Renting the Good Life
University of Houston Law Center
U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 111
William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 49, 2007
Academic literature and court decisions are replete with calls to ban or severely inhibit the rent-to-own industry. The argument is simple enough: Rent-to-own firms charge exorbitant prices to the most needy and vulnerable segments of society.
The case for burdensome regulations, however, is much more difficult to make out than past scholarship has admitted. For the most part, academics have proceeded directly to propose specific regulations for the industry without first carefully analyzing the rent-to-own business or the reasons for imposing drastic regulations.
This Article examines the theoretical justifications for regulating the rent-to-own industry against the backdrop of interviews I conducted with key participants in the market, recent empirical data about the industry, and the industry's unique business model. I find that the case for completely banning the rent-to-own transaction is very weak. On the other hand, guided by insights from behavioral law and economics, policy makers have strong justifications for imposing regulations tailored to address the cognitive defects from which customers are most likely to suffer.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 77
Keywords: rent-to-own, consumer finance, behavioral law and economics
JEL Classification: D12, D18, K20
Date posted: August 1, 2007 ; Last revised: April 21, 2008
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds