Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1001952
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (203)



 


 



Making Unpublished Opinions Precedential: A Recipe for Ethical Problems & Legal Malpractice?


Andrew T. Solomon


South Texas College of Law


Mississippi College Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
This Article advances a relatively simple thesis - unpublished opinions should be non-precedential, at least until these opinions can be readily researched by all attorneys. Unfortunately, based upon the questionable assumption that technological advances have made unpublished opinions readily available, some jurisdictions have recently given unpublished opinions full precedential value and this trend appears to be the next frontier in the crusade over unpublished opinions. In truth, although unpublished opinions are increasingly available, many unpublished opinions are not as readily available as published opinions. By affording precedential value to these difficult to research unpublished opinions, jurisdictions will possibly create ethical and legal malpractice problems for attorneys.

This Article does not attempt to comprehensively report on which unpublished opinions, on both the state and federal levels, are readily available. Instead, it focuses upon the availability of Fifth Circuit unpublished opinions and shows an example of a jurisdiction which has made some of its unpublished opinions precedential, even though those opinions are difficult, and sometimes virtually impossible, to research. The Article ultimately makes two recommendations: (1) the Fifth Circuit should change its rule regarding the precedential value afforded to unpublished opinions, and (2) other jurisdictions should avoid the Fifth Circuit's mistake and only consider making unpublished opinions precedential when those opinions are readily available and can be comprehensively researched. By adopting these recommendations, courts will minimize the risk that attorneys will face ethical and legal malpractice problems for failing to use binding unpublished opinions in their client representation

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: courts, unpublished opinions, research, precedent

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 27, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Solomon, Andrew T., Making Unpublished Opinions Precedential: A Recipe for Ethical Problems & Legal Malpractice?. Mississippi College Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1001952

Contact Information

Andrew T. Solomon (Contact Author)
South Texas College of Law ( email )
1303 San Jacinto Street
Houston, TX 77002
United States
713-646-2905 (Phone)
713-646-1644 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,399
Downloads: 140
Download Rank: 116,916
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  203

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.359 seconds