| . |
James J. Heckman's
Scholarly Papers
Click on the title of any column to sort the table by that
column. |
|
|
| |
|
|
Aggregate Statistics |
|
Total Downloads
11,597 |
Total
Citations
3,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
18 Aug 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
29 Jul 09
|
|
932 (5,572)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper uses data available from the National Opinion Research Center's (NORC) survey on religious attitudes and powerful statistical methods to evaluate the effect of prayer on the attitude of God toward human beings.
kernel estimator, unobserved variables
|
|
|
2.
|
|
Human Capital Policy
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
26 Feb 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Oct 09
|
|
746 ( 8,024) |
125
|
|
|
|
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
675
|
125
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers alternative policies for promoting skill formation that are targeted to different stages of the life cycle. We demonstrate the importance of both cognitive and noncognitive skills that are formed early in the life cycle in accounting for racial, ethnic and family background gaps in schooling and other dimensions of socioeconomic success. Most of the gaps in college attendance and delay are determined by early family factors. Children from better families and with high ability earn higher returns to schooling. We find only a limited role for tuition policy or family income supplements in eliminating schooling and college attendance gaps. At most 8% of American youth are credit constrained in the traditional usage of that term. The evidence points to a high return to early interventions and a low return to remedial or compensatory interventions later in the life cycle. Skill and ability beget future skill and ability. At current levels of funding, traditional policies like tuition subsidies, improvements in school quality, job training and tax rebates are unlikely to be effective in closing gaps.
Human Capital, Life Cycle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Feb 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Oct 09
|
|
71
|
125
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers alternative policies for promoting skill formation that are targetted to different stages of the life cycle. We demonstrate the importance of both cognitive and noncognitive skills that are formed early in the life cycle in accounting for racial, ethnic and family background gaps in schooling and other dimensions of socioeconomic success. Most of the gaps in college attendance and delay are determined by early family factors. Children from better families and with high ability earn higher returns to schooling. We find only a limited role for tuition policy or family income supplements in eliminating schooling and college attendance gaps. At most 8% of American youth are credit constrained in the traditional usage of that term. The evidence points to a high return to early interventions and a low return to remedial or compensatory interventions later in the life cycle. Skill and ability beget future skill and ability. At current levels of funding, traditional policies like tuition subsidies, improvements in school quality, job training and tax rebates are unlikely to be effective in closing gaps.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
Earnings Functions, Rates of Return and Treatment Effects: The Mincer Equation and Beyond
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
09 Aug 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
476 ( 15,255) |
40
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Sep 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Sep 05
|
|
24
|
40
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers the interpretation of "Mincer rates of return". We test and reject the Mincer model. It fails to track the time series of true returns. We show how repeated cross section and panel data improves the ability of analysts to estimate the ex ante and ex post marginal rate of returns. Accounting for sequential revelation of information calls into question the validity of the internal rate of return as a tool for policy analysis. The large estimated psychic costs of schooling found in recent work helps to explain why persons do not attend school even though the financial rewards for doing so are high. We present methods for computing distributions of ex post and ex ante returns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Aug 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
452
|
40
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Numerous studies regress log earnings on schooling and report estimated coefficients as "Mincer rates of return". A more recent literature uses instrumental variables. This chapter considers the economic interpretation of these analyses and how the availability of repeated cross section and panel data improves the ability of analysts to estimate the rate of return. We consider under what conditions the Mincer model estimates an ex post rate of return. We test and reject the model on six cross sections of U.S. Census data. We present a general nonparametric approach for estimating marginal internal rates of return that takes into account tuition, income taxes and forms of uncertainty. We also contrast estimates based on a single cross-section of data, using the synthetic cohort approach, with estimates based on repeated cross-sections following actual cohorts. Cohort-based models fitted on repeated cross section data provide more reliable estimates of ex post returns. Accounting for uncertainty affects estimates of rates of return. Accounting for sequential revelation of information calls into question the validity of the internal rate of return as a tool for policy analysis. An alternative approach to computing economic rates of return that accounts for sequential revelation of information is proposed and the evidence is summarized. We distinguish ex ante from ex post returns. New panel data methods for estimating the uncertainty and psychic costs facing agents are reviewed. We report recent evidence that demonstrates that there are large psychic costs of schooling. This helps to explain why persons do not attend school even though the financial rewards for doing so are high. We present methods for computing distributions of returns ex ante and ex post. We review the literature on IV estimation. The link of the estimates to the economics is not strong. The traditional instruments are weak, and this literature has not produced decisive empirical estimates. We exposit new methods that interpret the economic content of different instruments within a unified framework.
rate of return to schooling, internal rate of return, uncertainty, psychic costs, panel data, distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
Fifty Years of Mincer Earnings Regressions
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
11 Jun 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
466 ( 15,719) |
62
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Jun 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
419
|
62
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The Mincer earnings function is the cornerstone of a large literature in empirical economics. This paper discusses the theoretical foundations of the Mincer model and examines the empirical support for it using data from Decennial Censuses and Current Population surveys. While data from the 1940 and 1950 Censuses provide some support for Mincer's model, data from later decades are inconsistent with it. We examine the importance of relaxing functional form assumptions in estimating internal rates of return to schooling and in accounting for taxes, tuition, nonlinearity in schooling, and nonseparability between schooling and work experience. Inferences about trends in rates of return to high school and college obtained from our more general model differ substantially from inferences drawn from estimates based on a Mincer earnings regression. Important differences also arise between cohort-based and cross-sectional estimates of the rate of return to school. In the recent period of rapid technological change, widely used cross-sectional applications of the Mincer model produce dramatically biased estimates of cohort returns to schooling. We also examine the implications of accounting for uncertainty and agent expectation formation. Even when the static framework of Mincer is maintained, accounting for uncertainty substantially affects rate of return estimates. Considering the sequential resolution of uncertainty over time in a dynamic setting gives rise to option values, which fundamentally changes the analysis of schooling decisions. In the presence of sequential resolution of uncertainty and option values, the internal rate of return - a cornerstone of classical human capital theory - is not a useful guide to policy analysis.
Mincer Model, Earnings Regressions, Returns to Schooling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Jun 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Jun 03
|
|
47
|
62
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The Mincer earnings function is the cornerstone of a large literature in empirical economics. This paper discusses the theoretical foundations of the Mincer model and examines the empirical support for it using data from Decennial Censuses and Current Population Surveys. While data from 1940 and 1950 Censuses provide some support for Mincer's model, data from later decades are inconsistent with it. We examine the importance of relaxing functional form assumptions in estimating internal rates of return to schooling and of accounting for taxes, tuition, nonlinearity in schooling, and nonseparability between schooling and work experience. Inferences about trends in rates of return to high school and college obtained from our more general model differ substantially from inferences drawn from estimates based on a Mincer earnings regression. Important differences also arise between cohort-based and cross-sectional estimates of the rate of return to schooling. In the recent period of rapid technological progress, widely used cross-sectional applications of the Mincer model produce dramatically biased estimates of cohort returns to schooling. We also examine the implications of accounting for uncertainty and agent expectation formation. Even when the static framework of Mincer is maintained, accounting for uncertainty substantially affects the return estimates. Considering the sequential resolution of uncertainty over time in a dynamic setting gives rise to option values, which fundamentally changes the analysis of schooling decisions. In the presence of sequential resolution of uncertainty and option values, the internal rate of return - a cornerstone of classical human capital theory - is not a useful guide to policy analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
Schools, Skills, and Synapses
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
05 Jun 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Jun 08
|
|
387 ( 20,039) |
11
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Jun 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Jun 08
|
|
27
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper discusses (a) the role of cognitive and noncognitive ability in shaping adult outcomes, (b) the early emergence of differentials in abilities between children of advantaged families and children of disadvantaged families, (c) the role of families in creating these abilities, (d) adverse trends in American families, and (e) the effectiveness of early interventions in offsetting these trends. Practical issues in the design and implementation of early childhood programs are discussed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
05 Jun 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Jun 08
|
|
360
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper discusses (a) the role of cognitive and noncognitive ability in shaping adult outcomes, (b) the early emergence of differentials in abilities between children of advantaged families and children of disadvantaged families, (c) the role of families in creating these abilities, (d) adverse trends in American families, and (e) the effectiveness of early interventions in offsetting these trends. Practical issues in the design and implementation of early childhood programs are discussed.
productivity, high school dropout, ability gaps, family influence, noncognitive skills, early interventions
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
Interpreting the Evidence on Life Cycle Skill Formation
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Dimitriy V. Masterov University of Chicago - Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies
|
|
Posted:
|
|
14 Jun 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
351 ( 22,652) |
66
|
|
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Dimitriy V. Masterov University of Chicago - Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Jul 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
278
|
66
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper presents economic models of child development that capture the essence of recent findings from the empirical literature on skill formation. The goal of this essay is to provide a theoretical framework for interpreting the evidence from a vast empirical literature, for guiding the next generation of empirical studies, and for formulating policy. Central to our analysis is the concept that childhood has more than one stage. We formalize the concepts of self-productivity and complementarity of human capital investments and use them to explain the evidence on skill formation. Together, they explain why skill begets skill through a multiplier process. Skill formation is a life cycle process. It starts in the womb and goes on throughout life. Families play a role in this process that is far more important than the role of schools. There are multiple skills and multiple abilities that are important for adult success. Abilities are both inherited and created, and the traditional debate about nature versus nurture is scientifically obsolete. Human capital investment exhibits both self-productivity and complementarity. Skill attainment at one stage of the life cycle raises skill attainment at later stages of the life cycle (self-productivity). Early investment facilitates the productivity of later investment (complementarity). Early investments are not productive if they are not followed up by later investments (another aspect of complementarity). This complementarity explains why there is no equity-efficiency trade-off for early investment. The returns to investing early in the life cycle are high. Remediation of inadequate early investments is difficult and very costly as a consequence of both self-productivity and complementarity.
skill formation, education, government policy, educational finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Dimitriy V. Masterov University of Chicago - Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Jun 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 Jun 05
|
|
73
|
66
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper presents economic models of child development that capture the essence of recent findings from the empirical literature on skill formation. The goal of this essay is to provide a theoretical framework for interpreting the evidence from a vast empirical literature, for guiding the next generation of empirical studies, and for formulating policy. Central to our analysis is the concept that childhood has more than one stage. We formalize the concepts of self-productivity and complementarity of human capital investments and use them to explain the evidence on skill formation. Together, they explain why skill begets skill through a multiplier process. Skill formation is a life cycle process. It starts in the womb and goes on throughout life. Families play a role in this process that is far more important than the role of schools. There are multiple skills and multiple abilities that are important for adult success. Abilities are both inherited and created, and the traditional debate about nature versus nurture is scientifically obsolete. Human capital investment exhibits both self-productivity and complementarity. Skill attainment at one stage of the life cycle raises skill attainment at later stages of the life cycle (self-productivity). Early investment facilitates the productivity of later investment (complementarity). Early investments are not productive if they are not followed up by later investments (another aspect of complementarity). This complementarity explains why there is no equity-efficiency trade-off for early investment. The returns to investing early in the life cycle are high. Remediation of inadequate early investments is difficult and very costly as a consequence of both self-productivity and complementarity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
|
The Productivity Argument for Investing in Young Children
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Dimitriy V. Masterov University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
|
|
Posted:
|
|
06 Apr 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
347 ( 22,980) |
22
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Dimitriy V. Masterov University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Apr 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
251
|
22
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper presents a productivity argument for investing in disadvantaged young children. For such investment, there is no equity-efficiency tradeoff.
early childhood investment, noncognitive skills, cognitive skills
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Dimitriy V. Masterov University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Apr 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 Jul 07
|
|
96
|
22
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper presents a productivity argument for investing in disadvantaged young children. For such investment, there is no equity-efficiency tradeoff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
John J. Donohue III Yale Law School James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
27 Jun 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 09
|
|
295 (27,942)
|
10
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Improvements in education and educational quality are widely acknowledged to be major contributors to black economic progress in the Twentieth Century. This paper investigates the sources of improvement in black education in the South in the first half of the century and demonstrates the important roles of social activism, especially NAACP litigation and private philanthropy, in improving the quality and availability of public schooling. Many scholars view education as a rival to social activism in explaining black economic progress, but such a view misses the important role of philanthropic and legal interventions in promoting education.
|
|
|
9.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Rosa L. Matzkin University of California, Los Angeles Lars Nesheim University College London
|
| Posted: |
|
16 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
277 (30,029)
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Making use of restrictions imposed by equilibrium, theoretical progress has been made on the nonparametric and semiparametric estimation and identification of scalar additive hedonic models (Ekeland, Heckman, and Nesheim, 2002) and scalar nonadditive hedonic models (Heckman, Matzkin, and Nesheim, 2002). However, little is known about the practical aspects of estimating such models or of the characteristics of equilibrium in such models. This paper presents computational and analytical results that fill some of these gaps. We simulate and estimate examples of equilibrium in the additive hedonic models and provide evidence on the performance of several estimation techniques. We also simulate examples of equilibria in nonadditive models and provide evidence on the performance of the nonadditive estimation techniques developed in Heckman, Matzkin, and Nesheim (2002).
hedonic models, nonparametric methods, simulation, Monte Carlo, additive models, nonadditive models
|
|
|
10.
|
|
Using Matching, Instrumental Variables and Control Functions to Estimate Economic Choice Models
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Salvador Navarro-Lozano University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
18 Feb 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
277 ( 30,029) |
44
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Salvador Navarro-Lozano University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 May 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
247
|
44
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper investigates four topics. (1) It examines the different roles played by the propensity score (probability of selection) in matching, instrumental variable and control functions methods. (2) It contrasts the roles of exclusion restrictions in matching and selection models. (3) It characterizes the sensitivity of matching to the choice of conditioning variables and demonstrates the greater robustness of control function methods to misspecification of the conditioning variables. (4) It demonstrates the problem of choosing the conditioning variables in matching and the failure of conventional model selection criteria when candidate conditioning variables are not exogenous.
