|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper,
please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: nber. ; Size: 74K
|
|
Strategic Judicial Decision Making
Pablo T. Spiller
University of California, Berkeley - Business & Public Policy Group
Rafael Gely
University of Missouri School of Law
August 2007
NBER Working Paper No. w13321
Abstract:
This survey paper starts from the basic, and intuitive, assumption that judges are human and as such, can be modeled in the same fashion we model politicians, activists, managers: driven by well-defined preferences, behaving in a purposive and forward-looking fashion. We explore, then, the role politics play in judicial decision-making. We provide a brief overview of what is called the "strategic approach," compare it to alternative approaches to understand judicial behavior, and offer some concluding thoughts about the future of positive analyses of judicial decision-making.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22
working papers series
Download This Paper
Date posted: August 24, 2007
Suggested CitationSpiller, Pablo T. and Gely, Rafael, Strategic Judicial Decision Making (August 2007). NBER Working Paper No. w13321. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1008815
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
