| . |
John Karl Scholz's
Scholarly Papers
Click on the title of any column to sort the table by that
column. |
|
|
| |
|
|
Aggregate Statistics |
|
Total Downloads
479 |
Total
Citations
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
V. Joseph Hotz Duke University John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Jan 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 Aug 01
|
|
95 (81,925)
|
54
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Since its inception in 1975, the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) has grown into the largest, Federally-funded means-tested cash assistance program in the United States. In this chapter, we review the political history of the EITC, its rules and goals and provide a broad set of program statistics on its growth and coverage. We summarize conceptual underpinnings of much of the recent economic research on the EITC, discussing participation in the credit and compliance with its provisions, and its effects on labor force participation and hours of work, marriage and fertility, skill formation and consumption. We note that participation rates of the credit are high, rates of credit noncompliance are also high, and that there are theoretical reasons to prefer the EITC to other anti-poverty programs if one's objective is to encourage work among the poor. We also note that the predicted effects of the EITC are not all pro-work, especially with respect to hours and its labor market incentives for two-earner couples. We then summarize the existing empirical research on the behavioral effects of the EITC, paying particularly emphasis to the effects of the 1986, 1990 and 1993 expansions of the credit on labor force participation and hours of work. The literature provides consistent evidence, generated from a variety of empirical approaches, that the EITC positively affects labor force participation. The literature also finds smaller, negative effects on hours of work for people already in the labor market and for secondary workers. We conclude the chapter with a discussion of the ongoing EITC-related policy debates and highlight what, if any, critical economic issues underlie these debates.
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics Ananth Seshadri University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Feb 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Nov 08
|
|
72 (98,224)
|
7
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the effects of children on consumption and wealth. To anchor intuition, we develop implications using a simple permanent income model with no uncertainty and complete markets. But this framework does not come close to matching the distribution of existing wealth. We therefore examine the effects of children using a rich, augmented life-cycle model, and using a life-cycle model with endogenous fertility. We find that children have a large effect on household's net worth and consequently are an important factor in understanding the wealth distribution. The effects of children are much larger than the effects of asset tests associated with cash and near-cash transfers, given earnings realizations and the social security system experienced by households in the original HRS cohort. We also show that fertility and credit constraints interact in ways that significantly affect wealth accumulation.
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics Ananth Seshadri University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
04 Feb 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 Feb 09
|
|
62 (107,100)
|
24
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Many people fear that Americans are preparing poorly for retirement. But developing rigorous evidence on this issue is difficult. In this paper we briefly discuss evidence on the adequacy of retirement wealth accumulation. We conclude that existing descriptive evidence does not seem consistent with dire assessments of poor financial preparation. We then extend the straightforward, but computationally complex dynamic programming approach used in our earlier work to assess the adequacy of retirement wealth preparation of Americans born before 1954. We find only 4 percent of HRS households have net worth below their optimal targets in 2004, though this percentage is somewhat higher for more recent HRS cohorts. While our work is preliminary, we find little evidence that Americans born before 1954 have prepared poorly for retirement.
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
Patrick J. Bayer Duke University - Department of Economics B. Douglas Bernheim Stanford University - Department of Economics John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Sep 96
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 May 00
|
|
56 (112,756)
|
34
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We examine the effects of education on financial decision-making skills by identifying an interesting source of variation in pertinent training. During the 1990s, an increasing number of individuals were exposed to programs of financial education provided by their employers. If, as some have argued, low saving frequently results from a failure to appreciate economic vulnerabilities, then education of this form could prove to have a powerful effect on rates of behavior. The current paper undertakes an analysis of these programs using a previously unexploited survey of employers. We find that both participation in and contributions to voluntary savings plans are significantly higher when employers offer retirement seminars. The effect is typically much stronger for non-highly compensated employees than for highly compensated employees. The frequency of seminars emerges as a particularly important correlate of behavior. We are unable to detect any effects of written materials, such as newsletters and summary plan descriptions, regardless of frequency. We also present evidence on other determinants of plan activity.
|
|
|
5.
|
|
Are Americans Saving 'Optimally' for Retirement?