Matching, Control Functions, Instrumental Variables, Discrete Choice, Identification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Salvador Navarro-Lozano University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
18 Feb 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Feb 03
|
|
30
|
44
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper investigates four topics. (1) It examines the different roles played by the propensity score (probability of selection) in matching, instrumental variable and control functions methods. (2) It contrasts the roles of exclusion restrictions in matching and selection models. (3) It characterizes the sensitivity of matching to the choice of conditioning variables and demonstrates the greater robustness of control function methods to misspecification of the conditioning variables. (4) It demonstrates the problem of choosing the conditioning variables in matching and the failure of conventional model selection criteria when candidate conditioning variables are not exogenous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
|
The Technology of Skill Formation
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
20 Jan 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
268 ( 31,318) |
51
|
|
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
23 Jan 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
244
|
51
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper develops a model of skill formation that explains a variety of findings established in the child development and child intervention literatures. At its core is a technology that is stage-specific and that features self productivity, dynamic complementarity and skill multipliers. Lessons are drawn for the design of new policies to alleviate the consequences of the accident of birth that is a major source of human inequality.
self productivity, skill multiplier, dynamic complementarity, accident of birth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Jan 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Jan 07
|
|
24
|
51
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper develops a model of skill formation that explains a variety of findings established in the child development and child intervention literatures. At its core is a technology that is stage-specific and that features self productivity, dynamic complementarity and skill multipliers. Lessons are drawn for the design of new policies to alleviate the consequences of the accident of birth that is a major source of human inequality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
|
Econometric Causality
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
17 Apr 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 May 08
|
|
266 ( 31,442) |
4
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
23 May 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 May 08
|
|
221
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper presents the econometric approach to causal modeling. It is motivated by policy problems. New causal parameters are defined and identified to address specific policy problems. Economists embrace a scientific approach to causality and model the preferences and choices of agents to infer subjective (agent) evaluations as well as objective outcomes. Anticipated and realized subjective and objective outcomes are distinguished. Models for simultaneous causality are developed. The paper contrasts the Neyman-Rubin model of causality with the econometric approach.
anticipated vs. realized outcomes, subjective and objective evaluations, Neyman-Rubin model, Roy model, econometrics, causality, counterfactuals, treatment effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Apr 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
02 May 08
|
|
45
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper presents the econometric approach to causal modeling. It is motivated by policy problems. New causal parameters are defined and identified to address specific policy problems. Economists embrace a scientific approach to causality and model the preferences and choices of agents to infer subjective (agent) evaluations as well as objective outcomes. Anticipated and realized subjective and objective outcomes are distinguished. Models for simultaneous causality are developed. The paper contrasts the Neyman-Rubin model of causality with the econometric approach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
|
Removing the Veil of Ignorance in Assessing the Distributional Impacts of Social Policies
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics Karsten T. Hansen Northwestern University - Department of Marketing James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
23 Mar 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
246 ( 34,350) |
21
|
|
|
|
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics Karsten T. Hansen Northwestern University - Department of Marketing James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Apr 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
218
|
21
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper summarizes our recent research on evaluating the distributional consequences of social programs. This research advances the economic policy evaluation literature beyond estimating assorted mean impacts to estimate distributions of outcomes generated by different policies and determine how those policies shift persons across the distributions of potential outcomes produced by them. Our approach enables analysts to evaluate the distributional effects of social programs without invoking the "Veil of Ignorance" assumption often used in the literature in applied welfare economics. Our methods determine which persons are affected by a given policy, where they come from in the ex-ante outcome distribution and what their gains are. We apply our methods to analyze two proposed policy reforms in American education. These reforms benefit the middle class and not the poor.
Social Programs, Distributional Effects, Policy Evaluation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics Karsten T. Hansen Northwestern University - Department of Marketing James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
23 Mar 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
01 May 02
|
|
28
|
21
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper summarizes our recent research on evaluating the distributional consequences of social programs. This research advances the economic policy evaluation literature beyond estimating assorted mean impacts to estimate distributions of outcomes generated by different policies and determine how those policies shift persons across the distributions of potential outcomes produced by them. Our approach enables analysts to evaluate the distributional effects of social programs without invoking the 'Veil of Ignorance' assumption often used in the literature in applied welfare economics. Our methods determine which persons are affected by a given policy, where they come from in the ex-ante outcome distribution and what their gains are. We apply our methods to analyze two proposed policy reforms in American education. These reforms benefit the middle class and not the poor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.
|
|
Comparing IV with Structural Models: What Simple IV Can and Cannot Identify
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Sergio Samuel Urzua Northwestern University
|
|
Posted:
|
|
02 Feb 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Mar 09
|
|
235 ( 36,034) |
3
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Sergio Samuel Urzua Northwestern University
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Feb 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Feb 09
|
|
63
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper compares the economic questions addressed by instrumental variables estimators with those addressed by structural approaches. We discuss Marschak's Maxim: estimators should be selected on the basis of their ability to answer well-posed economic problems with minimal assumptions. A key identifying assumption that allows structural methods to be more informative than IV can be tested with data and does not have to be imposed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Sergio Samuel Urzua Northwestern University
|
| Posted: |
|
02 Feb 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Mar 09
|
|
172
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper compares the economic questions addressed by instrumental variables estimators with those addressed by structural approaches. We discuss Marschak's Maxim: estimators should be selected on the basis of their ability to answer well-posed economic problems with minimal assumptions. A key identifying assumption that allows structural methods to be more informative than IV can be tested with data and does not have to be imposed.
instrumental variables, structural approaches, Marschak's Maxim
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
|
The Economics, Technology and Neuroscience of Human Capability Formation
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
03 Jul 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 09
|
|
219 ( 38,839) |
20
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Jul 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 09
|
|
184
|
20
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper begins the synthesis of two currently unrelated literatures: the human capital approach to health economics and the economics of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. A lifecycle investment framework is the foundation for understanding the origins of human inequality and for devising policies to reduce it.
critical periods, sensitive periods, early childhood, Barker hypothesis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Jul 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Jul 07
|
|
35
|
20
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper begins the synthesis of two currently unrelated literatures: the human capital approach to health economics and the economics of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. A lifecycle investment framework is the foundation for understanding the origins of human inequality and for devising policies to reduce it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.
|
|
The American High School Graduation Rate: Trends and Levels
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Paul LaFontaine American Bar Association
|
|
Posted:
|
|
19 Dec 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 May 08
|
|
216 ( 39,395) |
11
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Paul LaFontaine American Bar Association
|
| Posted: |
|
23 May 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 May 08
|
|
159
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper uses multiple data sources and a unified methodology to estimate the trends and levels of the U.S. high school graduation rate. Correcting for important biases that plague previous calculations, we establish that (a) the true high school graduation rate is substantially lower than the official rate issued by the National Center for Educational Statistics; (b) it has been declining over the past 40 years; (c) majority/minority graduation rate differentials are substantial and have not converged over the past 35 years; (d) the decline in high school graduation rates occurs among native populations and is not solely a consequence of increasing proportions of immigrants and minorities in American society; (e) the decline in high school graduation explains part of the recent slowdown in college attendance; and (f) the pattern of the decline of high school graduation rates by gender helps to explain the recent increase in male-female college attendance gaps.
high school dropout rate, high school graduation rates, educational attainment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Paul LaFontaine American Bar Association
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Dec 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 Feb 08
|
|
57
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper uses multiple data sources and a unified methodology to estimate the trends and levels of the U.S. high school graduation rate. Correcting for important biases that plague previous calculations, we establish that (a) the true high school graduation rate is substantially lower than the official rate issued by the National Center for Educational Statistics; (b) it has been declining over the past 40 years; (c) majority/minority graduation rate differentials are substantial and have not converged over the past 35 years; (d) the decline in high school graduation rates occurs among native populations and is not solely a consequence of increasing proportions of immigrants and minorities in American society; (e) the decline in high school graduation explains part of the recent slowdown in college attendance; and (f) the pattern of the decline of high school graduation rates by gender helps to explain the recent increase in male-female college attendance gaps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.
|
|
Selection Bias, Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Returns to Education: Evidence from China in 2000
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Xuesong Li Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) - Institute of Quantitative & Technical Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
04 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
209 ( 40,778) |
20
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Xuesong Li Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) - Institute of Quantitative & Technical Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Nov 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 May 08
|
|
28
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper uses Chinese micro data and new semi-parametric methods to estimate the current return to college education allowing for heterogeneous returns and for self-selection into schooling based on them. OLS and IV methods do not properly account for this sorting. Our estimates suggest that, for a randomly selected young person from an urban area, college attendance leads to a 43% increase in lifetime earnings (nearly 11% annually) in 2000, compared with just 36% (nearly 9% annually) for those who do not attend. Our evidence suggests that the return to education has increased substantially in China since the early 1990s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Xuesong Li Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) - Institute of Quantitative & Technical Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
18 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
138
|
20
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper uses newly available Chinese micro data to estimate the return to college education for late 20th century China when allowing for heterogeneous returns among individuals selecting into schooling based on these differences. We use recently developed semiparametric methods to identify the parameters of interest. We demonstrate that heterogeneity among people in returns to schooling is substantial. People sort into schooling on the basis of the principle of comparative advantage, which we document to be an empirically important phenomenon in modern Chinese labor markets. Standard least squares or instrumental variable methods do not properly account for this sorting. Using new methods that do, we estimate the effect on earnings of sending a randomly selected person to college is a 43% increase in lifetime earnings (nearly 11% annually) in 2000 for young people in urban areas of six provinces of China. The effect of college on those who go is 13%. Our evidence, and simple least squares evidence, suggests that after 20-plus years of economic reform with market orientation, the return to education has increased substantially in China, compared to the returns measured in the 1980's and the early 1990's.
education, returns to education
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Xuesong Li Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) - Institute of Quantitative & Technical Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Nov 04
|
|
43
|
20
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper uses newly available Chinese micro data to estimate the return to college education for late 20th century China when allowing for heterogeneous returns among individuals selecting into schooling based on these differences. We use recently developed semiparametric methods to identify the parameters of interest. We demonstrate that heterogeneity among people in returns to schooling is substantial. People sort into schooling on the basis of the principle of comparative advantage, which we document to be an empirically important phenomenon in modern Chinese labor markets. Standard least squares or instrumental variable methods do not properly account for this sorting. Using new methods that do, we estimate the effect on earnings of sending a randomly selected person to college is a 43% increase in lifetime earnings (nearly 11% annually) in 2000 for young people in urban areas of six provinces of China. The effect of college on those who go is 13%. Our evidence, and simple least squares evidence, suggests that after 20-plus years of economic reform with market orientation, the return to education has increased substantially in China, compared to the returns measured in the 1980's and the early 1990's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.
|
|
Identification and Estimation of Hedonic Models
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Ivar Ekeland University of British Columbia - Faculty of Education James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lars Nesheim University College London
|
|
Posted:
|
|
19 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 09
|
|
204 ( 41,779) |
31
|
|
|
|
|
Ivar Ekeland University of British Columbia - Faculty of Education James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lars Nesheim University College London
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Jan 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 09
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers the identification and estimation of hedonic models. We establish that in an additive version of the hedonic model, technology and preferences are generically nonparametrically identified from data on demand and supply in a single hedonic market. The empirical literature that claims that hedonic models estimated on data from a single market are fundamentally underidentified is based on arbitrary linearizations that do not use all the information in the model. The exact economic model that justifies linear approximations is unappealing. Nonlinearities are generic features of equilibrium in hedonic models and a fundamental and economically motivated source of identification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ivar Ekeland University of British Columbia - Faculty of Education James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lars Nesheim University College London
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Oct 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
188
|
31
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers the identification and estimation of hedonic models. We establish that in an additive version of the hedonic model, technology and preferences are generically identified up to affine transformations from data on demand and supply in a single hedonic market. For a very general parametric structure preferences and technology are fully identified. This is true under a strong assumption of statistical independence of the error term. It is also true under the weaker assumption of mean independence of the error term. Much of the confusion in the empircial literature that claims that hedonic models estimated on data from a single market are fundamentally underidentified is based on linearizations that do not use all of the information in the model. The exact economic model that justifies widely used linear approximations has strange properties so the approximation is doubly poor. A semiparametric estimation method is proposed that is valid when a statistical independence assumption is valid. Alternatively, under the weaker condition of mean independence instrumental variables estimators can be applied to identify technology and preference parameters from a single market. They are justified by nonlinearities that are generic features of equilibrium in hedonic models.
additive hedonic models, semiparametric estimation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ivar Ekeland University of British Columbia - Faculty of Education James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lars Nesheim University College London
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Aug 03
|
|
16
|
31
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers the identification and estimation of hedonic models. We establish that in an additive version of the hedonic model, technology and preferences are generically identified up to affine transformations from data on demand and supply in a single hedonic market. For a very general parametric structure, preferences and technology are fully identified. This is true under a strong assumption of statistical independence of the error term. It is also true under the weaker assumption of mean independence of the error term. Much of the confusion in the empirical literature that claims that hedonic models estimated on data from a single market are fundamentally underidentified is based on linearizations that do not use all of the information in the model. The exact economic model that justifies widely used linear approximations has strange properties so the approximation is doubly poor. A semiparametric estimation method is proposed that is valid when a statistical independence assumption is valid. Alternatively, under the weaker condition of mean independence instrumental variables estimators can be applied to identify technology and preference parameters from a single market. They are justified by nonlinearities that are generic features of equilibrium in hedonic models.
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.
|
|
The Performance of Performance Standards
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Carolyn Heinrich University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Department of Public Policy Analysis Jeffrey A. Smith Department of Economics, University of Michigan
|
|
Posted:
|
|
13 Jun 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
195 ( 43,687) |
18
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Carolyn Heinrich University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Department of Public Policy Analysis Jeffrey A. Smith Department of Economics, University of Michigan
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Aug 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
175
|
18
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the performance of the JTPA performance system, a widely emulated model for inducing efficiency in government organizations. We present a model of how performance incentives may distort bureaucratic decisions. We define cream skimming within the model. Two major empirical findings are (a) that the short run measures used to monitor performance are weakly, and sometimes perversely, related to long run impacts and (b) that the efficiency gains or losses from cream skimming are small. We find evidence that centers respond to performance standards.
Performance Standards, Reinventing Government, Evaluation, JTPA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Carolyn Heinrich University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Department of Public Policy Analysis Jeffrey A. Smith Department of Economics, University of Michigan
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Jun 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Jun 02
|
|
20
|
18
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the performance of the JTPA performance system, a widely emulated model for inducing efficiency in government organizations. We present a model of how performance incentives may distort bureaucratic decisions. We define cream skimming within the model. Two major empirical findings are (a) that the short run measures used to monitor performance are weakly, and sometimes perversely, related to long run impacts and (b) that the efficiency gains or losses from cream skimming are small. We find evidence that centers respond to performance standards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.
|
|
|
Lex Borghans University of Maastricht - Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA) Angela Duckworth University of Pennsylvania - Department of Psychology James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Bas ter Weel CPB Netherlands Bureau of Economic Policy Analysis
|
| Posted: |
|
23 May 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 May 08
|
|
181 (47,139)
|
30
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper explores the interface between personality psychology and economics. We examine the predictive power of personality and the stability of personality traits over the life cycle. We develop simple analytical frameworks for interpreting the evidence in personality psychology and suggest promising avenues for future research.
personality traits, lifecycle effects
|
|
|
21.
|
|
Understanding Instrumental Variables in Models with Essential Heterogeneity
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics Sergio Samuel Urzua Northwestern University
|
|
Posted:
|
|
08 Oct 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
173 ( 49,283) |
29
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics Sergio Samuel Urzua Northwestern University
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Oct 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
153
|
29
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the properties of instrumental variables (IV) applied to models with essential heterogeneity, that is, models where responses to interventions are heterogeneous and agents adopt treatments (participate in programs) with at least partial knowledge of their idiosyncratic response. We analyze two-outcome and multiple-outcome models including ordered and unordered choice models. We allow for transition-specific and general instruments. We generalize previous analyses by developing weights for treatment effects for general instruments. We develop a simple test for the presence of essential heterogeneity. We note the asymmetry of the model of essential heterogeneity: outcomes of choices are heterogeneous in a general way; choices are not. When both choices and outcomes are permitted to be symmetrically heterogeneous, the method of IV breaks down for estimating treatment parameters.
unobserved heterogeneity, instrumental variables, treatment parameters, policy evaluation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Sergio Samuel Urzua Northwestern University Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
08 Oct 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Feb 07
|
|
20
|
27
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the properties of instrumental variables (IV) applied to models with essential heterogeneity, that is, models where responses to interventions are heterogeneous and agents adopt treatments (participate in programs) with at least partial knowledge of their idiosyncratic response. We analyze two-outcome and multiple-outcome models including ordered and unordered choice models. We allow for transition-specific and general instruments. We generalize previous analyses by developing weights for treatment effects for general instruments. We develop a simple test for the presence of essential heterogeneity. We note the asymmetry of the model of essential heterogeneity: outcomes of choices are heterogeneous in a general way; choices are not. When both choices and outcomes are permitted to be symmetrically heterogeneous, the method of IV breaks down for estimating treatment parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.
|
|
Separating Uncertainty from Heterogeneity in Life Cycle Earnings
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Salvador Navarro-Lozano University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
05 Jan 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
155 ( 50,466) |
42
|
|
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Salvador Navarro-Lozano University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
02 Feb 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 May 05
|
|
23
|
42
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper develops and applies a method for decomposing cross section variability of earnings into components that are forecastable at the time students decide to go to college (heterogeneity) and components that are unforecastable. About 60% of variability in returns to schooling is forecastable. This has important implications for using measured variability to price risk and predict college attendance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Salvador Navarro-Lozano University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
05 Jan 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
132
|
42
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper develops and applies a method for decomposing cross section variability of earnings into components that are forecastable at the time students decide to go to college (heterogeneity) and components that are unforecastable. About 60% of variability in returns to schooling is forecastable. This has important implications for using measured variability to price risk and predict college attendance.
uncertainty, lifecycle earnings, schooling, heterogeneity, counterfactuals
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.
|
|
Economic, Neurobiological and Behavioral Perspectives on Building America's Future Workforce
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Eric I. Knudsen Stanford University - School of Medicine James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Judy L. Cameron University of Pittsburgh Jack P. Shonkoff Harvard University
|
|
Posted:
|
|
20 Jul 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Aug 06
|
|
168 ( 50,739) |
19
|
|
|
|
|
Eric I. Knudsen Stanford University - School of Medicine James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Judy L. Cameron University of Pittsburgh Jack P. Shonkoff Harvard University
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Jul 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Jul 06
|
|
139
|
19
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A growing proportion of the U.S. workforce will have been raised in disadvantaged environments that are associated with relatively high proportions of individuals with diminished cognitive and social skills. A cross-disciplinary examination of research in economics, developmental psychology, and neurobiology reveals a striking convergence on a set of common principles that account for the potent effects of early environment on the capacity for human skill development. Central to these principles are the findings that early experiences have a uniquely powerful influence on the development of cognitive and social skills, as well as on brain architecture and neurochemistry; that both skill development and brain maturation are hierarchical processes in which higher level functions depend on, and build on, lower level functions; and that the capacity for change in the foundations of human skill development and neural circuitry is highest earlier in life and decreases over time. These findings lead to the conclusion that the most efficient strategy for strengthening the future workforce, both economically and neurobiologically, and for improving its quality of life is to invest in the environments of disadvantaged children during the early childhood years.
child development, early experience, economic productivity, critical and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric I. Knudsen Stanford University - School of Medicine James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Judy L. Cameron University of Pittsburgh Jack P. Shonkoff Harvard University
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Jul 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Aug 06
|
|
29
|
19
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A growing proportion of the U.S. workforce will have been raised in disadvantaged environments that are associated with relatively high proportions of individuals with diminished cognitive and social skills. A cross-disciplinary examination of research in economics, developmental psychology, and neurobiology reveals a striking convergence on a set of common principles that account for the potent effects of early environment on the capacity for human skill development. Central to these principles are the findings that early experiences have a uniquely powerful influence on the development of cognitive and social skills, as well as on brain architecture and neurochemistry; that both skill development and brain maturation are hierarchical processes in which higher level functions depend on, and build on, lower level functions; and that the capacity for change in the foundations of human skill development and neural circuitry is highest earlier in life and decreases over time. These findings lead to the conclusion that the most efficient strategy for strengthening the future workforce, both economically and neurobiologically, and for improving its quality of life is to invest in the environments of disadvantaged children during the early childhood years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.
|
|
Dynamic Discrete Choice and Dynamic Treatment Effects
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Salvador Navarro-Lozano University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
18 Oct 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
167 ( 51,005) |
20
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Salvador Navarro-Lozano University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
21 Aug 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Aug 07
|
|
23
|
20
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers semiparametric identification of structural dynamic discrete choice models and models for dynamic treatment effects. Time to treatment and counterfactual outcomes associated with treatment times are jointly analyzed. We examine the implicit assumptions of the dynamic treatment model using the structural model as a benchmark. For the structural model we show the gains from using cross equation restrictions connecting choices to associated measurements and outcomes. In the dynamic discrete choice model, we identify both subjective and objective outcomes, distinguishing ex post and ex ante outcomes. We show how to identify agent information sets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Salvador Navarro-Lozano University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
18 Oct 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
144
|
20
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers semiparametric identification of structural dynamic discrete choice models and models for dynamic treatment effects. Time to treatment and counterfactual outcomes associated with treatment times are jointly analyzed. We examine the implicit assumptions of the dynamic treatment model using the structural model as a benchmark. For the structural model we show the gains from using cross equation restrictions connecting choices to associated measurements and outcomes. In the dynamic discrete choice model, we identify both subjective and objective outcomes, distinguishing ex post and ex ante outcomes. We show how to identify agent information sets.
dynamic treatment effects, dynamic discrete choice, semiparametric identification
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.
|
|
Labor Market Discrimination and Racial Differences in Premarket Factors
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Dimitriy V. Masterov University of Chicago - Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies
|
|
Posted:
|
|
06 Nov 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
162 ( 52,523) |
11
|
|
|
|
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Dimitriy V. Masterov University of Chicago - Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Jan 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
130
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We investigate the relative significance of differences in cognitive skills and discrimination in explaining racial/ethnic wage gaps. We show that cognitive test scores taken prior to entering the labor market are influenced by schooling. Adjusting the scores for racial/ethnic differences in education at the time the test is taken reduces their role in accounting for the wage gaps. We also consider evidence on parental and child expectations about education and on stereotype-threat effects. We find both factors to be implausible alternative explanations for the gaps we observe. We argue that policies need to address the sources of early skill gaps and to seek to influence the more malleable behavioral abilities in addition to their cognitive counterparts. Such policies are far more likely to be effective in promoting racial and ethnic equality for most groups than are additional civil rights and affirmative action policies targeted at the workplace.
ability, test scores, gaps, education
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Dimitriy V. Masterov University of Chicago - Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Nov 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Nov 03
|
|
32
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines minority-white wage gaps. Neal and Johnson (1996) show that controlling for ability measured in the teenage years eliminates young adult wage gaps for all groups except for black males, for whom they eliminate 70% of the gap. Their study has been faulted because minority children and their parents may have pessimistic expectations about receiving fair rewards for their skills and so they may invest less in skill formation. If this is the case, discrimination may still affect wages, albeit indirectly, though it would appear that any racial differences in wages are due to differences in acquired traits. We find that gaps in ability across racial and ethnic groups open up at very early ages, long before child expectations are likely to become established. These gaps widen with age and schooling for Blacks, but not for Hispanics which indicates that poor schools and neighborhoods cannot be the principal factors affecting the slow black test score growth rate. Test scores depend on schooling attained at the time of the test. Adjusting for racial and ethnic differences in schooling attainment at the age the test is taken reduces the power of measured ability to shrink wage gaps for blacks, but not for other minorities. The evidence from expectations data are mixed. Although all groups are quite optimistic about future schooling outcomes, minority parents and children have more pessimistic expectations about child schooling relative to white children and their parents when their children are young. At later ages, expectations are more uniform across racial and ethnic groups. However, we also present some evidence that expectations data are unreliable and ambiguous. We also document the presence of disparities in noncognitive traits across racial and ethnic groups. These characteristics have been shown elsewhere to be important for explaining the labor market outcomes of adults. This evidence points to the importance of early (preschool) family factors and environments in explaining both cognitive and noncognitive ability differentials by ethnicity and race. Policies that foster both types of ability are far more likely to be effective in promoting racial and ethnic equality for most groups than are additional civil rights and affirmative action policies targeted at the workplace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.
|
|
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics Karsten T. Hansen Northwestern University - Department of Marketing James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 May 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
162 (52,523)
|
51
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper uses factor models to identify and estimate distributions of counterfactuals. We extend LISREL frameworks to a dynamic treatment effect setting, extending matching to account for unobserved conditioning variables. Using these models, we can identify all pairwise and joint treatment effects. We apply these methods to a model of schooling and determine the intrinsic uncertainty facing agents at the time they make their decisions about enrollment in school. Reducing uncertainty in returns raises college enrollment. We go beyond the "Veil of Ignorance" in evaluating educational policies and determine who benefits and loses from commonly proposed educational reforms.
Policy Evaluation, Returns to Schooling, Factor Models, Counterfactual Distributions
|
|
|
27.
|
|
The Effect of Schooling and Ability on Achievement Test Scores
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Karsten T. Hansen Northwestern University - Department of Marketing James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Kathleen J. Mullen RAND Corporation
|
|
Posted:
|
|
05 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
157 ( 54,076) |
26
|
|
|
|
|
Karsten T. Hansen Northwestern University - Department of Marketing James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Kathleen J. Mullen RAND Corporation
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
127
|
26
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper develops two methods for estimating the effect of schooling on achievement test scores that control for the endogeneity of schooling by postulating that both schooling and test scores are generated by a common unobserved latent ability. These methods are applied to data on schooling and test scores. Estimates from the two methods are in close agreement. We find that the effects of schooling on test scores are roughly linear across schooling levels. The effects of schooling on measured test scores are slightly larger for lower latent ability levels. We find that schooling increases the AFQT score on average between 2 and 4 percentage points, roughly twice as large as the effect claimed by Herrnstein and Murray (1994) but in agreement with estimates produced by Neal and Johnson (1996) and Winship and Korenman (1997). We extend the previous literature by estimating the impact of schooling on measured test scores at various quantiles of the latent ability distribution.
Education, Ability, Latent Variables, Selection, MCMC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Karsten T. Hansen Northwestern University - Department of Marketing James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Kathleen J. Mullen RAND Corporation
|
| Posted: |
|
05 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 Aug 03
|
|
30
|
26
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper develops two methods for estimating the effect of schooling on achievement test scores that control for the endogeneity of schooling by postulating that both schooling and test scores are generated by a common unobserved latent ability. These methods are applied to data on schooling and test scores. Estimates from the two methods are in close agreement. We find that the effects of schooling on test scores are roughly linear across schooling levels. The effects of schooling on measured test scores are slightly larger for lower latent ability levels. We find that schooling increases the AFQT score on average between 2 and 4 percentage points, roughly twice as large as the effect claimed by Herrnstein and Murray (1994) but in agreement with estimates produced by Neal and Johnson (1996) and Winship and Korenman (1997). We extend the previous literature by estimating the impact of schooling on measured test scores at various quantiles of the latent ability distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.
|
|
A New Framework for the Analysis of Inequality
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
21 Sep 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
153 ( 55,470) |
11
|
|
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
29 Jan 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
125
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper presents a new framework for analyzing inequality that moves beyond the anonymity postulate. We estimate the determinants of sectoral choice and the joint distributions of outcomes across sectors. We determine which components of realized earnings variability are due to uncertainty and which components are due to components of human diversity that are forecastable by agents. Using our tools, we can determine how policies shift persons across sectors and outcome distributions across sectors.
inequality, anonymity postulate, uncertainty, policy evaluation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
21 Sep 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Dec 06
|
|
28
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper presents a new framework for analyzing inequality that moves beyond the anonymity postulate. We estimate the determinants of sectoral choice and the joint distributions of outcomes across sectors. We determine which components of realized earnings variability are due to uncertainty and which components are due to components of human diversity that are forcastable by agents. Using our tools, we can determine how policies shift persons across sectors and outcome distributions across sectors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.
|
|
Contributions of Zvi Griliches
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
14 Jul 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
149 ( 56,856) |
1
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Jul 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
128
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this article, I summarize Griliches' contributions to economics and to applied econometrics.
social rate of return, growth, productivity improvement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Jul 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Aug 06
|
|
21
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper summarizes the major research contributions of Zvi Griliches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.
|
|
Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Ambiguity Aversion
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Lex Borghans University of Maastricht - Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA) Bart Golsteyn Maastricht University - Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA) James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Huub Meijers University of Maastricht - Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT)
|
|
Posted:
|
|
17 Feb 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Sep 09
|
|
128 ( 64,944) |
2
|
|
|
|
|
Lex Borghans University of Maastricht - Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA) Bart Golsteyn Maastricht University - Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA) James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Huub Meijers University of Maastricht - Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT)
|
| Posted: |
|
02 Mar 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
02 Mar 09
|
|
80
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper demonstrates gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. It also contributes to a growing literature relating economic preference parameters to psychological measures by asking whether variations in preference parameters among persons, and in particular across genders, can be accounted for by differences in personality traits and traits of cognition. Women are more risk averse than men. Over an initial range, women require no further compensation for the introduction of ambiguity but men do. At greater levels of ambiguity, women have the same marginal distaste for increased ambiguity as men. Psychological variables account for some of the interpersonal variation in risk aversion. They explain none of the differences in ambiguity.
gender, risk aversion, ambiguity aversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lex Borghans University of Maastricht - Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA) Bart Golsteyn Maastricht University - Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA) James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Huub Meijers University of Maastricht - Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT)
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Feb 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Sep 09
|
|
48
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper demonstrates gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. It also contributes to a growing literature relating economic preference parameters to psychological measures by asking whether variations in preference parameters among persons, and in particular across genders, can be accounted for by differences in personality traits and traits of cognition. Women are more risk averse than men. Over an initial range, women require no further compensation for the introduction of ambiguity but men do. At greater levels of ambiguity, women have the same marginal distaste for increased ambiguity as men. Psychological variables account for some of the interpersonal variation in risk aversion. They explain none of the differences in ambiguity.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.
|
|
The Determinants of Participation in a Social Program: Evidence from a Prototypical Job Training Program
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Jeffrey A. Smith Department of Economics, University of Michigan
|
|
Posted:
|
|
05 Jul 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
112 ( 72,459) |
11
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Jeffrey A. Smith Department of Economics, University of Michigan
|
| Posted: |
|
05 Jul 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Jul 03
|
|
21
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper decomposes the participation process of a prototypical program into eligibility, awareness, application, acceptance and enrollment. With this decomposition, we determine the sources of unequal participation for different groups, and demonstrate that variables often have very different effects at different stages in the participation process. Our analysis shows that personal choices substantially affect participation and that awareness of program eligibility is a major source of variation in participation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Jeffrey A. Smith Department of Economics, University of Michigan
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Jul 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
91
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper decomposes the participation process of a prototypical program into eligibility, awareness, application, acceptance and enrollment. With this decomposition, we determine the sources of unequal participation for different groups, and demonstrate that variables often have very different effects at different stages in the participation process. Our analysis shows that personal choices substantially affect participation and that awareness of program eligibility is a major source of variation in participation.
Social Program Participation, Job Training, Performance Standards, Cream Skimming, Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.
|
|
The Evidence on Credit Constraints in Post-Secondary Schooling
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
11 Jul 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
111 ( 72,957) |
66
|
|
|
|
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Aug 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
90
|
66
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the family income-college enrollment relationship and the evidence on credit constraints in post-secondary schooling. We distinguish short-run liquidity constraints from the long-term factors that promote cognitive and noncognitive ability. Long-run factors crystallized in ability are the major determinants of the family income-schooling relationship, although there is some evidence that up to 8% of the U.S. population is credit constrained in a short-run sense. Evidence that IV estimates of the returns to schooling exceed OLS estimates is sometimes claimed to support the existence of substantial credit constraints. This argument is critically examined.
Human Capital, Return to Education, Credit Constraints
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Jul 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Jul 02
|
|
21
|
66
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the family income - college enrollment relationship and the evidence on credit constraints in post-secondary schooling. We distinguish short-run liquidity constraints from the long-term factors that promote cognitive and noncognitive ability. Long-run factors crystallized in ability are the major determinants of the family income - schooling relationship, although there is some evidence that up to 8% of the U.S. population is credit constrained in a short-run sense. Evidence that IV estimates of the returns to schooling exceed OLS estimates is sometimes claimed to support the existence of substantial credit constraints. This argument is critically examined.
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.
|
|
The Economics and Psychology of Inequality and Human Development
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
31 Jan 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Sep 09
|
|
101 ( 78,330) |
4
|
|
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
02 Mar 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
02 Mar 09
|
|
62
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Recent research on the economics of human development deepens understanding of the origins of inequality and excellence. It draws on and contributes to personality psychology and the psychology of human development. Inequalities in family environments and investments in children are substantial. They causally affect the development of capabilities. Both cognitive and noncognitive capabilities determine success in life but to varying degrees for different outcomes. An empirically determined technology of capability formation reveals that capabilities are self-productive and cross-fertilizing and can be enhanced by investment. Investments in capabilities are relatively more productive at some stages of a child's life cycle than others. Optimal child investment strategies differ depending on target outcomes of interest and on the nature of adversity in a child's early years. For some configurations of early disadvantage and for some desired outcomes, it is efficient to invest relatively more in the later years of childhood than in the early years.
inequality, capabilities, noncognitive traits, human development, technology of capability formation, policy targeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
31 Jan 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Sep 09
|
|
39
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Recent research on the economics of human development deepens understanding of the origins of inequality and excellence. It draws on and contributes to personality psychology and the psychology of human development. Inequalities in family environments and investments in children are substantial. They causally affect the development of capabilities. Both cognitive and noncognitive capabilities determine success in life but to varying degrees for different outcomes. An empirically determined technology of capability formation reveals that capabilities are self-productive and cross-fertilizing and can be enhanced by investment. Investments in capabilities are relatively more productive at some stages of a child's life cycle than others. Optimal child investment strategies differ depending on target outcomes of interest and on the nature of adversity in a child's early years. For some configurations of early disadvantage and for some desired outcomes, it is efficient to invest relatively more in the later years of childhood than in the early years.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.
|
|
Earnings Functions and Rates of Return
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
08 Feb 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 May 08
|
|
96 ( 81,202) |
14
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
23 May 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 May 08
|
|
71
|
14
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The internal rate of return to schooling is a fundamental economic parameter that is often used to assess whether expenditure on education should be increased or decreased. This paper considers alternative approaches to estimating marginal internal rates of return for different schooling levels. We implement a general nonparametric approach to estimate marginal internal rates of return that take into account tuition costs, income taxes and nonlinearities in the earnings-schooling-experience relationship. The returns obtained by the more general method differ substantially from Mincer returns in levels and in their evolution over time. They indicate relatively larger returns to graduating from high school than from graduating from college, although both have been increasing over time.
schooling, marginal internal rate of return, nonparametric estimation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
08 Feb 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Feb 08
|
|
25
|
14
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The internal rate of return to schooling is a fundamental economic parameter that is often used to assess whether expenditure on education should be increased or decreased. This paper considers alternative approaches to estimating marginal internal rates of return for different schooling levels. We implement a general nonparametric approach to estimate marginal internal rates of return that take into account tuition costs, income taxes and nonlinearities in the earnings-schooling-experience relationship. The returns obtained by the more general method differ substantially from Mincer returns in levels and in their evolution over time. They indicate relatively larger returns to graduating from high school than from graduating from college, although both have been increasing over time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Oct 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 09
|
|
94 (82,472)
|
6
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A large empirical literature documents a rise in wage inequality in the American economy. It is silent on whether the increase in inequality is due to greater heterogeneity in the components of earnings that are predictable by agents or whether it is due to greater uncertainty faced by agents. Applying the methodology of Cunha, Heckman, and Navarro (2005) to data on agents making schooling decisions in different economic environments, we join choice data with earnings data to estimate the fraction of future earnings that is forecastable and how this fraction has changed over time. We find that both predictable and unpredictable components of earnings have increased in recent years. The increase in uncertainty is substantially greater for unskilled workers. For less skilled workers, roughly 60% of the increase in wage variability is due to uncertainty. For more skilled workers, only 8% of the increase in wage variability is due to uncertainty. Roughly 26% of the increase in the variance of returns to schooling is due to increased uncertainty. Using conventional measures of income inequality masks the contribution of rising uncertainty to the rise in the inequality of earnings for less educated groups.
wage inequality, uncertainty, sorting, inequality accounting
|
|
|
36.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Dimitriy V. Masterov University of Chicago - Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Jan 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
93 (83,092)
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper argues that skill formation is a life-cycle process and develops the implications of this insight for Scottish social policy. Families are major producers of skills, and a successful policy needs to promote effective families and to supplement failing ones. We present evidence that early disadvantages produce severe later disadvantages that are hard to remedy. We also show that cognitive ability is not the only determinant of education, labor market outcomes and pathological behavior like crime. Abilities differ in their malleability over the life-cycle, with noncognitive skills being more malleable at later ages. This has important implications for the design of policy. The gaps in skills and abilities open up early, and schooling merely widens them. Additional university tuition subsidies or improvements in school quality are not warranted by Scottish evidence. Company-sponsored job training yields a higher return for the most able and so this form of investment will exacerbate the gaps it is intended to close. For the same reason, public job training is not likely to help adult workers whose skills are rendered obsolete by skill-biased technological change. Targeted early interventions, however, have proven to be very effective in compensating for the effect of neglect.
Scotland, education, training, family, policy
|
|
|
37.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
29 Jun 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
29 Jun 04
|
|
90 (85,027)
|
714
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this paper, I present a simple characterization of the sample selection bias problem that is also applicable to the conceptually distinct econometric problems that arise from truncated samples and from models with limited dependent variables. The problem of sample selection bias is fit within the conventional specification error framework of Griliches and Theil. A simple estimator is discussed that enables analysts to utilize ordinary regression methods to estimate models free of selection bias. The techniques discussed here are applied to re-estimate and test a model of female labor supply developed by the author. (1974). This paper is in three parts. In the first section, selection bias is presented within the specification error framework. In this section, general distributional assumptions are maintained. In section two, specific results are presented for the case of normal regression disturbances. Simple estimators are proposed and discussed. In the third section, empirical results are presented.
|
|
|
38.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
10 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 Jan 02
|
|
84 (89,059)
|
163
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers the formulation and estimation of simultaneous equation models with both discrete and continuous endogenous variables. The statistical model proposed here is sufficiently rich to encompass the classical simultaneous equation model for continuous endogenous variables and more recent models for purely discrete endogenous variables as special cases of a more general model.
|
|
|
39.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Oct 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Oct 02
|
|
69 (100,756)
|
6
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper discusses evidence on human capital investment in China. Policies through the mid 1990s favor physical investment over schooling.
|
|
|
40.
|
|
Policies to Foster Human Capital
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
29 Apr 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
67 (102,509) |
91
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Jul 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers the sources of skill formation in a modern economy and emphasizes the importance of both cognitive and noncognitive skills in producing economic and social success and the importance of both formal academic institutions and families and firms as sources of learning. Skill formation is a dynamic process with strong synergistic components. Skill begets skill. Early investment promotes later investment. Noncognitive skills and motivation are important determinants of success and these can be improved more successfully and at later ages than basic cognitive skills. Methods currently used to evaluate educational interventions ignore these noncogntive skills and therefore substantially understate the benefits of early intervention programs and mentoring and teenage motivation programs. At current levels of investment, American society underinvests in the very young and overinvests in mature adults with low skills.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
29 Apr 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Jun 00
|
|
67
|
91
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers the sources of skill formation in a modern economy and emphasizes the importance of both cognitive and noncognitive skills in producing economic and social success and the importance of both formal academic institutions and families and firms as sources of learning. Skill formation is a dynamic process with strong synergistic components. Skill begets skill. Early investment promotes later investment. Noncognitive skills and motivation are important determinants of success and these can be improved more successfully and at later ages than basic cognitive skills. Methods currently used to evaluate educational interventions ignore these noncogntive skills and therefore substantially understate the benefits of early intervention programs and mentoring and teenage motivation programs. At current levels of investment, American society underinvests in the very young and overinvests in mature adults with low skills.
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.
|
|
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics Karsten T. Hansen Northwestern University - Department of Marketing James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Mar 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Mar 03
|
|
66 (103,391)
|
50
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper uses factor models to identify and estimate distributions of counterfactuals. We extend LISREL frameworks to a dynamic treatment effect setting, extending matching to account for unobserved conditioning variables. Using these models, we can identify all pairwise and joint treatment effects. We apply these methods to a model of schooling and determine the intrinsic uncertainty facing agents at the time they make their decisions about enrollment in school. Reducing uncertainty in returns raises college enrollment. We go beyond the 'Veil of Ignorance' in evaluating educational policies and determine who benefits and who loses from commonly proposed educational reforms.
|
|
|
42.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Carmen Pages Inter-American Development Bank (IADB)
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Oct 01
|
|
64 (105,180)
|
62
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper documents the high level of job security protection in Latin American labor markets and analyzes its impact on employment. We show that job security policies have substantial impact on the level and the distribution of employment in Latin America. They reduce employment and promote inequality. The institutional organization of the labor market affects both employment and inequality.
|
|
|
43.
|
|
|
Stephen V. Cameron Columbia University - School of International & Public Affairs (SIPA) James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
29 Apr 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 May 00
|
|
62 (107,013)
|
23
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper estimates a dynamic model of schooling attainment to investigate the sources of discrepancy by race and ethnicity in college attendance. When the returns to college education rose, college enrollment of whites responded much more quickly than that of minorities. Parental income is a strong predictor of this response. However, using NLSY data, we find that it is the long-run factors associated with parental background and income and not short-term credit constraints facing college students that account for the differential response by race and ethnicity to the new labor market for skilled labor. Policies aimed at improving these long-term factors are far more likely to be successful in eliminating college attendance differentials than are short-term tuition reduction policies.
|
|
|
44.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
16 Mar 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Mar 05
|
|
61 (107,941)
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper discusses recent advances in our understanding of differences in human abilities and skills, their sources, and their evolution over the lifecycle.
|
|
|
45.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Apr 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
06 Apr 04
|
|
60 (108,880)
|
86
|
|
| |
Abstract:
No abstract is available for this paper.
|
|
|
46.
|
|
|
Stephen V. Cameron Columbia University - School of International & Public Affairs (SIPA) James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Mar 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Mar 01
|
|
60 (108,880)
|
34
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper analyzes the causes and consequences of the growing proportion of high-school-certified persons who achieve that status by exam certification rather than through high school graduation. Exam-certified high school equivalents are statistically indistinguishable from high school dropouts. Both dropouts and exam-certified equivalents have comparably poor wages, earnings, hours of work, unemployment experiences and job tenure. This is so whether or not ability measures are used to control for differences. Whatever differences are found among exam-certified equivalents, high school dropouts and high school graduates are accounted for by their years of schooling completed. There is no cheap substitute for schooling. The only payoff to exam certification arises from its value in opening post-secondary schooling and training opportunities. However, exam-certified equivalents receive lower returns to most forms of post-secondary education and training. We also discuss the political economy of the recent rapid growth of exam certification. There has been growth in direct government subsidies to adult basic education proggrams that feature exam certification as an output. In addition, there has been growth in government subsidies to post-secondary schooling programs that require certification in order to qualify for benefits. These sources account for the rapid growth in the use of exam certification in the face of the low economic returns to it.
|
|
|
47.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Hidehiko Ichimura University College London - Department of Economics Jeffrey A. Smith Department of Economics, University of Michigan Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Nov 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 May 00
|
|
56 (112,663)
|
176
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper develops and applies semiparametric econometric methods to estimate the form of selection bias that arises from using nonexperimental comparison groups to evaluate social programs and to test the identifying assumptions that justify three widely-used classes of estimators and our extensions of them: (a) the method of matching; (b) the classical econometric selection model which represents the bias solely as a function of the probability of participation; and (c) the method of difference-in-differences. Using data from an experiment on a prototypical social program combined with unusually rich data from a nonexperimental comparison group, we reject the assumptions justifying matching and our extensions of that method but find evidence in support of the index-sufficient selection bias model and the assumptions that justify application of a conditional semiparametric version of the method of difference-in-difference. Fa comparable people and to appropriately weight participants and nonparticipants a sources of selection bias as conveniently measured. We present a rigorous defin bias and find that in our data it is a small component of conventially meausred it is still substantial when compared with experimentally-estimated program impa matching participants to comparison group members in the same labor market, givi same questionnaire, and making sure they have comparable characteristics substan the performance of any econometric program evaluation estimator. We show how t analysis to estimate the impact of treatment on the treated using ordinary observational data.
|
|
|
48.
|
|
|
Lex Borghans University of Maastricht - Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA) Angela Duckworth University of Pennsylvania - Department of Psychology James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Bas ter Weel CPB Netherlands Bureau of Economic Policy Analysis
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Feb 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Mar 08
|
|
53 (115,682)
|
30
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper explores the interface between personality psychology and economics. We examine the predictive power of personality and the stability of personality traits over the life cycle. We develop simple analytical frameworks for interpreting the evidence in personality psychology and suggest promising avenues for future research.
