| . |
Robert Litterman's
Scholarly Papers
Click on the title of any column to sort the table by that
column. |
|
|
| |
|
|
Aggregate Statistics |
|
Total Downloads
5,280 |
Total
Citations
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
Guangliang He Independent Robert Litterman Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. - Quantitative Strategy Group
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Oct 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Oct 02
|
|
5,066 (237)
|
14
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this article we demonstrate that the optimal portfolios generated by the Black-Litterman asset allocation model have a very simple, intuitive property. The unconstrained optimal portfolio in the Black-Litterman model is the scaled market equilibrium portfolio (reflecting the uncertainty in the equilibrium expected returns) plus a weighted sum of portfolios representing the investor's views. The weight on a portfolio representing a view is positive when the view is more bullish than the one implied by the equilibrium and the other views. The weight increases as the investor becomes more bullish on the view, and the magnitude of the weight also increases as the investor becomes more confident about the view.
Baysian, Black-Litterman model, CAPM, mean-variance analysis, portfolio selection
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
Tim Shepheard-Walwyn The National Academies - National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Robert Litterman Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. - Quantitative Strategy Group
|
| Posted: |
|
16 Nov 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Nov 07
|
|
133 (63,338)
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this paper, the authors consider how risk measures, based on internal models of this type, might be integrated into a firm's own methodology for allocating risk capital to its individual business units and for determining its optimal capital structure. They also consider the implications of these developments for the future approach to determining regulatory capital requirements.
capital regulation
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
Thomas Doan Independent Robert Litterman Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. - Quantitative Strategy Group Christopher A. Sims Princeton University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
03 May 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 May 04
|
|
41 (129,082)
|
75
|
|
| |
Abstract:
No abstract is available for this paper.
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
Robert Litterman Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. - Quantitative Strategy Group
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Jun 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Jun 04
|
|
20 (167,186)
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
No abstract is available for this paper.
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
Robert Litterman Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. - Quantitative Strategy Group Laurence Weiss Independent
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Jun 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Jun 04
|
|
20 (167,186)
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper reexamines both monthly and quarterly U.S. postwar data to investigate if the observed comovements between money, real interestrates, prices and output are compatible with the money-real interest-output link suggested by existing monetary theories of output, which include both Keynesian and equilibrium models.The major empirical findings are these;1) In both monthly and quarterly data, we cannot reject the hypothesis that the ex ante real rate is exogenous, or Granger-causally prior in the context of a four-variable system which contains money, prices, nominal interest rates and industrial production.2) In quarterly data, there is significantly more information con-tained in either the levels of expected inflation or the innovationof this variable for predicting future output, given current and lagged output, than in any other variable examined (money, actualinflation, nominal interest rates, or ex ante real rates). The effect of an inflation innovation on future output is unambiguously negative. The first result casts strong doubt on the empirical importance of existing monetary theories of output, which imply that money should have a causal role on the ex ante real rates. The second result would appear incompatible with most demand driven models of output.In light of these results, we propose an alternative structural model which can account for the major dynamic interactions among the variables.This model has two central features: i) output is unaffected by money supply;and ii) the money supply process is motivated by short-run price stability.
|
|