| . |
Martin Uribe's
Scholarly Papers
Click on the title of any column to sort the table by that
column. |
|
|
| |
|
|
Aggregate Statistics |
|
Total Downloads
11,180 |
Total
Citations
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Aug 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
1,218 (3,540)
|
15
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper compares the welfare costs of business cycles in a dollarized economy to those arising in economies with different monetary arrangements. The alternative monetary policy regimes studied belong to three broad families: devaluation rate rules, inflation targeting, and money growth rate rules. The analysis is conducted within an optimizing model of a small open economy with sticky prices. The model is calibrated to the Mexican economy and is driven by three external shocks: terms of trade, world interest rate, and import-price inflation. We show econometrically that these shocks explain at a minimum 45 percent of the observed forecasting error variance of Mexican output and the Mexican real exchange rate at 8- to 16-quarter horizons. The model fits the data relatively well in the sense that it can account for the volatility and comovements of key macroeconomic indicators such as output, consumption, inflation, and the real exchange rate. The welfare comparisons suggest that dollarization is the least successful of the monetary policy rules considered: agents are willing to give up between 0.1 and 0.3 percent of their nonstochastic steady-state consumption to see a policy other than dollarization implemented.
|
|
|
2.
|
|
Closing Small Open Economy Models
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
11 Nov 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
1,090 ( 4,275) |
73
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Oct 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Oct 02
|
|
31
|
73
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The small open economy model with incomplete asset markets features a steady state that depends on initial conditions and equilibrium dynamics that possess a random walk component. A number of modifications to the standard model have been proposed to induce stationarity. This paper presents a quantitative comparison of these alternative approaches. Five different specifications are considered: (1) A model with an endogenous discount factor (Uzawa-type preferences); (2) A model with a debt-elastic interest-rate premium; (3) A model with convex portfolio adjustment costs; (4) A model with complete asset markets; and (5) A model without stationarity-inducing features. The main finding of the paper is that all models deliver virtually identical dynamics at business-cycle frequencies, as measured by unconditional second moments and impulse response functions. The only noticeable difference among the alternative specifications is that the complete-asset-market model induces smoother consumption dynamics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
10 Jan 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Oct 02
|
|
18
|
73
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The small open economy model with incomplete asset markets features a steady state that depends on initial conditions. In addition, equilibrium dynamics posses a random walk component. A number of modifications to the standard model have been proposed to induce stationarity. This Paper presents a quantitative comparison of these alternative approaches. Five different specifications are considered: (1) A model with an endogenous discount factor (Uzawa-type preferences); (2) A model with a debt-elastic interest-rate premium; (3) A model with convex portfolio adjustment costs; (4) A model with complete asset markets; (5) A model without stationarity-inducing features. The main finding of the Paper is that all models deliver virtually identical dynamics at business-cycle frequencies, as measured by unconditional second moments and impulse response functions. The only noticeable difference among the alternative specifications is that the complete-asset-market model induces smoother consumption dynamics.
Small open economy, stationarity, complete and incomplete asset markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Nov 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
1,041
|
73
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The small open economy model with incomplete asset markets features a steady state that depends on initial conditions. In addition, equilibrium dynamics posses a random walk component. A number of modifications to the standard model have been proposed to induce stationarity. This paper presents a quantitative comparison of these alternative approaches. Five different specifications are considered: (1) A model with an endogenous discount factor (Uzawa-type preferences); (2) A model with a debt-elastic interest-rate premium; (3) A model with convex portfolio adjustment costs; (4) A model with complete asset markets; (5) A model without stationarity-inducing features. The main finding of the paper is that all models deliver virtually identical dynamics at business-cycle frequencies, as measured by unconditional second moments and impulse response functions. The only noticeable difference among the alternative specifications is that the complete-asset-market model induces smoother consumption dynamics.
Small Open Economy, Stationarity, Complete and Incomplete Asset Markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy Under Sticky Prices
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
16 Jul 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
1,004 ( 4,898) |
50
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Sep 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Sep 02
|
|
35
|
50
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies optimal fiscal and monetary policy under sticky product prices. The theoretical framework is a stochastic production economy without capital. The government finances an exogenous stream of purchases by levying distortionary income taxes, printing money, and issuing one-period nominally risk-free bonds. The main findings of the paper are: First, for a miniscule degree of price stickiness (i.e., many times below available empirical estimates) the optimal volatility of inflation is near zero. This result stands in stark contrast with the high volatility of inflation implied by the Ramsey allocation when prices are flexible. The finding is in line with a recent body of work on optimal monetary policy under nominal rigidities that ignores the role of optimal fiscal policy. Second, even small deviations from full price flexibility induce near random walk behavior in government debt and tax rates, as in economies with real non-state-contingent debt only. Finally, sluggish price adjustment raises the average nominal interest rate above the one called for by the Friedman rule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Sep 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
06 Sep 01
|
|
15
|
50
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This Paper studies optimal fiscal and monetary policy under sticky product prices. The theoretical framework is a stochastic production economy without capital. The government finances an exogeneous stream of purchases by levying distortionary income taxes, printing money, and issuing one-period nominally risk-free bonds. The main findings of the Paper are: First, for a miniscule degree of price stickiness (ie. many times below available empirical estimates) the optimal volatility of inflation is near zero. This result stands in stark contrast with the high volatility of inflation implied by the Ramsey allocation when prices are flexible. The finding is in line with a recent body of work on optimal monetary policy under nominal rigidities that ignores the role of optimal fiscal policy. Second, even small deviations from full price flexibility induce near random walk behaviour in government debt and tax rates, as in economies with real non-state-contingent debt only. Finally, sluggish price adjustment raises the average nominal interest rate above the one called for by the Friedman rule.
Optimal fiscal and monetary policy, sticky prices, optimal inflation volatility, tax smoothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
16 Jul 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
954
|
50
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies optimal fiscal and monetary policy under sticky product prices. The theoretical framework is a stochastic production economy without capital. The government finances an exogenous stream of purchases by levying distortionary income taxes, printing money, and issuing one-period nominally risk-free bonds. The main findings of the paper are: First, for a miniscule degree of price stickiness (i.e., many times below available empirical estimates) the optimal volatility of inflation is near zero. This result stands in stark contrast with the high volatility of inflation implied by the Ramsey allocation when prices are flexible. The finding is in line with a recent body of work on optimal monetary policy under nominal rigidities that ignores the role of optimal fiscal policy. Second, even small deviations from full price flexibility induce near random walk behavior in government debt and tax rates, as in economies with real non-state-contingent debt only. Finally, sluggish price adjustment raises the average nominal interest rate above the one called for by the Friedman rule.
Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy, Sticky Prices, Optimal Inflation Volatility, Tax Smoothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
Solving Dynamic General Equilibrium Models Using a Second-Order Approximation to the Policy Function
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
03 Aug 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
947 ( 5,419) |
53
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Oct 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Oct 02
|
|
13
|
53
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper derives a second-order approximation to the solution of a general class of discrete-time rational expectations models. The main theoretical contribution of the paper is to show that for any model belonging to the general class considered, the coefficients on the terms linear and quadratic in the state vector in a second-order expansion of the decision rule are independent of the volatility of the exogenous shocks. In other words, these coefficients must be the same in the stochastic and the deterministic versions of the model. Thus, up to second order, the presence of uncertainty affects only the constant term of the decision rules. In addition, the paper presents a set of MATLAB programs designed to compute the coefficients of the second-order approximation. The validity and applicability of the proposed method is illustrated by solving the dynamics of a number of model economies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Sep 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Oct 02
|
|
25
|
53
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Since the seminal paper of Kydland and Prescott (1982) and King, Plosser and Rebelo (1988), it has become commonplace in macroeconomics to approximate the solution to nonlinear, dynamic general equilibrium models using linear methods. Linear approximation methods are useful to characterize certain aspects of the dynamic properties of complicated models. First-order approximation techniques are not however, well suited to handle questions such as welfare comparisons across alternative stochastic of policy environments. The problem with using linearized decision rules to evaluate second-order approximations to the objective function is that some second-order terms of the objective function are ignored when using a linearized decision rule. Such problems do not arise when the policy function is approximated to second-order or higher. In this paper we derive a second order approximation to the policy function of a dynamic, rational expectations model. Our approach follows the perturbation method described in Judd (1998) and developed further by Collard and Juillard (2001). We follow Collard and Juillard closely in notation and methodology. An important difference separates this Paper from the work of Collard and Juillard. Namely, Collard and Juillard apply what they call a bias reduction procedure to capture the fact that the policy function depends on the variance of the underlying shocks. Instead, we explicitly incorporate a scale parameter for the variance of the exogenous shocks as an argument of the policy function. In approximating the policy function, we take a second order Taylor expansion with respect to the state variables as well as this scale parameter. To illustrate its applicability, the method is used to solve the dynamics of a simple neoclassical model. The Paper closes with a brief description of a set of MATLAB programs designed to implement the method.
