Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1000272
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (120)



 


 



Ex Parte Young


John C. Harrison


University of Virginia School of Law

July 12, 2007


Abstract:     
Ex parte Young does not represent an exception to ordinary principles of sovereign immunity, it does not employ a legal fiction, it does not imply a novel cause of action under the Constitution or other federal law, and it does not create a paradox by treating officers as state actors for one purpose and private persons for another. All those bits of conventional wisdom are wrong for the same reason: Young was about a traditional tool of equity, the injunction to restrain proceedings at law, or anti-suit injunction. By seeking an anti-suit injunction, a potential defendant at law can become a plaintiff in equity and present a defense in an affirmative posture. Asserting defenses against the government, like the railroads' constitutional defenses at issue in Young, does not offend sovereign immunity, so it does not require a fiction to cover up a violation of sovereign immunity. Anti-suit injunctions have long been a standard tool of equity and so in approving one the Court in Young did not recognize a novel cause of action applicable only to government officers, and for that reason did not encounter a paradox. This article elaborates on the argument just described, discusses the extent to which the opinion in Ex parte Young reflects the fact that it involved an anti-suit injunction, and briefly considers the contemporary implications of this way of understanding this foundational case.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 19, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Harrison, John C., Ex Parte Young (July 12, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1000272 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1000272

Contact Information

John C. Harrison (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,074
Downloads: 186
Download Rank: 96,009
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  120

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds