The Confluence of Law and Antebellum Black Literature
Andrea L. McArdle
CUNY School of Law
Law & Literature, Vol. 17, No. 2, p. 183, 2005
This article argues that the acculturation of black Bostonians to the rhetoric of the law during the Revolutionary era was constitutive and sustaining. This article examines how three pivotal Boston-based antebellum authorsPrince Hall, David Walker, and Maria Stewart appropriated the rhetoric of legal pleading used in Revolutionary-era government petitions and freedom suits (petitioning for redress of grievances, closely analyzing precedential texts, distilling ideas into reasoned arguments, adding factual proof, the pointed use of narrative and interrogative mode) to produce a literature of complaint and rights-assertion. The central premise of the article is that antebellum black texts used these lawyerly discursive practices ironically, as an empowering move, to draw attention to the disparity between the rhetoric of rights and actual practice. Because these "lawyers' words" called upon the authority and salience of the law as a source of rights in the process of claiming rights, lawyerly discourse served as a sustaining strategy of empowerment for black people, and captured the sense of irony in their experience.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 27, 2007
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds