| . |
Rainer Thiele's
Scholarly Papers
Click on the title of any column to sort the table by that
column. |
|
|
| |
|
|
Aggregate Statistics |
|
Total Downloads
848 |
Total
Citations
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
Rainer Thiele University of Kiel Daniel Piazolo IPD Investment Property Databank
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Feb 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
31 May 02
|
|
364 (21,712)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper describes the construction of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) for Bolivia for the year 1997. Three distinctive features render the SAM a useful starting point for distributional analyses. First, production in the agricultural and services sector is split up into formal and informal activities to account for the fact that poverty is largely confined to the latter. Second, factor and household accounts exhibit a high level of disaggregation, thus permitting the monitoring of the factorial and personal income distribution. Finally, the SAM contains a detailed system of accumulation balances which reveals the distribution of assets among household groups.
SAM, Structural Adjustment Programs, Poverty, Income Distribution, Bolivia
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
Maurizio Bussolo World Bank - Development Prospects Group Olivier Godart University of Nottingham Jann Lay Kiel Institute for World Economics Rainer Thiele University of Kiel
|
| Posted: |
|
12 Dec 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Dec 06
|
|
102 (77,843)
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Policies and external shocks affecting agriculture, the main source of income for rural households, can be expected to have a significant impact on poverty. The authors study the case of Uganda. Throughout the 1990s, more than 90 percent of its poor lived in rural areas and, during the same period, large international price fluctuations as well as an extensive domestic deregulation affected the coffee sector, its main source of export revenues. Using data from three household surveys covering the 1990s, the authors confirm a strong correlation between changes in coffee prices (in a liberalized market) and poverty reduction. This is highlighted by comparing the performance of different households grouped according to their dependence on coffee farming. Regression analysis (based on pooled data from the three surveys) of consumption expenditure on coffee-related variables, other controls, and time-fixed effects corroborates that the mentioned correlation is not spurious. The authors also find that while both poor and rich farmers enter the coffee sector, the price boom benefits the poorer households relatively more, whereas the liberalization seems to create more opportunities for richer farmers. Finally, notwithstanding the importance of the coffee price boom, the agricultural policy framework and the thorough structural reforms in which the coffee market liberalization was embedded have certainly played a role in triggering overall agricultural growth. These factors appear to matter especially in the second half of the 1990s when prices went down but poverty reduction continued.
Crops & Crop Management Systems, Markets and Market Access, Rural Poverty Reduction, Access to Markets
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
Gustavo J. Canavire Bacarreza Georgia State University - Department of Economics Peter Nunnenkamp University of Kiel Rainer Thiele University of Kiel Luis Triveno Kiel Institute for World Economics - Advanced Studies Program
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Jul 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Jul 05
|
|
101 (78,388)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this paper, we perform a Tobit analysis of aid allocation, covering the period 1999-2002 and accounting for both altruistic and selfish donor motives. It turns out that poorer countries get clearly more aid from both bilateral and multilateral donors. Most donors are also found to direct significantly more aid to well-governed recipients if governance is measured by the World Bank's Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA). If the CPIA is replaced by the Kaufmann index on institutional conditions in recipient countries, however, the policy orientation of aid becomes extremely weak. In contrast to a recent paper by Dollar and Levin, our estimates do not suggest that multilateral aid is more poverty- and policy-oriented than bilateral aid. Post-conflict resolution emerges as a significant determinant of aid allocation in 2002. The importance of selfish aid motives clearly differs between bilateral and multilateral donors. In particular, the export-related self-interest of donor countries provided a fairly strong incentive to grant bilateral aid, as did colonial ties.
Foreign aid allocation, donor motives, Tobit analysis
|
|
|
4.
|
|
Does Aid for Education Educate Children? Evidence from Panel Data
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Axel Dreher University of Goettingen (Gottingen) Peter Nunnenkamp University of Kiel Rainer Thiele University of Kiel
|
|
Posted:
|
|
06 Dec 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Aug 09
|
|
81 ( 91,243) |
5
|
|
|
|
|
Axel Dreher University of Goettingen (Gottingen) Peter Nunnenkamp University of Kiel Rainer Thiele University of Kiel
|
| Posted: |
|
07 Jul 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Aug 09
|
|
0
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Most of the aid effectiveness literature has focused on the potential growth effects of aggregate aid, with inconclusive results. Considering that donors have repeatedly stressed the multidimensionality of their objectives, a more disaggregated view on aid effectiveness is warranted. The impact of aid on education is analyzed empirically for almost 100 countries over 1970-2004. The effectiveness of sector-specific aid is assessed within the framework of social production functions. The Millennium Development Goals related to education, particularly the goal of achieving universal primary school enrollment, are considered as outcome variables. The analysis suggests that higher per capita aid for education significantly increases primary school enrollment, while increased domestic government spending on education does not. This result is robust to the method of estimation, the use of instruments to control for the endogeneity of aid, and the set of control variables included in the estimations.
F35, O11, H52, I22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Axel Dreher University of Goettingen (Gottingen) Peter Nunnenkamp University of Kiel Rainer Thiele University of Kiel
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Dec 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Apr 07
|
|
81
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper empirically analyzes the impact of aid on education for about 100 countries over the period 1970-2005. We estimate a system of equations to test whether and to what extent the impact of sector-specific aid on educational attainment depends on (i) the extent to which aid adds to overall educational expenditure of the recipient government, (ii) the strength of the link between government expenditure and education, (iii) the quality of institutions in the recipient country, and (iv) whether aid encourages institutional reforms. According to our results, aid significantly increases primary school enrolment. This result is robust to the method of estimation, employing instruments to control for the endogeneity of aid, and the measure of institutional quality employed. The degree of institutional quality, however, has no robust impact on this relationship.
