|
||||
|
||||
Federal Search Commission? Access, Fairness and Accountability in the Law of Search
Frank A. Pasquale III Seton Hall University - School of Law; Yale Law School Oren Bracha University of Texas at Austin - School of Law Cornell Law Review, September 2008 U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 123 Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper No. 1002453 Abstract: Should search engines be subject to the types of regulation now applied to personal data collectors, cable networks, or phone books? In this article, we make the case for some regulation of the ability of search engines to manipulate and structure their results. We demonstrate that the First Amendment, properly understood, does not prohibit such regulation. Nor will such interventions inevitably lead to the disclosure of important trade secrets. After setting forth normative foundations for evaluating search engine manipulation, we explain how neither market discipline nor technological advance is likely to stop it. Though savvy users and personalized search may constrain abusive companies to some extent, they have little chance of checking untoward behavior by the oligopolists who now dominate the search market. Against the trend of courts that would declare search results unregulable speech, this article makes a case for an ongoing conversation on search engine regulation.
Keywords: Google, search engine, privacy, defamation, internet, public utility JEL Classifications: A10, Z10, H23, D43, D62, D83, K20, K21, K23, 034 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 26, 2007 ; Last revised: February 05, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.125 seconds.