Citations (2)



CAFA's Impact on Litigation as a Public Good

Elizabeth Chamblee Burch

University of Georgia Law School

Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 29, p. 2517, 2008

Class actions regulate when government fails. Perhaps this use as an ex post remedy when ex ante regulation founders explains the fervor and rhetoric surrounding Rule 23's political life. In truth, the class action does more than aggregate; it augments government policing and generates external societal benefits. These societal benefits - externalities - are the spillover effects from facilitating small claims litigation. In federalizing class actions through the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), Congress, in some ways, impeded class action practice, thereby negating its positive externalities and inhibiting backdoor regulation. This Article critically considers those effects on the common good. It also develops an implicit but overlooked theme within the CAFA debate - the notion that litigation itself is a public good.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: CAFA, class action fairness act, choice-of-law, procedural justice, spillover, externality, transparency, deterrence, public litigation, private attorneys' general

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 7, 2007 ; Last revised: October 1, 2015

Suggested Citation

Burch, Elizabeth Chamblee, CAFA's Impact on Litigation as a Public Good. Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 29, p. 2517, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1005021

Contact Information

Elizabeth Chamblee Burch (Contact Author)
University of Georgia Law School ( email )
225 Herty Drive
Athens, GA 30602
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,308
Downloads: 177
Download Rank: 113,043
Citations:  2

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds