|
||||
|
||||
Tying Up the Loose Ends in Simple Correspondence AnalysisMichael GreenacreUniversitat Pompeu Fabra - Faculty of Economic and Business Sciences January 2001 Abstract: Although correspondence analysis is now widely available in statistical software packages and applied in a variety of contexts, notably the social and environmental sciences, there are still some misconceptions about this method as well as unresolved issues which remain controversial to this day. In this paper we hope to settle these matters, namely (i) the way CA measures variance in a two-way table and how to compare variances between tables of different sizes, (ii) the influence, or rather lack of influence, of outliers in the usual CA maps, (iii) the scaling issue and the biplot interpretation of maps,(iv) whether or not to rotate a solution, and (v) statistical significance of results.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 37 Keywords: Biplot, bootstrapping, canonical correlation, chi-square distance, confidence, ellipse, contingency table, convex hull, correspondence analysis, inertia, randomization test, rotation, singular value JEL Classification: C19, C88 working papers seriesDate posted: July 20, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.391 seconds