SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (24)

Beta

 
 

Citations (44)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Mutual Fund Survivorship

Mark M. Carhart
GSAM Quantitative Strategies Group


May 15, 1997

USC working paper 97-1

Abstract:     
Survivorship induces a variety of biases in mutual fund research. I show analytically that biases in performance estimates depend on sample length and whether funds disappear after one or many poor returns. Using a sample free of survivor bias, I document higher risk and predominantly multiple-year underperformance in nonsurviving funds. This causes the bias in mean return estimates to increase in the time-length of the sample. In my data set, the bias is 0.43 percent per year in five-year samples and approximately one percent for samples longer than fifteen years. I also find downward bias in persistence tests and both upward and downward bias in the relations between performance and fund attributes depending on the type of selection bias. The results cast doubt on the conclusions of many published mutual fund studies.

JEL Classifications: G23, C40

Working Paper Series

Date posted: June 18, 1997 ; Last revised: October 19, 1997

Suggested Citation

Carhart, Mark M., Mutual Fund Survivorship (May 15, 1997). USC working paper 97-1. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=36091 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.36091


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Mark M. Carhart (Contact Author)
GSAM Quantitative Strategies Group ( email )
32 Old Slip, 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10005
United States
(212) 357-5993 (Phone)
(212) 493-0726 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,903
Downloads: 973
Download Rank: 975
References: 24
Citations: 44

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.094 seconds.