|
|
|
49.
|
|
Structural Equations, Treatment Effects and Econometric Policy Evaluation
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
24 May 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 May 05
|
|
53 (115,682) |
51
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
24 May 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 May 05
|
|
23
|
51
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper uses the marginal treatment effect (MTE) to unify the nonparametric literature on treatment effects with the econometric literature on structural estimation using a nonparametric analog of a policy invariant parameter; to generate a variety of treatment effects from a common semiparametric functional form; to organize the literature on alternative estimators; and to explore what policy questions commonly used estimators in the treatment effect literature answer. A fundamental asymmetry intrinsic to the method of instrumental variables is noted. Recent advances in IV estimation allow for heterogeneity in responses but not in choices, and the method breaks down when both choice and response equations are heterogeneous in a general way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
24 May 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 May 05
|
|
30
|
51
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper uses the marginal treatment effect (MTE) to unify the nonparametric literature on treatment effects with the econometric literature on structural estimation using a nonparametric analog of a policy invariant parameter; to generate a variety of treatment effects from a common semiparametric functional form; to organize the literature on alternative estimators; and to explore what policy questions commonly used estimators in the treatment effect literature answer. A fundamental asymmetry intrinsic to the method of instrumental variables is noted. Recent advances in IV estimation allow for heterogeneity in responses but not in choices, and the method breaks down when both choice and response equations are heterogeneous in a general way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Carmen Pages Inter-American Development Bank (IADB)
|
| Posted: |
|
05 Dec 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Feb 04
|
|
51 (117,670)
|
23
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper summarizes the main lessons learned from Law and Employment: Lessons from Latin America and the Caribbean, a forthcoming NBER book. It places Latin American economies and economic policies in a world context. The paper quantifies the cost of regulation in Latin America and OECD Europe and discusses the origin of regulation. It shows the fragility of time series data analyses of the sort widely used to analyze the impact of regulation in OECD Europe and the benefits of using microdata data. The evidence shows that regulation reduces labor market flexibility, reduces the employment of marginal workers and generates inequality in the larger society.
|
|
|
51.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Feb 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
01 Apr 01
|
|
51 (117,670)
|
25
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The major contributions of twentieth century econometrics to knowledge were the definition of causal parameters when agents are constrained by resources and markets and causes are interrelated, the analysis of what is required to recover causal parameters from data (the identification problem), and clarification of the role of causal parameters in policy evaluation and in forecasting the effects of policies never previously experienced. This paper summarizes the development of those ideas by the Cowles Commission, the response to their work by structural econometricians and VAR econometricians, and the response to structural and VAR econometrics by calibrators, advocates of natural and social experiments, and by nonparametric econometricians and statisticians.
|
|
|
52.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Sep 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 Oct 09
|
|
50 (118,748)
|
8
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the performance of the German economy and the role of the regulation and welfare state policies in affecting its performance. While the German economy is still strong, incentives in place are likely to impair future German competitiveness and productivity.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
53.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Jora Stixrud University of Chicago - Department of Economics Sergio Samuel Urzua Northwestern University
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Apr 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 06
|
|
48 (120,944)
|
44
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper establishes that a low dimensional vector of cognitive and noncognitive skills explains a variety of labor market and behavioral outcomes. For many dimensions of social performance cognitive and noncognitive skills are equally important. Our analysis addresses the problems of measurement error, imperfect proxies, and reverse causality that plague conventional studies of cognitive and noncognitive skills that regress earnings (and other outcomes) on proxies for skills. Noncognitive skills strongly influence schooling decisions, and also affect wages given schooling decisions. Schooling, employment, work experience and choice of occupation are affected by latent noncognitive and cognitive skills. We study a variety of correlated risky behaviors such as teenage pregnancy and marriage, smoking, marijuana use, and participation in illegal activities. The same low dimensional vector of abilities that explains schooling choices, wages, employment, work experience and choice of occupation explains these behavioral outcomes.
|
|
|
54.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Ricardo Cossa Chicago Partners, LLC & University of Chicago
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Jul 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
27 Oct 09
|
|
48 (120,944)
|
9
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper investigates the impact of wage subsidies on skill formulation. We analyze two prototypical models of skill formation: (a) a learning-by-doing model and (b) an on-the-job training model. We develop conditions on the pricing of jobs under which the two models are equivalent. In general they are different and have different implications of wage subsidies on skill formation. On-the-job training models predict that wage subsidies reduce skill formation. Learning-by-doing models predict the opposite. The provisional evidence favors the learning-by-doing model. We apply our estimates to investigate the impact of the EITC on skill formation. We estimate that the EITC reduced the long term wages of participants with low levels of education.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
55.
|
|
|
John Cawley Cornell University - Department of Policy Analysis & Management (PAM) Karen Conneely Princeton University - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Sep 96
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 May 00
|
|
48 (120,944)
|
24
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper presents new evidence from the NLSY on the importance of meritocracy in American society. In it, we find that general intelligence, or g -- a measure of cognitive ability--is dominant in explaining test score variance. The weights assigned to tests by g are similar for all major demographic groups. These results support Spearman's theory of g. We also find that g and other measures of ability are not rewarded equally across race and gender, evidence against the view that the labor market is organized on meritocratic principles. Additional factors beyond g are required to explain wages and occupational choice. However, both blue collar and white collar wages are poorly predicted by g or even multiple measures of ability. Observed cognitive ability is only a minor predictor of social performance. White collar wages are more g loaded than blue collar wages. Many noncognitive factors determine blue collar wages.
|
|
|
56.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Justin L. Tobias University of California, Irvine - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
12 Oct 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 Sep 01
|
|
41 (128,972)
|
9
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper derives simply computed closed-form expressions for the Average Treatment Effect (ATE), the effect of Treatment on the Treated (TT), Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE) and Marginal Treatment Effect (MTE) in a latent variable framework for both normal and non-normal models. The techniques presented in the paper are applied to estimating a variety of treatment parameters capturing the returns to a college education for various populations using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY).
|
|
|
57.
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Salvador Navarro University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Aug 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Aug 08
|
|
40 (130,229)
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper extends the widely used ordered choice model by introducing stochastic thresholds and interval-specific outcomes. The model can be interpreted as a generalization of the GAFT (MPH) framework for discrete duration data that jointly models durations and outcomes associated with different stopping times. We establish conditions for nonparametric identification. We interpret the ordered choice model as a special case of a general discrete choice model and as a special case of a dynamic discrete choice model.
discrete choice, ordered choice, dynamics
|
|
|
58.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
17 May 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Apr 01
|
|
40 (130,229)
|
44
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper unites the treatment effect literature and the latent variable literature. The economic questions answered by the commonly used treatment effect parameters are considered. We demonstrate how the marginal treatment effect parameter can be used in a latent variable framework to generate the average treatment effect, the effect of treatment on the treated and the local average treatment effect, thereby establishing a new relationship among these parameters. The method of local instrumental variables directly estimates the marginal treatment effect parameters, and thus can be used to estimate all of the conventional treatment effect parameters when the index condition holds and the parameters are identified. When they are not, the method of local instrumental variables can be used to produce bounds on the parameters with the width of the bounds depending on the width of the support for the index generating the choice of the observed potential outcome.
|
|
|
59.
|
|
|
John Cawley Cornell University - Department of Policy Analysis & Management (PAM) James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Jul 00
|
|
39 (131,447)
|
9
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the contribution of the rise in the return to ability to the rise in the economic return to education. All of the evidence on this question comes from panel data sets in which a small collection of adjacent birth cohorts is followed over time. The structure of the data creates an identification problem that makes it impossible to identify main age and time effects and to isolate all possible age-time interactions. In addition, many education-ability cells are empty due to the stratification of ability with educational attainment. These empty cells or identification problems are literature and produce a variety of different estimates. We test and reject widely used linearity assumptions invoked to identify the contribution of the return to ability on the return to schooling. Using nonparametric methods find little evidence that the rise in the return to education is centered among the most able.
|
|
|
60.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Christopher R Taber National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
|
| Posted: |
|
30 Jun 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
30 Jun 00
|
|
39 (131,447)
|
37
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Missing from recent discussions of tax reform is any systematic analysis of the effects of various tax proposals on skill formation. This gap in the literature in empirical public finance is due to the absence of any empirically based general equilibrium models with both human capital formation and physical capital formation that are consistent with observations on modern labor markets. This paper is a progress report on our ongoing research on formulating and estimating dynamic general equilibrium models with endogenous heterogeneous human capital accumulation. Our model explains many features of rising wage inequality in the U.S. economy (James Heckman, Lance Lochner and Christopher Taber, 1998). In this paper, we use our model to study the impacts on skill formation of proposals to switch from progressive taxes to flat income and consumption taxes. For the sake of brevity, we focus on steady states in this paper, although we study both transitions and steady states in our research.
|
|
|
61.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Sergio Samuel Urzua Northwestern University Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
07 Jul 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 Jul 08
|
|
38 (132,722)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper develops the method of local instrumental variables for models with multiple, unordered treatments when treatment choice is determined by a nonparametric version of the multinomial choice model. Responses to interventions are permitted to be heterogeneous in a general way and agents are allowed to select a treatment (e.g., participate in a program) with at least partial knowledge of the idiosyncratic response to the treatments. We define treatment effects in a general model with multiple treatments as differences in counterfactual outcomes that would have been observed if the agent faced different choice sets. We show how versions of local instrumental variables can identify the corresponding treatment parameters. Direct application of local instrumental variables identifies the marginal treatment effect of one option versus the next best alternative without requiring knowledge of any structural parameters from the choice equation or any large support assumptions. Using local instrumental variables to identify other treatment parameters requires either large support assumptions or knowledge of the latent index function of the multinomial choice model.
treatment effects, multinomial, nonparametric
|
|
|
62.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Christopher R Taber National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Mar 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 May 00
|
|
38 (132,722)
|
9
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper formulates and estimates an open-economy overlapping generation general-equilibrium model of endogenous heterogeneous human capital in the form of schooling and on-the-job training. Physical capital accumulation is also analyzed. We use the model to explain rising wage inequality in the past two decades due to skill-biased technical change and to estimate investment responses. We compare an open economy version with a closed economy version. Using our empirically grounded general equilibrium model that explains rising wage inequality, we evaluate two policies often suggested as solutions to the problem of rising wage inequality: (a) tuition subsidies to promote skill formation and (b) tax policies. We establish that conventional partial equilibrium policy evaluation methods widely used in labor economics and public finance give substantially misleading estimates of the impact of national tax and tuition policies on skill formation. Conventional microeconomic methods for estimating the schooling response to tuition overestimate the response by an order of magnitude. Simulations of our model also reveal that move to a flat consumption tax raises capital accumulation and the real wages of all skill groups and barely affects overall measures of income inequality.
|
|
|
63.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Jeffrey A. Smith Department of Economics, University of Michigan
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Apr 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Sep 00
|
|
37 (133,954)
|
22
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A variety of criteria are relevant for evaluating alternative policies in democratic societies composed of persons with diverse values and perspectives. In this paper, we consider alternative criteria for evaluating the welfare state, and the data required to operationalize them. We examine sets of identifying assumptions that bound, or exactly produce, these alternative criteria given the availability of various types of data. We consider the economic questions addressed by two widely-used econometric evaluation estimators and relate them to the requirements of a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis. We present evidence on how the inference from the most commonly used econometric evaluation estimator is modified when the direct costs of a program are fully assessed, including the welfare costs of the taxes required to support the program. Finally, we present evidence of the empirical inconsistency of alternative criteria derived from evaluations based on on self-selection and attrition decisions, and on self-reported evaluations from questionnaires when applied to a prototypical job training program.
|
|
|
64.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 Jul 00
|
|
34 (137,966)
|
6
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers the use of instrumental variables to estimate the mean effect of treatment on the treated. It reviews previous work on this topic by Heckman and Robb (1985, 1986) and demonstrates that (a) unless the effect of treatment is the same for everyone (conditional on observables), or (b) treatment effects are variable across persons but the person-specific component of the variability not forecastable by observables does not determine participation in the program, widely-used instrumental variable methods produce inconsistent estimators of the parameter of interest. Neither assumption is very palatable. The first assumes a homogeneity that is implausible. The second assumes either very rich data available to the econometrician or that the persons being studied either do not have better information than the econometrician or that they do not use it. Instrumental variable methods do not provide a general solution to the evaluation problem.
|
|
|
65.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Jeffrey A. Smith Department of Economics, University of Michigan Christopher R Taber National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Jun 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 May 00
|
|
34 (137,966)
|
18
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Bureaucratic performance standards are featured in many proposals to increase efficiency in government. These standards reward bureaucrats on the basis of measured outcomes. The performance standards system created under the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) of 1982 is often cited as a successful prototype. Under the JTPA system, local training centers receive monetary rewards based on the employment levels and wage rates attained by their trainees upon completion of the program. Critics of the JTPA performance standards system argue that it creates an incentive for program managers to encourage case workers to `cream-skim' the most employable applicants into the program. We examine this issue by analyzing the determinants of acceptance into JTPA among applicants at a training center for which we have data on everyone who applied over a two year period. We find that case workers prefer to accept the least employable applicants, rather than the most employable as suggested by the cream-skimming story. This evidence indicates that concerns about cream-skimming in JTPA may be exaggerated. Instead, the performance standards system may operate as a countervailing force against the preferences of case workers. Using experimental data from the recent National JTPA Study, we also determine whether or not case workers accept those applicants with higher expected gains from the program. Our evidence only weakly supports this hypothesis.
|
|
|
66.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
27 Jun 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
27 Jun 07
|
|
33 (139,387)
|
21
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers the recent case for randomized social experimentation and contrasts it with older cases for social experimentation. The recent case eschews behavioral models, assumes that certain mean differences in outcomes are the parameters of interest to evaluators and assumes that randomization does not disrupt the social program being analyzed. Conditions under which program disruption effects are of no consequence are presented. Even in the absence of randomization bias, ideal experimental data cannot estimate median (other quantile) differences between treated and untreated persons without invoking supplementary statistical assumptions. The recent case for randomized experimentation does not address the choice of the appropriate stage in a multistage program at which randomization should be conducted. Evidence on randomization bias is presented.
|
|
|
67.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Aug 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Jun 01
|
|
33 (139,387)
|
10
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper exposits and relates two distinct approaches to bounding the average treatment effect. One approach, based on instrumental variables, is due to Manski (1990, 1994), who derives tight bounds on the average treatment effect under a mean independence form of the instrumental variables (IV) condition. The second approach, based on latent index models, is due to Heckman and Vytlacil (1999, 2000a), who derive bounds on the average treatment effect that exploit the assumption of a nonparametric selection model with an exclusion restriction. Their conditions imply the instrumental variable condition studied by Manski, so that their conditions are stronger than the Manski conditions. In this paper, we study the relationship between the two sets of bounds implied by these alternative conditions. We show that: (1) the Heckman and Vytlacil bounds are tight given their assumption of a nonparametric selection model; (2) the Manski bounds simplify to the Heckman and Vytlacil bounds under the nonparametric selection model assumption.
|
|
|
68.
|
|
Evaluating Marginal Policy Changes and the Average Effect of Treatment for Individuals at the Margin
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
04 Aug 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Aug 09
|
|
32 (140,809) |
|
|
|
|
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Aug 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Aug 09
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper develops methods for evaluating marginal policy changes. We characterize how the effects of marginal policy changes depend on the direction of the policy change, and show that marginal policy effects are fundamentally easier to identify and to estimate than conventional treatment parameters. We develop the connection between marginal policy effects and the average effect of treatment for persons on the margin of indifference between participation in treatment and nonparticipation, and use this connection to analyze both parameters. We apply our analysis to estimate the effect of marginal changes in tuition on the return to going to college.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pedro Manuel Carneiro University College London - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Aug 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 Aug 09
|
|
32
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper develops methods for evaluating marginal policy changes. We characterize how the effects of marginal policy changes depend on the direction of the policy change, and show that marginal policy effects are fundamentally easier to identify and to estimate than conventional treatment parameters. We develop the connection between marginal policy effects and the average effect of treatment for persons on the margin of indifference between participation in treatment and nonparticipation, and use this connection to analyze both parameters. We apply our analysis to estimate the effect of marginal changes in tuition on the return to going to college.
marginal treatment effect, effects of marginal policy changes, marginal policy relevant treatment effect, average marginal treatment effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
69.
|
|
|
Robert Bornholz University of Chicago James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Dec 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 Aug 09
|
|
32 (140,809)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the economic and statistical foundations of proposed tests for discrimination. We focus on extension of disparate impact doctrine to new domains.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
70.
|
|
Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics James M. Snyder Jr. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Political Science & Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
04 Feb 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 09
|
|
32 (140,809) |
42
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics James M. Snyder Jr. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Political Science & Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Feb 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 09
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We formulate and estimate a rigorously justified linear probability model of binary choices over alternatives characterized by unobserved attributes. We apply the model to estimate preferences of congressmen as expressed in their votes on bills. The effective dimension of the attribute space characterizing votes is larger than what has been estimated in recent influential studies of congressional voting by Poole and Rosenthal. Congressmen vote on more than ideology. Issue-specific attributes are an important determinant of congressional voting patterns. The estimated dimension is too large for the median voter model to describe congressional voting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics James M. Snyder Jr. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Political Science & Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Feb 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 May 00
|
|
32
|
42
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper formulates and estimates a rigorously-justified linear probability model of binary choices over alternatives characterized by unobserved attributes. The model is applied to estimate preferences of congressmen as expressed in their votes on bills. The effective dimension of the attribute space characterizing votes is larger than what has been estimated in recent influential studies of congressional voting by Poole and Rosenthal. Congressmen vote on more than ideology. Issue-specific attributes are an important determinant of congressional voting patterns. The estimated dimension is too large for the median voter model to describe congressional voting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.
|
|
|
Arild Aakvik University of Bergen - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
29 Sep 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Jun 01
|
|
29 (145,559)
|
17
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper formulates an econometric framework for studying the impact of interventions on discrete outcomes when responses to treatment vary among observationally identical persons. Using a latent variable model that can be linked to well-posed economic models, we show how to define and interpret the average treatment effects, the average effect of treatment on the treated, the marginal treatment effect and the distribution of treatment effects for discrete outcomes. To estimate these parameters and the distribution of treatment effects, we formulate and estimate a discrete choice model with unobservables generated by a factor structure model. We apply our methods to evaluate the effect of Norwegian Vocational Rehabilitation training programs on employment outcomes for women. We find that applicants to these programs who participate in active training have a 4.6% higher employment rate than nonparticipants. When we control for the observable characteristics of applicants, we find that the average treatment effects falls to 4.1%. When we control for the unobservables characteristics of applicants, the average treatment effect falls to -1.4% and effect of treatment on the treated is -11%. We also find evidence of substantial heterogeneity in response to training.
|
|
|
72.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Jul 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Jul 08
|
|
29 (145,559)
|
14
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers the problem of policy evaluation in a modern society with heterogeneous agents and diverse groups with conflicting interests. Several different approaches to the policy evaluation problem are compared including the approach adopted in modern welfare economics, the classical representative agent approach adopted in macroecononomics and the microeconomic treatment effect approach. A new approach to the policy evaluation problem is developed and applied that combines and extends the best features of these earlier approaches.Evidence on the importance of heterogeneity is presented. Using an empirically based dynamic general equilibrium model of skill formation with heterogeneous agents, the benefits of the more comprehensive approach to policy evaluation are examined in the context of examining the impact of tax reform on skill formation and the political economy aspects of such reform. A parallel analysis of tution policy is presented.
|
|
|
73.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Christopher R Taber National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
|
| Posted: |
|
25 May 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 Jun 06
|
|
28 (147,319)
|
39
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers models for unobservables in duration models. It demonstrates how cross-section and time-series variation in regressors facilitates identification of single-spell, competing risks and multiple spell duration models. We also demonstrate the limited value of traditional identification studies by considering a case in which a model is identified in the conventional sense but cannot be consistently estimated.
|
|
|
74.
|
|
|
Christopher J. Flinn Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
05 Feb 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Feb 01
|
|
28 (147,319)
|
19
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper presents new econometric methods for the empirical analysis of individual labor market histories. The techniques developed here extend previous work on continuous time models in four ways: (1) A structural economic interpretation of these models is presented. (2) Time varying explanatory variables are introduced into the analysis in a general way. (3) Unobserved heterogeneity components are permitted to be correlated across spells. (4) A flexible model of duration dependence is presented that accommodates many previous models as a special case and that permits tests among competing specifications within a unified framework. We contrast our methods with more conventional discrete time and regression procedures. The parameters of continuous time models are invariant to the sampling time unit used to record observations. Problems plague the regression approach advocated in this paper. The regression approach cannot be readily adopted to accomodate time varying explanatory variables. The functional forms of regression functions depend on the time paths of the explanatory variables. _Ad hoc_ solutions to this problem can make exogenous variables endogenous to the model and so can induce simultaneous equations bias. Two sets of empirical results are presented. A major conclusion of the first analysis is that the discrete time Markov model widely used in labor market analysis is inconsistent with the data. The second set of empirical results is a test of the hypothesis that "unemployment" and "out of the labor force" are behaviorally different labor market states. Contrary to recent claims, we find that they are separate states for our sample of young men.
|
|
|
75.
|
|
|
Stephen V. Cameron Columbia University - School of International & Public Affairs (SIPA) James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Jul 00
|
|
28 (147,319)
|
91
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines an empirical regularity found in many societies: that family influences on the probability of transiting from one grade level to the next diminish at higher levels of education. We examine the statistical model used to establish the empirical regularity and the intuitive behavioral interpretation often used to rationalize it. We show that the implicit economic model assumes myopia. The intuitive interpretive model is identified only by imposing arbitrary distributional assumptions onto the data. We produce an alternative choice-theoretic model with fewer parameters that rationalizes the same data and is not based on arbitrary distributional assumptions.
|
|
|
76.
|
|
Nonparametric Identification and Estimation of Nonadditive Hedonic Models
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Rosa L. Matzkin University of California, Los Angeles Lars Nesheim University College London
|
|
Posted:
|
|
04 Aug 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Sep 09
|
|
27 (149,304) |
9
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Rosa L. Matzkin University of California, Los Angeles Lars Nesheim University College London
|
| Posted: |
|
18 Aug 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Sep 09
|
|
1
|
9
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies the identification and estimation of preferences and technologies in equilibrium hedonic models. In it, we identify nonparametric structural relationships with nonadditive heterogeneity. We determine what features of hedonic models can be identified from equilibrium observations in a single market under weak assumptions about the available information. We then consider use of additional information about structural functions and heterogeneity distributions. Separability conditions facilitate identification of consumer marginal utility and firm marginal product functions. We also consider how identification is facilitated using multimarket data.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Rosa L. Matzkin University of California, Los Angeles Lars Nesheim University College London
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Aug 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 Aug 09
|
|
26
|
9
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies the identification and estimation of preferences and technologies in equilibrium hedonic models. In it, we identify nonparametric structural relationships with nonadditive heterogeneity. We determine what features of hedonic models can be identified from equilibrium observations in a single market under weak assumptions about the available information. We then consider use of additional information about structural functions and heterogeneity distributions. Separability conditions facilitate identification of consumer marginal utility and firm marginal product functions. We also consider how identification is facilitated using multimarket data.
hedonic models, hedonic equilibrium, nonadditive models, identification, non-parametric estimation
|
|
|
|
|
|
77.
|
|
Taking the Easy Way Out: How the GED Testing Program Induces Students to Drop Out
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Paul LaFontaine American Bar Association Pedro L. Rodriguez University of Chicago - Center for Social Program Evaluation
|
|
Posted:
|
|
02 Jun 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Dec 08
|
|
27 (149,304) |
1
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Paul LaFontaine American Bar Association Pedro L. Rodriguez University of Chicago - Center for Social Program Evaluation
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Nov 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Dec 08
|
|
22
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We exploit an exogenous increase in General Educational Development (GED) testing requirements to determine whether raising the difficulty of the test causes students to finish high school rather than drop out and GED certify. We find that a six point decrease in GED pass rates induces a 1.3 point decline in overall dropout rates. The effect size is also much larger for older students and minorities. Finally, a natural experiment based on the late introduction of the GED in California reveals, that adopting the program increased the dropout rate by 3 points more relative to other states during the mid-1970s.
GED, dropout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Paul LaFontaine American Bar Association Pedro L. Rodriguez University of Chicago - Center for Social Program Evaluation
|
| Posted: |
|
02 Jun 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Jun 08
|
|
5
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We exploit an exogenous increase in General Educational Development (GED) testing requirements to determine whether raising the difficulty of the test causes students to finish high school rather than drop out and GED certify. We find that a six point decrease in GED pass rates induces a 1.3 point decline in overall dropout rates. The effect size is also much larger for older students and minorities. Finally, a natural experiment based on the late introduction of the GED in California reveals, that adopting the program increased the dropout rate by 3 points more relative to other states during the mid-1970s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
78.
|
|
The Identification and Economic Content of Ordered Choice Models With Stochastic Thresholds
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Salvador Navarro University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
23 Jul 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Apr 08
|
|
27 (149,304) |
3
|
|
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Salvador Navarro University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Dec 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Apr 08
|
|
21
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This article extends the widely used ordered choice model by introducing stochastic thresholds and interval-specific outcomes. The model can be interpreted as a generalization of the GAFT (MPH) framework for discrete duration data that jointly models durations and outcomes associated with different stopping times. We establish conditions for nonparametric identification. We interpret the ordered choice model as a special case of a general discrete choice model and as a special case of a dynamic discrete choice model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Salvador Navarro University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
23 Jul 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 Jul 07
|
|
6
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper extends the widely used ordered choice model by introducing stochastic thresholds and interval-specific outcomes. The model can be interpreted as a generalization of the GAFT (MPH) framework for discrete duration data that jointly models durations and outcomes associated with different stopping times. We establish conditions for nonparametric identification. We interpret the ordered choice model as a special case of a general discrete choice model and as a special case of a dynamic discrete choice model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
79.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Robert J. Willis University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
25 May 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 May 01
|
|
27 (149,304)
|
21
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this paper, we discuss statistical problems that arise in studying sequences of quantal responses (e.g., labor force participation) in panel data on heterogeneous populations (i.e., populations in which there is unobserved variation in response probabilities). Assuming that response probabilities are governed by a beta distribution, we derive a generalization of the cross-section logit model to enable it to deal with sequences of discrete events in panel data. This model is applied to panel data on labor force participation of married women. One of our findings is that the distribution of participation probabilities is U-shaped, indicating that most women have participation probabilities near zero or one.
|
|
|
80.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Aug 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
02 Apr 01
|
|
27 (149,304)
|
21
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers two problems that arise in determining the role of ability in explaining the level of and change in the rate of return to schooling. (1) Ability and schooling are so strongly dependent that it is not possible, over a wide range of variation in schooling and ability, to independently vary these two variables and estimate their separate impacts. (2) The structure of panel data makes it difficult to identify main age and time effects or to isolate crucial education-ability-time interactions needed to assess the role of ability in explaining the rise in the return to education.
|
|
|
81.
|
|
A Note on Adapting Propensity Score Matching and Selection Models to Choice Based Samples
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (4)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
04 Jul 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
06 Oct 09
|
|
26 (151,377) |
4
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Jul 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Jul 09
|
|
22
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The probability of selection into treatment plays an important role in matching and selection models. However, this probability can often not be consistently estimated, because of choice-based sampling designs with unknown sampling weights. This note establishes that the selection and matching procedures can be implemented using propensity scores fit on choice-based samples with misspecified weights, because the odds ratio of the propensity score fit on the choice-based sample is monotonically related to the odds ratio of the true propensity scores.
choice-based sampling, matching models, propensity scores, selection models
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Jul 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Aug 09
|
|
2
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The probability of selection into treatment plays an important role in matching and selection models. However, this probability can often not be consistently estimated, because of choice-based sampling designs with unknown sampling weights. This note establishes that the selection and matching procedures can be implemented using propensity scores fit on choice-based samples with misspecified weights, because the odds ratio of the propensity score fit on the choice-based sample is monotonically related to the odds ratio of the true propensity scores.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Jul 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Aug 09
|
|
2
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The probability of selection into treatment plays an important role in matching and selection models. However, this probability can often not be consistently estimated, because of choice-based sampling designs with unknown sampling weights. This note establishes that the selection and matching procedures can be implemented using propensity scores fit on choice-based samples with misspecified weights, because the odds ratio of the propensity score fit on the choice-based sample is monotonically related to the odds ratio of the true propensity scores.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Jul 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
06 Oct 09
|
|
0
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The probability of selection into treatment plays an important role in matching and selection models. However, this probability can often not be consistently estimated, because of choice-based sampling designs with unknown sampling weights. This note establishes that the selection and matching procedures can be implemented using propensity scores fit on choice-based samples with misspecified weights, because the odds ratio of the propensity score fit on the choice-based sample is monotonically related to the odds ratio of the true propensity scores.
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Rosa L. Matzkin University of California, Los Angeles Lars Nesheim University College London
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 Sep 09
|
|
26 (151,377)
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Making use of restrictions imposed by equilibrium, theoretical progress has been made on the nonparametric and semiparametric estimation and identification of scalar additive hedonic models (Ekeland, Heckman, and Nesheim, 2002) and scalar nonadditive hedonic models (Heckman, Matzkin, and Nesheim, 2002). However, little is known about the practical aspects of estimating such models or of the characteristics of equilibrium in such models. This paper presents computational and analytical results that fill some of these gaps. We simulate and estimate examples of equilibrium in the additive hedonic models and provide evidence on the performance of several estimation techniques. We also simulate examples of equilibria in nonadditive models and provide evidence on the performance of the nonadditive estimation techniques developed in Heckman, Matzkin, and Nesheim (2002).
