the same age. This relationship holds true no matter how we break the data. This effect is much larger than our estimated elasticity of intergenerational transmission of income of approximately .2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
27 Aug 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Sep 08
|
|
48
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
More able parents tend to have more able children. While few would question the validity of this statement, there is little large-scale evidence on the intergenerational transmission of IQ scores. Using a larger and more comprehensive dataset than previous work, we are able to estimate the intergenerational correlation in IQ scores, examining not just average correlations but also how this relationship varies for different subpopulations. We find that there is substantial intergenerational transmission of IQ scores; an increase in father's IQ at age 18 of 10% is associated with a 3.2% increase in son's IQ at the same age. This relationship holds true no matter how we break the data. This effect is much larger than our estimated elasticity of intergenerational transmission of income of approximately .2.
ability, intergenerational mobility
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
10 Sep 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Sep 07
|
|
51 (117,767)
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
While recent research finds strong evidence that birth order affects children's outcomes such as education and earnings, the evidence on the effects of birth order on IQ is decidedly mixed. This paper uses a large dataset on the population of Norway and focuses on the effect of birth order and family size on IQ, an outcome not previously available in datasets of this magnitude. Importantly, we find a strong and significant effect of birth order on IQ, and our results suggest that earlier born children have higher IQs.
birth order, IQ
|
|
|
7.
|
|
|
Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Robert A. Hart University of Stirling - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
21 Jul 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
29 Jul 05
|
|
42 (127,891)
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Using the British New Earnings Survey Panel Data (NESPD) for the period 1975 to 2001 we estimate the wage cyclicality of job stayers (those remaining within single jobs in a given company), within company job movers, and between company job movers. We also examine how the proportion of internal and external job moves varies over the business cycle. We find that the wages of internal movers are slightly more procyclical and wages of external movers considerably more procyclical than those of stayers. Notwithstanding, a decomposition shows that in Britain, wage cyclicality arises almost entirely from the procyclicality of wages for job stayers, with across- and within-firm mobility playing a lesser role. Thus, there is little evidence for rigid wage models that imply that employers use changes in job titles as a means of adjusting wages to the business cycle. We also show that the distinctions between private and public sectors and between workers covered and uncovered by collective agreements have important impacts on the wage estimates of both stayers and movers.
wage cyclicality, job stayers, internal job movers, external job movers
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
10 Sep 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Sep 07
|
|
34 (138,089)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
How do families influence the ability of children? Cognitive skills have been shown to be a strong predictor of educational attainment and future labor market success; as a result, understanding the determinants of cognitive skills can lead to a better understanding of children's long run outcomes. This paper uses a large dataset on the male population of Norway and focuses on one family characteristic: the effect of family size on IQ. Because of the endogeneity of family size, we instrument for family size using twin births and sex composition. IV estimates using sex composition as an instrument show no negative effect of family size; however, IV estimates using twins imply that family size has a negative effect on IQ. Our results suggest that effect of family size depends on the type of family size intervention. We conclude that there are no important negative effects of expected increases in family size on IQ but that unexpected shocks to family size resulting from twin births have negative effects on the IQ of existing children.
family size, IQ
|
|
|
9.
|
|
|
Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Robert A. Hart University of Stirling - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Feb 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Feb 05
|
|
34 (138,089)
|
8
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Based on the methodology of Beaudry and DiNardo (1991), this paper investigates the relative importance of the spot market and implicit contracts in the determination of British real wages. Empirical work is carried out separately for males and females with individual-level data taken from the New Earnings Survey Panel for the years 1976 to 2001. In contrast to previous studies that used North American data, the spot market is found to be more important than implicit contracts in determining real wages. Indeed, there is very little support for implicit contracts in these data. Further evidence is provided through the analysis of individual wage sequences. These suggest that the downwardly rigid wage sequences implied by implicit contracts with costless worker mobility are not prevalent in Britain.
spot market wages, implicit contracts, unemployment, wage sequences
|
|
|
10.
|
|
|
Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
21 Feb 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 03
|
|
33 (139,494)
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Many economics theories suggest that the assignment of workers to occupations changes over the business cycle: expansions allow workers to upgrade to occupations that pay higher wages and require more skill. This paper provides some empirical evidence from the USA that such upgrading does occur and that, as predicted, it has greater effects on less-skilled individuals. Furthermore, the skill composition of new hires changes over the business cycle, even within occupations. Consistent with a job competition model, the education levels of new hires within occupations are higher when the unemployment rate is high and this effect is more pronounced in lower-paying occupations. The changes in assignment imply that low-skilled individuals suffer most from recessions in terms of occupation quality and unemployment. The results are consistent with employers responding to a greater supply of educated workers by increasing hiring standards, and so imply that the social return to education may be lower than the private return. However, the results are also consistent with more neo-classical models of the labor market.
