Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1008347
 


 



'Common Sense Legal Reform' and Bell's Toll: Eliminating Punitive Damage Claims from Jurisdictional Amount Calculations in Federal Diversity Cases


Russell G. Murphy


Suffolk University Law School


Kentucky Law Journal, Vol. 84, p. 71, 1995

Abstract:     
This article re-examines, in the context of modern federal court diversity of citizenship litigation, the rule of Bell v. Preferred Life Assurance Society (US Supreme Court 1943) that punitive damage claims can be used to satisfy the jurisdictional amount requirements for federal court diversity jurisdiction. It considers the history of diversity jurisdiction, major criticisms of reliance on punitive damages, the larger debate over justifications for such damages, and the ways in which jurisdiction based on punitive damages disrupts the functioning of federal courts. The article concludes with a recommendation that either the Supreme Court or Congress reverse Bell and prohibit use of punitive damages in measuring the existence of the jurisdictional amount in diversity law suits.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 26, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Murphy, Russell G., 'Common Sense Legal Reform' and Bell's Toll: Eliminating Punitive Damage Claims from Jurisdictional Amount Calculations in Federal Diversity Cases. Kentucky Law Journal, Vol. 84, p. 71, 1995. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1008347

Contact Information

Russell G. Murphy (Contact Author)
Suffolk University Law School ( email )
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 404
Downloads: 13

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.719 seconds