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics Ananth Seshadri University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics Surachai Khitatrakun Tax Policy Center
|
|
Posted:
|
|
31 Jan 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Nov 08
|
|
54 (114,738) |
39
|
|
|
|
|
John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics Ananth Seshadri University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics Surachai Khitatrakun Tax Policy Center
|
| Posted: |
|
01 Nov 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Nov 08
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We solve each household's optimal saving decisions using a life cycle model that incorporates uncertain lifetimes, uninsurable earnings and medical expenses, progressive taxation, government transfers, and pension and social security benefits. With optimal decision rules, we compare, household by household, wealth predictions from the life cycle model using a nationally representative sample. We find, making use of household-specific earnings histories, that the model accounts for more than 80 percent of the 1992 cross-sectional variation in wealth. Fewer than 20 percent of households have less wealth than their optimal targets, and the wealth deficit of those who are undersaving is generally small.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics Ananth Seshadri University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics Surachai Khitatrakun Tax Policy Center
|
| Posted: |
|
31 Jan 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
31 Jan 04
|
|
54
|
39
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the degree to which Americans are saving optimally for retirement. Our standard for assessing optimality comes from a life-cycle model that incorporates uncertain lifetimes, uninsurable earnings and medical expenses, progressive taxation, government transfers, and pension and social security benefit functions derived from rich household data. We solve every household's decision problem from death to starting age and then use the decision rules in conjunction with earnings histories to make predictions about wealth in 1992. Ours is the first study to compare, household by household, wealth predictions that arise from a life-cycle model that incorporates earnings histories for a nationally representative sample. The results, based on data from the Health and Retirement Study, are striking - we find that the model is capable of accounting for more than 80 percent of the 1992 cross-sectional variation in wealth. Fewer than 20 percent of households have less wealth than their optimal targets, and the wealth deficit of those who are undersaving is generally small.
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
V. Joseph Hotz Duke University John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Apr 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Apr 06
|
|
36 (135,392)
|
38
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines the employment effects of the earned income tax credit (EITC). We use a unique dataset, created by matching administrative data from public assistance records, unemployment insurance records, and federal tax returns for a sample of California residents. We conduct a set of four tests to assess our ability to isolate the causal effects of the EITC on employment. The first test is based on the intuition that if the EITC alters employment, all else being equal, employment rates for two-or-more child families should grow relative to the employment rates of one-child families, as credit amounts available to these groups of families diverged over the 1990s. The second test examines whether or not people eligible for the EITC actually file tax returns and claim it. The third test is based on the intuition that, if the EITC, and not other factors such as the strong economy in the 1990s, is causing employment differences between families with two or more children relative to those with one child, we should expect to see no employment differences (after conditioning on other characteristics) between families with two children and families with three or more children, since the EITC did not change differentially for the latter two groups. The fourth test conditions the sample on those who do not file tax returns and again examines employment changes in the 1990s for families with two or more children relative to families with one child. Using fixed-effects empirical employment models estimated on a sample of single-parent families, our coefficient estimates are consistent with the EITC having a substantial, positive effect on the employment of families who have used or will use welfare.
|
|
|
7.
|
|
Personal Bankruptcy and Credit Supply and Demand
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Reint Gropp European Business School (EBS) Wiesbaden - Department of Finance, Accounting & Real Estate John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics Michelle J. White University of California, San Diego - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
15 Oct 96
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Nov 08
|
|
35 (136,681) |
69
|
|
|
|
|
Reint Gropp European Business School (EBS) Wiesbaden - Department of Finance, Accounting & Real Estate John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics Michelle J. White University of California, San Diego - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Mar 08
|
|
35
|
69
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines how personal bankruptcy and bankruptcy exemptions affect the supply and demand for credit. While generous state-level bankruptcy exemptions are probably viewed by most policymakers as benefitting less-well-off borrowers, our results using data from the 1983 Survey of Consumer Finances suggest they increase the amount of credit held by high-asset households and reduce the availability and amount of credit to low-asset households, conditioning on observable characteristics. We also find evidence that interest rates on automobile loans for low-asset households are higher in high exemption states. Thus, bankruptcy exemptions redistribute credit toward borrowers with high assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reint Gropp European Business School (EBS) Wiesbaden - Department of Finance, Accounting & Real Estate John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics Michelle J. White University of California, San Diego - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Oct 96
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Nov 08
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper examines how personal bankruptcy and bankruptcy exemptions affect the supply and demand for credit. While generous state-level bankruptcy exemptions are probably viewed by most policy makers as benefiting less-well-off borrowers, our results using data from the 1983 Survey of Consumer Finances suggest they increase the amount of credit held by high-asset households and reduce the availability and amount of credit to low-asset households, conditioning on observable characteristics. We also find evidence that interest rates on automobile loans for low- asset households are higher in high exemption states. Thus, bankruptcy exemptions redistribute credit toward borrowers with high assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
Eric M. Engen Federal Reserve Board William G. Gale Brookings Institution John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Dec 96
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 May 00
|
|
25 (153,767)
|
47
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper evaluates research examining the effects of tax-based saving incentives on private and national saving. Several" factors make this an unusually difficult problem. First, households that participate in, or are eligible for, saving incentive plans have systematically stronger tastes for saving than other households. Second, the data indicate that households with saving incentives have taken on more debt than other households. Third, significant changes in the 1980s in financial markets, pensions, social security, and nonfinancial assets interacted with the expansion of saving incentives. Fourth, saving incentive accounts represent pre-tax balances, whereas conventional taxable accounts represent post-tax balances. Fifth, the fact that employer contributions to saving incentive plans are a part of total employee compensation is typically ignored. A major theme of this paper is that analyses that ignore these issues overstate the impact of saving incentives on saving. We show that accounting for these factors largely or completely eliminates the estimated positive impact of saving incentives on saving found in the literature. Thus, we conclude that little if any of the overall contributions to existing saving incentives have raised private or national saving.
