Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1006302
 


 



Contracting With Tortfeasors: Mandatory Arbitration Clauses and Personal Injury Claims


Elizabeth G. Thornburg


Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law


Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 67, p. 253, 2004

Abstract:     
People thinking about contractual arbitration clauses usually envision the resulting disputes as contractual in nature. However, there is also a group of cases in which the clauses are used to compel arbitration of personal injury claims. This article examines those cases, including the impact of the Federal Arbitration Act on their enforcement. Next, the article considers the ways in which these pre-dispute, mandatory arbitration clauses can disturb the traditional values of procedural justice, contractual fairness, and the enforcement of tort-based duties. Finally, the article proposes changes in the law of arbitration and evaluates whether such changes are politically feasible.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: arbitration, torts, personal injury, contracts, procedure, discovery, jury, class action

JEL Classification: K41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 11, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Thornburg, Elizabeth G., Contracting With Tortfeasors: Mandatory Arbitration Clauses and Personal Injury Claims. Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 67, p. 253, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1006302

Contact Information

Elizabeth G. Thornburg (Contact Author)
Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 0116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States
214-768-2613 (Phone)
214-768-3142 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 478
Downloads: 47

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.234 seconds