| . |
William N. Kinnard's
Scholarly Papers
Click on the title of any column to sort the table by that
column. |
|
|
| |
|
|
Aggregate Statistics |
|
Total Downloads
0 |
Total
Citations
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
Elaine M. Worzala University of San Diego - Real Estate Institute Margarita M. Lenk Colorado State University - College of Business William N. Kinnard Real Estate Counseling Group of Connecticut, Inc.
|
| Posted: |
|
07 May 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 May 98
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Increased competition, falling real estate market values and management fees dependent upon appraised values may create a deadly cocktail for independent real estate appraisers. These factors may encourage appraisers to succumb to client pressures to overvalue properties as well as impair the public perception of appraiser independence. This dilemma is evidenced most clearly by the widely publicized Prudential vs. Mark Jorgensen lawsuit (Williams 1993). This research explores the behavioral effects of the potential risks that may be affecting the appraiser's judgment process: risk of client loss and risk of disciplinary action due to violation of the Appraisal Standards of Professional Practice should the appraisal be shown to be significantly incorrect at a later date. These risks have been documented in the auditing literature with the behavioral research methodology that has been used in this study. This paper reports the results of a survey of real estate appraisers who were put into a role playing scenario and asked to accept additional data from their client and revise a value upward in one of their appraisal reports. Two non-appraisal factors were varied to determine if either or the combination of the two would influence the appraiser's willingness to revise the report. They were client size as a percentage of annual revenues (to proxy client pressure to opinion shop) and the size of the adjustment (to proxy risk of disciplinary action). Preliminary results indicate that client size is a statistically significant factor whereas neither the size of the adjustments nor the interaction of the two variables seems to influence the appraiser's willingness to succumb to the pressure to change the value.
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
William N. Kinnard Real Estate Counseling Group of Connecticut, Inc.
|
| Posted: |
|
21 Mar 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
01 Jan 98
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper reviews studies on the effect and impact of proximity to high-voltage electricity transmission lines (HVTLs) on the sales prices (and hence market values) of nearby residential properties. Because of the focus and character of most published studies (and of unpublished papers that are nevertheless available for study and review), the emphasis is on single-family residential value impacts.
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
William N. Kinnard Real Estate Counseling Group of Connecticut, Inc. Mary Beth Geckler Real Estate Counseling Group of Connecticut, Inc. Sue Ann Dickey S.A.D. Association
|
| Posted: |
|
21 Mar 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 Dec 97
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
For more than a decade, since the early 1980's, a feeling has developed among homeowners and landowners in proximity to what have come to be known as Locally Undesirable Land Uses (LULUs) represent hazards to human health and safety. As a result, increasing numbers and amounts of claims for damages associated with property value diminution have been filed in both State and Federal Courts. The major reason given is the existence of "widespread public fear" and "widespread public perceptions of hazards" emanating from these LULUs. The list of claimed or perceived hazards is long and growing. The hazards include: water contamination from toxic and hazardous materials, soil contamination from toxic and hazardous materials, air contamination from toxic, hazardous and noxious materials, noise from airports or highways (or both), radiation from various sources, Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and of course hazardous and toxic materials from landfills or waste storage facilities. All of this is in addition to visual and aural impacts that intrude on "quiet enjoyment". From these claims, and several important Court decisions based upon them, a mythology about the direct, linear relationship between "widespread perceived fear" and diminished values of residential properties proximate to these sources of perceived hazards has emerged. The objective of the research reported in this paper is to examine and test the premises on which that mythology has been constructed.
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
William N. Kinnard Real Estate Counseling Group of Connecticut, Inc. John R. Knight University of the Pacific (UOP) - McGeorge School of Law Mary Beth Geckler Real Estate Counseling Group of Connecticut, Inc. Jeffrey B. Kinnard Real Estate Counseling Group of Connecticut, Inc.
|
| Posted: |
|
07 Mar 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Jan 98
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Property tax assessors and their valuation experts frequently argue that rentals of anchor department stores in regional/superregional shopping centers are "too low" and not representative of market rentals. Canadian shopping center data for the years 1975-1990 were analyzed to test this contention. The data included median figures for Gross Leasable Area (GLA), sales per square foot of GLA, and rental per square foot of GLA from 15 different categories of retail activities. Linear and logarithmic model specifications were tested to identify the functional form of the relationship between rental rates, size, and sales per square foot. The results demonstrate clearly and unequivocally that reported rentals for Canadian anchor department stores are entirely consistent with the lower marginal productivity (expressed in sales per square foot of GLA) accompanying their larger size. Those market rentals decrease at a decreasing rate as size in GLA increases, and increase at a decreasing rate as sales per square foot of GLA increase. A stable, consistent pattern of market behavior emerged that lends support to an income capitalization approach for valuing retail space, large or small.
|
|