Abstract

 
 

References (39)



 
 

Citations (4)



 


 



Are All Special Items Equally Special? The Predictive Role of Conservatism


Richard M. Frankel


Washington University in Saint Louis - Olin Business School

Sugata Roychowdhury


Boston College

December 22, 2008


Abstract:     
We predict the persistence of large negative special items based on expected accounting conservatism. Greater conservatism results in immediate recognition of anticipated future cash flow losses, leading to large negative special items that are highly associated with contemporaneous returns. If prompt loss recognition induces managers to terminate loss-producing projects earlier, then negative special items reported by more conservative firms should exhibit faster reversal. In contrast, if firms with lower expected conservatism enjoy greater flexibility in spreading the recognition of losses then they are apt to experience future losses associated with current special items, and consequently should exhibit lower reversal. We predict and find that negative special items of these firms are less closely tied to contemporaneous returns and are more persistent with respect to future net income. Additional analysis indicates that the variation in special-items persistence does not simply reflect variation in the persistence of all earnings components, nor is it restricted to firms that just meet or beat important earnings targets.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: asymmetric timeliness, differential timeliness, special items, special items persistence, earnings persistence, conservatism, strategic reporting, special items classification, CSCORE, predicted conservatism

JEL Classification: M41, M43, M44, G12

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 18, 2007 ; Last revised: January 11, 2009

Suggested Citation

Frankel, Richard M. and Roychowdhury, Sugata, Are All Special Items Equally Special? The Predictive Role of Conservatism (December 22, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1001434 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1001434

Contact Information

Richard M. Frankel
Washington University in Saint Louis - Olin Business School ( email )
One Brookings Drive
Campus Box 1133
St. Louis, MO 63130-4899
United States
Sugata Roychowdhury (Contact Author)
Boston College ( email )
Boston College, Fulton 520A
140 Commonwealth Avenue
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
United States
617-552-1764 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,480
Downloads: 542
Download Rank: 22,836
References:  39
Citations:  4

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.454 seconds