|
|
|
11.
|
|
|
Joseph G. Altonji Yale University - Economic Growth Center Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Apr 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 May 00
|
|
31 (142,387)
|
52
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, we find that true wage changes have many fewer nominal cuts and more nominal freezes than reported nominal wage changes. The data overwhelmingly rejects a model of flexible wage changes and provides some evidence against a model of perfect downward rigidity in favor of a more general model. The more general model incorporates downward rigidity but specifies that nominal wage cuts may occur when large cuts would occur in the absence of wage rigidity. However, the results of the general model imply that nominal wage cuts are rare. We also analyze the personnel files of a large corporation and find cuts in base pay are rare and almost always associated with changes in full time status or a switch between compensation schemes involving incentives. Our evidence on the consequences of nominal wage rigidity is mixed. We find modest support for the hypothesis that workers who are overpaid because of nominal wage rigidity are less likely to quit.
|
|
|
12.
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
23 May 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 May 08
|
|
25 (153,767)
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Does it matter when a child starts school? While the popular press seems to suggest it does, there is limited evidence of a long-run effect of school starting age on student outcomes. This paper uses data on the population of Norway to examine the role of school starting age on longer-run outcomes such as IQ scores at age 18, educational attainment, teenage pregnancy, and earnings. Unlike much of the recent literature, we are able to separate school starting age from test age effects using scores from IQ tests taken outside of school, at the time of military enrolment, and measured when students are around age 18. Importantly, there is variation in the mapping between year and month of birth and the year the test is taken, allowing us to distinguish the effects of school starting age from pure age effects. We find evidence for a small positive effect of starting school younger on IQ scores measured at age 18. In contrast, we find evidence of much larger positive effects of age at test, and these results are very robust. We also find that starting school younger has a significant positive effect on the probability of teenage pregnancy, but has little effect on educational attainment of boys or girls. There appears to be a short-run positive effect on earnings of beginning school at a younger age' however, this effect has essentially disappeared by age 30. This pattern is consistent with the idea that starting school later reduces potential labor market experience at a given age for a given level of education' however, this becomes less important as individuals age.
education, earnings, IQ, teenage childbearing
|
|
|
13.
|
|
Forced to Be Rich? Returns to Compulsory Schooling in Britain
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Robert A. Hart University of Stirling - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
23 May 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Jun 08
|
|
17 (175,776) |
3
|
|
|
|
|
Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Robert A. Hart University of Stirling - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Jun 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Jun 08
|
|
0
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Do students benefit from compulsory schooling? Researchers using changes in compulsory schooling laws as instruments have typically estimated very high returns to additional schooling that are greater than the corresponding OLS estimates and concluded that the group of individuals who are influenced by the law change have particularly high returns to education. That is, the Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE) is larger than the average treatment effect (ATE). However, studies of a 1947 British compulsory schooling law change that impacted about half the relevant population have also found very high instrumental variables returns to schooling (about 15%), suggesting that the ATE of schooling is also very high and higher than OLS estimates suggest. We utilize the New Earnings Survey Panel Data-set (NESPD), that has superior earnings information compared to the datasets previously used and find instrumental variable estimates that are small and much lower than OLS. In fact, there is no evidence of any positive return for women and the return for men is in the 4-7% range. These estimates provide no evidence that the ATE of schooling is very high.
compulsory schooling, return to education
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Robert A. Hart University of Stirling - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
23 May 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 May 08
|
|
17
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Do students benefit from compulsory schooling? Researchers using changes in compulsory schooling laws as instruments have typically estimated very high returns to additional schooling that are greater than the corresponding OLS estimates and concluded that the group of individuals who are influenced by the law change have particularly high returns to education. That is, the Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE) is larger than the average treatment effect (ATE). However, studies of a 1947 British compulsory schooling law change that impacted about half the relevant population have also found very high instrumental variables returns to schooling (about 15%), suggesting that the ATE of schooling is also very high and higher than OLS estimates suggest. We utilize the New Earnings Survey Panel Data-set (NESPD), that has superior earnings information compared to the datasets previously used and find instrumental variable estimates that are small and much lower than OLS. In fact, there is no evidence of any positive return for women and the return for men is in the 4-7% range. These estimates provide no evidence that the ATE of schooling is very high.
compulsory schooling, return to education
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.
|
|
Older and Wiser? Birth Order and IQ of Young Men
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
09 Jul 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 May 08
|
|
17 (175,776) |
4
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
23 May 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 May 08
|
|
0
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
While recent research finds strong evidence that birth order affects children's outcomes such as education and earnings, the evidence on the effects of birth order on IQ is decidedly mixed. This paper uses a large dataset on the population of Norway that allows us to precisely measure birth order effects on IQ using both cross-sectional and within-family methods. Importantly, irrespective of method, we find a strong and significant effect of birth order on IQ, and our results suggest that earlier born children have higher IQs. Our preferred estimates suggest differences between first-borns and second-borns of about one fifth of a standard deviation or approximately 3 IQ points. Despite these large average effects, birth order only explains about 3% of the within-family variance of IQ. When we control for birth endowments, the estimated birth order effects increase. Thus, our analysis suggests that birth order effects are not biologically determined. Also, there is no evidence that birth order effects occur because later-born children are more affected by family breakdown.
Birth order, human capital, intelligence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Jul 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Sep 07
|
|
17
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
While recent research finds strong evidence that birth order affects children's outcomes such as education and earnings, the evidence on the effects of birth order on IQ is decidedly mixed. This paper uses a large dataset on the population of Norway that allows us to precisely measure birth order effects on IQ using both cross-sectional and within-family methods. Importantly, irrespective of method, we find a strong and significant effect of birth order on IQ, and our results suggest that earlier born children have higher IQs. Our preferred estimates suggest differences between first-borns and second-borns of about one fifth of a standard deviation or approximately 3 IQ points. Despite these large average effects, birth order only explains about 3% of the within-family variance of IQ. When we control for birth endowments, the estimated birth order effects increase. Thus, our analysis suggests that birth order effects are not biologically determined. Also, there is no evidence that birth order effects occur because later-born children are more affected by family breakdown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
|
Small Family, Smart Family? Family Size and the IQ Scores of Young Men
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
24 Aug 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
30 May 08
|
|
16 (178,683) |
2
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
30 May 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
30 May 08
|
|
0
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
How do families influence the ability of children? Cognitive skills have been shown to be a strong predictor of educational attainment and future labor market success; as a result, understanding the determinants of cognitive skills can lead to a better understanding of children's long run outcomes. This paper uses a large dataset on the male population of Norway and focuses on one family characteristic: the effect of family size on IQ. Because of the endogeneity of family size, we instrument for family size using twin births and sex composition. IV estimates using sex composition as an instrument show no negative effect of family size; however, IV estimates using twins imply that family size has a negative effect on IQ. Our results suggest that effect of family size depends on the type of family size intervention. We conclude that there are no important negative effects of expected increases in family size on IQ but that unexpected shocks to family size resulting from twin births have negative effects on the IQ of existing children.
family size, intelligence, Quantity-Quality Model
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Aug 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 Oct 07
|
|
16
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
How do families influence the ability of children? Cognitive skills have been shown to be a strong predictor of educational attainment and future labor market success; as a result, understanding the determinants of cognitive skills can lead to a better understanding of children's long run outcomes. This paper uses a large dataset on the male population of Norway and focuses on one family characteristic: the effect of family size on IQ. Because of the endogeneity of family size, we instrument for family size using twin births and sex composition. IV estimates using sex composition as an instrument show no negative effect of family size; however, IV estimates using twins imply that family size has a negative effect on IQ. Our results suggest that effect of family size depends on the type of family size intervention. We conclude that there are no important negative effects of expected increases in family size on IQ but that unexpected shocks to family size resulting from twin births have negative effects on the IQ of existing children.
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.
|
|
|
Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Robert A. Hart University of Stirling - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Aug 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 Aug 08
|
|
9 (198,667)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this paper, we compile a unique historical dataset that records strike activity in the British engineering industry from 1920 to 1970. These data have the advantage of containing a fairly homogenous set of companies and workers, covering a long period with varying labour market conditions, including information that enables the addition of union and company fixed effects, and providing geographical detail that allows a district-level analysis that controls for year and seasonal effects. We study the cyclicality of strike durations, strike incidence, and strike outcomes and distinguish between pay and non-pay strikes. Like the previous literature, we find evidence that strikes over pay have countercyclical durations. However, in the post-war period, the magnitude of this effect is much reduced when union and firm fixed effects are included. These findings suggest that it is important when studying strike durations to take account of differences in the composition of companies and unions that are involved in strikes at different points of the business cycle. We also find that strike outcomes tend to be more favourable to unions when the national unemployment rate is lower.
incidence, duration, cyclicality, strikes, outcome
|
|
|
17.
|
|
|
Sandra E. Black University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Kjell G. Salvanes Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
23 Apr 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 May 08
|
|
9 (198,667)
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Does it matter when a child starts school? While the popular press seems to suggest it does, there is limited evidence of a long-run effect of school starting age on student outcomes. This paper uses data on the population of Norway to examine the role of school starting age on longer-run outcomes such as IQ scores at age 18, educational attainment, teenage pregnancy, and earnings. Unlike much of the recent literature, we are able to separate school starting age from test age effects using scores from IQ tests taken outside of school, at the time of military enrolment, and measured when students are around age 18. Importantly, there is variation in the mapping between year and month of birth and the year the test is taken, allowing us to distinguish the effects of school starting age from pure age effects. We find evidence for a small positive effect of starting school younger on IQ scores measured at age 18. In contrast, we find evidence of much larger positive effects of age at test, and these results are very robust. We also find that starting school younger has a significant positive effect on the probability of teenage pregnancy, but has little effect on educational attainment of boys or girls. There appears to be a short-run positive effect on earnings of beginning school at a younger age; however, this effect has essentially disappeared by age 30. This pattern is consistent with the idea that starting school later reduces potential labor market experience at a given age for a given level of education; however, this becomes less important as individuals age.
