• Selected
• Entire List

Abstract:
Although having some sympathies with Zimmerman's critique of Ittner and Larcker's review of the empirical management accounting research literature, this analysis points out how Zimmerman has too easily allowed his own prejudices to influence both his assessment of the empirical management accounting literature and his recommendations for improvement. Particular emphasis is put on analysing Zimmerman's classification of the accounting research literature and his unproblematic optimism in the potential of economic modes of understanding.