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
83.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Jan 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Jan 02
|
|
26 (151,377)
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The Clinton administration has made job training and skill upgrading a major priority. Secretary of Labor Robert Reich has already presented a bold program for skill enhancement drawing on new consensus in certain circles of the social science and policy communities about the need to upgrade the nation's skills. An apparently new approach to training and education has been proposed and Secretary Reich is now busy selling it to the Congress and the Nation. This paper provides background on the problems in the labor market that motivate the new Clinton-Reich initiatives on training and schooling. It briefly summarizes the proposed strategies and the background philosophy for the Clinton-Reich agenda. It then considers the evidence that supports or contradicts assumptions of their plan. There is a lot of evidence about many of the "new" proposals because some are reworked versions of old programs that have been carefully evaluated. Other proposals borrow ideas from Germany. I compare the rhetoric that accompanies these proposals in the context of the U.S. labor market. Still other proposals have been evaluated in demonstration projects but the lessons from these evaluations have not yet influenced administration thinking. This is unfortunate because many current plans are based on assumptions that have been discredited in careful empirical studies. This research has not yet caught the attention of the policy makers in Washington.
|
|
|
84.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Thomas E. MaCurdy Stanford University
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Nov 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 May 09
|
|
26 (151,377)
|
8
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper surveys new methods for estimatifg labor supply functions. A unified framework of analysis is presented. All recent models of labor supply are special cases of a general index function model developed for the analysis o dummy endogenous variables.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
85.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Dimitriy V. Masterov University of Chicago - Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Feb 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Aug 09
|
|
25 (153,654)
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper argues that skill formation is a life-cycle process and develops the implications of this insight for Scottish social policy. Families are major producers of skills, and a successful policy needs to promote effective families and to supplement failing ones. We present evidence that early disadvantages produce severe later disadvantages that are hard to remedy. We also show that cognitive ability is not the only determinant of education, labor market outcomes and pathological behavior like crime. Abilities differ in their malleability over the life-cycle, with noncognitive skills being more malleable at later ages. This has important implications for the design of policy. The gaps in skills and abilities open up early, and schooling merely widens them. Additional university tuition subsidies or improvements in school quality are not warranted by Scottish evidence. Company-sponsored job training yields a higher return for the most able and so this form of investment will exacerbate the gaps it is intended to close. For the same reason, public job training is not likely to help adult workers whose skills are rendered obsolete by skill-biased technological change. Targeted early interventions, however, have proven to be very effective in compensating for the effect of neglect.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
86.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Christopher R Taber National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 Jul 00
|
|
25 (153,654)
|
85
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper develops and estimates an overlapping generations general equilibrium model of labor earnings, skill formation and physical capital accumulation with heterogeneous human capital. The model analyzes both schooling choices and post-school on-the-job investment in skills in a framework in which different schooling levels index different skills. A key insight in the model is that accounting for the distinction between skill prices and measured wages is important for analyzing the changing wage structure, as they often move in different directions. New methods are developed and applied to estimate the demand for unobserved human capital and to determine the substitution relationships in aggregate technology among skills and capital. We estimate skill-specific human capital accumulation equations that are consistent with the general equilibrium predictions of the model. Using our estimates, we find that a model of skill-biased technical change with a trend estimated from our aggregate technology is consistent with the central feature of rising wage equality measured by the college-high school wage differential and by the standard deviation of log earnings over the past 15 years. Immigration of low skill workers contributes little to rising wage inequality. When the model is extended to account for the enlarged cohorts of the Baby Boom, we find that the same parameter estimates of the supply functions for human capital that are used the explain the wage history of the last 15 years also explain the last 35 years of wage inequality as documented by Katz and Murphy (1992).
|
|
|
87.
|
|
|
Orley C. Ashenfelter Princeton University - Industrial Relations Section James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
05 Jan 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Jan 07
|
|
24 (156,085)
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Since 1941, six Executive Orders have been issued forbidding Federal government contractors from discriminating against minority workers. In principle, all prospective contractors are required to demonstrate compliance with the law before a contract is let. The potential penalties are severe: failure to comply with the law may result in revocation of current contracts and suspension of the right to bid on future contracts. Despite these provisions, doubts have been raised about the effectiveness of the Orders. Defenders of the Orders cite cases in which contract award dates have been postponed until firms have taken steps toward compliance with the law. In this paper, we investigate these competing claims using data from 40,445 establishments sampled in 1966 and 1970. In the first section of this paper, we distinguish what can be measured from what cannot. We develop a framework to measure and interpret program effects. In the second section we discuss the design of our sample and present results of an analysis of the randomness of this sample. In the third and concluding section, we present the estimates and discuss their plausibility.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and resident of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org
|
|
|
88.
|
|
|
Flavio Cunha University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Oct 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 Oct 07
|
|
23 (158,653)
|
6
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A large empirical literature documents a rise in wage inequality in the American economy. It is silent on whether the increase in inequality is due to greater heterogeneity in the components of earnings that are predictable by agents or whether it is due to greater uncertainty faced by agents. Applying the methodology of Cunha, Heckman and Navarro (2005) to data on agents making schooling decisions in different economic environments, we join choice data with earnings data to estimate the fraction of future earnings that is forecastable and how this fraction has changed over time. We find that both predictable and unpredictable components of earnings have increased in recent years. The increase in uncertainty is substantially greater for unskilled workers. For less skilled workers, roughly 60% of the increase in wage variability is due to uncertainty. For more skilled workers, only 8% of the increase in wage variability is due to uncertainty. Roughly 26% of the increase in the variance of returns to schooling is due to increased uncertainty. Using conventional measures of income inequality masks the contribution of rising uncertainty to the rise in the inequality of earnings for less educated groups.
|
|
|
89.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Anne Layne-Farrar Law and Economics Consulting Group (LECG), LLC - Chicago, IL Office Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
25 May 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Jun 07
|
|
23 (158,653)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper investigates the economic and empirical foundations of the evidence relating earnings to schooling quality. We replicate the Card-Krueger model for Census years 1970, 1980 and 1990 and find that it consistently produces a strong relationship between schooling quality and the rate of return to schooling. We test key identifying assumptions used by Card and Krueger and others. Several assumptions are rejected. When they are relaxed, the evidence for a strong effect of schooling quality on earning is greatly weakened. A crucial identifying assumption is the absence of selective migration on the basis of earnings. Nonparametric tests strongly reject this hypothesis. The conventional assumption of linearity of the earnings- schooling relationship widely used in the literature is also rejected. The only surviving evidence of any schooling quality effect is in the return to college education. We also test and reject conventional efficiency unit models of the pricing of labor services. The empirically concordant model of earnings is a model of heterogeneous human capital in which regional shocks affect the prices of less- skilled labor.
|
|
|
90.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Paul LaFontaine American Bar Association
|
| Posted: |
|
27 Apr 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 May 06
|
|
23 (158,653)
|
6
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Using three sources of data, this paper examines the direct economic return to GED certification for both native and immigrant high school dropouts. One data source %u2013 the CPS %u2013 is plagued by non-response and allocation bias from the hot-deck procedure that biases upward the estimated return to the GED. Correcting for allocation bias and ability bias, there is no direct economic return to GED certification. An apparent return to GED certification with age found in the raw CPS data is due to dropouts becoming more skilled over time. These results apply to native born as well as immigrant populations.
|
|
|
91.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Jeffrey A. Smith Department of Economics, University of Michigan
|
| Posted: |
|
18 Mar 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 May 00
|
|
23 (158,653)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The recent experimental evaluation of the U.S. Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) program found negative effects of training on the earnings of disadvantaged male youth and no effect on the earnings of disadvantaged female youth. These findings provided justification for Congress to cut the budget of JTPA's youth component by over 80 percent. In this paper, we examine the sensitivity of the experimental impact estimates along several dimensions of construction and interpretation. We find that the statistical significance of the male youth estimates is extremely fragile and that the magnitudes of the estimates for both youth groups are sensitive to nearly all the factors we consider. In particular, accounting for experimental control group members who substitute training from other providers leads to a much more positive picture regarding the effectiveness of JTPA classroom training. Our study indicates the value of sensitivity analyses in experimental evaluations and illustrates that experimental impact estimates, like those from nonexperimental analyses, require careful interpretation if they are to provide a reliable guide to policymakers.
|
|
|
92.
|
|
|
Richard J. Butler Brigham Young University - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Feb 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Jan 02
|
|
22 (161,391)
|
8
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper surveys recent evidence on the impact of government programs on the measured labor market status of black Americans. In this paper, we argue that previous studies neglect the impact of recent government policy on the supply side of the labor market, and that the supply side effects of recent policy play an important role in explaining the recent measured increase in the ratio of the wages and incomes of blacks to the wages and incomes of whites.
|
|
|
93.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario - Department of Economics Christopher R Taber National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
|
| Posted: |
|
01 Sep 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
01 Sep 00
|
|
22 (161,391)
|
37
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper defines and estimates general equilibrium treatment effects. The conventional approach in the literature on treatment effects ignores interactions among individuals induced by the policy interventions being studied. Focusing on the impact of tuition policy, and using estimates from our dynamic overlapping generations general equilibrium model of capital and human capital formation, we find that general equilibrium impacts of tuition on college enrollment are an order of magnitude smaller than those reported in the literature on microeconomic treatment effects. The assumptions used to justify the LATE parameter in a partial equilibrium setting do not hold in a general equilibrium setting. Policy changes induce two way flows. We extend the LATE concept to a general equilibrium setting. We present a more comprehensive evaluation to program evaluation by considering both the tax and benefit consequences of the program being evaluated and placing the analysis in a market setting.
|
|
|
94.
|
|
The Rate of Return to the High/Scope Perry Preschool Program
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Seong Moon University of Chicago - Department of Economics Rodrigo R. Pinto Sr. University of Chicago - Department of Economics Peter Savelyev University of Chicago - Department of Economics Adam Yavitz University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
09 Nov 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Nov 09
|
|
21 (167,067) |
3
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Seong Moon University of Chicago - Department of Economics Rodrigo R. Pinto Sr. University of Chicago - Department of Economics Peter Savelyev University of Chicago - Department of Economics Adam Yavitz University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Nov 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Nov 09
|
|
7
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper estimates the rate of return to the High/Scope Perry Preschool Program, an early intervention program targeted toward disadvantaged African-American youth. Estimates of the rate of return to the Perry program are widely cited to support the claim of substantial economic benefits from preschool education programs. Previous studies of the rate of return to this program ignore the compromises that occurred in the randomization protocol. They do not report standard errors. The rates of return estimated in this paper account for these factors. We conduct an extensive analysis of sensitivity to alternative plausible assumptions. Estimated social rates of return generally fall between 7-10 percent, with most estimates substantially lower than those previously reported in the literature. However, returns are generally statistically significantly different from zero for both males and females and are above the historical return on equity. Estimated benefit-to-cost ratios support this conclusion.
rate of return, cost-benefit analysis, standard errors, Perry Preschool Program, compromised randomization, early childhood intervention programs, deadweight costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Seong Moon University of Chicago - Department of Economics Rodrigo R. Pinto Sr. University of Chicago - Department of Economics Peter Savelyev University of Chicago - Department of Economics Adam Yavitz University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Nov 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Nov 09
|
|
14
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper estimates the rate of return to the High/Scope Perry Preschool Program, an early intervention program targeted toward disadvantaged African-American youth. Estimates of the rate of return to the Perry program are widely cited to support the claim of substantial economic benefits from preschool education programs. Previous studies of the rate of return to this program ignore the compromises that occurred in the randomization protocol. They do not report standard errors. The rates of return estimated in this paper account for these factors. We conduct an extensive analysis of sensitivity to alternative plausible assumptions. Estimated social rates of return generally fall between 7-10 percent, with most estimates substantially lower than those previously reported in the literature. However, returns are generally statistically significantly different from zero for both males and females and are above the historical return on equity. Estimated benefit-to-cost ratios support this conclusion.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
95.
|
|
|
Jean-Pierre Florens University of Toulouse James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Costas Meghir University College London - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
16 May 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 May 08
|
|
21 (164,193)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We use the control function approach to identify the average treatment effect and the effect of treatment on the treated in models with a continuous endogenous regressor whose impact is heterogeneous. We assume a stochastic polynomial restriction on the form of the heterogeneity but, unlike alternative nonparametric control function approaches, our approach does not require large support assumptions.
|
|
|
96.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Robert J. Willis University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
05 Jan 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Jan 07
|
|
20 (167,067)
|
9
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In the past few years, there has been substantial progress in the application of the economic theory of household decision making to human fertility behavior. Theoretical emphasis has been given to the effects of the costs of parental tine and money resources devoted to rearing children on the demand for the total number of children in a static framework under conditions of certainty. Empirical work has focused on explaining variation in the number of children ever born to women, who have completed their childbearing, as a function of measures of the household's total resources and the opportunity cost of time, especially the value of the wife's time. One important objection to static theories of fertility is their failure to deal with the implications of the simple fact that reproduction is a stochastic biological process in which the number and timing of births and the traits of children (e.g. sex, intelligence, health, etc.) are uncertain and not subject to direct control. In this paper, we report some initial results of a study in progress whose goal is to develop an integrated theoretical and econometric model of fertility behavior within a sequential stochastic framework. The principal contribution of the paper is to the development of an appropriate econometric methodology for dealing with some new econometric problems that arise in such models.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and resident of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org
|
|
|
97.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Anne Layne-Farrar Law and Economics Consulting Group (LECG), LLC - Chicago, IL Office Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Aug 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Aug 00
|
|
20 (167,067)
|
27
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the economic and empirical foundations of the aggregate evidence on the effect of schooling quality on earnings. A common framework is presented which nests all previous studies as special cases. We discuss two crucial identifying assumptions and test them. The first assumption is the absence of region of birth - region of resident interactions in the return to schooling. This rules out patterns of migration on the basis of realized earnings in the destination state. Both parametric and nonparametric versions of this hypothesis are tested. Using 1970, 1980 and 1990 Census data, it is decisively rejected. A second assumption is that log earnings equations are linear - or nearly linear in schooling. This assumption is false. We find that estimated earnings-quality relationships are sensitive to specification of the earnings function. When false linearity assumptions are relaxed, the only effect of measured schooling quality is on the returns for college graduates. The evidence for an aggregate earnings-quality relationship is weak once false empirical restrictions are relaxed.
|
|
|
98.
