Savings Clauses and Trends in Natural Resources Federalism
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington
32 William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 129 (2007)
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 86
This article considers recent trends in federalism, with particular attention to natural resource law's statutory savings clauses. It begins with a case study of elk management in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. The elk controversy shows how a statutory savings clause can provide a state with traction to advance its interests, and demonstrates how the political winds of change can shift the balance of state-federal relations. The article then focuses on the common statutory savings clauses and their roles in circumscribing federal agency authority and establishing a basis for cooperation between federal and state governments. We analyze the interpretive approaches the judiciary may employ to make sense of the statutory savings language, and conceptualize them along a continuum of influence in resolving cases. The article concludes with an explanation of trends that set the direction for policy innovations in natural resources federalism and general thoughts about the future of federalism in natural resources law.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41
Keywords: federalism, natural resources law, savings clauses, public land management, elk management
Date posted: August 22, 2007 ; Last revised: June 29, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds