Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (23)



 


 



Two Goals for Executive Compensation Reform


Brett McDonnell


University of Minnesota Law School


New York Law School Law Review, Vol. 52, 2007
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-34

Abstract:     
Most corporate law scholars who suggest reforming executive compensation worry about corporate governance problems that arise out of poor compensation design. Most politicians who suggest reforming executive compensation seem as or more worried about growing economic inequality. This essay briefly considers two arguments justifying legal scholars in ignoring the concern with inequality. The first argument says that we should address inequality concerns only through tax and transfer policy. This essay responds that politics may dictate sometimes trying to reduce inequality through other means as well. The second argument claims that high pay for the top executives of public corporations has played only a small role in the growth of economic inequality. This essay finds this argument much more persuasive, but suggests reasons why further empirical investigation may still show that reforming executive compensation may be a modestly important part of a broader package of reforms to reduce inequality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: executive compensation, inequality, corporate governance

JEL Classification: D30, G30, H20, K22

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 24, 2007  

Suggested Citation

McDonnell, Brett H., Two Goals for Executive Compensation Reform. New York Law School Law Review, Vol. 52, 2007; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-34. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1008356

Contact Information

Brett H. McDonnell (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-625-1373 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,941
Downloads: 289
Download Rank: 50,243
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  23

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.329 seconds