Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1006826
 
 

Footnotes (107)



 


 



If You Love Arbitration, Set it Free: How 'Mandatory' Undermines 'Arbitration'


David S. Schwartz


University of Wisconsin Law School

August 2007

Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1052

Abstract:     
By forcing employment and consumer cases into the mandatory arbitration system, the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act has created inexorable pressures to judicialize arbitration, thereby tending to undermine what is valuable about arbitration as a dispute resolution process. A large and rapidly-expanding body of judicial doctrine - external arbitration law - now frames arbitration with decisional law on enforceability of arbitration clauses, arbitrability of issues, the judicial enforcement procedures for arbitrations both before and after the award, and sundry related matters. In addition, arbitration is becoming internally judicialized with formal procedures for how a case will be arbitrated, rules imposed extra-contractually, by case law, statute, professional organizations, and the arbitration providers themselves. Finally, academic commentators exacerbate this process of surrounding and infusing arbitration with formal law by focusing on increasingly specific doctrinal questions reflecting acceptance of or resignation to the mandatory arbitration regime. In other words, contemporary arbitration law is largely how courts and commentators cope with the two big mistakes underlying the Supreme Court's FAA interpretation. Believers in arbitration as a faster, simpler and cheaper alternative to litigation should support legislative reversal of judicially-created doctrine of mandatory arbitration.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: arbitration, mandatory arbitration, pre-dispute arbitration, arbitration agreements, Federal Arbitration Act, litigation, judicial procedure, preemption, employment, consumer, class action, unconscionability, American Arbitration Association

JEL Classification: K41

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 17, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Schwartz, David S., If You Love Arbitration, Set it Free: How 'Mandatory' Undermines 'Arbitration' (August 2007). Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1052. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1006826 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1006826

Contact Information

David S. Schwartz (Contact Author)
University of Wisconsin Law School ( email )
975 Bascom Mall
Madison, WI 53706
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,613
Downloads: 289
Download Rank: 61,806
Footnotes:  107

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.282 seconds