|
|
Meritocracy in America: Wages Within and Across Occupations
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
John Cawley Cornell University - Department of Policy Analysis & Management (PAM) James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
25 Jan 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 09
|
|
20 (167,067) |
3
|
|
|
|
|
John Cawley Cornell University - Department of Policy Analysis & Management (PAM) James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
24 Jul 00
|
|
20
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In The Bell Curve, Herrnstein and Murray argue that the U.S. economy is a meritocracy in which differences in wages (including differences across race and gender) are explained by differences in cognitive ability. In this paper we test their claim for wages conditional on occupation using a simultaneous model of occupation choice and wage determination. Our results contradict Herrnstein and Murray's claim that the U.S. labor market operates only on meritocratic principles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Cawley Cornell University - Department of Policy Analysis & Management (PAM) James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Edward J. Vytlacil Yale University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Jan 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 09
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In The Bell Curve, Herrnstein and Murray argue that the U.S. economy is a meritocracy in which differences in wages (including differences across race and gender) are explained by differences in cognitive ability. In this paper we test their claim for wages conditional on occupation using a simultaneous model of occupation choice and wage determination. Our results contradict Herrnstein and Murray's claim that the U.S. labor market operates only on meritocratic principles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.
|
|
|
Armin Falk Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Nov 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Nov 09
|
|
18 (178,549)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Laboratory experiments are a widely used methodology for advancing causal knowledge in the physical and life sciences. With the exception of psychology, the adoption of laboratory experiments has been much slower in the social sciences, although during the last two decades, the use of lab experiments has accelerated. Nonetheless, there remains considerable resistance among social scientists who argue that lab experiments lack "realism" and "generalizability". In this article we discuss the advantages and limitations of laboratory social science experiments by comparing them to research based on non-experimental data and to field experiments. We argue that many recent objections against lab experiments are misguided and that even more lab experiments should be conducted.
laboratory experiments, field experiments, controlled variation
|
|
|
100.
|
|
|
John J. Donohue III Yale Law School James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Jan 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Jan 09
|
|
18 (172,785)
|
42
|
|
| |
Abstract:
No abstract is available for this paper.
|
|
|
101.
|
|
|
George J. Borjas Harvard University James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
08 Jun 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 Jun 04
|
|
18 (172,785)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
No abstract is available for this paper.
|
|
|
102.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Jeffrey A. Smith Department of Economics, University of Michigan
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Jul 00
|
|
18 (172,785)
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper demonstrates that even under ideal conditions, social experiments in general only uniquely determine the mean impacts of programs but not the median or the distribution of program impacts. The conventional common parameter evaluation model widely used in econometrics is one case where experiments uniquely determine joint the distribution of program impacts. That model assumes that everyone responds to a social program in the same way. Allowing for heterogeneous responses to programs, the data from social experiments are consistent with a wide variety of alternative impact distribution. We discuss why it is interesting to know the distribution of program impacts. We propose and implement a variety of different ways of incorporating prior information to reduce the wide variability intrinsic in experimental data. Robust Bayesian methods and deconvolution methods are developed and applied. We analyze earnings and employment data on adult women from a recent social experiment. In order to produce plausible impact distributions, it is necessary to impose strong positive dependence between outcomes in the treatment and in the control distributions. Such dependence is an outcome of certain optimizing models of the program participation decision.
|
|
|
103.
|
|
|
John J. Donohue III Yale Law School James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Jul 00
|
|
18 (172,785)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Improvements in educational attainment and in educational quality are universally acknowledged to be major contributors to black economic progress in the twentieth century. The sources of these improvements are less well understood. Many scholars implicitly assume improvements in schooling reflect private choices. In fact, schooling is publicly provided and increases in the quality and availability of black schools in the South occurred at a time when blacks were excluded from the political process. This paper demonstrates the important roles of social action, especially NAACP litigation, and private philanthropy, in improving access and quality of public schooling in Georgia and in the rest of the South in the first half of the century. Analyses that pit rising schooling quality as an alternative to social action in explaining black progress miss the important role of social activism in promoting schooling quality and hence in elevating the economic status of black Americans.
|
|
|
104.
|
|
|
Christopher J. Flinn Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Jul 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 Jul 04
|
|
17 (175,656)
|
30
|
|
| |
Abstract:
No abstract is available for this paper.
|
|
|
105.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics James R. Walker University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
03 May 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Aug 08
|
|
16 (178,549)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This article demonstrates the value of microdata for understanding the effect of wages on life cycle fertility dynamics. Conventional estimates of neoclassical economic fertility models obtained from linear aggregate time series regressions are widely criticized for being nonrobust when adjusted for serial correlation. Moreover, the forecasting power of these aggregative neoclassical models has been shown to be inferior when compared with conventional time series models that assign no role to wages. This article demonstrates, that when neoclassical models of fertility are estimated on microdata using methods that incorporate key demographic restrictions and when they are properly aggregated, they have considerable forecasting power.
|
|
|
106.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Christopher J. Flinn Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
05 Feb 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Feb 01
|
|
16 (178,549)
|
40
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper takes a first step toward developing econometric models for the structural analysis of labor force dynamics. Our analysis is presented in continuous time, although most of the points raised here can be applied to discrete time models. We show that in previous attempts to estimate "structural" models of job search, a key source of information necessary to identify certain structural parameters has been neglected. We discuss the conditions under which structural search models can be estimated. In particular, the wage offer distribution must be _recoverable_ -- i.e., it must be the case that the parameters of the untruncated wage offer distribution be estimable from the truncated accepted wage distribution. The wage offer distribution must be assumed to belong to a parameteric family. Estimates of structural parameters are shown to be sensitive to the distributional assumption made. A partial equilibrium two state model of employment dynamics is estimated, using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Young Men. We find employment and nonemployment rates implied by the structural parameter estimates to be generally consistent with those observed for the population of young males.
|
|
|
107.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Jeffrey A. Smith Department of Economics, University of Michigan Christopher R Taber National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Jul 00
|
|
16 (178,549)
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers the statistical and economic justification for one widely-used method of adjusting data from social experiments to account for dropping-out behavior due to Bloom (1984). We generalize the method to apply to distributions not just means, and present tests of the key identifying assumption in this context. A reanalysis of the National JTPA experiment base vindicates application of Bloom's method in this context.
|
|
|
108.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Nov 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Nov 07
|
|
14 (184,290)
|
7
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper discusses how randomized social experiments operate as an instrumental variable. For two types of randomization schemes, the fundamental experimental estimation equations are derived from the principle that experiments equate bias in control and experimental samples. Using conventional econometric representations, we derive the orthogonality conditions for the fundamental estimation equations. Randomization is a multiple instrumental variable in the sense that one randomization defines the parameter of interest expressed as a function of multiple endogenous variables in the conventional usage of that term. It orthogonalizes the treatment variable simultaneously with respect to the other regressors in the model and the disturbance term for the conditional population. However, conventional `structural' parameters are not in general identified by the two types of randomization schemes widely used in practice.
|
|
|
109.
|
|
|
Stephen V. Cameron Columbia University - School of International & Public Affairs (SIPA) James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
21 Aug 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Aug 07
|
|
14 (184,290)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
No abstract is available for this paper.
|
|
|
110.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
25 May 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Jun 07
|
|
14 (184,290)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
|
|
|
111.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Jeffrey A. Smith Department of Economics, University of Michigan
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Mar 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 May 00
|
|
14 (184,290)
|
33
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The key to estimating the impact of a program is constructing the counterfactual outcome representing what would have happened in its absence. This problem becomes more complicated when agents self-select into the program rather than being exogenously assigned to it. This paper uses data from a major social experiment to identify what would have happened to the earnings of self-selected participants in a job training program had they not participated in it. We investigate the implications of these earnings patterns for the validity of widely-used before-after and difference-in-differences estimators. Motivated by the failure of these estimators to produce credible estimates, we investigate the determinants of program participation. We find that labor force status dynamics, rather than earnings or employment dynamics, drive the participation process. Our evidence suggests that training programs often function as a form of job search. Methods that control only for earnings dynamics, like the conventional difference-in-differences estimator, do not adequately capture the underlying differences between participants and non-participants. We use the estimated probabilities of participation in both matching estimators and a nonparametric, conditional version of the differences-in-differences estimator and produce large reductions in the selection bias in non-experimental estimates of the effect of training on earnings.
|
|
|
112.
|
|
|
Pedro Erik A. Carneiro University of Brazil - Department of Economics James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
10 Sep 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
28 Feb 04
|
|
13 (187,181)
|
66
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the family income-college enrolment relationship and the evidence on credit constraints in post-secondary schooling. We distinguish short run liquidity constraints from the long term factors that promote cognitive and noncognitive ability. Long run factors crystallised in ability are the major determinants of the family income-schooling relationship, although there is some evidence that up to 8% of the total US population is credit constrained in a short run sense. Evidence that IV estimates of the returns to schooling exceed OLS estimates is sometimes claimed to support the existence of substantial credit constraints. This argument is critically examined.
|
|
|
113.
|
|
Testing the Correlated Random Coefficient Model
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Daniel Schmierer University of Chicago - Department of Economics Sergio Samuel Urzua Northwestern University
|
|
Posted:
|
|
03 Nov 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Nov 09
|
|
12 (190,078) |
1
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Daniel Schmierer University of Chicago - Department of Economics Sergio Samuel Urzua Northwestern University
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Nov 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Nov 09
|
|
4
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The recent literature on instrumental variables (IV) features models in which agents sort into treatment status on the basis of gains from treatment as well as on baseline-pretreatment levels. Components of the gains known to the agents and acted on by them may not be known by the observing economist. Such models are called correlated random coefficient models. Sorting on unobserved components of gains complicates the interpretation of what IV estimates. This paper examines testable implications of the hypothesis that agents do not sort into treatment based on gains. In it, we develop new tests to gauge the empirical relevance of the correlated random coefficient model to examine whether the additional complications associated with it are required. We examine the power of the proposed tests. We derive a new representation of the variance of the instrumental variable estimator for the correlated random coefficient model. We apply the methods in this paper to the prototypical empirical problem of estimating the return to schooling and find evidence of sorting into schooling based on unobserved components of gains.
instrumental variables, testing, correlated random coefficient, power of tests based on IV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Daniel Schmierer University of Chicago - Department of Economics Sergio Samuel Urzua Northwestern University
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Nov 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Nov 09
|
|
8
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The recent literature on instrumental variables (IV) features models in which agents sort into treatment status on the basis of gains from treatment as well as on baseline-pretreatment levels. Components of the gains known to the agents and acted on by them may not be known by the observing economist. Such models are called correlated random coefficient models. Sorting on unobserved components of gains complicates the interpretation of what IV estimates. This paper examines testable implications of the hypothesis that agents do not sort into treatment based on gains. In it, we develop new tests to gauge the empirical relevance of the correlated random coefficient model to examine whether the additional complications associated with it are required. We examine the power of the proposed tests. We derive a new representation of the variance of the instrumental variable estimator for the correlated random coefficient model. We apply the methods in this paper to the prototypical empirical problem of estimating the return to schooling and find evidence of sorting into schooling based on unobserved components of gains.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
114.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Fredrick Flyer Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics Colleen P. Loughlin affiliation not provided to SSRN
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Mar 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Aug 08
|
|
11 (193,016)
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Reliably identifying the causal factors underlying youth smoking initiation is an important part of developing effective smoking prevention programs and shaping other types of smoking-related policies. The establishment of reliable scientific evidence in support of a causal link between cigarette advertising and youth smoking initiation depends on both rich longitudinal data as well as careful empirical applications. We examine basic principles of empirical scientific investigation of potential causal relationships, discuss findings of recent research on causal factors of youth smoking, and evaluate evidence from the public health literature regarding the effects of cigarette advertising on youth smoking.
|
|
|
115.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
08 Sep 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 Sep 08
|
|
0 (0)
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper discusses (a) the role of cognitive and noncognitive ability in shaping adult outcomes, (b) the early emergence of differentials in abilities between children of advantaged families and children of disadvantaged families, (c) the role of families in creating these abilities, (d) adverse trends in American families, and (e) the effectiveness of early interventions in offsetting these trends. Practical issues in the design and implementation of early childhood programs are discussed. (JEL A12)
|
|
|
116.
|
|
|
Stephen V. Cameron Columbia University - School of International & Public Affairs (SIPA) James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
29 Sep 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 09
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper estimates a dynamic model of schooling attainment to investigate the sources of racial and ethnic disparity in college attendance. Parental income in the child's adolescent years is a strong predictor of this disparity. This is widely interpreted to mean that credit constraints facing families during the college-going years are important. Using NLSY data, we find that it is the long-run factors associated with parental background and family environment, and not credit constraints facing prospective students in the college-going years, that account for most of the racial-ethnic college-going differential. Policies aimed at improving these long-term family and environmental factors are more likely to be successful in eliminating college attendance differentials than short-term tuition reduction and family income supplement policies aimed at families with college age children.
|
|
|
117.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
30 Jul 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 09
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper summarizes the contributions of microeconometrics to economic knowledge. Four main themes are developed. (1) Microeconometricians developed new tools to respond to econometric problems raised by the analysis of the new sources of micro data produced after the Second World War. (2) Microeconometrics improved on aggregate time-series methods by building models that linked economic models for individuals to data on individual behavior. (3) An important empirical regularity detected by the field is the diversity and heterogeneity of behavior. This heterogeneity has profound consequences for economic theory and for econometric practice. (4) Microeconometrics has contributed substantially to the scientific evaluation of public policy.
|
|
|
118.
|
|
|
John J. Donohue III Yale Law School James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics Petra Todd University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
10 Feb 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 09
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Improvements in educational attainment and in educational quality are universally acknowledged to be major contributors to Black economic progress in the Twentieth Century. The sources of these improvements are less well understood. Many scholars implicitly assume improvements in schooling reflect private choices. In fact, schooling is publicly provided, and increases in the quality and availability of Black schools in the South occurred at a time when Blacks were excluded from the political process. This paper demonstrates the important roles of social action, especially NAACP litigation, and private philanthropy in improving access and quality of public schooling in Georgia and in the rest of the South in the first half of the century. Analyses that pit rising schooling quality as an alternative to social action in explaining Black progress miss the important role of social activism in promoting schooling quality and hence in elevating the economic status of Black Americans.
|
|
|
119.
|
|
|
James J. Heckman University of Chicago - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Apr 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Mar 09
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper considers the use of instrumental variables to estimate the mean effect of treatment on the treated, the mean effect of treatment on randomly selected persons and the local average treatment effect. It examines what economic questions these parameters address. When responses to treatment vary, the standard argument justifying the use of instrumental variables fails unless person-specific responses to treatment do not influence decisions to participate in the program being evaluated. This requires that individual gains from the program that cannot be predicted from variables in outcome equations do not influence the decision of the persons being studied to participate in the program. In the likely case in which individuals possess and act on private information about gains from the program that cannot be fully predicted by variables in the outcome equation, instrumental variables methods do not estimate economically interesting evaluation parameters. Instrumental variable methods are extremely sensitive to assumptions about how people process information. These arguments are developed for both continuous and discrete treatment variables, and several explicit economic models are presented.
|
|