Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1004112
 
 

Footnotes (404)



 


 



Liberty, Substantive Due Process, and Personal Jurisdiction


Charles W. (Rocky) Rhodes IV


South Texas College of Law


Tulane Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 2, 2007

Abstract:     
This article defends-against numerous critics-the view that constitutional limits on personal jurisdiction arise from basic substantive due process principles. It first demonstrates the parallel historical development of personal jurisdiction and substantive due process, beginning in the antebellum era when both doctrines were viewed as stemming from foundational precepts of natural rights and justice. After the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court slowly transformed these foundational concepts into enforceable federal law as part of the liberty guaranteed by due process. While the post-New Deal Court retreated from these limits, later Courts thereafter rekindled substantive due process doctrine.

The minimum contacts standard is part of modern substantive due process. The jurisdictional contacts analysis establishes the scope of the defendant's liberty interest-if the defendant has not committed the necessary purposeful acts, the state cannot intrude upon that defendant's fundamental liberty interest in the absence of a compelling government interest. On the other hand, if the nonresident defendant has committed the purposeful acts establishing the required forum ties, the jurisdictional assertion is reasonable unless the defendant can make a compelling case that the fair play factors would render jurisdiction unreasonable. While this provides more protection for the defendant than the traditional rational basis test, it is similar to a balancing standard employed in other substantive due process cases involving analogous concerns.

This substantive due process understanding of personal jurisdiction helps clarify the various articulations of the policies underlying the minimum contacts test. It also provides a cogent framework for the Court's prior jurisdictional decisions and a guide for litigants and courts to use in resolving personal jurisdiction queries.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 63

Keywords: Personal Jurisdiction, Substantive Due Process

JEL Classification: K10, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 30, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Rhodes, Charles W. (Rocky), Liberty, Substantive Due Process, and Personal Jurisdiction. Tulane Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 2, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1004112

Contact Information

Charles W. (Rocky) Rhodes IV (Contact Author)
South Texas College of Law ( email )
1303 San Jacinto Street
Houston, TX 77002
United States
713-646-2918 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,218
Downloads: 160
Download Rank: 108,016
Footnotes:  404

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.219 seconds