|
|
|
18.
|
|
|
Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
20 May 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 May 08
|
|
4 (209,890)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In many economic applications, observations are naturally categorized into mutually exclusive and exhaustive groups. For example, individuals can be classified into cohorts and workers are employees of a particular firm. Grouping models are widely used in economics -- for example, cohort models have been used to study labour supply, wage inequality, consumption, and intergenerational transfer of human capital. The simplest grouping estimator involves taking the means of all variables for each group and then carrying out a group-level regression by OLS or weighted least squares. This estimator is biased in finite samples. I show that the standard errors in variables estimator (EVE) designed to correct for small sample bias is exactly equivalent to the Jack-knife Instrumental Variables Estimator (JIVE). Also EVE is closely related to the k-class of instrumental variables estimators. I then use results from the instrumental variables literature to develop an estimator (UEVE) with better finite-sample properties than existing errors in variables estimators. The theoretical results are demonstrated using Monte Carlo experiments. Finally, I use the estimators to implement a model of inter-temporal male labour supply using micro data from the United States Census. There are sizeable differences in the wage elasticity across estimators, showing the practical importance of the theoretical issues discussed in this paper even in circumstances where the sample size is quite large.
Errors-in-variables, grouped data
|
|
|
19.
|
|
|
Daniel A. Ackerberg University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
02 Dec 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 Dec 08
|
|
3 (211,708)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We introduce two simple new variants of the Jackknife Instrumental Variables (JIVE) estimator for overidentified linear models and show that they are superior to the existing JIVE estimator, significantly improving on its small sample bias properties. We also compare our new estimators to existing Nagar (1959) type estimators. We show that, in models with heteroskedasticity, our estimators have superior properties to both the Nagar estimator and the related B2SLS estimator suggested in Donald and Newey (2001). These theoretical results are verified in a set of Monte-Carlo experiments and then applied to estimating the returns to schooling using actual data.
JIVE, weak instruments
|
|
|
20.
|
|
|
Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics Gautam Tripathi University of Connecticut - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
02 Dec 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Jan 09
|
|
1 (216,028)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We develop a simple semiparametric framework for combining censored and uncensored samples so that the resulting estimators are consistent, asymptotically normal, and use all information optimally. No nonparametric smoothing is required to implement our estimators. To illustrate our results in an empirical setting, we show how to estimate the effect of changes in compulsory schooling laws on age at first marriage, a variable that is censored for younger individuals. We find positive effects of the laws on age at first marriage but the effects are much smaller than would be inferred if one ignored the censoring problem. Results from a small simulation experiment suggest that the estimator proposed in this paper can work very well in finite samples.
age at first marriage, censored data, compulsory schooling
|
|
|
21.
|
|
|
Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
01 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
01 Aug 03
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In the 1980s, both wages and labor supply of poorly educated men fell substantially relative to those of educated men. Some observers have interpreted this positive association between changes in wages and labor supply as reflecting movement along stable labor supply curves. The author casts doubt on this interpretation by showing that the wage elasticity necessary to account, by itself, for the observed labor supply decline would greatly exceed elasticity levels typically found in prior studies. Analysis of Census data shows little relationship between changes in relative wages at the state level and changes in male labor supply. Also, panel data analysis shows no strong correlation between long-run changes in individual hours and wages. The small implied labor supply elasticities suggest that very little of the labor supply changes of men during the 1980s can be related to changes in relative wages.
|
|
|
22.
|
|
|
Paul J. Devereux University College Dublin - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Oct 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Oct 01
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, the author examines the cyclicality of wages within employer-employee matches for the years 1970-91. Recent research on wage cyclicality has suggested that wages are very procyclical (tending to rise and fall with economic upturns and downturns), even for workers who remain with the same employer. The author finds, however, that the evidence for wage procyclicality within the matches he examines is rather weak except for the small group of workers who were paid by piece rate or commissions. Despite having acyclical wage rates, men who were paid hourly had earnings movements that were very procyclical. Salaries exhibited little cyclicality, but salaried workers who had income sources from bonuses, commissions, or overtime had procyclical earnings. The results suggest that the increasing prevalence of incentive-based pay will increase the procyclicality of wages within matches.
|
|