Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1003426
 
 

Footnotes (232)



 


 



Herding Bullfrogs Towards a More Balanced Wheelbarrow: An Illustrative Recommendation for Federal Sentencing Post-Booker


Brian Gallini


University of Arkansas School of Law

Emily Q. Shults


affiliation not provided to SSRN


Journal of Legislation, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2006

Abstract:     
The Article first provides an overview of the history and prevailing motivations behind the promulgation of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Then, using the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as an illustrative example, the Article contends that, notwithstanding the supposed "far-reaching" implications of both Blakely and Booker, the judiciary's continued reliance on the "advisory" Guidelines has practically changed federal sentencing procedures very little in form or function. For a contrasting response to Booker, the Article thereafter examines the State of Maine's sentencing scheme and its response to the Supreme Court's Booker/Blakely decisions. By arguing that Maine's sentencing procedure reflects a commonsense approach to sentencing by affording substantial discretion to sentencing courts within the confines of a determinate sentencing system, the Article concludes by advocating a revision to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines to reflect a mixed determinate/indeterminate sentencing system.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: Booker, sentencing, guidelines, Blakely, Sixth Circuit, Maine Supreme Judicial Court

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 29, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Gallini, Brian and Shults, Emily Q., Herding Bullfrogs Towards a More Balanced Wheelbarrow: An Illustrative Recommendation for Federal Sentencing Post-Booker. Journal of Legislation, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1003426

Contact Information

Brian Gallini (Contact Author)
University of Arkansas School of Law ( email )
260 Waterman Hall
Fayetteville, AR 72701
United States
479-575-6973 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.uark.edu/faculty-staff/faculty-biography.html?user=bgallini

Emily Q. Shults
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 980
Downloads: 62
Download Rank: 201,533
Footnotes:  232

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.313 seconds