SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (62)

Beta

 


 



Modeling Cultural Cognition

Donald Braman
Cultural Cognition Project; George Washington University - Law School

James Grimmelmann
New York Law School

Dan M. Kahan
Yale University - Law School



Social Justice Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, September 2005
GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 295
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 295

Abstract:     
In this article we defend our contention that culture is prior to facts in resolving the gun debate. The basis for this position, simply put, is that culture is prior to facts in human cognition. Through an overlapping set of psychological and social mechanisms, individuals adopt the factual beliefs that are dominant among persons who share their cultural orientations. Far from being updated in light of new evidence, beliefs so formed operate as an evidentiary filter, inducing individuals to dismiss any contrary evidence as unreliable, particularly when that evidence is proffered by individuals of an opposing cultural affiliation. So even accepting - which we do - that individuals care about both what guns do and what guns mean, it's idle to hope that consensus based on empirical research can settle the gun debate: individuals simply won't perceive any such consensus to exist so long as cultural conflict over the meaning of guns persists.

We fill out the details of this claim - and the extensive research in social psychology on which it rests - by developing a series of models that simulate the formation and transmission of belief. Section 2 will present the Factual Enlightenment Model, which shows how persuasive empirical proof can indeed generate societal consensus on a disputed issue. Section 3 will present the Cultural Cognition Model, which shows how various social and psychological mechanisms can generate beliefs that are uniform within and polarized across distinct cultural orientations. Section 4 develops a model - Truth vs. Culture - that shows that cultural cognition constrains factual enlightenment when these two dynamics of belief-formation and transmission are pitted against one another. And finally, in section, we develop a Breakthrough Politics Model, which shows how persuasive empirical proof can dispel culturally influenced states of false belief once policy options are invested with social meanings that make them compatible with diverse cultural orientations.

Keywords: cognition, psychological and social mechanisms, cultural cognition, empirical

JEL Classifications: K14, K40, K42

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: July 20, 2007 ; Last revised: February 05, 2008

Suggested Citation

Braman, Donald, Grimmelmann, James Taylor Lewis and Kahan, Dan M., Modeling Cultural Cognition. Social Justice Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, September 2005; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 295; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 295. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1000449


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Dan M. Kahan (Contact Author)
Yale University - Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
HOME PAGE: http://research.yale.edu/culturalcognition/kahan
Donald Braman
Cultural Cognition Project ( email )
2000 H St NW
2000 H Street
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-491-8843 (Phone)
202 491-8843 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.culturalcognition.net/braman
George Washington University - Law School ( email )
2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
James Taylor Lewis Grimmelmann
New York Law School ( email )
57 Worth Street
New York, NY 10011-2960
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 796
Downloads: 200
Download Rank: 44,893
References: 62

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.141 seconds.