Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1000284
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (155)



 


 



Commercial Lending and the Separation of Banking and Commerce


Adam Feibelman


Tulane University - Law School


University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, 2007
UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1000284

Abstract:     
Modern scholarship on corporate law treats equity-holders, managers and/or directors as the primary levers of corporate governance. In recent years, however, economists and legal scholars have increasingly recognized that creditors often engage in governance as well. Creditors engage in governance directly, for example, when they exercise contractual rights that give them some degree of control over the operations of their corporate debtors. They can also engage in governance indirectly, as when they monitor borrowers and signal important information to other stakeholders. Among creditors, banks are particularly active in providing these forms of corporate governance. The fact that banks exercise such governance of their corporate borrowers is puzzling in light of an important, enduring principle of American banking law and regulation - the separation of banking and commerce. Despite recent reforms that supposedly tear down the wall between banking and commerce, banks still generally cannot become owners of corporate firms. Yet banks' lending activities often share many of the financial and functional attributes of formal ownership. And most of the rationales given for the policy of separation of banking and commerce - e.g., concerns about potential conflicts of interest, expansion of subsidies, and accumulation of market power - seemingly apply to banks in their capacity as corporate lenders. This in turn suggests that banks' relationships with their corporate debtors may provide evidence that would help evaluate the potential costs and benefits of allowing banks to invest more broadly in the equity of commercial firms. In fact, available data suggest that banks' governance is often valuable to their corporate borrowers. If so, this may reflect that at least some of the rationales for separating banking and commerce are unfounded or overstated.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: banks, banking, creditor governance, bank governance, banking and commerce, corporate governance

JEL Classification: G20, G21, G28, G30, G32, G34, K10, K12

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 17, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Feibelman, Adam, Commercial Lending and the Separation of Banking and Commerce. University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, 2007; UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1000284. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1000284

Contact Information

Adam Feibelman (Contact Author)
Tulane University - Law School ( email )
6329 Freret Street
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,275
Downloads: 244
Download Rank: 72,688
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  155

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds