| . |
Daniel M. G. Raff's
Scholarly Papers
Click on the title of any column to sort the table by that
column. |
|
|
| |
|
|
Aggregate Statistics |
|
Total Downloads
168 |
Total
Citations
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
Naomi R. Lamoreaux University of California, Los Angeles - Department of Economics Daniel M. G. Raff University of Pennsylvania - Management Department Peter Temin Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
27 Jun 02
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
06 Nov 09
|
|
71 (99,037)
|
14
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We sketch a new synthesis of American business history to replace (and subsume) that put forward by Alfred D. Chandler, Jr., most famously in his book The Visible Hand (1977). We see the broader subject as the history of the institutions of coordination in the economy, with the management of information and the addressing of problems of informational asymmetries representing central problems for firm- and relationship design. Our analysis emphasizes the endogenous adoption of coordination mechanisms in the context of evolving but specific operating conditions and opportunities. This naturally gives rise both to change and to heterogeneity in the population of coordination mechanisms to be observed in use at any moment in time. In discussing the changes in the population of mechanisms over time, we seek to avoid the tendency, exemplified by Chandler's work but characteristic of the field, to see history of adoption in teleological rather than evolutionary perspective. We see a richer set of mechanisms in play than is conventional and a more complex historical process at work, in particular a process in which hierarchical institutions have both risen and, more recently, declined in significance.
Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
Daniel M. G. Raff University of Pennsylvania - Management Department Peter Temin Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
12 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
20 Sep 00
|
|
41 (128,972)
|
1
|
|
| |
Abstract:
Sears Roebuck and Co. faced similar challenges in the 1920s and the 1980s. On the strength of the early period's strategic investment decisions, the company grew into the nation's largest retailer and a pervasive factor in the economy. In the later period, unanswered challenges nearly destroyed the company. We analyze the elements that contributed to the success in the 1920s and to the near disaster in the 1980s and place them in a broader and more systematic context. We argue that successful innovations combine a focus on an attractive market with an exploitation and even enhancement of a firm's existing competitive strengths.
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
Daniel M. G. Raff University of Pennsylvania - Management Department Manuel Trajtenberg Tel Aviv University - Eitan Berglas School of Economics
|
| Posted: |
|
13 Jul 00
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 Jul 00
|
|
29 (145,559)
|
8
|
|
| |
Abstract:
We push the span of hedonic price calculations for automobiles backwards towards the industry's birth. Most of the real change that occurred between 1906 and 1982 occurred between 1906 and 1940. During these years, hedonic prices fell at an average annual rate of 5%. The pace was brisker still during the first 8-12 years. Our measured declines can be decomposed into price and quality components. Our calculations suggest that 60% of the overall decline 1906-1940 was due to process innovation and only 40% to product innovation or quality change per se. Regressors representing mechanical systems matter in these calculations.
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
Daniel M. G. Raff University of Pennsylvania - Management Department Lawrence H. Summers Harvard University
|
| Posted: |
|
11 Apr 04
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
11 Apr 04
|
|
27 (149,304)
|
5
|
|
| |
Abstract:
No abstract is available for this paper.
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
Amy L. Bertin Economics Resource Group Timothy F. Bresnahan Stanford University - Department of Economics Daniel M. G. Raff University of Pennsylvania - Management Department
|
| Posted: |
|
13 May 98
|
|
Last Revised:
|
|
13 May 98
|
|
0 (0)
|
|
|
| |
Abstract:
A recent empirical literature has shaken economists' confidence in the value of aggregate (industry-level) data to illuminate production relationships. But the statistical finding "you can't aggregate," however well documented, is not an economic explanation. Plant-level relationships do aggregate in Depression-era blast furnace operations despite the presence of very substantial interplant heterogeneity, the most common economic cause of nonaggregability. The economic explanation of this lies in poor short-run substitutability of one plant's output for another's. Substitutability determines the importance of composition effects in understanding aggregate time series, constrains the potential cleansing effects of recessions, and therefore influences industry evolution quite broadly.
|
|