|
|
|
9.
|
|
|
B. Douglas Bernheim Stanford University - Department of Economics Robert J. Lemke Lake Forest College - Department of Economics John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
16 Jun 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Jun 01
|
|
20 (167,186)
|
12
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Proposals to alter the estate tax are contentious and have been debated largely in an empirical vacuum. This paper examines time series and cross-sectional variation to identify the effects of gift and estate taxation on the timing of private transfers. The analysis is based on data from the 1989, 1992, 1995, and 1998 waves of the Surveys of Consumer Finances. Legislative activity during this period reduced the tax disadvantage of bequests relative to gifts. Moreover, the magnitude of this reduction differed systematically across identifiable household categories. We find that households experiencing larger declines in the expected tax disadvantages of bequests substantially reduced inter vivos transfers relative to households experiencing small declines in the tax disadvantages of bequests. This implies that the timing of transfers is highly responsive to applicable gift and estate tax rates. These conclusions are based both on simple comparisons of the probability of giving across different time periods and groups, and on empirical specifications that control for a variety of potentially confounding factors, such as systematic changes in the fraction of wealth attributable to unrealized capital gains. The results also provide evidence of a systematic bequest motive for some high-wealth households.
|
|
|
10.
|
|
|
B. Douglas Bernheim Stanford University - Department of Economics John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Jun 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Jun 04
|
|
15 (181,535)
|
21
|
|
| |
Abstract:
No abstract is available for this paper.
|
|
|
11.
|
|
|
Meta Brown Federal Reserve Banks - Federal Reserve Bank of New York John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics Ananth Seshadri University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Apr 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Apr 09
|
|
7 (203,520)
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We discuss a simple model of intergenerational transfers with one-sided altruism: parents care about their child but the child does not reciprocate. Parents and children make investments in the child's education, investments for other purposes, and parents can transfer cash to their child. We show that for an identifiable set of parent-child pairs, parents will rationally under-invest in their child's education. For these parent-child pairs, additional financial aid will increase educational attainment. The model highlights an important feature of higher education finance, the "expected family contribution" (EFC) that is based on income, assets, and other factors. The EFC is neither legally guaranteed nor universally offered: Our model identifies the set of families that are disproportionately likely to not provide their full EFC. Using a common proxy for financial aid, we show, using of data from the Health and Retirement Study, that financial aid increases the educational attainment of children whose families are disproportionately likely to under-invest in education. Financial aid has no effect on the educational attainment of children in other families. The theory and empirical evidence identifies a set of children who face quantitatively important borrowing constraints for higher education.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
12.
|
|
|
Robert A. Moffitt Johns Hopkins University - Department of Economics John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Nov 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Nov 09
|
|
2 (213,870)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Means-tested and social insurance programs in the U.S. have been transformed over the last 25 years, with expansions in Medicare and Medicaid, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and Supplemental Security Income, and with contractions in Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. We examine the effect of these changes on benefits received by families. We find that transfer program expenditures in total rose from 1984 to 2004 but the increase was spread unevenly across different demographic groups and income classes. Very poor elderly, disabled, and childless families received greatly increased expenditures, mostly arising from Social Security, SSDI, SSI, and the health programs. Very poor single parent and two-parent households experienced declines in expenditures, driven largely by lower recipiency rates, benefit receipt, or both in the AFDC/TANF and Food Stamp programs. For example, AFDC-TANF participation for one-adult families with children and market income below 50 percent of the poverty line fell from 62 percent in 1984 to 24 percent in 2004. However, expenditures received by one- and two-parent households further up the income scale increased, largely because of expansions of the EITC. Thus there was a redistribution of income from the very poor to the near-poor and nonpoor for these one- and two-parent households, as well as an overall relative redistribution from them to the elderly, disabled, and childless.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
13.
|
|
|
Patrick J. Bayer Duke University - Department of Economics B. Douglas Bernheim Stanford University - Department of Economics John Karl Scholz University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Oct 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Oct 09
|
|
0 (0)
|
33
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We examine the effects of education on financial decision-making skills by identifying an interesting source of variation in pertinent training. During the 1990s, an increasing number of individuals were exposed to programs of financial education provided by their employers. If, as some have argued, low saving frequently results from a failure to appreciate economic vulnerabilities, then education of this form could prove to have a powerful effect on behavior. The current article undertakes an analysis of these programs using a previously unexploited survey of employers. We find that both participation in and contributions to voluntary savings plans are significantly higher when employers offer retirement seminars. The effect is typically much stronger for nonhighly compensated employees than for highly compensated employees. The frequency of seminars emerges as a particularly important correlate of behavior. We are unable to detect any effects of written materials, such as newsletters and summary plan descriptions, regardless of frequency. We also present evidence on other determinants of plan activity.
|
|