Solving dynamic general equilibrium models, second order approximation, MATLAB code
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Aug 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
909
|
53
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper derives a second-order approximation to the solution of a general class of discrete-time rational expectations models. The main theoretical contribution of the paper is to show that for any model belonging to the general class considered, the coefficients on the terms linear and quadratic in the state vector in a second-order expansion of the decision rule are independent of the volatility of the exogenous shocks. In other words, these coefficients must be the same in the stochastic and the deterministic versions of the model. Thus, up to second order, the presence of uncertainty affects only the constant term of the decision rules. In addition, the paper presents a set of MATLAB programs designed to compute the coefficients of the second-order approximation. The validity and applicability of the proposed method is illustrated by solving the dynamics of a number of model economies.
dynamic general equilibrium models, perturbation methods, second-order approximation
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
29 Jan 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
835 (6,693)
|
12
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies optimal fiscal and monetary policy under imperfect competition in a stochastic, flexible-price, production economy without capital. It shows analytically that in this economy the nominal interest rate acts as an indirect tax on monopoly profits. Unless the social planner has access to a direct 100 percent tax on profits, he will always find it optimal to deviate from the Friedman rule by setting a positive and time-varying nominal interest rate. The dynamic properties of the Ramsey allocation are characterized numerically. As in the perfectly competitive case, the labor income tax is remarkably smooth, whereas inflation is highly volatile and serially uncorrelated. An exact numerical solution method to the Ramsey conditions is proposed.
Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy, Friedman rule, Imperfect competition
|
|
|
6.
|
|
A Fiscal Theory of Sovereign Risk
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
20 Sep 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 05
|
|
829 ( 6,764) |
9
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Sep 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Sep 02
|
|
19
|
9
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper presents a fiscal theory of sovereign risk and default. Under certain monetary-fiscal regimes, the risk of default, and thus the emergence of sovereign risk premia, are inevitable. The paper characterizes the equilibrium processes of the sovereign risk premium and the default rate under a number of alternative monetary policy arrangements. Under some of the policy environments considered, the expected default rate and the sovereign risk premium are zero although the government defaults regularly. Under other monetary regimes the default rate and the sovereign risk premium are serially correlated and therefore forecastable. Environments are characterized under which delaying default is counterproductive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 05
|
|
810
|
9
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper presents a fiscal theory of sovereign risk and default. Under certain monetary-fiscal regimes, the risk of default, and thus the emergence of sovereign risk premia, are inevitable. The paper characterizes the equilibrium processes of the sovereign risk premium and the default rate under a number of alternative monetary policy arrangements. It is argued that, given the fiscal stance, monetary policy plays a crucial role in shaping the equilibrium behaviour of the country risk premium and the default rate. For instance, under some of the monetary policy rules considered, the expected default rate and the sovereign risk premium are zero (and therefore unforecastable) although the government defaults regularly. Under other monetary regimes the default rate and the sovereign risk premium are serially correlated (and therefore forecastable). In addition, environments are characterized under which delaying default is counterproductive.
default, sovereign risk, public debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Nov 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
643 (9,942)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
When a government decides to dollarize its economy, that is, to replace the domestic currency with the U.S. dollar, it automatically ceases to collect the stream of seignorage revenue, which is instead redirected toward the U.S. government. A central issue in the debate about dollarization is the distribution of seignorage between U.S. and the economies that are considering the adoption of the dollar as the sole legal tender. A pre-requisite for designing meaningful seignorage sharing rules is to asses the amount of resources that are at stake. A common misconception is that the amount of seignorage income involved is simply equal to the interest income on the amount of foreign reserves required to exchange the entire domestic money supply for dollars. This way of measuring the loss of seignorage income is in general biased for it implicitly assumes no growth in monetary assets. In this note we show that this bias can lead to enormous underestimations of the amount of seignorage revenue lost by governments of countries that dollarize.
|
|
|
8.
|
|
Real Exchange Rate Targeting and Macroeconomic Instability
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
07 Sep 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
544 ( 12,670) |
6
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
25 Oct 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
25 Oct 02
|
|
12
|
6
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Using an optimizing model of a small open economy, this paper studies the macroeconomic effects of PPP rules whereby the government increases the devaluation rate when the real exchange rate defined as the price of tradables in terms of nontradables is below its long-run level and reduces the devaluation rate when the real exchange rate is above its long-run level. The paper shows that the mere existence of such a rule can generate aggregate fluctuations due to self-fulfilling revisions in expectations. The result is shown to obtain in both flexible- and sticky-price environments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
07 Sep 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
532
|
6
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Using an optimizing model of a small open economy, this paper studies the macroeconomic effects of PPP rules whereby the government increases the devaluation rate when the real exchange rate - defined as the price of tradables in terms of nontradables - is below its long-run level and reduces the devaluation rate when the real exchange rate is above its long-run level. The paper shows that the mere existence of such a rule can generate aggregate fluctuations due to self-fulfilling revisions in expectations. The result is shown to obtain in both flexible- and sticky-price environments.
real exchange rate targeting, sunspot equilibria, indeterminacy
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
|
Liquidity Traps with Global Taylor Rules
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
26 Sep 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
456 ( 16,229) |
2
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
02 Oct 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 Oct 01
|
|
16
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A key result of a recent literature that focuses on the global consequences of Taylor-type interest rate feedback rules is that such rules, in combination with the zero-bound on nominal interest rates, can lead to unintended liquidity traps. An immediate question posed by this result is whether the government could avoid liquidity traps by ignoring the zero-bound, that is, by threatening to set the nominal interest rate at a negative value should the inflation rate fall below a certain threshold. This Paper shows that even if the government could credibly commit to setting the interest rate at a negative value, self-fulfilling liquidity traps can still emerge. That is, deflationary equilibria originating arbitrarily near the intended equilibrium and leading to low (possibly zero) interest rates and low (and possibly negative) rates of inflation cannot be ruled out by lifting the zero-bound on the monetary policy rule. This result obtains in models with flexible and sticky prices and under continuous and discrete time.
Taylor rules, liquidity traps, zero bound on nominal interest rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Sep 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
440
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A key result of a recent literature that focuses on the global consequences of Taylor-type interest rate feedback rules is that such rules in combination with the zero bound on nominal interest rates can lead to unintended liquidity traps. An immediate question posed by this result is whether the government could avoid liquidity traps by ignoring the zero bound, that is, by threatening to set the nominal interest rate at a negative value should the inflation rate fall below a certain threshold. This paper shows that even if the government could credibly commit to setting the interest rate at a negative value, self-fulfilling liquidity traps can still emerge. That is, deflationary equilibria originating arbitrarily near the intended equilibrium and leading to low (possibly zero) interest rates and low (and possibly negative) rates of inflation cannot be ruled out by lifting the zero bound on the monetary policy rule. This result obtains in models with flexible and sticky prices and under continuous and discrete time.
Taylor rules, liquidity traps, zero bound on nominal interest rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
|
Anticipated Ramsey Reforms and the Uniform Taxation Principle: The Role of International Financial Markets
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
20 Aug 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Mar 04
|
|
400 ( 19,231) |
1
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Jul 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
23 Jul 03
|
|
15
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies the role of asset-market completeness for the properties of optimal policy. A suitable framework for this purpose is the small open economy with complete international asset markets. For in this environment changes in policy represent country-specific risk diversifiable in world markets. Our main finding is that the fundamental public finance principle whereby when taxes on all final goods are available, it is optimal to tax final goods uniformly fails to obtain. In general, uniform taxation is optimal because it amounts to a nondistorting tax on fixed factors of production. In the open economy this principle fails because when households can insure against the risk of a policy reform, initial private asset holdings are contingent on actual policy and thus no longer represent an inelastically supplied source of income. Two further differences between optimal policy in the closed and open economies with complete markets are: (a) In the open economy, optimal consumption and income tax rates are unchanged in response to government purchases shocks. By contrast, in the closed economy tax rates do respond to innovations in public spending. (b) In the open economy, the Friedman rule is optimal only if the Ramsey planner has access to consumption taxes. In the absence of consumption taxes, deviations from the Friedman rule are large. On the other hand, in the closed economy, the availability of either consumption or income taxes suffices to render the Friedman rule optimal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Feb 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Mar 04
|
|
371
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies the role of asset-market completeness for the properties of optimal fiscal and monetary policy. A suitable framework for this purpose is the small open economy with complete international asset markets. For changes in policy represent country-specific risk diversifiable in world markets. Our main finding is that the fundamental public finance principle whereby when taxes on all final goods are available, it is optimal to tax final goods uniformly fails to obtain. In general, uniform taxation is optimal because it amounts to a nondistorting tax on fixed factors of production. In the open economy this principle fails because when households can insure against the risk of a policy reform, initial private asset holdings are contingent on expected policy and not an inelastically supplied source of income. Furthermore, we find that the Friedman rule is optimal only if the Ramsey planner has access to consumption taxes.
Optimal monetary and fiscal policy, open economies, anticipated Ramsey policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Aug 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Jul 03
|
|
14
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This Paper studies the role of asset-market completeness for the properties of optimal policy. A suitable framework for this purpose is the small open economy with complete international asset markets. For in this environment changes in policy represent country-specific risk diversifiable in world markets. Our main finding is that the fundamental public finance principle whereby when taxes on all final goods are available, it is optimal to tax final goods uniformly fails to obtain. In general, uniform taxation is optimal because it amounts to a non-distorting tax on fixed factors of production. In the open economy this principle fails because when households can insure against the risk of a policy reform, initial private asset holdings are contingent on actual policy and thus no longer represent an inelastically supplied source of income. Two further differences between optimal policy in the closed and open economies with complete markets are: (a) In the open economy, optimal consumption and income tax rates are unchanged in response to government purchases shocks. By contrast, in the closed economy tax rates do respond to innovations in public spending. (b) In the open economy, the Friedman rule is optimal only if the Ramsey planner has access to consumption taxes. In the absence of consumption taxes, deviations from the Friedman rule are large. On the other hand, in the closed economy, the availability of either consumption or income taxes suffices to render the Friedman rule optimal.
Optimal monetary and fiscal policy, open economies, anticipated Ramsey policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
|
Optimal Simple and Implementable Monetary and Fiscal Rules
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
23 Jan 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Sep 09
|
|
345 ( 23,169) |
45
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
05 May 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 May 04
|
|
14
|
45
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The goal of this Paper is to compute optimal monetary and fiscal policy rules in a real business cycle model augmented with sticky prices, a demand for money, taxation, and stochastic government consumption. We consider simple policy rules, whereby the nominal interest rate is set as a function of output and inflation, and taxes are set as a function of total government liabilities. We require policy to be implementable in the sense that it guarantees uniqueness of equilibrium. We do away with a number of empirically unrealistic assumptions typically maintained in the related literature that are used to justify the computation of welfare using linear methods. Instead, we implement a second-order accurate solution to the model. Our main findings are: First, the size of the inflation coefficient in the interest-rate rule plays a minor role for welfare. It matters only insofar as it affects the determinacy of equilibrium. Second, optimal monetary policy features a muted response to output. More importantly, interest rate rules that feature a positive response of the nominal interest rate to output can lead to significant welfare losses. Third, the optimal fiscal policy is passive. The welfare losses associated with the adoption of an active fiscal stance are, however, negligible.
Optimal fiscal and monetary policy, nominal rigidities, optimal inflation volatility, second-order approximation techniques
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
31 Jan 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Sep 09
|
|
14
|
45
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The goal of this paper is to compute optimal monetary and fiscal policy rules in a real business cycle model augmented with sticky prices, a demand for money, taxation, and stochastic government consumption. We consider simple policy rules whereby the nominal interest rate is set as a function of output and inflation, and taxes are set as a function of total government liabilities. We require policy to be implementable in the sense that it guarantees uniqueness of equilibrium. We do away with a number of empirically unrealistic assumptions typically maintained in the related literature that are used to justify the computation of welfare using linear methods. Instead, we implement a second-order accurate solution to the model. Our main findings are: First, the size of the inflation coefficient in the interest-rate rule plays a minor role for welfare. It matters only insofar as it affects the determinacy of equilibrium. Second, optimal monetary policy features a muted response to output. More importantly, interest rate rules that feature a positive response of the nominal interest rate to output can lead to significant welfare losses. Third, the optimal fiscal policy is passive. However, the welfare losses associated with the adoption of an active fiscal stance are negligible.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
23 Jan 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 Aug 08
|
|
317
|
45
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The goal of this paper is to compute optimal monetary and fiscal policy rules in a real business cycle model augmented with sticky prices, a demand for money, taxation, and stochastic government consumption. We consider simple policy rules whereby the nominal interest rate is set as a function of output and inflation, and taxes are set as a function of total government liabilities. We require policy to be implementable in the sense that it guarantees uniqueness of equilibrium. We do away with a number of empirically unrealistic assumptions typically maintained in the related literature that are used to justify the computation of welfare using linear methods. Instead, we implement a second-order accurate solution to the model. Our main findings are: First, the size of the inflation coefficient in the interest-rate rule plays a minor role for welfare. It matters only insofar as it affects the determinacy of equilibrium. Second, optimal monetary policy features a muted response to output. More importantly, interest rate rules that feature a positive response of the nominal interest rate to output can lead to significant welfare losses. Third, the optimal fiscal policy is passive. However, the welfare losses associated with the adoption of an active fiscal stance are negligible.
Optimal fiscal and monetary policy, nominal rigidities, optimal inflation volatility, second-order approximation techniques
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
|
Country Spreads and Emerging Countries: Who Drives Whom?
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics Zhanwei Vivian Yue University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
13 Oct 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
334 ( 24,137) |
44
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics Zhanwei Vivian Yue University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Oct 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Oct 03
|
|
23
|
44
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A number of studies have stressed the role of movements in US interest rates and country spreads in driving business cycles in emerging market economies. At the same time, country spreads have been found to respond to changes in both the US interest rate and domestic conditions in emerging markets. These intricate interrelationships leave open a number of fundamental questions: Do country spreads drive business cycles in emerging countries or vice versa, or both? Do US interest rates affect emerging countries directly or primarily through their effect on country spreads? This paper addresses these and other related questions using a methodology that combines empirical and theoretical elements. The main findings of the paper are: (1) US interest rate shocks explain about 20 percent of movements in aggregate activity in emerging market economies at business-cycle frequency. (2) Country spread shocks explain about 12 percent of business-cycle movements in emerging economies. (3) About 60 percent of movements in country spreads are explained by country-spread shocks. (4) In response to an increase in US interest rates, country spreads first fall and then display a large, delayed overshooting; (5) US-interest-rate shocks affect domestic variables mostly through their effects on country spreads. (6) The fact that country spreads respond to business conditions in emerging economies significantly exacerbates aggregate volatility in these countries. (7) The US-interest-rate shocks and country-spread shocks identified in this paper are plausible in the sense that they imply similar business cycles in the context of an empirical VAR model as they do in the context of a theoretical dynamic general equilibrium model of an emerging market economy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics Zhanwei Vivian Yue University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Oct 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
311
|
44
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A number of studies have stressed the role of movements in US interest rates and country spreads in driving business cycles in emerging market economies. At the same time, country spreads have been found to respond to changes in both the US interest rate and domestic conditions in emerging markets. These intricate interrelationships leave open a number of fundamental questions: Do country spreads drive business cycles in emerging countries or vice versa, or both? Do US interest rates affect emerging countries directly or primarily through their effect on country spreads? This paper addresses these and other related questions using a methodology that combines empirical and theoretical elements. The main findings are: (1) US interest rate shocks explain about 20 percent of movements in aggregate activity in emerging market economies at business-cycle frequency. (2) Country spread shocks explain about 12 percent of business-cycle movements in emerging economies. (3) About 60 percent of movements in country spreads are explained by country-spread shocks. (4) In response to an increase in US interest rates, country spreads first fall and then display a large, delayed overshooting; (5) US-interest-rate shocks affect domestic variables mostly through their effects on country spreads. (6) The fact that country spreads respond to business conditions in emerging economies significantly exacerbates aggregate volatility in these countries. (7) The US-interest-rate shocks and country-spread shocks identified in this paper are plausible in the sense that they imply similar business cycles in the context of an empirical VAR model as they do in the context of a theoretical dynamic general equilibrium model of an emerging market economy.
Country Risk Premium, Business Cycles, Small Open Economy
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
|
|
Jess Benhabib Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
19 Aug 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
300 (27,432)
|
10
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A growing empirical and theoretical literature argues in favor of specifying monetary policy in the form of Taylor-type interest rate feedback rules. That is, rules whereby the nominal interest rate is set as an increasing function of inflation with a slope greater than one around an intended inflation target. This paper shows that such rules can easily lead to chaotic dynamics. The result is obtained for feedback rules that depend on contemporaneous or expected future inflation. The existence of chaotic dynamics is established analytically and numerically in the context of calibrated economies. The battery of fiscal policies that has recently been advocated for avoiding global indeterminacy induced by Taylor-type interest-rate rules (such as liquidity traps) are shown to be unlikely to provide a remedy for the complex dynamics characterized in this paper.
