Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A6
Canada
University of Saskatchewan
SSRN RANKINGS
in Total Papers Downloads
sexual consent, affirmative consent, voluntary agreement, Canada, equality rights, sexual self-determination, sexual autonomy, jurisprudence, criminal law, law reform, legal theory
sexual assault, consent, mens rea, mistake of law, defence of belief in consent, self-determination, sexual autonomy, affirmative consent
sexual assault, rape, consent, seduction, criminal law, legal reasoning, judicial decision-making, prosecutorial discretion, charging decisions, police decision-making, Canada
access to justice, administration of justice, legitecture, public interest, trial process, courts, dispute resolution, communication, fair hearing, institutional design, fact finding, rule of law, reasons for decision, law reform, jurisprudence, Canada
criminal responsibility, sexual assault, consent, mens rea, recklessness, wilful blindness, legal rhetoric
sexual assault, sex worker, prostitution, mens rea, statutory rape, reasonable steps, reckless exploitation, inequality, criminal culpability, mistake of fact, statutory bar, prosecutorial discretion, aboriginal, human rights
HIV, consent, non-disclosure, deceit, fraud, Mabior, Hutchinson, sexual assault, sexual autonomy, human rights, equality rights, penal consequences, criminal law, Canada
sexual assault law,aboriginal child,prosecutorial discretion,police decision-making,judicial discretion,rule of law,legal reasoning,bias,sexual consent,statutory rape,juries,mistake of law,mens rea,belief in consent,human rights,indigenous,feminist,discrimination,inequality,reasonable
sexual assault, criminal responsibility, consent, mens rea, mistake of law, judicial discretion, mistaken belief in consent, rape myths, rule of law
criminal law, criminal justice, criminology
cabinet appeals, poltical control, political accountability,executive power,rule of law, administrative law, regulation, parliamentary democracy, Canada, National Energy Board, Canadian Transport Commission, Foreign Investment Review Board, Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission
sexual assault, affirmative consent, belief in consent, defences, mistake of fact, reasonable steps, Canada, mens rea, statutory bar, common sense, law reform, judicial decision-making, prejudicial effect, evidence
mistake of law, prosecutorial discretion, mens rea, excuse, obstruction of justice
sexual assault, judicial misconduct, legal reasoning, victim-blaming, principles of fundamental justice, equality, impartiallity, misogyny, racism, rape-myths, administration of criminal justice, Judges Act, s. 65
autonomy, vulnerable persons, physical integrity, consent, sexual assault, consensual sex, right to die, euthanasia, medical treatment, human rights
Prisons, Penitentiaries, Prisoner Rights, Access to Health Care, Informed Consent, Consent to Treatment, Right to Refuse Medical Treatment, Coerced Consent, Legal Regulation of Prison Medical Care, Prison Administration, Regulation of Penitentiaries, Human Rights of Prisoners
criminal responsibility, codification, principles of fundamental justice, substantive criminal law
sexual assault, consent, feminist, police, prosecutorial discretion, social norms, criminal justice system, decision-making, equality rights, human rights, legal theory, non-enforcement, judicial discretion, legal definitions, rule of law
Choice, Necessity, Duress, Consensual Model, Consent, Social Responsibility, Substantive Justice, Distributive Justice, Retributive Justice, Institutional Design, Human Rights, Justification, Excuse, Regulation
jury instructions, judicial discretion, sexual assault, criminal responsibility, mistake of law, mistake of fact,
sexual offences, reasons for decision, judicial accountability, public access to the courts, transparency, written reasons, Bill C-5, Canadian Parliament, Canadian Criminal Code, criminal law,
Sexual Consent, Criminal Law, BDSM, Autonomy, Canada, Reform, Motive, Sexual Assault, Equality Rights, Gender Violence, Agency
legal ethics, lawyer-client relationship, professional regulation, regulation of the legal profession, abuse of authority to act, abuse of power
Africa, Gender Equality, Marriage Laws, Slavery, Forced Marriage, Consent, Coercion, Pre-Colonial, Colonial, Post-Colonial, Human Rights, Cultural Tradition
social justice, jurisprudence, human rights, common sense, judicial discretion, legal reasoning, prejudice, bias, poverty, discrimination, constitutional law
sexual assault, mens rea, reasonable steps, belief in consent, Canada, law reform, statutory bar, s.273.2, sexual consent, criminal responsibility, wilful blindness, recklessness
moral criticism, ought, social obligation, conclusiveness, finality, context-bound, human rights, moral argumentation, moral reasoning, social institution, Searle, stand-point, point of view, internal versus external,
legal decision-making, empirical uncertainty, precautionary principle, policy-making, knowledge, societal preference, norms
human rights, reproductive rights, access to fertility services
Reasons for Decision, Judicial Accountability, Right to Know, Transparency, Public Access to the Courts
rape,sexual assault, Quaker, Religious Society of Friends, complicity, Clery Act, non-reporting, gender equality, colleges, day schools, boarding schools,
