Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1008851
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (297)



 


 



Institutions in the Marketplace of Ideas


Joseph Blocher


Duke University - School of Law


Duke Law Journal, Vol. 57, No. 4, February 2008

Abstract:     
If any area of constitutional law has been defined by a metaphor, the First Amendment is the area, and the "marketplace of ideas" is the metaphor. Ever since Justice Holmes invoked the concept in his Abrams dissent, academic and popular understandings of the First Amendment have embraced the notion that free speech, like the free market, creates a competitive environment in which the best ideas ultimately prevail. But as with the free market for goods and services, there are discontents who point to the market failures that make the marketplace metaphor aspirational at best, and inequitable at worst.

Defenders of the free economic market have responded to these criticisms by developing a thicker understanding of how the market actually functions. Their most successful model is the New Institutional Economics (NIE), which incorporates and explains the transaction costs and institutions that populate and effectively regulate that market. The marketplace of ideas model, however, remains faithfully wedded to a neoclassical view of the market that depends on a perfectly costless and efficient exchange of ideas. It is thus vulnerable to the same criticisms economists answered decades ago, and it fails to take into account the rich view of market mechanisms and institutions they have developed since. In recent years, First Amendment scholars led by Frederick Schauer laid the groundwork for a solution by describing an "Institutional First Amendment" that would accord special treatment to certain institutions like schools and the press.

But just as the marketplace of ideas fails to account for institutions, the Institutional First Amendment fails to account for the marketplace of ideas. As it turns out, the two theories are not only reconcilable, but complementary. This Article brings them together, using the New Institutional Economics to describe the "speech institutions" - such as schools and universities - that play the same cost-reducing role in the marketplace of ideas as other institutions do in the market for goods and services. For the same reason and to the same degree as economists defer to the private norms of market-enhancing institutions, so too should courts defer to the speech rules of marketplace-of-ideas-enhancing institutions. The Article then tests the descriptive and normative validity of this "New Institutional First Amendment," finding that it both explains and justifies much of the Court's recent school speech doctrine, including its recent ruling in Morse v. Frederick, and also justifies the special status of universities as speech institutions. By addressing the economic objections to the marketplace metaphor, the Article attempts to better describe, explain, and rehabilitate the marketplace of ideas.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 69

Keywords: First Amendment, New Institutional Economics, Free Speech, Marketplace of Ideas

JEL Classification: K00, K19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 27, 2007 ; Last revised: July 4, 2008

Suggested Citation

Blocher, Joseph, Institutions in the Marketplace of Ideas. Duke Law Journal, Vol. 57, No. 4, February 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1008851

Contact Information

Joseph Blocher (Contact Author)
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,555
Downloads: 277
Download Rank: 61,636
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  297

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.485 seconds