Taylor rules, chaos, periodic equilibria
|
|
|
14.
|
|
|
Jess Benhabib Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
22 Feb 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
264 (31,725)
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The existing literature on the stabilizing properties of interest-rate feedback rules has stressed the perils of linking interest rates to forecasts of future inflation. Such rules have been found to give rise to aggregate fluctuations due to self-fulfilling expectations. In response to this concern, a growing literature has focused on the stabilizing properties of interest-rate rules whereby the central bank responds to a measure of past inflation. The consensus view that has emerged is that backward-looking rules contribute to protecting the economy from embarking on expectations-driven fluctuations. A common characteristic of the existing studies that arrive at this conclusion is their focus on local analysis. The contribution of this paper is to conduct a more global analysis. We find that backward-looking interest-rate feedback rules do not guarantee uniqueness of equilibrium. We present examples in which for plausible parameterizations attracting equilibrium cycles exist. The paper also contributes to the quest for policy rules that guarantee macroeconomic stability globally. Our analysis indicates that policy rules whereby the interest rate is set as a function of the past interest rate and current inflation are likely to ensure global stability provided that the coefficient on lagged interest rates is greater than unity.
Backward Looking Taylor Rules, Endogenous Cycles, Sticky Prices
|
|
|
15.
|
|
Avoiding Liquidity Traps
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Jess Benhabib Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
12 Jan 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
222 ( 38,325) |
43
|
|
|
|
|
Jess Benhabib Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
30 Jul 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Once the zero bound on nominal interest rates is taken into account, Taylor-type interest rate feedback rules give rise to unintended self-fulfilling decelerating inflation paths and aggregate fluctuations driven by arbitrary revisions in expectations. These undesirable equilibria exhibit the essential features of liquidity traps since monetary policy is ineffective in bringing about the government's goals regarding the stability of output and prices. This paper proposes several fiscal and monetary policies that preserve the appealing features of Taylor rules, such as local uniqueness of equilibrium near the inflation target, and at the same time rule out the deflationary expectations that can lead an economy into a liquidity trap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jess Benhabib Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Sep 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
17 Jul 02
|
|
24
|
43
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Once the zero-bound on nominal interest rates is taken into account, Taylor-type interest-rate feedback rules give rise to unintended self-fulfilling decelerating inflation paths and aggregate fluctuations driven by arbitrary revisions in expectations. These undesirable equilibria exhibit the essential features of liquidity traps, as monetary policy is ineffective in bringing about the government's goals regarding the stability of output and prices. This Paper proposes several fiscal and monetary policies that preserve the appealing features of Taylor rules, such as local uniqueness of equilibrium near the inflation target, and at the same time rule out the deflationary expectations that can lead an economy into a liquidity trap.
Taylor rules, liquidity traps, zero-bound on nominal interest rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jess Benhabib Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
12 Jan 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
198
|
43
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Once the zero bound on nominal interest rates is taken into account, Taylor-type interest-rate feedback rules give rise to unintended self-fulfilling decelerating inflation paths and aggregate fluctuations driven by arbitrary revisions in expectations. These undesirable equilibria exhibit the essential features of liquidity traps, as monetary policy is ineffective in bringing about the government's goals regarding the stability of output and prices. This paper proposes several fiscal and monetary policies that preserve the appealing features of Taylor rules, such as local uniqueness of equilibrium near the inflation target, and at the same time rule out the deflationary expectations that can lead an economy into a liquidity trap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.
|
|
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Feb 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
196 (43,479)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper makes three contributions to the supply-side theory of the real effects of exchange-rate-based disinflation: First, the empirical relevance of the supply-side hypothesis has been questioned on the grounds of its reliance on the assumption that purchases of investment goods are subject to a cash-in-advance constraint. This paper replaces this assumption with a more realistic one that assigns money the role of facilitating firms' transactions (such as sales and payments to factor inputs). A formal correspondence is shown to exist between the model proposed in this paper and the one in which investment is a cash good. Second, the implications of the supply-side hypothesis are derived under much weaker restrictions on preferences, technologies, and initial conditions than in existing studies. Third, equilibrium dynamics are characterized without resorting to linear approximation techniques, which are invalid in the context of the theoretical framework used in the literature on exchange-rate-based stabilization, namely, small open economy models with a constant subjective rate of discount and an exogenous world real interest rate.
|
|
|
17.
|
|
|
Enrique G. Mendoza International Monetary Fund (IMF) Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Aug 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
173 (49,326)
|
7
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper shows that some key stylized facts of exchange-rate-based stabilization plans can be explained by the uncertain duration of the plans themselves. Uncertain duration is modeled to reflect evidence showing that devaluation probabilities are higher when the plans are introduced and abandoned than in the period in between. If contingent-claims markets are incomplete, this uncertain duration distortion introduces temporary fiscal cuts with large wealth effects. Investment and employment are also distorted, and the resulting supply-side effects play a critical role. Stabilizations of uncertain duration entail large welfare costs, but they are preferred to persistent high inflation. Mexico's experience is examined in the light of these predictions.
|
|
|
18.
|
|
|
Enrique G. Mendoza International Monetary Fund (IMF) Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Sep 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
156 (54,449)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In his seminal 1960 study on the dynamics of alternative exchange rate regimes, Robert Mundell proposed a theory of balance-of-payments crises in which speculators base their actions on the observed holdings of central bank foreign reserves. We examine the quantitative implications of this view from the perspective of an equilibrium business cycle model in which rational expectations of a devaluation are conditioned on foreign reserves. The model explains some of the empirical regularities of the business cycle associated with temporary fixed-exchange-rate regimes. In turn, these cyclical dynamics validate the agents' expectations by producing devaluation probabilities that resemble those estimated from the data. The model thus aims to explain both the real effects and the collapse of exchange-rate-based stabilizations in an unified framework.
|
|
|
19.
|
|
|
Jess Benhabib Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Aug 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
143 (59,080)
|
56
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Since John Taylor's (1993) seminal paper, a large literature has argued that active interest rate feedback rules, that is, rules that respond to increases in inflation with a more than one-for-one increase in the nominal interest rate, are stabilizing. In this paper, we argue that once the zero bound on nominal interest rates is taken into account, active interest rate feedback rules can easily lead to unexpected consequences. Specifically, we show that even if the steady state at which monetary policy is active is locally the unique equilibrium, typically there exists an infinite number of equilibrium trajectories originating arbitrarily close to that steady state that converge to a liquidity trap, that is, a steady state in which the nominal interest rate is near zero and inflation is possibly negative.
|
|
|
20.
|
|
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Jan 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
111 (73,020)
|
8
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A defining stylized fact associated with exchange-rate-based stabilization programs is that their initial phase is characterized by several years of continuous expansion in private consumption and a gradual appreciation of the real exchange rate. This paper shows that a large class of standard optimizing models is unable to account for this empirical regularity. In particular, models in this class predict that a gradual appreciation of the real exchange rate must necessarily be accompanied by a declining path of consumption. The paper then suggests several possible solutions to this problem and develops one in detail. Namely, the relaxation of the assumption of time separability in preferences. Specifically, it shows that under habit formation currency pegs induce a positive comovement between consumption and the real exchange rate. The paper also establishes that habit formation provides an explanation for why in failed currency pegs a contraction in aggregate demand sets in before the collapse of the program.
|
|
|
21.
|
|
|
Jess Benhabib Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Aug 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
111 (73,020)
|
69
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this paper, we characterize conditions under which interest rate feedback rules whereby the nominal interest rate is set as an increasing function of the inflation rate generate multiple equilibria. We show that these conditions depend not only on the fiscal regime (as emphasized in the fiscal theory of the price level) but also on the way in which money is assumed to enter preferences and technology. We analyze this issue in flexible and sticky price environments. We provide a number of examples in which, contrary to what is commonly believed, active monetary policy in combination with a fiscal policy that preserves government solvency gives rise to multiple equilibria and passive monetary policy renders the equilibrium unique.
|
|
|
22.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
07 Jul 97
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
102 (77,843)
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper analyzes the implications of a balanced budget fiscal policy rule for the determinacy of the price level in a cash-in-advance economy under three alternative monetary policy regimes. It shows that in such stylized models with flexible prices and a period-by-period balanced budget requirement the price level is determinate under a money growth rate peg and is indeterminate under a pure nominal interest rate peg. Under a feedback rule whereby the nominal interest rate is set as an increasing function of the inflation rate, the price level is determinate for intermediate values of the inflation elasticity of the feedback rule and is indeterminate for both very low and very high values of the inflation elasticity. Finally, regardless of the particular monetary policy specification, a rational expectations equilibrium consistent with the optimal quantity of money may not exist.
|
|
|
23.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
22 May 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
30 May 06
|
|
87 (87,096)
|
12
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this paper, we study Ramsey-optimal fiscal and monetary policy in a medium-scale model of the U.S. business cycle. The model features a rich array of real and nominal rigidities that have been identified in the recent empirical literature as salient in explaining observed aggregate fluctuations. The main result of the paper is that price stability appears to be a central goal of optimal monetary policy. The optimal rate of inflation under an income tax regime is half a percent per year with a volatility of 1.1 percent. This result is surprising given that the model features a number of frictions that in isolation would call for a volatile rate of inflation-particularly non-state-contingent nominal public debt, no lump-sum taxes, and sticky wages. Under an income-tax regime, the optimal income tax rate is quite stable, with a mean of 30 percent and a standard deviation of 1.1 percent.
