Citations (3)


Footnotes (120)



Ex Parte Young

John C. Harrison

University of Virginia School of Law

July 12, 2007

Ex parte Young does not represent an exception to ordinary principles of sovereign immunity, it does not employ a legal fiction, it does not imply a novel cause of action under the Constitution or other federal law, and it does not create a paradox by treating officers as state actors for one purpose and private persons for another. All those bits of conventional wisdom are wrong for the same reason: Young was about a traditional tool of equity, the injunction to restrain proceedings at law, or anti-suit injunction. By seeking an anti-suit injunction, a potential defendant at law can become a plaintiff in equity and present a defense in an affirmative posture. Asserting defenses against the government, like the railroads' constitutional defenses at issue in Young, does not offend sovereign immunity, so it does not require a fiction to cover up a violation of sovereign immunity. Anti-suit injunctions have long been a standard tool of equity and so in approving one the Court in Young did not recognize a novel cause of action applicable only to government officers, and for that reason did not encounter a paradox. This article elaborates on the argument just described, discusses the extent to which the opinion in Ex parte Young reflects the fact that it involved an anti-suit injunction, and briefly considers the contemporary implications of this way of understanding this foundational case.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 19, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Harrison, John C., Ex Parte Young (July 12, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1000272 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1000272

Contact Information

John C. Harrison (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,223
Downloads: 205
Download Rank: 100,300
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  120

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.313 seconds