Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1008672
 
 

Footnotes (304)



 


 



Doctrine Formulation and Distrust


Toby J. Heytens


University of Virginia School of Law

August 21, 2007

Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 83, 2008

Abstract:     
Legal scholars exhaustively debate the substantive wisdom of Supreme Court decisions and the appropriate methods for interpreting legal texts, but rarely consider the more pragmatic need to craft rules that will be faithfully implemented by the lower court judges who have the last word in the overwhelming majority of cases. Political scientists, in contrast, invest tremendous effort seeking to determine whether lower courts "comply" with Supreme Court directives, but find themselves unable to explain why their own studies generally find high levels of compliance. This Article argues that part of the answer lies in the Court's ability to craft legal doctrines that both shape a trial court's initial decision and increase the efficacy of appellate monitoring. After identifying numerous strategies for increasing lower court control, this Article argues that appreciating the links between them helps illuminate recent developments in three areas of public law - the constitutional law of punitive damages; the rules governing "officer suits" brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and the concept of "reasonable" searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60

Keywords: Legal doctrine, courts, constitutional law, civil rights litigation, criminal procedure, punitive damages

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 1, 2007 ; Last revised: June 1, 2013

Suggested Citation

Heytens, Toby J., Doctrine Formulation and Distrust (August 21, 2007). Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 83, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1008672 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1008672

Contact Information

Toby J. Heytens (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
202-257-2635 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 507
Downloads: 69
Download Rank: 195,867
Footnotes:  304

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.719 seconds