Ramsey policy, inflation stabilization, tax smoothing, time to tax
|
|
|
24.
|
|
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Jun 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
64 (105,264)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A defining stylized fact associated with exchange-rate-based (ERB) stabilization programs is that their initial phase is characterized by several years of expansion in private consumption and a gradual appreciation of the real exchange rate. In this paper, I argue that standard optimizing models are unable to account for this empirical regularity, as they predict that, except for the date of announcement of the program, an appreciation of the real exchange rate must necessarily be accompanied by a decline in consumption. I show that this price-consumption problem can be resolved by relaxing the assumption of time separability in preferences. Specifically, under habit formation a permanent ERB program generates a smooth boom in consumption and gradual real exchange rate appreciation. A temporary program induces, in addition, a smooth boom-recession cycle with the recession beginning before the abandonment of the program.
|
|
|
25.
|
|
Deep Habits
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (3)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
31 Jan 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Aug 06
|
|
54 (114,738) |
35
|
|
|
|
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Aug 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Aug 06
|
|
14
|
35
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper generalizes the standard habit-formation model to an environment in which agents form habits over individual varieties of goods as opposed to over a composite consumption good. We refer to this preference specification as deep habit formation. Under deep habits, the demand function faced by individual producers depends on past sales. This feature is typically assumed ad hoc in customer-market and brand-switching-cost models. A central result of the paper is that deep habits give rise to countercyclical mark-ups, which is in line with the empirical evidence. This result is important, because ad hoc formulations of customer-market and switching-cost models have been criticized for implying procyclical and hence counterfactual mark-up movements. Under deep habits, consumption and wages respond procyclically to government-spending shocks. The paper provides econometric estimates of the parameters pertaining to the deep-habit model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
01 Apr 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
02 Apr 04
|
|
18
|
35
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This Paper generalizes the standard habit formation model to an environment in which agents form habits over individual varieties of goods as opposed to over a composite consumption good. We refer to this preference specification as 'deep habit formation'. Under deep habits, the demand function faced by individual producers depends on past sales. This feature is typically assumed ad-hoc in customer market and brand switching cost models. A central result of the Paper is that deep habits give rise to counter cyclical mark-ups, which is in line with the empirical evidence. This result is important because ad-hoc formulations of customer-market and switching-cost models have been criticized for implying pro-cyclical and hence counterfactual mark-up movements. The Paper also provides econometric estimates of the parameters pertaining to the deep habit model.
Habit formation, customer market models, switching cost models, time varying mark-ups, business cycles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
31 Jan 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
10 Mar 04
|
|
22
|
35
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper generalizes the standard habit formation model to an environment in which agents form habits over individual varieties of goods as opposed to over a composite consumption good. We refer to this preference specification as 'deep habit formation'. Under deep habits, the demand function faced by individual producers depends on past sales. This feature is typically assumed ad-hoc in customer market and brand switching cost models. A central result of the paper is that deep habits give rise to countercyclical markups, which is in line with the empirical evidence. This result is important because ad-hoc formulations of customer-market and switching-cost models have been criticized for implying procyclical and hence counterfactual markup movements. The paper also provides econometric estimates of the parameters pertaining to the deep habit model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.
|
|
|
Jesús Fernández-Villaverde University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics Pablo Guerron-Quintana NC State University - Department of Economics Juan Francisco Rubio-Ramirez Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Apr 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
06 Apr 09
|
|
49 (119,954)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper shows how changes in the volatility of the real interest rate at which small open emerging economies borrow have a quantitatively important effect on real variables like output, consumption, investment, and hours worked. To motivate our investigation, we document the strong evidence of time-varying volatility in the real interest rates faced by a sample of four emerging small open economies: Argentina, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Brazil. We postulate a stochastic volatility process for real interest rates using T-bill rates and country spreads and estimate it with the help of the Particle filter and Bayesian methods. Then, we feed the estimated stochastic volatility process for real interest rates in an otherwise standard small open economy business cycle model. We calibrate eight versions of our model to match basic aggregate observations, two versions for each of the four countries in our sample. We find that an increase in real interest rate volatility triggers a fall in output, consumption, investment, and hours worked, and a notable change in the current account of the economy.
Small Open Economy, DSGE Models, Stochastic Volatility
|
|
|
27.
|
|
|
Javier Garcia Cicco Duke University - Department of Economics Roberto Pancrazi Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
20 Nov 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
29 Mar 07
|
|
42 (127,891)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We investigate the hypothesis that an RBC model driven by permanent and transitory productivity shocks can explain well observed business-cycle fluctuations in emerging countries. A drawback of existing studies is the use of short samples to identify permanent shifts in productivity. We overcome this difficulty by using more than one century of Argentine data to estimate the structural parameters of a small-open-economy RBC model. We place particular emphasis on the behavior of the trade balance because this variable plays a central role in all existing empirical or theoretical characterizations of the developing-country business-cycle. We find that the RBC model predicts a near random walk behavior for the trade balance-to-output ratio with a flat autocorrelation function close to unity. By contrast, in the data, the autocorrelation function of the trade balance-to-output ratio is significantly below unity and converges quickly to zero, resembling the one implied by a stationary autoregressive process. In addition, we show that the RBC model fails to capture a number of other important aspects of the emerging-market business cycle, including the volatilities of output, consumption, investment, and the trade balance.
|
|
|
28.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
23 Apr 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
37 (134,069)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
As the millennium draws to an end, the threat posed by the Year 2000 (Y2K) computer problem is inducing vast private and public spending on its remediation. In this paper, we model the Y2K problem as an anticipated, permanent loss in output whose magnitude can be lessened by investing resources in advance. We embed the Y2K problem into a dynamic general equilibrium framework and show that our model replicates three observed characteristics of the dynamics triggered by the Y2K bug: (1) Precautionary investment: investment in solving the Y2K problem begins before the year 2000; (2) Investment delay: although economic agents have been aware of the Y2K problem since the 1960s, investment did not begin until recently; (3) Investment acceleration: as the new millennium approaches, the amount of resources allocated to solving the Y2K problem increases. Furthermore, the model predicts that Y2K investment peaks at the end of 1999 and that consumption growth is not negatively affected by Y2K, whereas investment in physical capital is.
|
|
|
29.
|
|
The Macroeconomics of Subsistence Points
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
26 Jan 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Aug 09
|
|
36 (135,392) |
4
|
|
|
|
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
05 May 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 May 05
|
|
16
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper explores the macroeconomic consequences of preferences displaying a subsistence point. It departs from the existing related literature by assuming that subsistence points are specific to each variety of goods rather than to the composite consumption good. We show that this simple feature makes the price elasticity of demand for individual goods procyclical. As a result, markups behave countercyclically in equilibrium. This implication is in line with the available empirical evidence.
Non-homothetic preferences, time-varying markups, business cycles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Jan 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Aug 09
|
|
20
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper explores the macroeconomic consequences of preferences displaying a subsistence point. It departs from the existing related literature by assuming that subsistence points are specific to each variety of goods rather than to the composite consumption good. We show that this simple feature makes the price elasticity of demand for individual goods procyclical. As a result, markups behave countercyclically in equilibrium. This implication is in line with the available empirical evidence.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
18 Aug 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
02 Sep 08
|
|
33 (139,494)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this paper, we perform a structural Bayesian estimation of the contribution of anticipated shocks to business cycles in the postwar United States. Our theoretical framework is a real-business-cycle model augmented with four real rigidities: investment adjustment costs, variable capacity utilization, habit formation in consumption, and habit formation in leisure. Business cycles are assumed to be driven by permanent and stationary neutral productivity shocks, permanent investment-specific shocks, and government spending shocks. Each of these shocks is buffeted by four types of structural innovations: unanticipated innovations and innovations anticipated one, two, and three quarters in advance. We find that anticipated shocks account for more than two thirds of predicted aggregate fluctuations. This result is robust to estimating a variant of the model featuring a parametric wealth elasticity of labor supply.
|
|
|
31.
|
|
Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy Under Imperfect Competition
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
28 Feb 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Dec 03
|
|
32 (140,918) |
16
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Dec 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Dec 03
|
|
17
|
16
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper studies optimal fiscal and monetary policy under imperfect competition in a stochastic, flexible-price, production economy without capital. It shows analytically that in this economy the nominal interest rate acts as an indirect tax on monopoly profits. Unless the social planner has access to a direct 100 percent tax on profits, he will always find it optimal to deviate from the Friedman rule by setting a positive and time-varying nominal interest rate. The dynamic properties of the Ramsey allocation are characterized numerically. As in the perfectly competitive case, the labor income tax is remarkably smooth, whereas inflation is highly volatile and serially uncorrelated. An exact numerical solution method to the Ramsey conditions is proposed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
28 Feb 01
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Dec 03
|
|
15
|
16
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This Paper studies optimal fiscal and monetary policy under imperfect competition in a stochastic, flexible-price, production economy without capital. It shows analytically that in this economy the nominal interest rate acts as an indirect tax on monopoly profits. Unless the social planner has access to a direct 100% tax on profits, he will always find it optimal to deviate from the Friedman rule by setting a positive and time-varying nominal interest rate. The dynamic properties of the Ramsey allocation are characterized numerically. As in the perfectly competitive case, the labour income tax is remarkably smooth, whereas inflation is highly volatile and serially uncorrelated. An exact numerical solution method to the Ramsey conditions is proposed.
