'Move On' Orders as Fourth Amendment Seizures
Stephen E. Henderson
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Brigham Young University Law Review, Vol. 2008, No. 1, 2008
If a police officer orders one to move on, must the recipient comply? This article analyzes whether there is a federal constitutional right to remain, and in particular whether a police command to move on constitutes a seizure of the person for purposes of the Fourth Amendment. Although it is a close question, I conclude that the Fourth Amendment typically does not restrict a move on (MO) order, and that substantive due process only prohibits the most egregious such orders. It is a question of broad significance given the many legitimate reasons police might order persons to move on, as well as the potential for discriminatory harassment if such orders are unrestricted, and thus state and local legislatures should investigate how best to restrict the MO authority of their agents.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46
Keywords: search, seizure, fourth amendment, move on, anywhere but here
JEL Classification: K14Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 20, 2007 ; Last revised: June 12, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.375 seconds