SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (49)

Beta

 
 

Citations (3)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Is Default Risk Negatively Related to Stock Returns?

Sudheer Chava
Texas A&M University

Amiyatosh K. Purnanandam
University of Michigan - Stephen M. Ross School of Business


July 4, 2009


Abstract:     
We find a positive cross-sectional relationship between expected stock returns and default risk, contrary to the negative relationship estimated by prior studies. Whereas prior studies use noisy ex post realized returns to estimate expected returns, we use ex ante estimates based on the implied cost of capital. The results suggest that investors expected higher returns for bearing default risk, but they were negatively surprised by lower-than-expected returns on high default risk stocks in the 1980s. We also extend the sample compared to prior studies, and find that the evidence based on realized returns is considerably weaker in the 1952-1980 period.

Keywords: Default risk, bankruptcy, expected return, realized return, implied cost of capital

JEL Classifications: G11, G12, G13, G14, G33, G29

Working Paper Series

Date posted: August 01, 2007 ; Last revised: July 27, 2009

Suggested Citation

Chava, Sudheer and Purnanandam, Amiyatosh K., Is Default Risk Negatively Related to Stock Returns? (July 4, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1003682


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Amiyatosh K. Purnanandam (Contact Author)
University of Michigan - Stephen M. Ross School of Business ( email )
701 Tappan Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
United States
Sudheer Chava
Texas A&M University ( email )
College Station, TX 77843-4218
United States
HOME PAGE: http://wehner.tamu.edu/finc.www/schava
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,039
Downloads: 351
Download Rank: 19,997
References: 49
Citations: 3
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.234 seconds.