The Message, Not the Medium: Defamation, Publication and the Internet in Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law
Sydney Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 263-280, 2002
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 07/48
The challenges posed by internet defamation have been the subject of few decisions by ultimate appellate courts. One of the few, and the first, was the High Court of Australia's decision in Dow Jones & Co. Inc. v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575. This article canvasses the issues central to the appeal: the meaning of the term, 'publication', in defamation law; the place of publication; the power to exercise jurisdiction over a matter and the discretionary non-exercise of jurisdiction; the impact of the unique characteristics of the internet and the desirability of technology-specific rules and principles; and other policy considerations surrounding this vexed area of law, such as the impact of globalisation; the need for certainty; freedom of expression; the need to give due recognition to foreign legal systems; the legitimate interests of plaintiffs and defendants; and the existing, practical solutions to problems posed by multistate defamation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 17
Keywords: Defamation, Private international law, Internet; Publication, Jurisdiction, Forum non conveniens, Dow Jones v Gutnick, Globalisation, Freedom of expression
JEL Classification: K10, K33, K41Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 12, 2007
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.422 seconds