Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1008802
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (208)



 


 



Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Support Systems in a Three-Step Model


Arno R. Lodder


VU University Amsterdam - Computer/Law Institute; VU University Amsterdam - Faculty of Law

John Zeleznikow


Victoria University


Harvard Negotiation Law Review, Vol. 10, pp. 287-337, 2005

Abstract:     
Although artificial intelligence (AI) is commonly associated with anthropomorphic computers performing amazing feats, as in movies like The Matrix and Minority Report, AI is actually a much broader field of study whose results are not always mind-blowing. So what is AI? Basically, AI involves the study of automated human intelligence. This includes both practically-oriented research, such as building computer applications that perform tasks requiring human intelligence, and fundamental research, such as determining how to represent knowledge in a computer-comprehensible form. At the intersection of AI on the one hand and law on the other lies a field dedicated to the use of advanced computer technology for legal purposes: AI & Law. This article applies the authors' research in AI & Law (negotiation decision support systems and dialogical argument tools.) to construct a model for online dispute resolution (ODR).

In considering the principles and theory underlying our integrated ODR environment, we first evaluated the order in which online disputes are best resolved. The system that we propose conforms to the following sequencing, which in our opinion produces the most effective ODR environment:
1) First, the negotiation support tool should provide feedback on the likely outcome(s) of the dispute if the negotiation were to fail - i.e., the "best alternative to a negotiated agreement" (BATNA).
2) Second, the tool should attempt to resolve any existing conflicts using dialogue techniques.
3) Third, for those issues not resolved in step two, the tool should employ compensation/trade-off strategies in order to facilitate resolution of the dispute.
4) Finally, if the result from step three is not acceptable to the parties, the tool should allow the parties to return to step two and repeat the process recursively until either the dispute is resolved or a stalemate occurs.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: online dispute resolution, argumentation, negotiation, batna, artificial intelligence

JEL Classification: J11, J10, J12

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 22, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Lodder, Arno R. and Zeleznikow, John, Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Support Systems in a Three-Step Model. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, Vol. 10, pp. 287-337, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1008802

Contact Information

Arno R. Lodder (Contact Author)
VU University Amsterdam - Computer/Law Institute ( email )
De Boelelaan 1105
Amsterdam, 1081HV
Netherlands
VU University Amsterdam - Faculty of Law ( email )
De Boelelaan 1105
1081 HV Amsterdam
Netherlands
John Zeleznikow
Victoria University of Technology
P.O. Box 14428
Melbourne, Victoria 8001
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,234
Downloads: 404
Download Rank: 40,252
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  208

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.250 seconds