The War on Terror, Local Police, and Immigration Enforcement: A Curious Tale of Police Power in Post-9/11 America
David A. Harris
University of Pittsburgh - School of Law
Rutgers Law Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1, Fall 2006
U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2007-04
In post-9/11 America, preventing the next terrorist attack ranks as law enforcement's top priority. This is as true for local police departments as it is for the FBI. This has led many advocates of stronger enforcement of U.S. immigration law to recast their efforts as anti-terrorism campaigns. As part of this endeavor, these advocates have called for local police to become involved in enforcing immigration law, and their allies in both the executive and legislative branches of the federal government have taken a number of actions designed to force local police to do this. Surprisingly, local law enforcement has for the most part vehemently refused to accept this new responsibility, saying that becoming involved in immigration enforcement will actually make the public not safer, but less safe, from criminals and even from terrorists. The reasons for this have much to do with the success of community policing over the last twenty years. Thus the refusal of state and local law enforcement to become involved in immigration enforcement both illuminates a turning point in American policing, and teaches us important lessons in how we must go forward in the war on terror if we are to succeed.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 61
Keywords: immigration enforcement, police, local police, police power, war on terror, national security, borders, CLEAR Act, crime, community policingAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 23, 2007 ; Last revised: February 11, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds