Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1008040
 
 

Footnotes (218)



 


 



'Move On' Orders as Fourth Amendment Seizures


Stephen E. Henderson


University of Oklahoma College of Law

2008

Brigham Young University Law Review, Vol. 2008, No. 1, 2008

Abstract:     
If a police officer orders one to move on, must the recipient comply? This article analyzes whether there is a federal constitutional right to remain, and in particular whether a police command to move on constitutes a seizure of the person for purposes of the Fourth Amendment. Although it is a close question, I conclude that the Fourth Amendment typically does not restrict a move on (MO) order, and that substantive due process only prohibits the most egregious such orders. It is a question of broad significance given the many legitimate reasons police might order persons to move on, as well as the potential for discriminatory harassment if such orders are unrestricted, and thus state and local legislatures should investigate how best to restrict the MO authority of their agents.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: search, seizure, fourth amendment, move on, anywhere but here

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 20, 2007 ; Last revised: June 12, 2013

Suggested Citation

Henderson, Stephen E., 'Move On' Orders as Fourth Amendment Seizures (2008). Brigham Young University Law Review, Vol. 2008, No. 1, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1008040

Contact Information

Stephen E. Henderson (Contact Author)
University of Oklahoma College of Law ( email )
300 Timberdell Road
Norman, OK 73019
United States
405.325.7127 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,971
Downloads: 834
Download Rank: 15,037
Footnotes:  218

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.344 seconds