| . |
John W.R. Phillips's
Scholarly Papers
Click on the title of any column to sort the table by that
column. |
|
|
| |
|
|
Aggregate Statistics |
|
Total Downloads
512 |
Total
Citations
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
Olivia S. Mitchell University of Pennsylvania - Insurance & Risk Management Department John W.R. Phillips National Institutes on Aging - Health Scientist Administrator
|
| Posted: |
|
16 Jun 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Aug 06
|
|
105 (76,058)
|
6
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Social Security reform proposals are often presented in terms of their differential impacts on hypothetical or example workers. Our work explores how different benchmarks produce different replacement rate outcomes. We use the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to evaluate how Social Security benefit replacement rates differ for actual versus hypothetical earner profiles, and we examine whether these findings are sensitive to alternative definitions of replacement rates. We find that workers with the median HRS profile would be estimated to receive benefits worth 55% of lifetime average earnings, versus 48% for the SSA medium scaled profile. Since US policymakers tend to prefer a replacement rate measure tied to workers' own past earnings, using these metrics would yield higher replacement rates compared to commonly used scaled illustrative profiles. However, benchmarks that use population as opposed to individual earnings measures to compare individual worker benefits to pre-retirement consumption produce lower replacement rates for HRS versus hypothetical earners.
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
Andrew Au University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School Olivia S. Mitchell University of Pennsylvania - Insurance & Risk Management Department John W.R. Phillips National Institutes on Aging - Health Scientist Administrator
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Jun 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Feb 08
|
|
102 (77,721)
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
To assess the distributional effects of social security reform proposals, it is essential to have good information on real-world workers' lifetime earnings trajectories. Until recently, however, policymakers have relied on hypothetical earnings profiles for policy analysis. We use actual lifetime earnings data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to compare actual workers' covered earnings profiles to these hypothetical profiles. We show that the hypothetical profiles do not track earnings patterns of current retirees; thus lifetime pay levels are much higher than for most HRS workers. Therefore, using hypothetical profiles could misrepresent benefits paid and taxes collected under such reforms.
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
William G. Gale Brookings Institution Michael Dworsky Brookings Institution John W.R. Phillips National Institutes on Aging - Health Scientist Administrator Leslie Muller Social Security Administration
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Jun 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Jun 07
|
|
86 (87,645)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We provide the first estimates of how after-tax defined benefit plans and social security affect household wealth. The analysis employs a sample of elderly households with detailed information on lifetime earnings, and follows several recent papers in adjusting pension wealth for the life-cycle. These factors reduce data measurement problems relative to previous research and provide an estimation framework that is consistent with economic theory. Using data on married couples from the 1996 SIPP, we find that after-tax pension benefits have little effect on other wealth among households where the husband did not attend college, but almost completely crowd out other wealth accumulation among households where the husband did attend college.
social security, pension, benefits, retirement
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
Olivia S. Mitchell University of Pennsylvania - Insurance & Risk Management Department John W.R. Phillips National Institutes on Aging - Health Scientist Administrator
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Feb 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 Feb 08
|
|
43 (126,486)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This project explores the process by which older workers apply for, and are awarded, Social Security Disability Insurance (DI) benefits. Our focus is on how and whether DI serves as a path out of the labor market at older ages. This research is important to the extent that proposals to raise the early retirement age under Social Security alter the opportunity set available to older workers. Identifying the characteristics of older workers who apply for DI under current rules, those who are rejected after application, and those who then go on to appeal, can provide policymakers with insight regarding the potential well-being of the "at risk" population if the early retirement age were to rise. We use data from the Health and Retirement Study to compare older workers prior to application, and use these characteristics to predict future DI application and award patterns. The findings indicate that older people initially in poor health and with low economic status are more likely to apply for DI thereafter, as compared to those reporting no health problems and with more assets. Nevertheless few factors distinguish statistically between applicants awarded versus denied benefits, and between those who appeal rejected applications versus those who do not.
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
Olivia S. Mitchell University of Pennsylvania - Insurance & Risk Management Department John W.R. Phillips National Institutes on Aging - Health Scientist Administrator
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Jan 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Jan 08
|
|
38 (132,614)
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In order to understand whom among the non-disabled older population experiences a health problem later in life and applies for Social Security Disability Insurance, it is necessary to investigate patterns of coverage and reasons for non-coverage. This paper shows that while the safety net program covers most American workers, a substantial group of older women is not covered. In this sense, the program is not helpful to workers reaching their late 50's and early 60's with health-related problems.
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
Olivia S. Mitchell University of Pennsylvania - Insurance & Risk Management Department John W.R. Phillips National Institutes on Aging - Health Scientist Administrator Andrew Au University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School David McCarthy Imperial College Business School
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Feb 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 Feb 08
|
|
37 (133,855)
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper explores how earnings variability is related to retirement wealth. Past research has demonstrated that the average American household on the verge of retirement would need to save substantially more, in order to preserve consumption flows in old age. While several socioeconomic factors have been examined that might explain such problems, prior studies have not assessed the role of earnings variability over the lifetime as a potential explanation for poor retirement prospects. Thus two workers having identical levels of average lifetime earnings might have had very different patterns of earnings variability over their lifetimes. Such differences could translate into quite different retirement wealth outcomes. This paper evaluates the effect of earnings variability on retirement wealth using information supplied by respondents to the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). This is a rich and nationally representative dataset on Americans on the verge of retirement, with responses linked to administrative records from the Social Security Administration. Our research illuminates the key links between lifetime earnings variability and retirement wealth.
|
|
|
7.
|
|
|
Olivia S. Mitchell University of Pennsylvania - Insurance & Risk Management Department John W.R. Phillips National Institutes on Aging - Health Scientist Administrator
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Feb 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Feb 08
|
|
31 (142,192)
|
6
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Social Security reform proposals are often presented in terms of their differential impacts on hypothetical or 'example' workers. Our work explores how different benchmarks produce different replacement rate outcomes. We use the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to evaluate how Social Security benefit replacement rates differ for actual versus hypothetical earner profiles, and we examine whether these findings are sensitive to alternative definitions of replacement rates. We find that workers with the median HRS profile would be estimated to receive benefits worth 55% of lifetime average earnings, versus 48% for the SSA medium scaled profile. Since US policymakers tend to prefer a replacement rate measure tied to workers' own past earnings, using these metrics would yield higher replacement rates compared to commonly used scaled illustrative profiles. However, benchmarks that use population as opposed to individual earnings measures to compare individual worker benefits to pre-retirement consumption produce lower replacement rates for HRS versus hypothetical earners.
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
Andrew Au University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School Olivia S. Mitchell University of Pennsylvania - Insurance & Risk Management Department John W.R. Phillips National Institutes on Aging - Health Scientist Administrator
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Feb 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Feb 08
|
|
26 (151,261)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Prior research has suggested that many older Americans have not saved enough to maintain consumption levels in old age. One way older persons might respond to inadequate savings would be to extend their worklives by delaying retirement. This paper examines evidence on this matter using the Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative panel survey of people age 51-61 in 1992 followed for several years in a panel. We use the data to project household retirement assets and to determine how much more saving would be needed to preserve post-retirement consumption levels. Our research then examines the links between derived saving shortfall measures and delayed retirement patterns. Among nonmarried persons, there is evidence that larger shortfalls do produce delayed retirement, though the effect is not quantitatively large. For married couples, pre-retirement wealth shortfalls do not appear to be significantly associated with delayed retirement. Evidently couples have other means of handling saving shortfalls.
|
|
|
9.
|
|
|
Howard Iams U.S. Social Security Administration John W.R. Phillips National Institutes on Aging - Health Scientist Administrator Kristen Robinson affiliation not provided to SSRN Lionel Deang Social Security Administration Irena Dushi Social Security Administration
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Mar 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 Jul 09
|
|
19 (169,849)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Dramatic changes in life expectancy, women's roles in the labor market, the structure of the workforce, and pension systems have occurred in recent decades, all influencing the well-being of future retirees. This article uses different sources of United States data to focus on the retirement resources of women aged 55-64. By comparing the resources for this age group in 2004 to their counterparts in 1994 and 1984, this analysis provides some indication of changes in the retirement preparedness of three different cohorts of women. Our findings indicate that notable changes have occurred with women's pathways into retirement that are due to increased education and lifetime work experience. As a consequence, there are marked differences in potential retirement outcomes. We find that women aged 55-64 today are better prepared in several respects than their counterparts of the same age 10 or 20 years ago.
women, aged, retirement
|
|
|
10.
|
|
|
John W.R. Phillips National Institutes on Aging - Health Scientist Administrator Olivia S. Mitchell University of Pennsylvania - Insurance & Risk Management Department
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Jan 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Jan 08
|
|
13 (187,071)
|
9
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper evaluates potential responses to reductions in early Social Security retirement benefits. Using the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) linked to administrative records, we find that Social Security coverage is quite uneven in the older population: one-quarter of respondents in their late 50's lacks coverage under the Disability Insurance program, and one-fifth lacks coverage for old-age benefits. Among those eligible for benefits, respondents who subsequently retired early appear quite similar initially to those who later filed for normal retirement benefits, but both groups were healthier and better educated than those who later filed for disability benefits. Next we investigate the potential impact of curtailing, and then eliminating, early Social Security benefits. A life-cycle model of retirement behavior provides estimated parameters used to simulate the effects of cutting early Social Security benefits on retirement pathways. We find that cutting early Social Security benefits would boost the probability of normal retirement by twice as much as it would the probability of disability retirement.
|
|
|
11.
|
|
|
William G. Gale Brookings Institution John W.R. Phillips National Institutes on Aging - Health Scientist Administrator
|
| Posted: |
|
12 Dec 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
12 Dec 08
|
|
12 (189,949)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Using data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), we calculate the relationship between socio-economic status and a utility based measure of annuity value. We find considerable variation between groups once we take account of not only socio-economic differences in mortality, but also pre-annuitized wealth and longevity risk pooling in marriage.
Using HRS data on subjective survival probabilities, we then construct a subjective life table for each individual in the HRS. We show that these tables vary appropriately between groups and aggregate closely to group level averages. We calculate the value each household would place on annuitization, based on the husband and wife's subjective life tables, and the household's degree of risk-aversion and proportion of pre-annuitized wealth. A significant minority would perceive themselves as suffering a net loss from mandatory annuitization.
|
|