Imperfect Competition, Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy, Ramsey Equilibria
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Jul 05
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Jul 09
|
|
30 (143,957)
|
12
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this paper, we study Ramsey-optimal fiscal and monetary policy in a medium-scale model of the U.S.\ business cycle. The model features a rich array of real and nominal rigidities that have been identified in the recent empirical literature as salient in explaining observed aggregate fluctuations. The main result of the paper is that price stability appears to be a central goal of optimal monetary policy. The optimal rate of inflation under an income tax regime is half a percent per year with a volatility of 1.1 percent. This result is surprising given that the model features a number of frictions that in isolation would call for a volatile rate of inflation---particularly nonstate-contingent nominal public debt, no lump-sum taxes, and sticky wages.Under an income-tax regime, the optimal income tax rate is quite stable, with a mean of 30 percent and a standard deviation of 1.1 percent. Simple monetary and fiscal rules are shown to implement a competitive equilibrium that mimics well the one induced by the Ramsey policy. When the fiscal authority is allowed to tax capital and labor income at different rates, optimal fiscal policy is characterized by a large and volatile subsidy on capital.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
33.
|
|
|
Jess Benhabib Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
31 Jan 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
31 Jan 04
|
|
24 (156,183)
|
10
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A growing empirical and theoretical literature argues in favor of specifying monetary policy in the form of Taylor-type interest rate feedback rules. That is, rules whereby the nominal interest rate is set as an increasing function of inflation with a slope greater than one around an intended inflation target. This paper shows that such rules can easily lead to chaotic dynamics. The result is obtained for feedback rules that depend on contemporaneous or expected future inflation. The existence of chaotic dynamics is established analytically and numerically in the context of calibrated economies. The battery of fiscal policies that has recently been advocated for avoiding global indeterminacy induced by Taylor-type interest-rate rules (such as liquidity traps) are shown to be unlikely to provide a remedy for the complex dynamics characterized in this paper.
|
|
|
34.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
31 Jul 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
01 Aug 09
|
|
22 (161,510)
|
9
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper characterizes Ramsey-optimal monetary policy in a medium-scale macroeconomic model that has been estimated to fit well postwar U.S.\ business cycles. We find that mild deflation is Ramsey optimal in the long run. However, the optimal inflation rate appears to be highly sensitive to the assumed degree of price stickiness. Within the window of available estimates of price stickiness (between 2 and 5 quarters) the optimal rate of inflation ranges from -4.2 percent per year (close to the Friedman rule) to -0.4 percent per year (close to price stability). This sensitivity disappears when one assumes that lump-sum taxes are unavailable and fiscal instruments take the form of distortionary income taxes. In this case, mild deflation emerges as a robust Ramsey prediction. In light of the finding that the Ramsey-optimal inflation rate is negative, it is puzzling that most inflation-targeting countries pursue positive inflation goals. We show that the zero bound on the nominal interest rate, which is often cited as a rationale for setting positive inflation targets, is of no quantitative relevance in the present model. Finally, the paper characterizes operational interest-rate feedback rules that best implement Ramsey-optimal stabilization policy. We find that the optimal interest-rate rule is active in price and wage inflation, mute in output growth, and moderately inertial. This rule achieves virtually the same level of welfare as the Ramsey optimal policy.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
35.
|
|
|
Enrique G. Mendoza International Monetary Fund (IMF) Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Jul 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 May 00
|
|
22 (161,510)
|
4
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In his seminal 1960 article Robert Mundell proposed a model of balance-of-payments crises in which confidence in the continuation of a currency peg depended on the observed holdings of central bank foreign reserves. We examine the implications of a reformulation of this view from the perspective of an equilibrium business cycle model in which the probability of devaluation is an endogenous variable conditioned on foreign reserves. The model explains some business cycle regularities of exchange-rate-based stabilizations while also producing devaluation probabilities that capture some features of devaluation probabilities estimated in the data. The analysis aims to explain both the real effects and the collapse of temporary fixed-exchange-rate regimes in an unified framework, and provides an economic interpretation for the evidence that foreign reserves are a robust leading indicator of currency crises.
|
|
|
36.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Sep 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Dec 04
|
|
21 (164,320)
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper identifies optimal interest-rate rules within a rich, dynamic, general equilibrium model that has been shown to account well for observed aggregate dynamics in the postwar United States. We perform policy evaluations based on second-order accurate approximations to conditional and unconditional expected welfare. We require that interest-rate rules be operational, in the sense that they include as arguments only a few readily observable macroeconomic indicators and respect the zero bound on nominal interest rates. We find that the optimal operational monetary policy is a real-interest-rate targeting rule. That is, an interest-rate feedback rule featuring a unit inflation coefficient, a mute response to output, and no interest-rate smoothing. Contrary to existing studies, we find a significant degree of optimal inflation volatility. A key factor driving this result is the assumption of indexation to past inflation. Under indexation to long-run inflation the optimal inflation volatility is close to zero. Finally, we show that initial conditions matter for welfare rankings of policies.
|
|
|
37.
|
|
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
14 Apr 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
14 Apr 06
|
|
20 (167,186)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper characterizes the equilibrium dynamics in an economy facing an aggregate debt ceiling. This borrowing limit is intended to capture an environment in which foreign investors base their lending decisions predominantly upon macro indicators. Individual agents do not internalize the borrowing constraint. Instead, a country interest-rate premium emerges to clear the financial market. The implied equilibrium dynamics are compared to those arising from a model in which the debt ceiling is imposed at the level of each individual agent. The central finding of the paper is that the economy with the aggregate borrowing limit does not generate higher levels of debt than the economy with the individual borrowing limit. That is, there is no overborrowing in equilibrium.
|
|
|
38.
|
|
|
Jess Benhabib Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Mar 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Mar 03
|
|
20 (167,186)
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The existing literature on the stabilizing properties of interest-rate feedback rules has stressed the perils of linking interest rates to forecasts of future inflation. Such rules have been found to give rise to aggregate fluctuations due to self-fulfilling expectations. In response to this concern literature has focused on the stabilizing properties of interest-rate rules whereby the central bank responds to a measure of past inflation. The consensus view that has emerged is that backward-looking rules contribute to protecting the economy from embarking on expectations-driven fluctuations. A common characteristic of the existing studies that arrive at this conclusion is their focus on local analysis. The contribution of this paper is to conduct a more global analysis. We find that backward-looking interest-rate feedback rules do not guarantee uniqueness of equilibrium. We present examples in which for plausible parameterizations attracting equilibrium cycles exist. The paper also contributes to the quest for policy rules that guarantee macroeconomic stability globally. Our analysis indicates that policy rules whereby the interest rate is set as a function of the past interest rate and current inflation are likely to ensure global stability provided that the coefficient on lagged interest rates is greater than unity.
|
|
|
39.
|
|
Incomplete Cost Pass-Through Under Deep Habits
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
15 Mar 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Jun 08
|
|
18 (172,894) |
|
|
|
|
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
09 Jun 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
09 Jun 08
|
|
1
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A number of empirical studies document that marginal cost shocks are not fully passed through to prices at the firm level and that prices are substantially less volatile than costs. We show that in the relative-deep-habits model of Ravn, Schmitt-Grohé, and Uribe (2006), firm-specific marginal cost shocks are not fully passed through to product prices. That is, in response to a firm-specific increase in marginal costs, prices rise, but by less than marginal costs leading to a decline in the firm-specific markup of prices over marginal costs. Pass-through is predicted to be even lower when shocks to marginal costs are anticipated by firms. In our model unanticipated firm-specific cost shocks lead to incomplete pass-through (or a decline in markups) of about 20 percent and anticipated cost shocks are associated with incomplete pass-through of about 50 percent. The model predicts that cost pass-through is increasing in the persistence of marginal cost shocks and U-shaped in the strength of habits. The relative-deep-habits model implies that conditional on marginal cost disturbances, prices are less volatile than marginal costs.
cost pass-through, deep habits, markups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
15 Mar 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
15 Mar 07
|
|
17
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A number of empirical studies document that marginal cost shocks are not fully passed through to prices at the firm level and that prices are substantially less volatile than costs. We show that in the relative-deep-habits model of Ravn, Schmitt-Grohe, and Uribe (2006), firm-specific marginal cost shocks are not fully passed through to product prices. That is, in response to a firm-specific increase in marginal costs, prices rise, but by less than marginal costs leading to a decline in the firm-specific markup of prices over marginal costs. Pass-through is predicted to be even lower when shocks to marginal costs are anticipated by firms. In our model, unanticipated firm-specific cost shocks lead to incomplete pass-through (or a decline in markups) of about 20 percent and anticipated cost shocks are associated with incomplete pass-through of about 50 percent. The model predicts that cost pass-through is increasing in the persistence of marginal cost shocks and U-shaped in the strength of habits. The relative-deep-habits model implies that conditional on marginal cost disturbances, prices are less volatile than marginal costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
07 Dec 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 Dec 06
|
|
18 (172,894)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We compare two ways of modeling Calvo-type wage stickiness. One in which each household is the monopolistic supplier of a differentiated type of labor input (as in Erceg, et al., 2000) and one in which households supply a homogenous labor input that is transformed by monopolistically competitive labor unions into a differentiated labor input (as in Schmitt-Grohe and Uribe, 2006a,b). We show that up to a log-linear approximation the two variants yield identical equilibrium dynamics, provided the wage stickiness parameter is in each case calibrated to be consistent with empirical estimates of the wage Phillips curve. It follows that econometric estimates of New Keynesian models that rely on log-linearizations of the equilibrium dynamics are mute about which type of wage stickiness fits the data better. In the context of a medium-scale macroeconomic model, we show that the two variants of the sticky-wage formulation give rise to the same Ramsey-optimal dynamics, which call for low volatility of price inflation. Furthermore, under both specifications the optimized operational interest-rate feedback rule features a large coefficient on price inflation and a mute response to wage inflation and output.
|
|
|
41.
|
|
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Dec 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 May 07
|
|
17 (175,776)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper proposes a novel international transmission mechanism based on the assumption of deep habits. The term deep habits stands for a preference specification according to which consumers form habits on a good-by-good basis. Under deep habits, firms face more elastic demand functions in markets where nonhabitual demand is high relative to habitual demand, creating an incentive to price discriminate. We refer to this type of price discrimination as pricing to habits. In the presence of pricing to habits, innovations to domestic aggregate demand induce a decline in markups in the domestic country but not abroad, leading to a departure from the law of one price. In this way, the proposed pricing-to-habit mechanism can explain the observation that prices of the same good across countries, expressed in the same currency, vary over the business cycle. Furthermore, it can account for the empirical fact that in response to a positive domestic demand shock, such as an increase in government spending, the real exchange rate depreciates, domestic consumption expands, and the trade balance deteriorates.
|
|
|
42.
|
|
|
Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
01 Jun 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
16 Feb 09
|
|
17 (175,776)
|
2
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper compares the equilibrium dynamics of an economy facing an aggregate collateral constraint on external debt to the dynamics of an economy facing a collateral constraint imposed at the level of each individual agent. The aggregate collateral constraint is intended to capture an environment in which foreign investors base their lending decisions predominantly upon macro indicators as opposed to individual abilities to pay. Individual agents do not internalize the aggregate borrowing constraint. Instead, in this economy a country interest-rate premium emerges to clear the financial market. The central finding of the paper is that the economy with the aggregate borrowing limit does not generate higher levels of debt than the economy with the individual borrowing limit. That is, there is no overborrowing in equilibrium.
|
|
|
43.
|
|
|
Enrique G. Mendoza International Monetary Fund (IMF) Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
08 Jul 99
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
08 May 00
|
|
17 (175,776)
|
7
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper shows that the risk of devaluation can be an important factor accounting for the stylized facts of exchange-rate-based stabilizations. This conclusion follows from studying the quantitative implications of a two-sector equilibrium business cycle model of a small open economy calibrated to Mexico's 1987-1994 stabilization plan. In the model a time-variant interest rate differential that acts as a stochastic tax on money demand, labor supply, investment, and saving. Under incomplete markets, this tax induces endogenous state-contingent wealth effects via fiscal adjustment and suboptimal investment. Devaluation risk entails large welfare costs in this environment.
|
|
|
44.
|
|
|
Jess Benhabib Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
06 Aug 03
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
06 Aug 03
|
|
14 (184,395)
|
3
|
|
| |
Abstract:
The existing literature on the stabilizing properties of interest-rate feedback rules has stressed the perils of linking interest rates to forecasts of future inflation. Such rules have been found to give rise to aggregate fluctuations due to self-fulfilling expectations. In response to this concern, a growing literature has focused on the stabilizing properties of interest-rate rules whereby the central bank responds to a measure of past inflation. The consensus view that has emerged is that backward-looking rules contribute to protecting the economy from embarking on expectations-driven fluctuations. A common characteristic of the existing studies that arrive at this conclusion is their focus on local analysis. The contribution of this Paper is to conduct a more global analysis. We find that backward-looking interest-rate feedback rules do not guarantee uniqueness of equilibrium. We present examples in which for plausible parameterizations attracting equilibrium cycles exist. The Paper also contributes to the quest for policy rules that guarantee macroeconomic stability globally. Our analysis indicates that policy rules whereby the interest rate is set as a function of the past interest rate and current inflation are likely to ensure global stability provided that the coefficient on lagged interest rates is greater than unity.
Backward-looking Taylor rules, endogenous cycles, sticky prices
|
|
|
45.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
03 Dec 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
07 Dec 04
|
|
13 (187,291)
|
11
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This Paper identifies optimal interest-rate rules within a rich, dynamic, general equilibrium model that has been shown to account well for observed aggregate dynamics in the post-war United States. We perform policy evaluations based on second-order accurate approximations to conditional and unconditional expected welfare. We require that interest-rate rules be operational, in the sense that they include as arguments only a few readily observable macroeconomic indicators and respect the zero bound on nominal interest rates. We find that the optimal operational monetary policy is a real-interest-rate targeting rule. That is, an interest-rate feedback rule featuring a unit inflation coefficient, a mute response to output, and no interest-rate smoothing. Contrary to existing studies, we find a significant degree of optimal inflation volatility. A key factor driving this result is the assumption of indexation to past inflation. Under indexation to long-run inflation the optimal inflation volatility is close to zero. Finally, we show that initial conditions matter for welfare rankings of policies.
Monetary policy evaluation, inflation stabilization, business cycles
|
|
|
46.
|
|
Explaining the Effects of Government Spending Shocks on Consumption and the Real Exchange Rate
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
24 Aug 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Jun 08
|
|
11 (193,140) |
8
|
|
|
|
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
05 Jun 08
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
05 Jun 08
|
|
0
|
8
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Using panel structural VAR analysis and quarterly data from four industrialized countries, we document that an increase in government purchases leads to an expansion in output and private consumption, a deterioration in the trade balance, and a depreciation of the real exchange rate (i.e., a decrease in the domestic CPI relative to the exchange-rate adjusted foreign CPI). We propose an explanation for these observed effects based on the deep habit mechanism. We estimate the key parameters of the deep-habit model employing a limited information approach. The predictions of the estimated deep-habit model fit well the observed responses of output, consumption, the trade balance, and the real exchange rate to an unanticipated government spending shock. In addition, the deep-habit model predicts that in response to an anticipated increase in government spending consumption and wages fail to increase on impact, which is consistent with the empirical evidence stemming from the narrative identification approach. In this way, the deep-habit model reconciles the findings of the SVAR and narrative literatures on the effects of government spending shocks.
Countercyclical Mark-ups, Deep Habits, Government Spending Shocks, Real exchange rate movements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
24 Aug 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
22 Oct 07
|
|
11
|
8
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Using panel structural VAR analysis and quarterly data from four industrialized countries, we document that an increase in government purchases leads to an expansion in output and private consumption, a deterioration in the trade balance, and a depreciation of the real exchange rate (i.e., a decrease in the domestic CPI relative to the exchange-rate adjusted foreign CPI). We propose an explanation for these observed effects based on the deep habit mechanism. We estimate the key parameters of the deep-habit model employing a limited information approach. The predictions of the estimated deep-habit model fit well the observed responses of output, consumption, the trade balance, and the real exchange rate to an unanticipated government spending shock. In addition, the deep-habit model predicts that in response to an anticipated increase in government spending consumption and wages fail to increase on impact, which is consistent with the empirical evidence stemming from the narrative identification approach. In this way, the deep-habit model reconciles the findings of the SVAR and narrative literatures on the effects of government spending shocks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Aug 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
04 Sep 06
|
|
11 (193,140)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper computes welfare-maximizing monetary and fiscal policy rules in a real business cycle model augmented with sticky prices, a demand for money, taxation, and stochastic government consumption. We consider simple feedback rules whereby the nominal interest rate is set as a function of output and inflation, and taxes are set as a function of total government liabilities. We implement a second-order accurate solution to the model. Our main findings are: First, the size of the inflation coefficient in the interest-rate rule plays a minor role for welfare. It matters only insofar as it affects the determinacy of equilibrium. Second, optimal monetary policy features a muted response to output. More importantly, interest rate rules that feature a positive response to output can lead to significant welfare losses. Third, the welfare gains from interest-rate smoothing are negligible. Fourth, optimal fiscal policy is passive. Finally, the optimal monetary and fiscal rule combination attains virtually the same level of welfare as the Ramsey optimal policy.
|
|
|
48.
|
|
Risk Matters: The Real Effects of Volatility Shocks
|
Show Abstracts |
Hide Abstracts |
Versions (2)
|
hide multiple versions |
Export Bibliographic Info |
|
Jesús Fernández-Villaverde University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics Pablo Guerron-Quintana NC State University - Department of Economics Juan Francisco Rubio-Ramirez Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
|
Posted:
|
|
13 Apr 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 May 09
|
|
10 (196,016) |
|
|
|
|
|
Jesús Fernández-Villaverde University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics Pablo Guerron-Quintana NC State University - Department of Economics Juan Francisco Rubio-Ramirez Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
19 May 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 May 09
|
|
0
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper shows how changes in the volatility of the real interest rate at which small open emerging economies borrow have a quantitatively important effect on real variables like output, consumption, investment, and hours worked. To motivate our investigation, we document the strong evidence of time-varying volatility in the real interest rates faced by a sample of four emerging small open economies: Argentina, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Brazil. We postulate a stochastic volatility process for real interest rates using T-bill rates and country spreads and estimate it with the help of the Particle filter and Bayesian methods. Then, we feed the estimated stochastic volatility process for real interest rates in an otherwise standard small open economy business cycle model. We calibrate eight versions of our model to match basic aggregate observations, two versions for each of the four countries in our sample. We find that an increase in real interest rate volatility triggers a fall in output, consumption, investment, and hours worked, and a notable change in the current account of the economy.
DSGE Models, Small Open Economy, Stochastic Volatility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jesús Fernández-Villaverde University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics Pablo Guerron-Quintana NC State University - Department of Economics Juan Francisco Rubio-Ramirez Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Apr 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
21 Apr 09
|
|
10
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper shows how changes in the volatility of the real interest rate at which small open emerging economies borrow have a quantitatively important effect on real variables like output, consumption, investment, and hours worked. To motivate our investigation, we document the strong evidence of time-varying volatility in the real interest rates faced by a sample of four emerging small open economies: Argentina, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Brazil. We postulate a stochastic volatility process for real interest rates using T-bill rates and country spreads and estimate it with the help of the Particle filter and Bayesian methods. Then, we feed the estimated stochastic volatility process for real interest rates in an otherwise standard small open economy business cycle model. We calibrate eight versions of our model to match basic aggregate observations, two versions for each of the four countries in our sample. We find that an increase in real interest rate volatility triggers a fall in output, consumption, investment, and hours worked, and a notable change in the current account of the economy.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
07 Apr 06
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Apr 06
|
|
10 (196,016)
|
9
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper characterizes Ramsey-optimal monetary policy in a medium-scale macroeconomic model that has been estimated to fit well postwar US business cycles. We find that mild deflation is Ramsey optimal in the long run. However, the optimal inflation rate appears to be highly sensitive to the assumed degree of price stickiness. Within the window of available estimates of price stickiness (between 2 and 5 quarters) the optimal rate of inflation ranges from -4.2 percent per year (close to the Friedman rule) to -0.4 percent per year (close to price stability). This sensitivity disappears when one assumes that lump-sum taxes are unavailable and fiscal instruments take the form of distortionary income taxes. In this case, mild deflation emerges as a robust Ramsey prediction. In light of the finding that the Ramsey optimal inflation rate is negative, it is puzzling that most inflation-targeting countries pursue positive inflation goals. We show that the zero bound on the nominal interest rate, which is often cited as a rationale for setting positive inflation targets, is of no quantitative relevance in the present model. Finally, the paper characterizes operational interest-rate feedback rules that best implement Ramsey-optimal stabilization policy. We find that the optimal interest-rate rule is active in price and wage inflation, mute in output growth, and moderately inertial.
Ramsey policy, interest rate rules, nominal rigidities, real rigidities
|
|
|
50.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Nov 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Nov 09
|
|
4 (209,890)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
More than half of U.S. currency circulates abroad. As a result, much of the seignorage income of the United States is generated outside of its borders. In this paper we characterize the Ramsey-optimal rate of inflation in an economy with a foreign demand for its currency. In the absence of such demand, the model implies that the Friedman rule—deflation at the real rate of interest—maximizes the utility of the representative domestic consumer. We show analytically that once a foreign demand for domestic currency is taken into account, the Friedman rule ceases to be Ramsey optimal. Calibrated versions of the model that match the range of empirical estimates of the size of foreign demand for U.S. currency deliver Ramsey optimal rates of inflation between 2 and 10 percent per annum. The domestically benevolent government finds it optimal to impose an inflation tax as a way to extract resources from the rest of the world in the form of seignorage revenue.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
51.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
17 Nov 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
19 Nov 09
|
|
1 (216,028)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A policy issue central banks are confronted with is whether inflation targets should be adjusted to account for the systematic upward bias in measured inflation due to quality improvements in consumption goods. We show that in the context of a Ramsey equilibrium the answer to this question depends on what prices are assumed to be sticky. If nonquality-adjusted prices are assumed to be sticky, then the Ramsey plan predicts that the inflation target should not be corrected. If, on the other hand, quality-adjusted (or hedonic) prices are assumed to be sticky, then the Ramsey plan calls for raising the inflation target by the magnitude of the bias.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
52.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohé Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Mar 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
26 Apr 09
|
|
1 (216,028)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
In this paper, we perform a structural Bayesian estimation of the contribution of anticipated shocks to business cycles in the postwar United States. Our theoretical framework is a real-business-cycle model augmented with four real rigidities: investment adjustment costs, variable capacity utilization, habit formation in consumption, and habit formation in leisure. Business cycles are assumed to be driven by permanent and stationary neutral productivity shocks, permanent investment-specific shocks, and government spending shocks. Each of these driving forces is buffeted by four types of structural innovations: unanticipated innovations and innovations anticipated one, two, and three quarters in advance. We find that anticipated shocks account for more than two thirds of predicted aggregate fluctuations.
anticipated shocks, Bayesian estimation, sources of aggregate fluctuations
|
|
|
53.
|
|
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohé Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics Lenno Uusukula European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO)
|
| Posted: |
|
18 Feb 09
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
18 Feb 09
|
|
1 (216,028)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper introduces deep habits into a sticky-price sticky-wage economy and asks whether the countercyclical markup movements induced by deep habits is helpful for accounting for the dynamic effects of monetary policy shocks. We find that this is the case: When allowing for deep habits, the model can account very precisely for the persistent impact of monetary policy shocks on aggregate consumption and for the impact on inflation that other models have hard a time explaining. In particular, the model can account both for the price puzzle and for inflation persistence. We also show that the deep habits mechanism and nominal rigidities are complementary: The deep habits model can account for the dynamic effects of monetary policy shock at low to moderate levels of nominal rigidities. We show that the results are stable over time and are not caused by monetary policy changes.
countercyclical markup, deep habits, inflation persistence, monetayr policy shocks, price puzzle
|
|
|
54.
|
|
|
Morten O. Ravn European University Institute - Economics Department (ECO) Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
26 Jun 07
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
12 May 08
|
|
1 (216,028)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
This paper proposes a novel international transmission mechanism based on the assumption of deep habits. The term deep habits stands for a preference specification according to which consumers form habits on a good-by-good basis. Under deep habits, firms face more elastic demand functions in markets where nonhabitual demand is high relative to habitual demand, creating an incentive to price discriminate. We refer to this type of price discrimination as pricing to habits. In the presence of pricing to habits, innovations to domestic aggregate demand induce a decline in markups in the domestic country but not abroad, leading to a departure from the law of one price. In this way, the proposed pricing-to-habit mechanism can explain the observation that prices of the same good across countries, expressed in the same currency, vary over the business cycle. Furthermore, it can account for the empirical fact that in response to a positive domestic demand shock, such as an increase in government spending, the real exchange rate depreciates, domestic consumption expands, and the trade balance deteriorates.
Countercyclical markup, deep habits, government spending, Law of one price, real exchange rate
|
|
|
55.
|
|
|
Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Duke University - Department of Economics Martin Uribe Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
27 Apr 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
03 Aug 08
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A common argument against a balanced-budget fiscal policy rule is that it would tend to amplify business cycles, inducing tax increases and public expenditure cuts during recessions and inducing the reverse during booms. This paper suggests an additional source of instability that may arise from this type of fiscal policy rule. It shows, within the standard neoclassical growth model, that a balanced-budget rule can make expectations of higher tax rates self-fulfilling if the fiscal authority relies heavily on changes in labor income taxes to eliminate short-run fiscal imbalances. Calibrated versions of the model show that this result is empirically plausible for the U.S. economy and other G-7 countries.
|
|