Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



The Talismanic Use of Incomprehensible Writings: An Empirical and Legal Study of Words Displayed in TV Advertisements


Arthur Best


University of Denver Sturm College of Law


St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 33, No. 285, 1988-1989

Abstract:     
Many television advertisements include textual disclaimers that are displayed very quickly. This Article presents empirical research showing that these words often fail to communicate their meanings to viewers. It suggests that when 1) a commercial's message would be deceptive without additional information and 2) a disclaimer with that information is shown too quickly to be comprehended, the advertisement should be treated as deceptive by the Federal Trade Commission and by courts in the context of private false advertising lawsuits. Also, the Article suggests that continued use of video "fine print" may propagate the mistaken idea that incomprehensible words have legal significance in consumer transactions. Reinforcing that idea may deter consumers from asserting rights and may reinforce people's notions that the law treats symbolic compliance with legal requirements as equivalent to actual compliance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 13, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Best, Arthur, The Talismanic Use of Incomprehensible Writings: An Empirical and Legal Study of Words Displayed in TV Advertisements. St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 33, No. 285, 1988-1989. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1005258

Contact Information

Arthur Best (Contact Author)
University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )
2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 336
Downloads: 56
Download Rank: 190,124
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.797 seconds