Citations (1)


Footnotes (139)



Putting the Blue Pencil Down: An Argument for Specificity in Noncompete Agreements

Griffin Toronjo Pivateau

Oklahoma State University

Nebraska Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 3, 2008

Perhaps no contractual clause invites as little respect as the noncompete agreement. In a few states, the agreement is void and unenforceable. In the remaining states, a noncompete agreement scarcely seems to rise to the level of a legally enforceable agreement. Too often, neither the parties to a noncompete agreement nor the court system believe in enforcement of the agreement as actually written.

In most jurisdictions, courts routinely blue pencil or reform covenants that are not reasonable. The blue pencil doctrine gives courts the authority to either strike unreasonable clauses from a noncompete agreement, leaving the rest to be enforced, or actually modify the agreement to reflect the terms that the parties could have - and probably should have - agreed to.

This article proposes that courts put the blue pencil down and refuse to enforce noncompete agreements imposing unreasonable restraints. Moreover, when faced with an unreasonable noncompete agreement, courts should refuse to enforce even those clauses or covenants that standing alone would constitute reasonable restraints. Several states already follow this no-modification rule. Moreover, this proposal comports with recent trends - courts have indicated a greater willingness to refuse to reform agreements that are not reasonable on their face.

As an alternative to use of the blue pencil doctrine, this article proposes a threshold test that courts should conduct before applying their standard reasonableness analysis. The proposed threshold test involves a requirement for specificity. The proposed specificity test would determine whether a court should further evaluate the contract for enforceability.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: noncompete, restrictive covenant, non-competition agreement, noncompetition, employment, labor law

JEL Classification: K12, K31, J68

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 31, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Pivateau, Griffin Toronjo, Putting the Blue Pencil Down: An Argument for Specificity in Noncompete Agreements. Nebraska Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 3, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1007599

Contact Information

Griffin Toronjo Pivateau (Contact Author)
Oklahoma State University ( email )
Stillwater, OK 74078-0555
United States
405-786-8640 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,320
Downloads: 397
Download Rank: 47,229
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  139

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds