SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Are Senior Judges Unconstitutional?

David R. Stras
University of Minnesota Law School; University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - Department of Political Science

Ryan W. Scott
Government of the United States of America - Department of Justice



Cornell Law Review, Vol. 92, 2007
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-10

Abstract:     
With burgeoning caseloads and persistent vacancies in many federal courts, senior judges play a vital role in the continued well-being of our federal judiciary. Despite the importance of their participation in the judicial process, however, senior judges raise a host of constitutional concerns that have escaped the notice of scholars and courts. Many of the problems originate with recent changes to the statute authorizing federal judges to elect senior status, including a 1989 law that permits senior judges to fulfill their statutory responsibilities by performing entirely nonjudicial work. Others arise from the ambiguity of the statutory scheme itself, which seems to suggest that senior status represents a separate constitutional office, requiring reappointment, even though senior judges nominally retain judicial office under federal law.

In the first scholarly article addressing the constitutionality of senior judges, the authors examine two general constitutional objections: (1) whether the requirement that senior judges be designated and assigned by another federal judge before performing any judicial work violates the tenure protection of Article III; and (2) whether allowing judges to elect senior status, without a second intervening appointment, violates the Appointments Clause. They also examine whether two specific types of senior judges - the bureaucratic senior judge who performs only administrative duties and the itinerant senior judge who sits exclusively on courts outside his home district or circuit - violate the Constitution.

The authors conclude that the current statute authorizing senior judges raises serious constitutional problems that should be addressed by Congress or the Judicial Conference of the United States. In that respect, they formulate a number of straightforward suggestions to repair senior status without having to sacrifice any of the considerable benefits that senior judges have conferred on the federal judiciary over the years.

Keywords: senior judges, federal courts, retirement

JEL Classifications: K10, K30, K40

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: March 03, 2006 ; Last revised: March 19, 2007

Suggested Citation

Stras, David R. and Scott, Ryan W.,Are Senior Judges Unconstitutional?. Cornell Law Review, Vol. 92, 2007; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=886711


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

David R. Stras (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-624-2947 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.umn.edu/facultyprofiles/strasd.html
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - Department of Political Science ( email )
Minneapolis, MN 55455-0410
United States
612-624-2947 (Phone)
Ryan W. Scott
Government of the United States of America - Department of Justice ( email )
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,024
Downloads: 484
Download Rank: 11,248

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.156 seconds.