Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1002452
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (242)



 


 



Recognition of the International Human Right to Health and Health Care in the United States


Eleanor D. Kinney


Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

2008

Rutgers Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, 2008

Abstract:     
This article reviews the history and progress of the realization of the international human right to health in the United States. Realization is defined and described as ratification of international human rights treaties, on which the US performance is poor, and constitutional guarantees and legislative and regulatory programming at the federal and state level. Key to realizing the international human right to health throughout the world is how progress is measured.

Historically, progress has been measured by ratification of treaties, adoption of legal authorities for public health care programs, and comparison of per capita health expenditures as a proxy for resources committed to health care. These measures fall short as accurate indicators of true progress. Health services research has developed indicators, measures, methods and data for measuring and comparing progress in the realization of the international human right to health.

The World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and World Bank have promoted development of statistical indicators and assisted nations in developing infrastructure for collecting data and reporting indicators. The four key categories of indicators to date are: (1) population health status and outcomes, (2) population access to health care, (3) health sector performance on quality and efficiency, and (4) government competence and commitment to health care. Comparing national performance on realization of the international human right to health with statistical indicators is more informative than comparing legal institutions or per capita health spending. The case of the US is instructive. The US spends more on health care per capita than other countries but performs less well on measures of population-based health status or health sector performance. Also, inequity in American society contributes to disparate health outcomes.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: international health care, human rights, per capita health expenditures

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 9, 2011 ; Last revised: February 14, 2012

Suggested Citation

Kinney, Eleanor D., Recognition of the International Human Right to Health and Health Care in the United States (2008). Rutgers Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1002452

Contact Information

Eleanor D. Kinney (Contact Author)
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law ( email )
530 West New York Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
United States
2741912 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://indylaw.indiana.edu/people/profile.cfm?Id=17

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,042
Downloads: 76
Download Rank: 180,443
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  242

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.750 seconds