Aid effectiveness, Education, Sector-specific aid
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
Targeting Aid to the Needy and Deserving: Nothing But Promises?
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (1)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Peter Nunnenkamp University of Kiel Rainer Thiele University of Kiel
|
|
Posted:
|
|
08 Sep 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Sep 06
|
|
11 ( 98,224) |
10
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Nunnenkamp University of Kiel Rainer Thiele University of Kiel
|
| Posted: |
|
08 Sep 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Sep 06
|
|
11
|
10
|
|
| |
Abstract:
By reallocating aid to where it is needed most and where a productive use is most likely, donors could help alleviate poverty in developing countries. The rhetoric of donors suggests that this insight has increasingly shaped the allocation of aid. We assess the poverty and policy orientation of bilateral and multilateral aid in different ways. In addition to presenting stylised facts based on bivariate correlations, we apply a Tobit model that captures both altruistic and selfish donor motives. We find little evidence supporting the view that the targeting of aid has improved significantly. Most donors provide higher aid to relatively poor countries, but so far the fight against poverty has not resulted in a stronger focus on needy recipients with favourable local conditions. The estimation results reveal that the policy orientation of aid critically depends on how local conditions are measured. In general, however, donors appear to be less policy-oriented than poverty-oriented. The response of donors to changing institutional and policy conditions in recipient countries turns out to be fairly weak. We reject the proposition that multilateral aid is clearly superior to bilateral aid in terms of rewarding poor countries with better policies and institutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
Rainer Thiele University of Kiel Peter Nunnenkamp University of Kiel Axel Dreher University of Goettingen (Gottingen)
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Feb 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Feb 06
|
|
72 (98,224)
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We analyze the aid portfolio of various bilateral and multilateral donors, testing whether they have prioritised aid in line with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In doing so, we combine sectorally disaggregated aid data with indicators reflecting the situation of recipient countries regarding the MDGs. Our results show that donors differ not only in terms of their overall generosity and the general poverty orientation of aid, but also in the extent to which their sectoral aid allocation is conducive to achieving more specific MDGs such as all children completing a full course of primary schooling, reducing child and maternal mortality as well as reversing the spread of HIV/AIDS. Overall, while some MDGs, e.g., the fight against HIV/AIDS, have shaped the allocation of aid, the sector-specific results reveal that with respect to other MDGs, most notably primary education, there is a considerable gap between donor rhetoric and actual aid allocation. These results invite the conclusion that the current focus on substantially increasing aid in order to turn the tide in trying to achieve the MDGs misses one important point: Unless the targeting of aid is improved, higher aid will not have the desired effects. Our results suggest that at least part of the blame for missing the MDGs falls on insufficient targeting of aid.
Aid Allocation, MDGs, Development Aid
|
|
|
7.
|
|
|
Dirk-Jan Koch Centre for International Development Issues Nijmegen Axel Dreher University of Goettingen (Gottingen) Peter Nunnenkamp University of Kiel Rainer Thiele University of Kiel
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Mar 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Mar 08
|
|
62 (107,100)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
NGOs play an important role in international development cooperation, but the allocation of NGO aid has rarely been mapped, let alone explained. Based on a representative dataset for 61 important NGOs from various OECD countries, we analyze the targeting of NGO aid across a large number of recipient countries by jointly considering major determinants of NGO aid in a multivariate regression framework. While our results show that NGOs are more active in the neediest countries, we reject the hypothesis that NGOs complement official aid through engaging in so-called difficult institutional environments. Rather, they tend to replicate the location choices of official "backdonors." Moreover, NGOs follow other NGOs so that aid gets clustered. Finally, NGOs select recipient countries with common traits related to religion or colonial history. Taken together, our findings suggest that NGOs keep a low profile rather than distinguishing themselves from other donors and trying to excel under risky conditions.
aid allocation, aid agencies, non-governmental organizations, poverty
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
Axel Dreher University of Goettingen (Gottingen) Peter Nunnenkamp University of Kiel Rainer Thiele University of Kiel
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Jun 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Apr 07
|
|
47 (122,119)
|
6
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Using panel data for 143 countries over the period 1973-2002, this paper empirically analyzes the influence of US aid on voting patterns in the UN General Assembly. We use disaggregated aid data to account for the fact that various forms of aid may differ in their ability to induce political support by recipients. We obtain strong evidence that US aid buys voting compliance in the Assembly. More specifically, our results suggest that general budget support and untied grants are the major aid categories by which recipients have been induced to vote in line with the United States. When replicating the analysis for other G7 donors, no comparable patterns emerge.
Bilateral Aid, UN General Assembly, Voting
|
|
|
9.
|
|
|
Jann Lay Kiel Institute for World Economics Rainer Thiele University of Kiel Manfred Wiebelt University of Kiel - Institute for World Economics (IfW)
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Jan 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
27 Mar 08
|
|
8 (201,147)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper analyzes how major external shocks and policy reforms affect Bolivias ability to achieve pro-poor growth. Employing a recursive-dynamic CGE model, it considers three different scenarios: an optimistic baseline scenario; a more realistic scenario that accounts for two important negative external shocks (declining capital inflows and El NiƱo); and a scenario that captures the combined effect of the shocks and two major reform projects (development of the gas sector and deregulation of the urban labor market). It turns out that the shocks are likely to impair Bolivias medium-term development prospects, leading to marked increases in both urban and rural poverty. If the reform projects were implemented, the poverty increase caused by the shocks would be more than offset for urban households, but reinforced for rural households.
|
|