SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (3)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

The Possibility of Practical Reason

J. David Velleman
New York University - Department of Philosophy



THE POSSIBILITY OF PRACTICAL REASON, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000
Ethics, Vol. 106, pp. 694-726, 1996

Abstract:     
Suppose that we want to frame a conception of reasons that isn't relativized to the inclinations of particular agents. That is, we want to identify particular things that count as reasons for acting simpliciter and not merely as reasons for some agents rather than others, depending on their inclinations.

One way to frame such a conception is to name some features that an action can have and to say that they count as reasons for someone whether or not he is inclined to care about them. The problem with the resulting conception, as we have seen, is that it entails the normative judgment that one ought to be inclined to care about the specified features, on pain of irrationality, and this normative judgment requires justification.

The advantage of internalism is that it avoids these normative commitments. It says that things count as reasons for someone only if he is inclined to care about them, and so it leaves the normative question of whether to care about them entirely open. Yet if we try to leave this question open, by defining things as reasons only for those inclined to care about them, we'll end up with a definition that's relativized to the inclinations of particular agents — won't we?

Not necessarily. For suppose that all reasons for acting are features of a single kind, whose influence depends on a single inclination. And suppose that the inclination on which the influence of reasons depends is, not an inclination that distinguishes some agents from others, but rather an inclination that distinguishes agents from nonagents. In that case, to say that these features count as reasons only for those who are inclined to care about them will be to say that they count as reasons only for agents — which will be to say no less than that they are reasons for acting, period, since applying only to agents is already part of the concept of reasons for acting. The restriction on the application of reasons will drop away from our definition, since it restricts their application, not to some proper subset of agents, but rather to the set of all agents, which is simply the universe of application for reasons to act.

Keywords: action, practical reason, internal reasons, Christine Korsgaard, Bernard Williams

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: August 19, 2007 ; Last revised: August 19, 2007

Suggested Citation

Velleman, J. David, The Possibility of Practical Reason. THE POSSIBILITY OF PRACTICAL REASON, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000; Ethics, Vol. 106, pp. 694-726, 1996. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1006925


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

J. David Velleman (Contact Author)
New York University - Department of Philosophy ( email )
5 Washington Place
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-998-8320 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://homepages.nyu.edu/~dv26/
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 922
Downloads: 337
Download Rank: 23,832
Citations: 3

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.109 seconds.